Refractive ErrorNCT01484938
Lens Wearing Experience and Biocompatibility of a Marketed Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution in Silicone Hydrogel and Soft Contact Lens Wearers
A study testing OPTI-FREE PureMoist in people with Refractive Error, run by Alcon Research at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to describe mean differences in corneal staining (type and area) for OPTI-FREE PureMoist Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution (MPDS) at Day 30 compared to Baseline (Day 0). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Refractive Error
- What is being tested?
- OPTI-FREE PureMoist
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 175 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2011to May 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years or older
- Soft contact lens wear on a daily wear basis
- Able to wear contact lenses for at least 8 hours
- Generally healthy and have normal ocular health
- Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply
Who cannot join
- No use of additional lens cleaners
- No known sensitivities to any ingredient in the test article
- No history of ocular surgery/trauma within the last six months
- Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Contact Alcon Call Center for Trial Locations
Fort Worth, Texas, 76134
About this study
The purpose of this study was to describe mean differences in corneal staining (type and area) for OPTI-FREE PureMoist Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution (MPDS) at Day 30 compared to Baseline (Day 0).
- Conditions
- Refractive Error
- Being tested
- OPTI-FREE PureMoist
- Keywords
- Soft contact lenses, Multi-purpose solution, Corneal staining
- Medical subject headings
- Refractive Errors
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OPTI-FREE PureMoistDevice
Commercially marketed multi-purpose contact lens solution for cleaning, rinsing, disinfecting/storing, and reinserting contact lenses
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| OPTI-FREE | Experimental | OPTI-FREE PureMoist multi-purpose contact lens solution used for cleaning, rinsing, disinfecting/storing, and reinserting contact lenses, per protocol-specified regimen Receives: Device: OPTI-FREE PureMoist |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Average Corneal Staining Area at Day 30
Percentage corneal staining was assessed by the investigator for each of five regions of the cornea; i.e., four quadrants plus central. The investigator instilled flourescein dye and examined the cornea with a slit lamp, i.e., biomicroscope and yellow filter. Percentage corneal staining was recorded in increments of ten, and the percentages of the five regions were averaged together.
Measured: Baseline (Day 0), Day 30
Mean Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Total Corneal Staining Type at Day 30
Corneal staining type was assessed by the investigator for each of five regions of the cornea, i.e., four quadrants plus central. The investigator instilled flourescein dye and examined the cornea with a slit lamp, i.e., biomicroscope and yellow filter. Corneal staining type was recorded on a 5-point scale for each region: 0=none; 1=micropunctate; 2=macropunctate; 3=coalesced macropunctate; 4=patch (>/= 1 mm). The five regions were summed, for a summed total range of 0-20.
Measured: Baseline (Day 0), Day 30
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2011
- Primary completionMay 2011
- Study completionMay 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Refractive ErrorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Alcon ResearchThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 175 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alcon Research
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jami R Kern, Study director, Alcon Research
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01484938
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C-10-017
- Status last verified
- Oct 2012
- First submitted
- 1 Dec 2011
- Last updated
- 10 Oct 2012
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Oct 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Lens Wearing Experience and Biocompatibility of a Marketed Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution in Silicone Hydrogel and Soft Contact Lens Wearers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01484938
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C-10-017
- Conditions
- Refractive Error
- Keywords
- Soft contact lenses, Multi-purpose solution, Corneal staining
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 175 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Alcon ResearchIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2011
- Primary completion
- May 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Oct 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to describe mean differences in corneal staining (type and area) for OPTI-FREE PureMoist Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution (MPDS) at Day 30 compared to Baseline (Day 0).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| OPTI-FREE | Experimental | Device: OPTI-FREE PureMoistOPTI-FREE PureMoist multi-purpose contact lens solution used for cleaning, rinsing, disinfecting/storing, and reinserting contact lenses, per protocol-specified regimen |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- 18 years or older
- Soft contact lens wear on a daily wear basis
- Able to wear contact lenses for at least 8 hours
- Generally healthy and have normal ocular health
- Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- No use of additional lens cleaners
- No known sensitivities to any ingredient in the test article
- No history of ocular surgery/trauma within the last six months
- Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OPTI-FREE PureMoistCommercially marketed multi-purpose contact lens solution for cleaning, rinsing, disinfecting/storing, and reinserting contact lenses | Device | OPTI-FREE |
Primary outcome
Mean Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Average Corneal Staining Area at Day 30
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 30
Percentage corneal staining was assessed by the investigator for each of five regions of the cornea; i.e., four quadrants plus central. The investigator instilled flourescein dye and examined the cornea with a slit lamp, i.e., biomicroscope and yellow filter. Percentage corneal staining was recorded in increments of ten, and the percentages of the five regions were averaged together.
Mean Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Total Corneal Staining Type at Day 30
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 30
Corneal staining type was assessed by the investigator for each of five regions of the cornea, i.e., four quadrants plus central. The investigator instilled flourescein dye and examined the cornea with a slit lamp, i.e., biomicroscope and yellow filter. Corneal staining type was recorded on a 5-point scale for each region: 0=none; 1=micropunctate; 2=macropunctate; 3=coalesced macropunctate; 4=patch (>/= 1 mm). The five regions were summed, for a summed total range of 0-20.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Oct 2012.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Refractive Error
Recruiting
Managing Premyopia in Chinese Children Using Artificial Intelligence Assisted Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments Based Spectacle Lens: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Pre-myopia, Myopia
Not yet recruiting
BRIGHT-LIGHT: Studying Red Light Therapy for Severe Short-Sightedness or Short-Sightedness That Worsens Despite Standard Treatment
Myopia, Myopia Progressing
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Performance and Outcomes After Toric Lens Transition
Astigmatism
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Psilocybin for Amblyopia - Targeting Critical Periods in Humans
Amblyopia
Recruiting
Evaluation of a New Laser Refractive Vision Correction Using the TENEO™ 317 Model 2
Hyperopia and Myopia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jami R Kern study director
Alcon Research
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing OPTI-FREE PureMoist in people with Refractive Error, run by Alcon Research at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Oct 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Oct 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Average Corneal Staining Area at Day 30 (time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 30). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Oct 2012.