Systemic SclerosisPhase 3DUAL-1NCT01474109
Macitentan for the Treatment of Digital Ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis Patients
A Phase 3 study testing macitentan 3mg and macitentan 10mg in people with Systemic Sclerosis and Ulcers, run by Actelion at 77 sites in 18 countries.
Trial summary
The DUAL-1 study is designed as a multicenter, double-blind two-period study with an initial fixed 16-week Period 1, followed by a Period 2 of variable duration. All patients completing Period 1 will continue on their original randomized treatment into Period 2, until the last randomized patient has completed Period… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Systemic Sclerosis, Ulcers
- What is being tested?
- macitentan 3mg and macitentan 10mg
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 289 participants
- Where
- 77 sitesin 18 countries
- Study dates
- Dec 2011to Nov 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients ≥ 18 years of age
- Women of childbearing potential must use two reliable methods of contraception
- Diagnosis of SSc according to the classification criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)
- At least one visible, active ischemic digital ulcers (DU) at baseline
- History of at least one additional recent active ischemic DU
Who cannot join
- DUs due to condition other than SSc
- Symptomatic Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)
- Body mass index (BMI) < 18 kg/m^2
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 1.5 x upper limit of the normal range (ULN)
- Hemoglobin < 75% of the lower limit of the normal range
- Systolic blood pressure < 95 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure < 50 mmHg
Show all 17Show fewer
- Severe malabsorption; any severe organ failure (e.g., lung, kidney), or any life-threatening condition.
- Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding or plan to do so during the course of this study.
- Substance or alcohol abuse or dependence, or tobacco use at any level.
- Treatment with phosphodiesterase type-5 (PDE5) inhibitors.
- Patients on statins, who have received treatment for less than 3 months prior to Screening or whose treatment has not been stable during this period.
- Patients on vasodilators, who have received treatment for less than 2 weeks prior to Screening or whose treatment has not been stable during this period.
- Treatment with prostanoids within 3 months.
- Treatment with disease modifying agents if present for less than 3 months prior to Screening or whose treatment has not been stable for at least 1 month prior to Screening.
- Treatment with oral corticosteroids (> 10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent).
- Treatment with ERAs within 3 months.
- Systemic antibiotics to treat infected DU(s) within 4 weeks.
Trial locations and contacts
77 sites in 18 countries.
77 sites in 18 countries
United States15 sites
The Center for Rheumatology
Albany, New York, 12206
University of Michigan - Scleroderma Program
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Arthritis & Rheumatic Disease Specialties
Aventura, Florida, 33180
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21224-6801
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425-8905
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Altoona Center for Clinical Research
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Michigan State University
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49546
UCLA Medical School - Rheumatology Division Rehabilitation Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095
University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey, UMDNJ Scleroderma Program
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903-0010
Ochsner Medical Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
University of Pittsburgh Department of Rheumatology
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261
Shanahan Rheumatology and Immunotherapy, PLLC
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27617-7884
Sarasota Arthritis Research Center
Sarasota, Florida, 34239
University of Arizona Arthritis Center
Tucson, Arizona, 85724
Germany8 sites
Universitätsmedizin Berlin Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Rheumatologie und Klinische Immunologie
Berlin, 10117
Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie der Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Bochum, 44791
Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie der Universität zu Köln
Cologne, 50937
Medizinische Universitätsklinik Freiburg, Abt. Rheumatologie und klinische Forschung
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
Asklepios Westklinikum Hamburg Abteilung für Gefäßmedizin, Angiologie und Diabetologie
Hamburg, 22559
Rheumatologie, klinische Immunologie, Nephrologie Asklepios Rheumazentrum Hamburg Asklepios Klinik Altona
Hamburg, 22763
Akademie für Gefäßkrankheiten eV.
Karlsbad, 76307
Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen
Tübingen, 72076
Croatia6 sites
Klinicki Bolnicki Centar Osijek
Osijek, 31000
University Hospital Centre Rijeka
Rijeka, 51000
Klinički bolnički centar Split
Split, 21000
Klinicka Bolnica "Svety Duh"
Zagreb, 10000
Klinička bolnica Dubrava
Zagreb, 10000
University Hospital Centre Zagreb
Zagreb, 10000
Australia5 sites
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, 5000
Wesley Hospital, Thoracic Department
Auchenflower, 4066
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Camperdown, 2050
St Vincent's Hospital
Fitzroy, 3065
Menzies Research Institute
Hobart, 7000
Canada5 sites
Rheumatology Research Associates
Edmonton, Alberta, T5M 0H4
St. Joseph's Health Care
London, Ontario, N6A 4V2
CHUS Hopital Fleurimont
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6
Chile4 sites
Prosalud
Santiago, 7510047
Private Office Marta Aliste
Santiago, 7510186
Hospital San Juan de Dios
Santiago, 8500000
Centro de Estudios Clinicos V
Viña del Mar, 2570017
Poland4 sites
Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne
Gdansk, 80-952
NZOZ Reumed
Lublin, 20-607
Centralny Szpital Kliniczny MSWiA
Warsaw, 02-507
Akademicki Szpital Kliniczny im. Jana Mikulicza-Radeckiego we Wrocławiu
Wroclaw, 50-566
Ukraine4 sites
Dinpropetrovsk Regional Clinical Hospital named after I. Mechnykova
Dnipropetrovsk, 49005
Municipal Institution of Kyiv Regional Council, Kyiv Regional Clinical Hospital
Kyiv, 04107
Lviv Regional Clinical Hospital
Lviv, 79010
Internal disease chair of Ukrainian medical dentist academy based on therapy department of Poltava Poltava City Clinical Hospital #1
Poltava, 36039
Belarus3 sites
Gomel Regional Clinical Hospital
Homyel, 246029
Healthcare Institution "Minsk City Hospital #1"
Minsk, 220013
Healthcare Institution "Minsk Clinical Hospital #9"
Minsk, 220116
Bulgaria3 sites
Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Sveti Pantaleymon"
Pleven, 5800
MHAT "Kaspela" EOOD Plovdiv - Rheumatology Ward
Plovdiv, 4002
MHAT "Sv. Ivan Rilski" EAD Sofia - Clinic of Rheumatology
Sofia, 1612
Czechia3 sites
Lekarna FN Brno
Brno, 62500
Faculty Hospital Hradec Králové
Hradec Králové, 500 05
Revmatologický ústav Praha
Prague, 12000
Hungary3 sites
Budai Irgalmasrendi Kórház
Budapest, 1023
Debreceni Egyetem Orvos- és Egészségtudományi Centrum
Debrecen, 4032
Pécsi Tudományegyetem Klinikai Központ, Reumatológiai és Immunológiai Klinika
Pécs, 7632
India3 sites
Advance Rheumatology Clinic
Hyderabad, 500082
Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences
Secunderabad, 500 003
Christian Medical College
Vellore, 632004
Italy3 sites
Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi
Florence, 50139
Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico di Modena
Modena, 41100
Complesso Integrato Columbus
Rome, 00168
Russia3 sites
State Healthcare Institution "Penza Regional Clinical Hospital named after N.N. Burdenko"
Penza, 440026
Vladimir Regional State Institution of Healthcare, "Regional Clinical Hospital"
Vladimir, 600023
State Healthcare Institution "Sverdlovsk Regional Clinical Hospital #1"
Yekaterinburg, 620102
Denmark2 sites
Bispebjerg Hospital København
Copenhagen, 2400
Odense Universitetshospital
Odense, 5000
Finland1 site
Helsingin yliopistollinen keskussairaala (HYKS), Meilahden kolmiosairaala, Reumatologian klinikka
Helsinki, 00290
About this study
Official title: Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Multicenter, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Macitentan in Patients With Ischemic Digital Ulcers Associated With Systemic Sclerosis
The DUAL-1 study is designed as a multicenter, double-blind two-period study with an initial fixed 16-week Period 1, followed by a Period 2 of variable duration. All patients completing Period 1 will continue on their original randomized treatment into Period 2, until the last randomized patient has completed Period 1.
Patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio (macitentan 3mg: macitentan 10mg: placebo).
Read more
The primary objective is to demonstrate the effect of macitentan on the reduction of the number of new digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis and ongoing digital ulcers.
Other objectives include:
- the evaluation of the efficacy of macitentan on hand functionality and DU burden at Week 16 in SSc patients with ongoing DU disease.
- the evaluation of the safety and tolerability of macitentan in these patients.
- the evaluation of the efficacy of macitentan on time to first DU complication during the entire treatment period.
Read the detailed description
Recurrent digital ulcers (DU) are a manifestation of vascular disease in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), are an important source of morbidity and lead to impaired function in these patients. In this study, we are investigating whether treatment with the endothelin receptor antagonist, macitentan, decreases the development of new digital ulcers in patients with SSc. Macitentan is a highly potent, tissue-targeting dual endothelin receptor antagonist. Through complete blockade of endothelin action, macitentan is expected to protect tissue from the damaging effect of elevated endothelin. This therapy is not approved for the treatment of systemic sclerosis, but the use of an ERA is an attractive approach in combating the structural vascular damage observed in SSc leading to complications such as DUs.
- Conditions
- Systemic Sclerosis, Ulcers
- Being tested
- macitentan 3mg, macitentan 10mg, placebo
- Keywords
- systemic sclerosis, digital ulcers
- Medical subject headings
- Scleroderma, Systemic, Ulcer, digital ulcers
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
macitentan 3mgDrug
Also called ACT-064992
macitentan 3mg tablet once daily
macitentan 10mgDrug
Also called ACT-064992
macitentan 10mg tablet once daily
placeboDrug
matching placebo once daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| macitentan 3mg | Active comparator | macitentan 3mg tablet once daily Receives: Drug: macitentan 3mg |
| macitentan 10mg | Active comparator | macitentan 10mg tablet once daily Receives: Drug: macitentan 10mg |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | matching placebo once daily Receives: Drug: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence Rate of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) up to Week 16
DUs were assessed at each visit starting with the screening visit. Only DUs from the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) distally (both on the dorsal and volar surface of the hand, including the digital tip) were recorded. The location of each DU was noted. At each subsequent visit the location of each new DU was noted. DUs that occurred and healed between visits and were reported by patients were not recorded as new DUs. The evaluation was performed by an experienced physician or a trained rater with expertise in the assessment of DUs in systemic sclerosis (SSc). For a given patient, DUs were assessed by the same rater at each visit, whenever possible. Any DU that developed over a previously healed ulcer was recorded as a new DU. Incidence rate is adjusted for 16 weeks of observation, hence is calculated as the number of new DUs/total number of observation days.
Measured: Baseline to week 16
Secondary outcomes (5)
Percentage of Participants Without a New DU Up To Week 16
DUs were assessed at each visit starting with the screening visit. Only DUs from the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) distally (both on the dorsal and volar surface of the hand, including the digital tip) were recorded. The location of each DU was noted. At each subsequent visit the location of each new DU was noted. DUs that occurred and healed between visits and were reported by patients were not recorded as new DUs. The evaluation was performed by an experienced physician or a trained rater with expertise in the assessment of DUs in systemic sclerosis (SSc). For a given patient, DUs were assessed by the same rater at each visit, whenever possible. Any DU that developed over a previously healed ulcer was recorded as a new DU. Numbers of patients with no new DU at Week 16 are imputed using the last observation carried forward method.
Measured: Baseline to week 16
Percentage of Participants With at Least One DU Complication
DU complications were defined as any one of the following, resulting from DU worsening: critical ischemic crisis necessitating hospitalization; gangrene, (auto)amputation; failure of conservative management; surgical and chemical sympathectomy, vascular reconstructions, or any unplanned surgery in the management of hand SSc manifestations; use of parenteral prostanoids; use of endothelin-receptor antagonists; class II, III, or IV narcotics or a > 50% increase in the existing dose compared with baseline; initiation of systemic antibiotics for the treatment of infection attributed to DUs.
Measured: Up to approximately 90 weeks
Change in Hand Functionality Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Hand Component From Baseline to Week 16
HAQ-DI assesses functional ability regarding fine movements of the upper extremities, locomotor activities in the lower extremities, and movements of the upper and lower limbs. Responses were extracted from the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire covering 8 domains of functional disability (dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other daily activities). A mean score ranging from 0-3 was calculated for each domain, and a composite score by dividing the summed domain scores by the number of domains. The composite score was interpreted as 0 (no impairment in function) to 3 (maximal impairment of function). Hand functionality was assessed using a composite of 4 domains (dressing and grooming, grip, hygiene, and eating).
Measured: Baseline to week 16
Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Overall Score From Baseline to Week 16
HAQ-DI assesses functional ability regarding fine movements of the upper extremities, locomotor activities in the lower extremities, and movements of the upper and lower limbs. Responses were extracted from the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire covering 8 domains of functional disability (dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other daily activities). A mean score ranging from 0-3 was calculated for each domain, and a composite score by dividing the summed domain scores by the number of domains. The composite score was interpreted as 0 (no impairment in function) to 3 (maximal impairment of function).
Measured: Baseline to week 16
Change in Hand Functionality - Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis - Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU) Score From Baseline to Week 16
Patients were asked to answer 24 questions on the use of the hand(s) affected by DUs over the past 7 days on a 6-point scale from 0 (yes without difficulty) to 5 (impossible). The HDISS-DU score is the arithmetic mean of the valid non-missing items. The scores are interpreted as 1 (better ability in completing activities) to 6 (worst ability in completing activities)
Measured: Baseline to week 16
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Nov 2011 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2011
- Primary completionNov 2013
- Study completionNov 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Systemic SclerosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 289 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Actelion
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01474109
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AC-055C301
- Acronym
- DUAL-1
- Status last verified
- Jan 2015
- First submitted
- 31 Oct 2011
- Last updated
- 6 Jan 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Khanna D, Denton CP, Merkel PA, Krieg T, Le Brun FO, Marr A, Papadakis K, Pope J, Matucci-Cerinic M, Furst DE; DUAL-1 Investigators; DUAL-2 Investigators. Effect of Macitentan on the Development of New Ischemic Digital Ulcers in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis: DUAL-1 and DUAL-2 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA. 2016 May 10;315(18):1975-88. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5258.
PubMed 27163986
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jan 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Multicenter, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Macitentan in Patients With Ischemic Digital Ulcers Associated With Systemic Sclerosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01474109
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DUAL-1 / AC-055C301
- Conditions
- Systemic Sclerosis, Ulcers
- Keywords
- systemic sclerosis, digital ulcers
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 289 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ActelionIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2011
- Primary completion
- Nov 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Nov 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 Jan 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The DUAL-1 study is designed as a multicenter, double-blind two-period study with an initial fixed 16-week Period 1, followed by a Period 2 of variable duration. All patients completing Period 1 will continue on their original randomized treatment into Period 2, until the last randomized patient has completed Period 1.
Patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio (macitentan 3mg: macitentan 10mg: placebo).
The primary objective is to demonstrate the effect of macitentan on the reduction of the number of new digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis and ongoing digital ulcers.
Other objectives include:
- the evaluation of the efficacy of macitentan on hand functionality and DU burden at Week 16 in SSc patients with ongoing DU disease.
- the evaluation of the safety and tolerability of macitentan in these patients.
- the evaluation of the efficacy of macitentan on time to first DU complication during the entire treatment period.
Detailed description
Recurrent digital ulcers (DU) are a manifestation of vascular disease in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), are an important source of morbidity and lead to impaired function in these patients. In this study, we are investigating whether treatment with the endothelin receptor antagonist, macitentan, decreases the development of new digital ulcers in patients with SSc. Macitentan is a highly potent, tissue-targeting dual endothelin receptor antagonist. Through complete blockade of endothelin action, macitentan is expected to protect tissue from the damaging effect of elevated endothelin. This therapy is not approved for the treatment of systemic sclerosis, but the use of an ERA is an attractive approach in combating the structural vascular damage observed in SSc leading to complications such as DUs.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| macitentan 3mg | Active comparator | Drug: macitentan 3mgmacitentan 3mg tablet once daily |
| macitentan 10mg | Active comparator | Drug: macitentan 10mgmacitentan 10mg tablet once daily |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: placebomatching placebo once daily |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients ≥ 18 years of age
- Women of childbearing potential must use two reliable methods of contraception
- Diagnosis of SSc according to the classification criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)
- At least one visible, active ischemic digital ulcers (DU) at baseline
- History of at least one additional recent active ischemic DU
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- DUs due to condition other than SSc
- Symptomatic Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)
- Body mass index (BMI) < 18 kg/m^2
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 1.5 x upper limit of the normal range (ULN)
- Hemoglobin < 75% of the lower limit of the normal range
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| macitentan 3mgAlso: ACT-064992macitentan 3mg tablet once daily | Drug | macitentan 3mg |
| macitentan 10mgAlso: ACT-064992macitentan 10mg tablet once daily | Drug | macitentan 10mg |
| placebomatching placebo once daily | Drug | placebo |
Primary outcome
Incidence Rate of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) up to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to week 16
DUs were assessed at each visit starting with the screening visit. Only DUs from the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) distally (both on the dorsal and volar surface of the hand, including the digital tip) were recorded. The location of each DU was noted. At each subsequent visit the location of each new DU was noted. DUs that occurred and healed between visits and were reported by patients were not recorded as new DUs. The evaluation was performed by an experienced physician or a trained rater with expertise in the assessment of DUs in systemic sclerosis (SSc). For a given patient, DUs were assessed by the same rater at each visit, whenever possible. Any DU that developed over a previously healed ulcer was recorded as a new DU. Incidence rate is adjusted for 16 weeks of observation, hence is calculated as the number of new DUs/total number of observation days.
5 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Without a New DU Up To Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to week 16
Percentage of Participants With at Least One DU Complication
Time frame: Up to approximately 90 weeks
Change in Hand Functionality Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Hand Component From Baseline to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to week 16
Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Overall Score From Baseline to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to week 16
Change in Hand Functionality - Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis - Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU) Score From Baseline to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to week 16
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jan 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27163986Khanna D, Denton CP, Merkel PA, Krieg T, Le Brun FO, Marr A, Papadakis K, Pope J, Matucci-Cerinic M, Furst DE; DUAL-1 Investigators; DUAL-2 Investigators. Effect of Macitentan on the Development of New Ischemic Digital Ulcers in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis: DUAL-1 and DUAL-2 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA. 2016 May 10;315(18):1975-88. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5258.
Related trials for Systemic Sclerosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Hyaluronidase Injections for Sclerodactyly in Patients With Scleroderma
Scleroderma, Sclerodactyly
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
RecruitingObservational study
Quantification of Calcinosis Cutis Disease Burden Using Computed Tomography Images
Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), Calcinosis Cutis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Phase I/II Study of AD-PluReceptor Plus Tafasitamab-cxix and Lymphodepleting Chemotherapy in Patients With Autoimmune Disorders
Autoimmune Disorders, Systemic Sclerosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
77 sites in 18 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing macitentan 3mg and macitentan 10mg in people with Systemic Sclerosis and Ulcers, run by Actelion at 77 sites in 18 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 77 sites in United States, Germany, Croatia, Australia, Canada and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Jan 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence Rate of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) up to Week 16 (time frame: Baseline to week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01474109, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2015.