Allergic RhinitisPhase 4NCT01478425
Efficacy and Tolerability of a Topical Microemulsion in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis Due to Sensitization to Pollen
A Phase 4 study testing Lipidic Microemulsion and Saline in people with Allergic Rhinitis, run by Reig Jofre Group at 9 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Study design: Randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel, multicentre multinational clinical trial, to show superiority of an active therapy as compared to a control therapy on intermittent or persistent Allergic Rhinitis. Primary objective: 1. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Allergic Rhinitis
- What is being tested?
- Lipidic Microemulsion and Saline
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 110 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2011to Aug 2011
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients of either gender, aged 18 years or older.
- With previous diagnostic of allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis due to sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens. Patients sensitized to other inhaled allergens might be included provided that these other sensitizations are not relevant to the patient's clinical symptoms or they are not exposed to these other allergens.
- Having suffered from allergic rhinitis symptoms (severe enough to require symptomatic medication usually prescribed for this condition) in previous years, but otherwise free of symptoms at inclusion.
- Residing during the months from March to July of 2011 in a geographical area in which the exposure to birch, grass or olive tree pollens is relevant (average pollination peaks of 100 grains/m3 of air during the previous specific pollen season).
- Providing written informed consent to participate in the study.
Who cannot join
- Known asthma of any origin (intrinsic or extrinsic, the latter due to any kind of allergenic trigger).
- Allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis whose symptoms are exclusively due to the sensitization to other inhaled allergens different from those referred in the inclusion criteria, sensitization to pollens that may interfere with the patient's allergic status during the study period (e.g., plane tree pollen).
- Rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis of allergic characteristics presenting in the spring season but with negative allergy study (skin prick tests (SPT)).
- Asymptomatic sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens.
- Sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens, but having had mild symptoms during the spring of 2010, not requiring the use of symptomatic medication.
- Sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens but only presenting with asthma symptoms.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Concurrent participation in another clinical trial at the time of this study.
- Co-morbid conditions that, in the investigator's judgment, preclude them from participating in this study.
- Continuous treatment with antihistamines, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants or any other drug that may alter the occurrence and/or severity of allergic symptoms.
- Individuals that, even if they meet the inclusion criteria, are concurrently under treatment with allergen-specific immunotherapy or have received this treatment within the last 36 months.
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 2 countries.
9 sites in 2 countries
Spain8 sites
Hospital General de Ciudad Real
Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, 13005
Clinica Ojeda
Madrid, Madrid, 28006
Clinica Subiza
Madrid, Madrid, 28006
Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008
Clinica Alergoasma
Salamanca, Salamanca, 37001
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Macarena
Seville, Sevilla, 41009
Area Hospitalaria de Valme
Seville, Sevilla, 41014
Paracelso Clínica Médico Quirúrgica
Valladolid, Valladolid, 47004
About this study
Official title: Study on the Efficacy and Tolerability of a Topical Microemulsion in Patients With Intermittent or Persistent Allergic Rhinitis Due to Sensitization to Birch, Olive Tree or Grass Pollen
Study design: Randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel, multicentre multinational clinical trial, to show superiority of an active therapy as compared to a control therapy on intermittent or persistent Allergic Rhinitis.
Primary objective:
Read more
- To show that a topical microemulsion is superior to a sterilized saline solution to prevent deterioration in the health related quality of life, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen. Secondary objectives
- To explore the effect of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, for the prevention of nasal and ocular symptoms in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
- To explore the effect of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, in the utilization of symptomatic medications, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
- To assess the patient's satisfaction with a topical microemulsion treatment, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
- To assess the safety of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, administered to patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
This is a clinical investigation study of a Class 1 medical device product. This is a prospective study of an active medical device versus a control medical device.
It was considered feasible to recruit 10 patients patients per center, and therefore the study should be conducted in 10 centers. To get treatment balance within each center, a total of 100 patients should be recruited.
Read the detailed description
Main study investigator:
Dr. Pedro Ojeda Clínica de Asma y Alergia doctores Ojeda C/ Oquendo, 23 28006 Madrid, Spain T1.: +34 91 562 32 62 T2.: +34 91 562 67 27 F.: +34 91 562 53 96 e-mail: drojeda@telefonica.net
Objectives
Primary objective
- To show that a topical microemulsion is superior to a sterilized saline solution to prevent deterioration in the health related quality of life, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen. Secondary objectives
- To explore the effect of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, for the prevention of nasal and ocular symptoms in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
- To explore the effect of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, in the utilization of symptomatic medications, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
- To assess the patient's satisfaction with a topical microemulsion treatment, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
- To assess the safety of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, administered to patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
Study design:
Randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel, multicentre multinational clinical trial, to show superiority of an active therapy as compared to a control therapy.
Study disease:
Intermittent or persistent Allergic Rhinitis.
Data from the drugs/interventions to be studied:
This is a clinical investigation study of a Class 1 medical device product. This is a prospective study of an active medical device versus a control medical device.
Study population and total number of subjects:
It was considered feasible to recruit 10 patients patients per center, and therefore the study should be conducted in 10 centers. To get treatment balance within each center, a total of 100 patients should be recruited.
In order to participate in the study, eligible candidates must fulfill all the following inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria:
Inclusion criteria
- Patients of either gender, aged 18 years or older.
- With previous diagnostic of allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis due to sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens. Patients sensitized to other inhaled allergens might be included provided that these other sensitizations are not relevant to the patient's clinical symptoms or they are not exposed to these other allergens.
- Having suffered from allergic rhinitis symptoms (severe enough to require symptomatic medication usually prescribed for this condition) in previous years, but otherwise free of symptoms at inclusion.
- Residing during the months from March to July of 2011 in a geographical area in which the exposure to birch, grass or olive tree pollens is relevant (average pollination peaks of 100 grains/m3 of air during the previous specific pollen season).
- Providing written informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion criteria
- Known asthma of any origin (intrinsic or extrinsic, the latter due to any kind of allergenic trigger).
- Allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis whose symptoms are exclusively due to the sensitization to other inhaled allergens different from those referred in the inclusion criteria, sensitization to pollens that may interfere with the patient's allergic status during the study period (e.g., plane tree pollen).
- Rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis of allergic characteristics presenting in the spring season but with negative allergy study (skin prick tests (SPT)).
- Asymptomatic sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens.
- Sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens, but having had mild symptoms during the spring of 2010, not requiring the use of symptomatic medication.
- Sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens but only presenting with asthma symptoms.
- Concurrent participation in another clinical trial at the time of this study.
- Co-morbid conditions that, in the investigator's judgment, preclude them from participating in this study.
- Continuous treatment with antihistamines, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants or any other drug that may alter the occurrence and/or severity of allergic symptoms.
- Individuals that, even if they meet the inclusion criteria, are concurrently under treatment with allergen-specific immunotherapy or have received this treatment within the last 36 months.
- Conditions
- Allergic Rhinitis
- Being tested
- Lipidic Microemulsion, Saline
- Keywords
- Prevention, Pollen, Allergy, Rhinitis
- Medical subject headings
- Rhinitis, Allergic, Hypersensitivity, Rhinitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lipidic MicroemulsionDevice
Also called Blox4
Topical nasal, twice a day
SalineDevice
Topical Nasal, twice a day
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active | Experimental | Lipidic Microemulsion Receives: Device: Lipidic Microemulsion |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Saline nose-spray device Receives: Device: Saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
global score of the mini-RQLQ at visit 2 (adjusting for the baseline value)
The primary analysis will be conducted on the global score of the mini-RQLQ at visit 2 (adjusting for the baseline value). It will be conducted on all randomized patients and will be considered as confirmatory. When visit 2 assessments are lacking, then no change from baseline will be assumed and baseline values will be carried forward to visit 2. As Normality and homcedasticity may be assumed, the analysis will consist of an ANCOVA model with a fixed treatment effect and baseline values as covariates.
Secondary outcomes (5)
• Mini-RQLQ dimensions scores at visit 2
Same analysis applied to the primary outcome but to individual dimensions of the RQLQ instead of global score
Mini-RQLQ global and dimensions scores at visit 3
Same analysis applied to the primary outcome but to individual dimensions of the RQLQ instead of global score
Mean of the sums of nasal symptom scores at visits 2 and 3
Same analysis applied to the primary outcome but to sums of nasal symptom scores at visits 2 and 3 instead of global score
Mean of the sums of ocular symptom scores at visits 2 and 3
Same analysis applied to the primary outcome but to sums of ocular symptom scores at visits 2 and 3 instead of global score
Mean of the sums of symptomatic treatments at visits 2 and 3
Same analysis applied to the primary outcome but to sums of symptomatic treatments at visits 2 and 3 instead of global score
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Nov 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2011
- Primary completionJun 2011
- Study completionAug 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Allergic RhinitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Reig Jofre Group
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pedro Ojeda, PhD, MD, Study director, Clínica OjedaMorgan Andersson, PhD, MD, Principal investigator, Lund University HospitalJulio Delgado, PhD, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital Universitario Virgen MacarenaAna Navarro, PhD, MD, Principal investigator, Area Hospitalaria de ValmeJavier Subiza, PhD, MD, Principal investigator, Clinica SubizaJosé María Olaguibel, PhD, MD, Principal investigator, Complejo Hospitalario de NavarraFrancisco Feo-Brito, PhD, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital General de Ciudad RealJuan Manuel Igea, PhD, MD, Principal investigator, Clínica Alergoasma
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01478425
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RJ-NME-11-01
- Status last verified
- Nov 2011
- First submitted
- 21 Nov 2011
- Last updated
- 29 Nov 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Ojeda P, Pique N, Alonso A, Delgado J, Feo F, Igea JM, Navarro A, Olaguibel JM, Subiza J, Nieto C, Andersson M. A topical microemulsion for the prevention of allergic rhinitis symptoms: results of a randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group, multicentre, multinational clinical trial (Nares study). Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2013 Aug 27;9(1):32. doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-9-32.
PubMed 23981504
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Nov 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study on the Efficacy and Tolerability of a Topical Microemulsion in Patients With Intermittent or Persistent Allergic Rhinitis Due to Sensitization to Birch, Olive Tree or Grass Pollen
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01478425
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RJ-NME-11-01
- Conditions
- Allergic Rhinitis
- Keywords
- Prevention, Pollen, Allergy, Rhinitis
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Reig Jofre GroupIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2011
- Primary completion
- Jun 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Nov 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Study design: Randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel, multicentre multinational clinical trial, to show superiority of an active therapy as compared to a control therapy on intermittent or persistent Allergic Rhinitis.
Primary objective:
- To show that a topical microemulsion is superior to a sterilized saline solution to prevent deterioration in the health related quality of life, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen. Secondary objectives
- To explore the effect of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, for the prevention of nasal and ocular symptoms in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
- To explore the effect of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, in the utilization of symptomatic medications, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
- To assess the patient's satisfaction with a topical microemulsion treatment, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
- To assess the safety of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, administered to patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
This is a clinical investigation study of a Class 1 medical device product. This is a prospective study of an active medical device versus a control medical device.
It was considered feasible to recruit 10 patients patients per center, and therefore the study should be conducted in 10 centers. To get treatment balance within each center, a total of 100 patients should be recruited.
Detailed description
Main study investigator:
Dr. Pedro Ojeda Clínica de Asma y Alergia doctores Ojeda C/ Oquendo, 23 28006 Madrid, Spain T1.: +34 91 562 32 62 T2.: +34 91 562 67 27 F.: +34 91 562 53 96 e-mail: drojeda@telefonica.net
Objectives
Primary objective
- To show that a topical microemulsion is superior to a sterilized saline solution to prevent deterioration in the health related quality of life, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen. Secondary objectives
- To explore the effect of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, for the prevention of nasal and ocular symptoms in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
- To explore the effect of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, in the utilization of symptomatic medications, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
- To assess the patient's satisfaction with a topical microemulsion treatment, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
- To assess the safety of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, administered to patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
Study design:
Randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel, multicentre multinational clinical trial, to show superiority of an active therapy as compared to a control therapy.
Study disease:
Intermittent or persistent Allergic Rhinitis.
Data from the drugs/interventions to be studied:
This is a clinical investigation study of a Class 1 medical device product. This is a prospective study of an active medical device versus a control medical device.
Study population and total number of subjects:
It was considered feasible to recruit 10 patients patients per center, and therefore the study should be conducted in 10 centers. To get treatment balance within each center, a total of 100 patients should be recruited.
In order to participate in the study, eligible candidates must fulfill all the following inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria:
Inclusion criteria
- Patients of either gender, aged 18 years or older.
- With previous diagnostic of allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis due to sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens. Patients sensitized to other inhaled allergens might be included provided that these other sensitizations are not relevant to the patient's clinical symptoms or they are not exposed to these other allergens.
- Having suffered from allergic rhinitis symptoms (severe enough to require symptomatic medication usually prescribed for this condition) in previous years, but otherwise free of symptoms at inclusion.
- Residing during the months from March to July of 2011 in a geographical area in which the exposure to birch, grass or olive tree pollens is relevant (average pollination peaks of 100 grains/m3 of air during the previous specific pollen season).
- Providing written informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion criteria
- Known asthma of any origin (intrinsic or extrinsic, the latter due to any kind of allergenic trigger).
- Allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis whose symptoms are exclusively due to the sensitization to other inhaled allergens different from those referred in the inclusion criteria, sensitization to pollens that may interfere with the patient's allergic status during the study period (e.g., plane tree pollen).
- Rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis of allergic characteristics presenting in the spring season but with negative allergy study (skin prick tests (SPT)).
- Asymptomatic sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens.
- Sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens, but having had mild symptoms during the spring of 2010, not requiring the use of symptomatic medication.
- Sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens but only presenting with asthma symptoms.
- Concurrent participation in another clinical trial at the time of this study.
- Co-morbid conditions that, in the investigator's judgment, preclude them from participating in this study.
- Continuous treatment with antihistamines, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants or any other drug that may alter the occurrence and/or severity of allergic symptoms.
- Individuals that, even if they meet the inclusion criteria, are concurrently under treatment with allergen-specific immunotherapy or have received this treatment within the last 36 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active | Experimental | Device: Lipidic MicroemulsionLipidic Microemulsion |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Device: SalineSaline nose-spray device |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients of either gender, aged 18 years or older.
- With previous diagnostic of allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis due to sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens. Patients sensitized to other inhaled allergens might be included provided that these other sensitizations are not relevant to the patient's clinical symptoms or they are not exposed to these other allergens.
- Having suffered from allergic rhinitis symptoms (severe enough to require symptomatic medication usually prescribed for this condition) in previous years, but otherwise free of symptoms at inclusion.
- Residing during the months from March to July of 2011 in a geographical area in which the exposure to birch, grass or olive tree pollens is relevant (average pollination peaks of 100 grains/m3 of air during the previous specific pollen season).
- Providing written informed consent to participate in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Known asthma of any origin (intrinsic or extrinsic, the latter due to any kind of allergenic trigger).
- Allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis whose symptoms are exclusively due to the sensitization to other inhaled allergens different from those referred in the inclusion criteria, sensitization to pollens that may interfere with the patient's allergic status during the study period (e.g., plane tree pollen).
- Rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis of allergic characteristics presenting in the spring season but with negative allergy study (skin prick tests (SPT)).
- Asymptomatic sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens.
- Sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens, but having had mild symptoms during the spring of 2010, not requiring the use of symptomatic medication.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lipidic MicroemulsionAlso: Blox4Topical nasal, twice a day | Device | Active |
| SalineTopical Nasal, twice a day | Device | Control |
Primary outcome
global score of the mini-RQLQ at visit 2 (adjusting for the baseline value)
The primary analysis will be conducted on the global score of the mini-RQLQ at visit 2 (adjusting for the baseline value). It will be conducted on all randomized patients and will be considered as confirmatory. When visit 2 assessments are lacking, then no change from baseline will be assumed and baseline values will be carried forward to visit 2. As Normality and homcedasticity may be assumed, the analysis will consist of an ANCOVA model with a fixed treatment effect and baseline values as covariates.
5 secondary outcomes
• Mini-RQLQ dimensions scores at visit 2
Mini-RQLQ global and dimensions scores at visit 3
Mean of the sums of nasal symptom scores at visits 2 and 3
Mean of the sums of ocular symptom scores at visits 2 and 3
Mean of the sums of symptomatic treatments at visits 2 and 3
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Nov 2011.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23981504Ojeda P, Pique N, Alonso A, Delgado J, Feo F, Igea JM, Navarro A, Olaguibel JM, Subiza J, Nieto C, Andersson M. A topical microemulsion for the prevention of allergic rhinitis symptoms: results of a randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group, multicentre, multinational clinical trial (Nares study). Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2013 Aug 27;9(1):32. doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-9-32.
Related trials for Allergic Rhinitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Tolerability of Fluticasone Propionate 10% Nasal Insert in Participants With Chronic Allergic Rhinitis
Chronic Allergic Rhinitis
RecruitingPhase 3
Specific Immunotherapy With Mannan-Conjugated Allergoids for HDM-Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis_MM09-SIT-063.
Allergic Rhinitis, Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
RecruitingPhase 3
Specific Immunotherapy With Mannan-Conjugated Allergoids for HDM-Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis. MM09-SIT-063.
Allergic Rhinitis, Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Allergy, Asthma, and Atopic Eczema in Finland
Asthma, Asthma in Children
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prevelance of Bronchial Asthma and Allergic Rhinitis Among Children With Nephrotic Syndrom at Sohag University Hospital
Allergic Diseases in Nephrotic Children, Nephrotic Syndrom
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pedro Ojeda, PhD, MD study director
Clínica Ojeda
Morgan Andersson, PhD, MD principal investigator
Lund University Hospital
Julio Delgado, PhD, MD principal investigator
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
9 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Lipidic Microemulsion and Saline in people with Allergic Rhinitis, run by Reig Jofre Group at 9 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in Spain, Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
global score of the mini-RQLQ at visit 2 (adjusting for the baseline value). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01478425, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2011.