Rheumatoid ArthritisACT SOLONCT01474291
An Observational Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) As Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Routine Clinical Practice
An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 119 sites in France.
Trial summary
This prospective, multi-center, observational study will evaluate factors influencing the use of tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) as monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients in real life setting. Data will be collected from participants for 12 months following initiation of tocilizumab treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Tocilizumab
- How many people
- 608 participants
- Where
- 119 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Jan 2012to Sep 2014
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis participants treated with tocilizumab in routine clinical practice
Who may be able to join
- Adult participants, >/= 18 years of age
- Patients with rheumatoid arthritis for whom the rheumatologist decides to start tocilizumab in combination with DMARD or as monotherapy
Who cannot join
- Current participation in a clinical trial in rheumatoid arthritis
Trial locations and contacts
119 sites in 1 country.
119 sites in 1 country
France119 sites
Study site
Aix-les-Bains, 73106
Study site
Amiens, 80000
Study site
Amiens, 80054
Study site
Angers, 49933
Study site
Auch, 32008
Study site
Aulnay-sous-Bois, 93602
Study site
Avignon, 84902
Study site
Bastia, 20604
Study site
Bayonne, 64109
Study site
Beauvais, 60021
Study site
Belfort, 90016
Study site
Belley, 01306
Study site
Berck, 62608
Study site
Besançon, 25030
Study site
Bobigny, 93009
Study site
Bois-Guillaume, 76233
Study site
Bondy, 93143
Study site
Bonneville, 74136
Study site
Bordeaux, 33075
Study site
Bordeaux, 33076
Study site
Boulogne-Billancourt, 92104
Study site
Bressuire, 79302
Study site
Brest, 29609
Study site
Bry-sur-Marne, 94366
Study site
Caen, 14033
Study site
Cahors, 46005
Study site
Cannes, 06401
Study site
Carcassonne, 11890
Study site
Chambray-lès-Tours, 37170
Study site
Chambray-lès-Tours, 37171
Study site
Châteauroux, 36019
Study site
Clermont-Ferrand, 63003
Study site
Colmar, 68024
Study site
Compiègne, 60321
Study site
Corbeil-essones, 91106
Study site
Corbeil-Essonnes, 91106
Study site
Créteil, 94010
Study site
Denain, 59723
Study site
Digne-les-Bains, 04000
Study site
Dijon, 21000
Study site
Dole, 39108
Study site
Draguignan, 83300
Study site
Druex, 28102
Study site
Échirolles, 38434
Study site
Épernay, 51200
Study site
Évian-les-Bains, 74500
Study site
Évreux, 27015
Study site
Évry, 91024
Study site
Fréjus, 83608
Study site
Freyming-Merlebach, 57804
Study site
Gap, 05000
Study site
Gleizé, 69400
Study site
Haguenau, 67500
Study site
Ivry-sur-Seine, 94200
Study site
Laon, 02001
Study site
Lavaur, 81500
Study site
Le Bouscat, 33491
Study site
Le Coudray, 28630
Study site
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275
Study site
Libourne, 33505
Study site
Liévin, 62806
Study site
Lille, 59037
Study site
Limoges, 87042
Study site
Limoges, 87100
Study site
Lomme, 59462
Study site
Lyon, 69002
Study site
Lyon, 69437
Study site
Maisons-Laffitte, 78600
Study site
Marseille, 13006
Study site
Marseille, 13274
Study site
Marseille, 13384
Study site
Metz-Tessy, 74370
Study site
Montauban, 82017
Study site
Montpellier, 34295
Study site
Moulins, 03000
Study site
Mulhouse, 68070
Study site
Nanterre, 92014
Study site
Nantes, 44035
Study site
Narbonne, 11108
Study site
Nevers, 58000
Study site
Nice, 06202
Study site
Nîmes, 30029
Study site
Orange, 84106
Study site
Paris, 75475
Study site
Paris, 75571
Study site
Paris, 75651
Study site
Paris, 75679
Study site
Paris, 75877
Study site
Paris, 75960
Study site
Périgueux, 24019
Study site
Perpignan, 66046
Study site
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
Study site
Poissy, 78303
Study site
Pontoise, 95300
Study site
Reims, 51092
Study site
Rennes, 35203
Study site
Rodez, 12027
Study site
Roubaix, 59056
Study site
Saint-Brieuc, 22027
Study site
Saint-Chamond, 42403
Study site
Saint-Mandé, 94163
Study site
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42277
Study site
Salon-de-Provence, 13658
Study site
Ste Maxime, 83120
Study site
Strasbourg, 67098
Study site
Suresnes, 92151
Study site
Thionville, 57126
Study site
Toulon, 83041
Study site
Toulouse, 31059
Study site
Toulouse, 31076
Study site
Toulouse, 31077
Study site
Tourcoing, 59208
Study site
Valenciennes, 59300
Study site
Valenciennes, 59322
Study site
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
Study site
Vannes, 56017
Study site
Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, 94195
Study site
Villeurbanne, 69626
Study site
Vlleneuve Sur Lot, 47307
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Factors Influencing Use of RoActemra® as Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in a Real Life Setting - ACT SOLO
This prospective, multi-center, observational study will evaluate factors influencing the use of tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) as monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients in real life setting. Data will be collected from participants for 12 months following initiation of tocilizumab treatment.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- Tocilizumab
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TocilizumabBiological
Also called RoActemra®, Actemra®
Tocilizumab administered according to prescribing information and normal clinical practice.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Tocilizumab administered as monotherapy or in combination with other standard of care therapy according to prescribing information and normal clinical practice. Receives: Biological: Tocilizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants Assigned Tocilizumab Monotherapy Versus Tocilizumab as Part of Combination Therapy at Study Inclusion
The number of participants assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy versus tocilizumab combination therapy is reported. A multivariate analysis was performed to search for predictive factors for the initiation of tocilizumab in monotherapy.
Measured: Day 1
Secondary outcomes (21)
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX)
The percentage of participants who discontinued MTX treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.
Reason for discontinuation "Other Intolerance" = intolerance other than cytopenia or hepatic cytolysis.
Measured: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Leflunomide
The percentage of participants who discontinued leflunomide treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.
Measured: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Sulfasalazine
The percentage of participants who discontinued sulfasalazine treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.
Measured: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Hydroxychloroquine
The percentage of participants who discontinued hydroxychloroquine treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.
Measured: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Unspecified Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
The percentage of participants who discontinued treatment with unspecified csDMARDs prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.
Measured: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
Mean Number of Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period
Measured: Up to 30 months
Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period
The percentage of participants who received infusions is presented by category of total infusions received over the study period.
Measured: Up to 13.4 months
Percentage of Participants With No Modification of Tocilizumab Treatment Over the Study Period
The percentage of participants with no modifications (dose modification or discontinuation) is presented.
Measured: Up to 30 months
Percentage of Participants With at Least One csDMARD Intensification During the Study
csDMARD intensification was defined as an addition of a csDMARD without suppression of other csDMARD, dose increase of a csDMARD, switch (addition and suppression) of a csDMARD without intolerance, biological abnormality or symptom improvement to the suppressed csDMARD, or modification of the MTX administration route (from oral route to intramuscular/subcutaneous) with dose increase or maintenance.
Measured: Up to 30 months
Percentage of Participants in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Month 12
DAS28-ESR was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity; scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤3.2 was considered to be DAS28-ESR LDA. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
Measured: Month 12
Percentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR Remission at Month 12
DAS28-ESR was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity; scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of <2.6 was considered to be DAS28-ESR remission. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
Measured: Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) LDA at Month 12
CDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; CDAI scores range from 0 to 76, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤10 was considered to be CDAI LDA. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
Measured: Month 12
Percentage of Participants With CDAI Remission at Month 12
CDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; CDAI scores range from 0 to 76, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤2.8 was considered to be CDAI remission. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
Measured: Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) LDA at Month 12
SDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, C-reactive protein (CRP) (milligrams per liter (mg/L)) per , and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; SDAI scores range from 0 to 86, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤11 was considered to be SDAI LDA. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
Measured: Month 12
Percentage of Participants With SDAI Remission at Month 12
SDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, CRP (mg/L), and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; SDAI scores range from 0 to 86, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. A score of ≤3.3 was considered to be SDAI remission. Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
Measured: Month 12
Percentage of Participants With American College or Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, and ACR70 at Month 12
ACR20/50/70 response was calculated as improvement (from baseline) of at least 20/50/70% (respectively) of tender and of swollen joints, and improvement from baseline of least 20/50/70% (respectively) in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: participant's pain assessment, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) score, and ESR (mm/hour) or CRP (mg/L). Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
Measured: Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 12
EULAR response was categorized as good or moderate response and was calculated as the difference between DAS28-ESR scores at baseline and Month 12. DAS28-ESR was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity; scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate less disease activity.
- If diminution from baseline >1.2 and score ≤3.2 at Month 12 = good response
- If diminution from baseline >1.2 and score >3.2 at Month 12 = moderate response
- If diminution from baseline >0.6 and ≤1.2, and score ≤5.1 at Month 12 = moderate response
- If diminution from baseline >0.6 and ≤1.2, and score >5.1 at Month 12 = non-response
- If diminution from baseline ≤1.2 at Month 12 = non-response
- Participants with missing data were considered as non-response
Measured: Month 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
The HAQ-DI is a participant-reported assessment of ability to perform daily living activities. This composite index score ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (total functional disability) and includes questions regarding 8 domains (dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week). A decrease in score corresponds to improvement in participant-assessed health state.
Measured: Baseline; Month 6; Month 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) Score
The RAID questionnaire is a participant-reported outcome measure evaluating the impact of rheumatoid arthritis on participant quality of life. This composite index score ranges from 0 (best) to 10 (worst) and includes questions regarding 7 domains (pain, functional disability assessment, fatigue, sleep, physical well-being, emotional well-being, coping). A decrease in score corresponds to improvement in participant-assessed health state.
Measured: Baseline; Month 6, Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Acceptable Health State Assessed by the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Questionnaire.
Participants were asked: "If you were to remain in the same condition for the next few months as you have been over the last 8 days, would this be 1) acceptable, 2) unacceptable?" The percentage of participants who responded "acceptable" at each time point is presented.
Measured: Baseline; Month 6; Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
An adverse event was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding if accompanied by clinical symptoms, results in a change in study treatment, results in a medical intervention or a change in concomitant therapy or clinically significant in the investigator's judgment), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
Measured: Up to 30 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Nov 2011 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2012
- Primary completionSep 2014
- Study completionSep 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 608 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01474291
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ML27873
- Acronym
- ACT SOLO
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 15 Nov 2011
- Last updated
- 28 Oct 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Flipo RM, Maillefert JF, Chazerain P, Idier I, Coudert M, Tebib J. Factors influencing the use of tocilizumab as monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a real-life setting: results at 1 year of the ACT-SOLO study. RMD Open. 2017 Jan 10;3(1):e000340. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000340. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28123778
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Oct 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Factors Influencing Use of RoActemra® as Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in a Real Life Setting - ACT SOLO
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01474291
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACT SOLO / ML27873
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 608 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2012
- Primary completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Nov 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 28 Oct 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This prospective, multi-center, observational study will evaluate factors influencing the use of tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) as monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients in real life setting. Data will be collected from participants for 12 months following initiation of tocilizumab treatment.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | – | Biological: TocilizumabTocilizumab administered as monotherapy or in combination with other standard of care therapy according to prescribing information and normal clinical practice. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis participants treated with tocilizumab in routine clinical practice
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adult participants, >/= 18 years of age
- Patients with rheumatoid arthritis for whom the rheumatologist decides to start tocilizumab in combination with DMARD or as monotherapy
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Current participation in a clinical trial in rheumatoid arthritis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TocilizumabAlso: RoActemra®, Actemra®Tocilizumab administered according to prescribing information and normal clinical practice. | Biological | Tocilizumab |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants Assigned Tocilizumab Monotherapy Versus Tocilizumab as Part of Combination Therapy at Study Inclusion
Time frame: Day 1
The number of participants assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy versus tocilizumab combination therapy is reported. A multivariate analysis was performed to search for predictive factors for the initiation of tocilizumab in monotherapy.
21 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX)
Time frame: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Leflunomide
Time frame: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Sulfasalazine
Time frame: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Hydroxychloroquine
Time frame: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Unspecified Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Time frame: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
Mean Number of Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period
Time frame: Up to 13.4 months
Percentage of Participants With No Modification of Tocilizumab Treatment Over the Study Period
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Percentage of Participants With at Least One csDMARD Intensification During the Study
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Percentage of Participants in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Month 12
Time frame: Month 12
Percentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR Remission at Month 12
Time frame: Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) LDA at Month 12
Time frame: Month 12
Percentage of Participants With CDAI Remission at Month 12
Time frame: Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) LDA at Month 12
Time frame: Month 12
Percentage of Participants With SDAI Remission at Month 12
Time frame: Month 12
Percentage of Participants With American College or Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, and ACR70 at Month 12
Time frame: Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 12
Time frame: Month 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Time frame: Baseline; Month 6; Month 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) Score
Time frame: Baseline; Month 6, Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Acceptable Health State Assessed by the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Questionnaire.
Time frame: Baseline; Month 6; Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Oct 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28123778Flipo RM, Maillefert JF, Chazerain P, Idier I, Coudert M, Tebib J. Factors influencing the use of tocilizumab as monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a real-life setting: results at 1 year of the ACT-SOLO study. RMD Open. 2017 Jan 10;3(1):e000340. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000340. eCollection 2017.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
119 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 119 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 119 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Oct 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants Assigned Tocilizumab Monotherapy Versus Tocilizumab as Part of Combination Therapy at Study Inclusion (time frame: Day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01474291, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Oct 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.