AzTrials
AzTrials

Allergic RhinitisPhase 4NCT01478425

Efficacy and Tolerability of a Topical Microemulsion in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis Due to Sensitization to Pollen

A Phase 4 study testing Lipidic Microemulsion and Saline in people with Allergic Rhinitis, run by Reig Jofre Group at 9 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Study design: Randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel, multicentre multinational clinical trial, to show superiority of an active therapy as compared to a control therapy on intermittent or persistent Allergic Rhinitis. Primary objective: 1. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Allergic Rhinitis
What is being tested?
Lipidic Microemulsion and Saline
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
110 participants
Where
9 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Mar 2011to Aug 2011
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients of either gender, aged 18 years or older.
  • With previous diagnostic of allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis due to sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens. Patients sensitized to other inhaled allergens might be included provided that these other sensitizations are not relevant to the patient's clinical symptoms or they are not exposed to these other allergens.
  • Having suffered from allergic rhinitis symptoms (severe enough to require symptomatic medication usually prescribed for this condition) in previous years, but otherwise free of symptoms at inclusion.
  • Residing during the months from March to July of 2011 in a geographical area in which the exposure to birch, grass or olive tree pollens is relevant (average pollination peaks of 100 grains/m3 of air during the previous specific pollen season).
  • Providing written informed consent to participate in the study.

Who cannot join

  • Known asthma of any origin (intrinsic or extrinsic, the latter due to any kind of allergenic trigger).
  • Allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis whose symptoms are exclusively due to the sensitization to other inhaled allergens different from those referred in the inclusion criteria, sensitization to pollens that may interfere with the patient's allergic status during the study period (e.g., plane tree pollen).
  • Rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis of allergic characteristics presenting in the spring season but with negative allergy study (skin prick tests (SPT)).
  • Asymptomatic sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens.
  • Sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens, but having had mild symptoms during the spring of 2010, not requiring the use of symptomatic medication.
  • Sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens but only presenting with asthma symptoms.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Concurrent participation in another clinical trial at the time of this study.
  • Co-morbid conditions that, in the investigator's judgment, preclude them from participating in this study.
  • Continuous treatment with antihistamines, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants or any other drug that may alter the occurrence and/or severity of allergic symptoms.
  • Individuals that, even if they meet the inclusion criteria, are concurrently under treatment with allergen-specific immunotherapy or have received this treatment within the last 36 months.

Trial locations and contacts

9 sites in 2 countries.

9 sites in 2 countries

Spain8 sites
  • Hospital General de Ciudad Real

    Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, 13005

  • Clinica Ojeda

    Madrid, Madrid, 28006

  • Clinica Subiza

    Madrid, Madrid, 28006

  • Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra

    Pamplona, Navarre, 31008

  • Clinica Alergoasma

    Salamanca, Salamanca, 37001

  • Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Macarena

    Seville, Sevilla, 41009

  • Area Hospitalaria de Valme

    Seville, Sevilla, 41014

  • Paracelso Clínica Médico Quirúrgica

    Valladolid, Valladolid, 47004

Other trials in Spain

Sweden1 site
  • Lund University Hospital

    Lund, 221 85

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: Study on the Efficacy and Tolerability of a Topical Microemulsion in Patients With Intermittent or Persistent Allergic Rhinitis Due to Sensitization to Birch, Olive Tree or Grass Pollen

Study design: Randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel, multicentre multinational clinical trial, to show superiority of an active therapy as compared to a control therapy on intermittent or persistent Allergic Rhinitis.

Primary objective:

Read more
  1. To show that a topical microemulsion is superior to a sterilized saline solution to prevent deterioration in the health related quality of life, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen. Secondary objectives
  2. To explore the effect of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, for the prevention of nasal and ocular symptoms in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
  3. To explore the effect of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, in the utilization of symptomatic medications, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
  4. To assess the patient's satisfaction with a topical microemulsion treatment, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
  5. To assess the safety of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, administered to patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.

This is a clinical investigation study of a Class 1 medical device product. This is a prospective study of an active medical device versus a control medical device.

It was considered feasible to recruit 10 patients patients per center, and therefore the study should be conducted in 10 centers. To get treatment balance within each center, a total of 100 patients should be recruited.

Read the detailed description

Main study investigator:

Dr. Pedro Ojeda Clínica de Asma y Alergia doctores Ojeda C/ Oquendo, 23 28006 Madrid, Spain T1.: +34 91 562 32 62 T2.: +34 91 562 67 27 F.: +34 91 562 53 96 e-mail: drojeda@telefonica.net

Objectives

Primary objective

  1. To show that a topical microemulsion is superior to a sterilized saline solution to prevent deterioration in the health related quality of life, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen. Secondary objectives
  2. To explore the effect of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, for the prevention of nasal and ocular symptoms in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
  3. To explore the effect of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, in the utilization of symptomatic medications, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
  4. To assess the patient's satisfaction with a topical microemulsion treatment, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
  5. To assess the safety of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, administered to patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.

Study design:

Randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel, multicentre multinational clinical trial, to show superiority of an active therapy as compared to a control therapy.

Study disease:

Intermittent or persistent Allergic Rhinitis.

Data from the drugs/interventions to be studied:

This is a clinical investigation study of a Class 1 medical device product. This is a prospective study of an active medical device versus a control medical device.

Study population and total number of subjects:

It was considered feasible to recruit 10 patients patients per center, and therefore the study should be conducted in 10 centers. To get treatment balance within each center, a total of 100 patients should be recruited.

In order to participate in the study, eligible candidates must fulfill all the following inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria:

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients of either gender, aged 18 years or older.
  2. With previous diagnostic of allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis due to sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens. Patients sensitized to other inhaled allergens might be included provided that these other sensitizations are not relevant to the patient's clinical symptoms or they are not exposed to these other allergens.
  3. Having suffered from allergic rhinitis symptoms (severe enough to require symptomatic medication usually prescribed for this condition) in previous years, but otherwise free of symptoms at inclusion.
  4. Residing during the months from March to July of 2011 in a geographical area in which the exposure to birch, grass or olive tree pollens is relevant (average pollination peaks of 100 grains/m3 of air during the previous specific pollen season).
  5. Providing written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Known asthma of any origin (intrinsic or extrinsic, the latter due to any kind of allergenic trigger).
  2. Allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis whose symptoms are exclusively due to the sensitization to other inhaled allergens different from those referred in the inclusion criteria, sensitization to pollens that may interfere with the patient's allergic status during the study period (e.g., plane tree pollen).
  3. Rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis of allergic characteristics presenting in the spring season but with negative allergy study (skin prick tests (SPT)).
  4. Asymptomatic sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens.
  5. Sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens, but having had mild symptoms during the spring of 2010, not requiring the use of symptomatic medication.
  6. Sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens but only presenting with asthma symptoms.
  7. Concurrent participation in another clinical trial at the time of this study.
  8. Co-morbid conditions that, in the investigator's judgment, preclude them from participating in this study.
  9. Continuous treatment with antihistamines, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants or any other drug that may alter the occurrence and/or severity of allergic symptoms.
  10. Individuals that, even if they meet the inclusion criteria, are concurrently under treatment with allergen-specific immunotherapy or have received this treatment within the last 36 months.
Being tested
Lipidic Microemulsion, Saline
Keywords
Prevention, Pollen, Allergy, Rhinitis
Medical subject headings
Rhinitis, Allergic, Hypersensitivity, Rhinitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lipidic MicroemulsionDevice

    Also called Blox4

    Topical nasal, twice a day

  • SalineDevice

    Topical Nasal, twice a day

Study groups in NCT01478425
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ActiveExperimentalLipidic Microemulsion
Receives: Device: Lipidic Microemulsion
ControlPlacebo comparatorSaline nose-spray device
Receives: Device: Saline

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. global score of the mini-RQLQ at visit 2 (adjusting for the baseline value)

    The primary analysis will be conducted on the global score of the mini-RQLQ at visit 2 (adjusting for the baseline value). It will be conducted on all randomized patients and will be considered as confirmatory. When visit 2 assessments are lacking, then no change from baseline will be assumed and baseline values will be carried forward to visit 2. As Normality and homcedasticity may be assumed, the analysis will consist of an ANCOVA model with a fixed treatment effect and baseline values as covariates.

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. • Mini-RQLQ dimensions scores at visit 2

    Same analysis applied to the primary outcome but to individual dimensions of the RQLQ instead of global score

  2. Mini-RQLQ global and dimensions scores at visit 3

    Same analysis applied to the primary outcome but to individual dimensions of the RQLQ instead of global score

  3. Mean of the sums of nasal symptom scores at visits 2 and 3

    Same analysis applied to the primary outcome but to sums of nasal symptom scores at visits 2 and 3 instead of global score

  4. Mean of the sums of ocular symptom scores at visits 2 and 3

    Same analysis applied to the primary outcome but to sums of ocular symptom scores at visits 2 and 3 instead of global score

  5. Mean of the sums of symptomatic treatments at visits 2 and 3

    Same analysis applied to the primary outcome but to sums of symptomatic treatments at visits 2 and 3 instead of global score

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Nov 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2011
  3. Primary completionJun 2011
  4. Study completionAug 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
110 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01478425
Sponsor's protocol ID
RJ-NME-11-01
Status last verified
Nov 2011
First submitted
21 Nov 2011
Last updated
29 Nov 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Ojeda P, Pique N, Alonso A, Delgado J, Feo F, Igea JM, Navarro A, Olaguibel JM, Subiza J, Nieto C, Andersson M. A topical microemulsion for the prevention of allergic rhinitis symptoms: results of a randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group, multicentre, multinational clinical trial (Nares study). Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2013 Aug 27;9(1):32. doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-9-32.

    PubMed 23981504

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Lipidic Microemulsion and Saline in people with Allergic Rhinitis, run by Reig Jofre Group at 9 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 9 sites in Spain, Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

global score of the mini-RQLQ at visit 2 (adjusting for the baseline value). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01478425, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in