NauseaNCT01479712
Intra-abdominal at Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial
A study testing Normal Saline Irrigation in people with Nausea and Vomiting, run by Virginia Commonwealth University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if intra-abdominal irrigation at the time of cesarean delivery increased maternal GI discomfort without affecting infection rates. We hypothesized that avoiding intra-operative irrigation at the time of cesarean delivery will decrease intra-operative nausea and vomiting… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- What is being tested?
- Normal Saline Irrigation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 263 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2010to Dec 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- pregnant women
- 18 years of age or older
- presenting to MCV Hospital
- undergoing obstetrically indicated cesarean section
- english speaking
Who cannot join
- none
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Virginia Commonwealth University Hospital System
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
About this study
The purpose of this study is to determine if intra-abdominal irrigation at the time of cesarean delivery increased maternal GI discomfort without affecting infection rates.
We hypothesized that avoiding intra-operative irrigation at the time of cesarean delivery will decrease intra-operative nausea and vomiting without increasing maternal infectious morbidity, post-operative pain, return of bowel function, or time to discharge.
Read the detailed description
This study will be a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Based on available literature and clinical experience, we expect a twenty percent decrease in gastrointestinal disturbances by avoiding intraoperative irrigation at the time of cesarean section. With the type 1 error rate set at 0.05 and a power of 0.90; this will require 184 patients in each arm (irrigation versus no irrigation) to obtain an adequate sample size. Paper copies of written consent and any identifying information will be kept in a secured, locked file. All data collected will be stored in a password protected computer file that will be accessible only to the investigators.
Patients will be identified at the time of admission to the Labor and Delivery unit. A physician will discuss the study with the patient. After time for consideration and having had all questions answered the patient will then be consented for the trial. Consent will be obtained at the time of admission to the Labor and Delivery unit. If the patient has a successful vaginal delivery the patient will not enter the study. If the patient requires a cesarean section the patient will be randomized either in to an irrigation or a nonirrigation group. Assignment will be performed by pulling sequentially numbered opaque envelopes containing computer-randomized individual allocations. This randomization will be carried out by research staff before the initiation of the study, and the patients will be blinded to treatment once assigned. Information regarding basic demographic data, comorbidities that may affect infection rates (diabetes, hypertension, ect), interventions during labor, and post partum course will be obtained from the patients' charts.
The two arms will differ only in intraoperative management of the patient after delivery of the baby. Patients in the irrigation arm will receive a cesarean section with irrigation of the abdominal cavity with 500-1000mL of warm normal saline after closure of the uterine incision but prior to the closure of the abdominal wall. In addition all blood clots and other debris will be evacuated from the paracolic gutters, anterior and posterior culdesacs, and under the bladder flap. The nonirrigation group will receive Joel-Cohen cesarean section without the irrigation with normal saline. This group will also have any large debris including blood clots evacuated. Both groups will undergo standard closure of the abdominal wall, including reapproximation of the rectus muscles and suturing of the rectus fascia with running nonlocking absorbable suture. Prefascial irrigation of the subcutaneous tissues superior to the closed fascia will be done in both groups. Staples or absorbable suture will be used for skin closure. In addition all patients will receive a standardized dose of 1 gram of a first generation cephalosporin or 900mg clindamycin intravenously as antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of umbilical cord clamping.
As per standard of care, the post partum care will include vital signs every 4 hours including patient report of pain level and nausea, discontinuation of the foley catheter and advancement of the diet on postoperative day one, daily examination of the incision, notation of return of gastrointestinal function, early ambulation, and a complete blood count on the first postoperative day.
The primary outcome of measure will be maternal GI disturbance. This will be defined as nausea or emesis during the cesarean section as well as any nausea requiring medical intervention during her hospitalization. The time to return of bowel function will also be recorded. The secondary outcome of measure is the incidence of maternal infectious morbidity, defined as endometritis. This will be diagnosed with two or more of the following are present: abnormally tender uterus on exam, temperature greater than 100.4°F at any time postoperatively, unexplained maternal tachycardia greater than 100 beats per minute. Patients will also be monitored for wound infections daily by visual inspection of the incision. Diagnosis will be made if any erythema, tenderness, discharge or separation occurs with maternal fever. Post operative care providers will be blinded to group assignment to avoid any potential bias.
The investigators will collect the data, perform data entry, and review charts to ensure accuracy of information provided by the treating physician. Periodic reviews of the data entry will be performed to ensure completeness and accuracy.
- Being tested
- Normal Saline Irrigation
- Keywords
- Irrigation, Cesarean Section, Nausea, Infection
- Medical subject headings
- Nausea, Vomiting, Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Normal Saline IrrigationProcedure or surgery
Irrigation with warm normal saline into the abdominal cavity. Approximately 500-1000cc.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Irrigation | Active comparator | This is the arm that will receive irrigation. Receives: Procedure: Normal Saline Irrigation |
| No Irrigation | No intervention | This is the arm that will not receive irrigation. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Intra-operative nausea
Any nausea reported by the patient during the cesarean section
Measured: intra-operative
Secondary outcomes (2)
Post operative GI disturbance
Any nausea or vomiting reported or observed during the patient's postoperative period
Measured: 2-3 days post operatively
Infection
Any documented infection during the patient's postoperative stay
Measured: 2-3 days post operatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Nov 2011 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2010
- Primary completionDec 2010
- Study completionDec 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for NauseaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 263 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Virginia Commonwealth University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Christine Isaacs, MD, Principal investigator, VCU Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01479712
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HM11572
- Status last verified
- Nov 2011
- First submitted
- 22 Nov 2011
- Last updated
- 24 Nov 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Viney R, Isaacs C, Chelmow D. Intra-abdominal irrigation at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun;119(6):1106-11. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182460d09.
PubMed 22617574
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Nov 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intra-abdominal at Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01479712
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HM11572
- Keywords
- Irrigation, Cesarean Section, Nausea, Infection
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 263 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Virginia Commonwealth UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2010
- Primary completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Nov 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine if intra-abdominal irrigation at the time of cesarean delivery increased maternal GI discomfort without affecting infection rates.
We hypothesized that avoiding intra-operative irrigation at the time of cesarean delivery will decrease intra-operative nausea and vomiting without increasing maternal infectious morbidity, post-operative pain, return of bowel function, or time to discharge.
Detailed description
This study will be a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Based on available literature and clinical experience, we expect a twenty percent decrease in gastrointestinal disturbances by avoiding intraoperative irrigation at the time of cesarean section. With the type 1 error rate set at 0.05 and a power of 0.90; this will require 184 patients in each arm (irrigation versus no irrigation) to obtain an adequate sample size. Paper copies of written consent and any identifying information will be kept in a secured, locked file. All data collected will be stored in a password protected computer file that will be accessible only to the investigators.
Patients will be identified at the time of admission to the Labor and Delivery unit. A physician will discuss the study with the patient. After time for consideration and having had all questions answered the patient will then be consented for the trial. Consent will be obtained at the time of admission to the Labor and Delivery unit. If the patient has a successful vaginal delivery the patient will not enter the study. If the patient requires a cesarean section the patient will be randomized either in to an irrigation or a nonirrigation group. Assignment will be performed by pulling sequentially numbered opaque envelopes containing computer-randomized individual allocations. This randomization will be carried out by research staff before the initiation of the study, and the patients will be blinded to treatment once assigned. Information regarding basic demographic data, comorbidities that may affect infection rates (diabetes, hypertension, ect), interventions during labor, and post partum course will be obtained from the patients' charts.
The two arms will differ only in intraoperative management of the patient after delivery of the baby. Patients in the irrigation arm will receive a cesarean section with irrigation of the abdominal cavity with 500-1000mL of warm normal saline after closure of the uterine incision but prior to the closure of the abdominal wall. In addition all blood clots and other debris will be evacuated from the paracolic gutters, anterior and posterior culdesacs, and under the bladder flap. The nonirrigation group will receive Joel-Cohen cesarean section without the irrigation with normal saline. This group will also have any large debris including blood clots evacuated. Both groups will undergo standard closure of the abdominal wall, including reapproximation of the rectus muscles and suturing of the rectus fascia with running nonlocking absorbable suture. Prefascial irrigation of the subcutaneous tissues superior to the closed fascia will be done in both groups. Staples or absorbable suture will be used for skin closure. In addition all patients will receive a standardized dose of 1 gram of a first generation cephalosporin or 900mg clindamycin intravenously as antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of umbilical cord clamping.
As per standard of care, the post partum care will include vital signs every 4 hours including patient report of pain level and nausea, discontinuation of the foley catheter and advancement of the diet on postoperative day one, daily examination of the incision, notation of return of gastrointestinal function, early ambulation, and a complete blood count on the first postoperative day.
The primary outcome of measure will be maternal GI disturbance. This will be defined as nausea or emesis during the cesarean section as well as any nausea requiring medical intervention during her hospitalization. The time to return of bowel function will also be recorded. The secondary outcome of measure is the incidence of maternal infectious morbidity, defined as endometritis. This will be diagnosed with two or more of the following are present: abnormally tender uterus on exam, temperature greater than 100.4°F at any time postoperatively, unexplained maternal tachycardia greater than 100 beats per minute. Patients will also be monitored for wound infections daily by visual inspection of the incision. Diagnosis will be made if any erythema, tenderness, discharge or separation occurs with maternal fever. Post operative care providers will be blinded to group assignment to avoid any potential bias.
The investigators will collect the data, perform data entry, and review charts to ensure accuracy of information provided by the treating physician. Periodic reviews of the data entry will be performed to ensure completeness and accuracy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Irrigation | Active comparator | Procedure: Normal Saline IrrigationThis is the arm that will receive irrigation. |
| No Irrigation | No intervention | –This is the arm that will not receive irrigation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- pregnant women
- 18 years of age or older
- presenting to MCV Hospital
- undergoing obstetrically indicated cesarean section
- english speaking
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- none
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Normal Saline IrrigationIrrigation with warm normal saline into the abdominal cavity. Approximately 500-1000cc. | Procedure or surgery | Irrigation |
Primary outcome
Intra-operative nausea
Time frame: intra-operative
Any nausea reported by the patient during the cesarean section
2 secondary outcomes
Post operative GI disturbance
Time frame: 2-3 days post operatively
Infection
Time frame: 2-3 days post operatively
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Nov 2011.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22617574Viney R, Isaacs C, Chelmow D. Intra-abdominal irrigation at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun;119(6):1106-11. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182460d09.
Related trials for Nausea
RecruitingPhase 3
Long-term Safety Study of Rimegepant in Pediatric Subjects for the Acute Treatment of Migraine
Acute Treatment of Migraine
RecruitingPhase 3
Randomized Study in Children and Adolescents With Migraine: Acute Treatment
Pediatric Migraine
Not yet recruiting
Manual Acupuncture for Intradialytic Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis
Intradialytic Nausea and Vomiting, Chronic Kidney Disease
Not yet recruiting
Amisulpride Injection for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
PONV
Not yet recruiting
Binaural Beats and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christine Isaacs, MD principal investigator
VCU Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Normal Saline Irrigation in people with Nausea and Vomiting, run by Virginia Commonwealth University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Nov 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Intra-operative nausea (time frame: intra-operative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01479712, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Nov 2011.