Cervical DystoniaPhase 4NCT01486264
Open-Label Non-Inferiority Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Xeomin® in Subjects With Cervical Dystonia Flex
A Phase 4 study testing Xeomin® in people with Cervical Dystonia, run by Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH at 43 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study will compare Xeomin®, a botulinum toxin medication, in shorter treatment intervals (Short Flex dosing) to the standard interval dosing (Long Flex dosing) to determine if the response to treatment is comparable in both how it works and any side effects. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 81 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Dystonia
- What is being tested?
- Xeomin®
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 283 participants
- Where
- 43 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 20 Jan 2012to 29 Mar 2016
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 81 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Documented clinical diagnosis of idiopathic or genetic Cervical Dystonia
Who cannot join
- Current treatment with botulinum toxin of any type for any other indication (including aesthetic indications) and for any body region during the study.
Trial locations and contacts
43 sites in 1 country.
43 sites in 1 country
United States43 sites
Merz Investigative Site #001221
Albany, New York, 12208
Merz Investigative Site #001055
Atlanta, Georgia, 30329
Merz Investigative Site #001234
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294-0017
Merz Investigative Site #001076
Boca Raton, Florida, 33486
Merz Investigative Site# 01252
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207
Merz Investigative Site# 01255
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Merz Investigative Site #001215
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Merz Investigative Site #1265
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Merz Investigative Site #1074
Dallas, Texas, 75214
Merz Investigative Site #001223
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Merz Investigative Site # 01069
Des Moines, Iowa, 50309
Merz Investigative Site # 001018
Detroit, Michigan, 48201-2153
Merz Investigative Site #001005
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
Merz Investigative Site # 0001275
Eagan, Minnesota, 55121
Merz Investigative Site # 001071
Elkridge, Maryland, 21075
Merz Investigative Site #001030
Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48334
Merz Investigative Site 001017
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
Merz Investigative Site #001019
Gainesville, Florida, 32610
Merz Investigative Site # 0001271
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
Merz Investigative Site # 001216
Houston, Texas, 77030
Merz Investigative Site# 001266
Houston, Texas, 77030
Merz Investigative Site #001046
Jacksonville, Florida, 32209
Merz Investigative Site #001224
Kirkland, Washington, 98034
Merz Investigative Site #001225
Loma Linda, California, 92354-3450
Merz Investigative Site #001219
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Merz Investigative Site # 001276
Manchester, Connecticut, 06040
Merz Investigative Site #001075
Melbourne, Florida, 32901
Merz Investigative Site #001206
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-2551
Merz Investigative Site #001233
New York, New York, 10003
Merz Investigative Site #1256
New York, New York, 10029-6574
Merz Investigative Site #001110
Overland Park, Kansas, 66211
Merz Investigative Site #1249
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Merz Investigative Site #001217
Port Charlotte, Florida, 33980
Merz Investigative Site #1033
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Merz Investigative Site #1251
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Merz Investigative Site# 01260
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
Merz Investigative Site #1270
Seattle, Washington, 98122
Merz Investigative Site #1250
St Louis, Missouri, 63104
Merz Investigative Site #001210
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Merz Investigative Site #1253
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Merz Investigative Site #001220
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136
Merz Investigative Site #001231
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
Merz Investigative Site #001009
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
About this study
Official title: An Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Two Injection Schedules of Xeomin® (incobotulinumtoxinA) [Short Flex Versus Long Flex] in Subjects With Cervical Dystonia With < 10 Weeks of Benefit From OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment
This study will compare Xeomin®, a botulinum toxin medication, in shorter treatment intervals (Short Flex dosing) to the standard interval dosing (Long Flex dosing) to determine if the response to treatment is comparable in both how it works and any side effects. Xeomin® is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of cervical dystonia (CD). The use of Xeomin® is investigational in regards to shorter treatment intervals. An investigational use is one that is not approved by the FDA.
Read the detailed description
Dystonia is a movement disorder which is characterized by sustained, involuntary muscle contractions which frequently causes twisting and repetitive movements or abnormal postures of the trunk, neck, face, or arms and legs. In focal dystonia, the abnormal movements involve a single area of the body. A commonly described form of focal dystonia is cervical dystonia (CD). Botulinum toxin treatment can be offered as a treatment option for the treatment of CD.
The current practice for botulinum toxin injection treatment is to inject patients every 3 months. However, not all patients receive continuing benefit from botulinum toxin injections for an entire 3 months. In a recent survey, approximately 45% of patients report that they would prefer a treatment cycle of less than 10 weeks.This study will compare Xeomin®, a botulinum toxin treatment, in shorter treatment intervals (Short Flex dosing) to the standard interval dosing (Long Flex dosing) to determine if the response to treatment is comparable in both how it works and any side effects. Xeomin® is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of CD. The use of Xeomin® is investigational in regards to shorter treatment intervals. An investigational use is one that is not approved by the FDA.
The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the efficacy of the Short Flex dosing of Xeomin® compared to the Long Flex dosing regimen of Xeomin®, using a standard scale completed by the doctors and subjects as well as questionnaires that ask subjects to rate symptoms of CD.
- Conditions
- Cervical Dystonia
- Being tested
- Xeomin®
- Medical subject headings
- Torticollis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Xeomin®Biological
Also called botulinum toxin, botulinum toxin type A
Xeomin is botulinum toxin type A produced from fermentation of Hall strain Clostridium botulinum serotype A
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Xeomin® Short Flex | Active comparator | short flex dosing of Xeomin. It is a botulinum toxin type A produced from fermentation of Hall strain Clostridium botulinum serotype A. Receives: Biological: Xeomin® |
| Xeomin® Long Flex | Active comparator | long flex dosing of Xeomin. It is a botulinum toxin type A produced from fermentation of Hall strain Clostridium botulinum serotype A. Receives: Biological: Xeomin® |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Severity Subscale Score Based on Blinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The validated assessment scale TWSTRS was used to measure the impact of cervical dystonia (CD) on participants. A blinded rater performed all TWSTRS-Severity subscale assessments for a given participant. TWSTRS-Severity subscale score ranges from 0 (=absence of severity) to 35 points (=maximum severity).
Measured: Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Secondary outcomes (12)
Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Total Score Based on Blinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The validated assessment scale TWSTRS was used to measure the impact of CD on participants. The scale comprised of 3 subscales: Severity, Disability, and Pain, each of which was scored independently. A blinded rater performed all TWSTRS assessments for a given participant. TWSTRS-Severity subscale score ranges from 0 (=absence of severity) to 35 points (=maximum severity); TWSTRS-Disability subscale score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability); and TWSTRS-Pain subscale score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). The total of these 3 comprises the TWSTRS total score which is scored from 0 (no symptoms) to 85 (worst symptoms). Higher scores indicate a greater impact of CD on participant.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Total Score Based on Unblinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The validated assessment scale TWSTRS was used to measure the impact of CD on participant. The scale comprised of 3 subscales: Severity, Disability, and Pain, each of which was scored independently. An unblinded rater performed all TWSTRS assessments for a given participant. TWSTRS-Severity subscale score ranges from 0 (=absence of severity) to 35 points (=maximum severity); TWSTRS-Disability subscale score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability); and TWSTRS-Pain subscale score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). The total of these 3 comprises the TWSTRS total score which is scored from 0 (least symptoms) to 85 (worst symptoms). Higher scores indicate a greater impact of CD on participant.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Severity Subscale Based on Unblinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The validated assessment scale TWSTRS was used to measure the impact of cervical dystonia (CD) on participants. An unblinded rater performed all TWSTRS-Severity subscale assessments for a given participant. TWSTRS-Severity score ranges from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity).
Measured: Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Disability Subscale Based on Unblinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The validated assessment scale TWSTRS was used to measure the impact of CD on participant. An unblinded rater performed all TWSTRS-Disability subscale assessments for a given participant. TWSTRS-Disability score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability).
Measured: Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Pain Subscale Based on Unblinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The validated assessment scale TWSTRS was used to measure the impact of CD on participants. An unblinded rater performed all TWSTRS-Pain subscale assessments for a given participant. TWSTRS-Pain score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain).
Measured: Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Change From Control Visit Week 4 After First Injection in Investigator-Rated Global Response at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The Investigator-Rated Global Response assessment for each Xeomin treatment was scored using a 9-point scale with a score ranging from -4 to +4 as follows: -4 (very marked worsening); -3 (marked worsening); -2 (moderately worsening); 1 (minimally worsening); 0 (no change); +1 (minimally improved); +2 (moderately improved); +3 (significantly improved); +4 (complete abolishment of signs and symptoms).
Measured: Week 4 and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Change From Control Visit Week 4 After First Injection in Subject-Rated Global Response at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The Subject-Rated Global Response assessment for each Xeomin treatment was scored using a 9-point scale with a score ranging from -4 to +4 as follows: -4 (very marked worsening); -3 (marked worsening); -2 (moderately worsening); 1 (minimally worsening); 0 (no change); +1 (minimally improved); +2 (moderately improved); +3 (significantly improved); +4 (complete abolishment of signs and symptoms).
Measured: Week 4 and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Change From Control Visit Week 4 After First Injection in Subject Satisfaction Score at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The Subject Satisfaction assessment for each Xeomin treatment was scored using a 10-point scale to answer the question, "How satisfied are you at the moment with your current therapy? Score ranges from: 1 (completely satisfied) to 10 (completely unsatisfied).
Measured: Week 4 and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity
Assessment of Clinical Global Impression Severity was scored using a 7-point scale for severity of illness, in response to the question, "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how ill is the participant at this time?" With scores as: 0 (not assessed); 1 (normal, not ill at all); 2 (borderline ill); 3 (mildly ill); 4 (moderately ill); 5 (markedly ill); 6 (severely ill); and 7 (among the most extremely ill participants).
Measured: Baseline and 8th injection (Week 44 for Short Flex and Week 84 for Long Flex)
Change From Baseline in Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile-58 (CDIP-58) Total Score at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The CDIP-58 assesses the health impact of CD. The CDIP-58 is composed of eight domains: head and neck (6 items; 6 to 30 points), pain and discomfort (5 items; 5 to 25 points), upper limb activities (9 items; 9 to 45 points), walking (9 items; 9 to 45 points), sleep (4 items; 4 to 20 points), annoyance (8 items; 8 to 40 points), mood (7 items; 7 to 35 points), and psychosocial functioning (10 items; 10 to 50 points). Subscale scores were transformed to a common theoretical range of 0 (no impact) to 100 (most impact). Transformation to a 0 to 100 scale for the sum scores of the sub- and total scales were done using the following formula (all single items have scores from 1 to 5): S0 to 100 =25 * ([ SO / NI] - 1), S0 to 100 = transformed sum score. SO = sum score of the original sub- / total scale. NI = number of items in the sub- / total scale. Negative changes from the baseline total score indicate improvement in the impact of CD on health whereas positive changes indicate worsening.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Change From Baseline in CDIP-58 Subscales' Scores at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The CDIP-58 assesses the health impact of CD. The CDIP-58 is composed of eight domains: head and neck (6 items; 6 to 30 points), pain and discomfort (5 items; 5 to 25 points), upper limb activities (9 items; 9 to 45 points), walking (9 items; 9 to 45 points), sleep (4 items; 4 to 20 points), annoyance (8 items; 8 to 40 points), mood (7 items; 7 to 35 points), and psychosocial functioning (10 items; 10 to 50 points). Subscale scores were transformed to a common theoretical range of 0 (no impact) to 100 (most impact). Negative changes from the baseline scores indicate improvement in the impact of CD on health whereas positive changes indicate worsening.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Time to Offset of Xeomin Effects by Injection Cycle
The Offset Questionnaire was a single question: "On most days last week, have you noticed that your CD symptoms are better, worse or the same as the week prior? Time to offset of effect was calculated from date of first onset of effect to date of offset of effects.
Measured: Week 4 up to Week 112
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Study start20 Jan 2012
- Primary completion29 Mar 2016
- Study completion29 Mar 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical DystoniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 283 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Merz North America, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Michael Kulagowski, MD, Study director, Merz North America, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01486264
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MUS60201_4073_1
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 2 Dec 2011
- Last updated
- 27 Oct 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Comella C, Hauser RA, Isaacson SH, Truong D, Oguh O, Hui J, Molho ES, Brodsky M, Furr-Stimming E, Comes G, Hast MA, Charles D. Efficacy and safety of two incobotulinumtoxinA injection intervals in cervical dystonia patients with inadequate benefit from standard injection intervals of botulinum toxin: Phase 4, open-label, randomized, noninferiority study. Clin Park Relat Disord. 2022 Mar 14;6:100142. doi: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2022.100142. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 35330880
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Oct 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Two Injection Schedules of Xeomin® (incobotulinumtoxinA) [Short Flex Versus Long Flex] in Subjects With Cervical Dystonia With < 10 Weeks of Benefit From OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01486264
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MUS60201_4073_1
- Conditions
- Cervical Dystonia
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 283 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbHIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Merz North America, Inc.
- Study start
- 20 Jan 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Mar 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Mar 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 Sep 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will compare Xeomin®, a botulinum toxin medication, in shorter treatment intervals (Short Flex dosing) to the standard interval dosing (Long Flex dosing) to determine if the response to treatment is comparable in both how it works and any side effects. Xeomin® is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of cervical dystonia (CD). The use of Xeomin® is investigational in regards to shorter treatment intervals. An investigational use is one that is not approved by the FDA.
Detailed description
Dystonia is a movement disorder which is characterized by sustained, involuntary muscle contractions which frequently causes twisting and repetitive movements or abnormal postures of the trunk, neck, face, or arms and legs. In focal dystonia, the abnormal movements involve a single area of the body. A commonly described form of focal dystonia is cervical dystonia (CD). Botulinum toxin treatment can be offered as a treatment option for the treatment of CD.
The current practice for botulinum toxin injection treatment is to inject patients every 3 months. However, not all patients receive continuing benefit from botulinum toxin injections for an entire 3 months. In a recent survey, approximately 45% of patients report that they would prefer a treatment cycle of less than 10 weeks.This study will compare Xeomin®, a botulinum toxin treatment, in shorter treatment intervals (Short Flex dosing) to the standard interval dosing (Long Flex dosing) to determine if the response to treatment is comparable in both how it works and any side effects. Xeomin® is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of CD. The use of Xeomin® is investigational in regards to shorter treatment intervals. An investigational use is one that is not approved by the FDA.
The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the efficacy of the Short Flex dosing of Xeomin® compared to the Long Flex dosing regimen of Xeomin®, using a standard scale completed by the doctors and subjects as well as questionnaires that ask subjects to rate symptoms of CD.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Xeomin® Short Flex | Active comparator | Biological: Xeomin®short flex dosing of Xeomin. It is a botulinum toxin type A produced from fermentation of Hall strain Clostridium botulinum serotype A. |
| Xeomin® Long Flex | Active comparator | Biological: Xeomin®long flex dosing of Xeomin. It is a botulinum toxin type A produced from fermentation of Hall strain Clostridium botulinum serotype A. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 81 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Documented clinical diagnosis of idiopathic or genetic Cervical Dystonia
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Current treatment with botulinum toxin of any type for any other indication (including aesthetic indications) and for any body region during the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Xeomin®Also: botulinum toxin, botulinum toxin type AXeomin is botulinum toxin type A produced from fermentation of Hall strain Clostridium botulinum serotype A | Biological | Xeomin® Long Flex, Xeomin® Short Flex |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Severity Subscale Score Based on Blinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
The validated assessment scale TWSTRS was used to measure the impact of cervical dystonia (CD) on participants. A blinded rater performed all TWSTRS-Severity subscale assessments for a given participant. TWSTRS-Severity subscale score ranges from 0 (=absence of severity) to 35 points (=maximum severity).
12 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Total Score Based on Blinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Total Score Based on Unblinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Severity Subscale Based on Unblinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Disability Subscale Based on Unblinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Pain Subscale Based on Unblinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Change From Control Visit Week 4 After First Injection in Investigator-Rated Global Response at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Time frame: Week 4 and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Change From Control Visit Week 4 After First Injection in Subject-Rated Global Response at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Time frame: Week 4 and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Change From Control Visit Week 4 After First Injection in Subject Satisfaction Score at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Time frame: Week 4 and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity
Time frame: Baseline and 8th injection (Week 44 for Short Flex and Week 84 for Long Flex)
Change From Baseline in Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile-58 (CDIP-58) Total Score at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Change From Baseline in CDIP-58 Subscales' Scores at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Time to Offset of Xeomin Effects by Injection Cycle
Time frame: Week 4 up to Week 112
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Oct 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 35330880Comella C, Hauser RA, Isaacson SH, Truong D, Oguh O, Hui J, Molho ES, Brodsky M, Furr-Stimming E, Comes G, Hast MA, Charles D. Efficacy and safety of two incobotulinumtoxinA injection intervals in cervical dystonia patients with inadequate benefit from standard injection intervals of botulinum toxin: Phase 4, open-label, randomized, noninferiority study. Clin Park Relat Disord. 2022 Mar 14;6:100142. doi: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2022.100142. eCollection 2022.
Related trials for Cervical Dystonia
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of VIM0423 in Individuals With Isolated Dystonia
Dystonia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessment of Cervical Range of Motion Restrictions in Infants With Arthrogenic Torticollis - A Feasibility Study
Torticollis (Arthrogenic)
Recruiting
Effect of Vibro-tactile Stimulation Intensity on Head Posture in Cervical Dystonia
Cervical Dystonia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
An Observational Study of Individuals With Isolated Dystonia
Isolated/Primary Dystonia That Affects More Than One Region of the Body
Recruiting
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Cervical Dystonia
Cervical Dystonia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael Kulagowski, MD study director
Merz North America, Inc.
43 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Xeomin® in people with Cervical Dystonia, run by Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH at 43 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 43 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Sep 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Severity Subscale Score Based on Blinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection (time frame: Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01486264, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Oct 2022.