Hip FracturesQ-HIPNCT01487772
Improving Quality of Care for Hip-Fracture Patients: Studies on Fast-track Surgery
An observational study of Hip Fractures, run by Danderyd Hospital at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
The aims of the studies are to examine the impact of delayed time to surgery for hip-fracture patients with regard to in-hospital complication rate and one-year mortality and to evaluate two different fast-track systems for hip-fracture patients with regard to patient outcome, complication rate and patient… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Hip Fractures
- How many people
- 1,307 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- Apr 2010to Apr 2013
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: All hip-fracture patients admitted to the Orthopaedic Department of Danderyd Hospital during a two-year period.
Who may be able to join
- Hip fracture
Who cannot join
- Periprosthetic fractures
- Pathological fractures
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The aims of the studies are to examine the impact of delayed time to surgery for hip-fracture patients with regard to in-hospital complication rate and one-year mortality and to evaluate two different fast-track systems for hip-fracture patients with regard to patient outcome, complication rate and patient satisfaction.
Read the detailed description
The aims of the studies are to examine the impact of delayed time to surgery for hip-fracture patients with regard to in-hospital complication rate and one-year mortality and to evaluate two different fast-track systems, the hip process pathway and the ambulance process pathway, for hip-fracture patients with regard to patient outcome, complication rate and patient satisfaction.
- Conditions
- Hip Fractures
- Medical subject headings
- Hip Fractures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hip-fracture patients | Hip-fracture patients admitted to Orthopaedic Department of Danderyd Hospital |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Complication rate
The 3-month medical complication rate
Measured: 3-months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Mortality rate
One-year mortality rate
Measured: 1-year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2010
- Primary completionApr 2013
- Study completionApr 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hip FracturesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,307 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Danderyd Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Olof Skoldenberg, Danderyd Hospital
- Investigators
- Olof Skoldenebrg, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01487772
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2010/685-32
- Acronym
- Q-HIP
- Status last verified
- Sep 2014
- First submitted
- 6 Dec 2011
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Improving Quality of Care for Hip-Fracture Patients: Studies on Fast-track Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01487772
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Q-HIP / 2010/685-32
- Conditions
- Hip Fractures
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,307 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Danderyd HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2010
- Primary completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aims of the studies are to examine the impact of delayed time to surgery for hip-fracture patients with regard to in-hospital complication rate and one-year mortality and to evaluate two different fast-track systems for hip-fracture patients with regard to patient outcome, complication rate and patient satisfaction.
Detailed description
The aims of the studies are to examine the impact of delayed time to surgery for hip-fracture patients with regard to in-hospital complication rate and one-year mortality and to evaluate two different fast-track systems, the hip process pathway and the ambulance process pathway, for hip-fracture patients with regard to patient outcome, complication rate and patient satisfaction.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hip-fracture patients | – | –Hip-fracture patients admitted to Orthopaedic Department of Danderyd Hospital |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All hip-fracture patients admitted to the Orthopaedic Department of Danderyd Hospital during a two-year period.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Hip fracture
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Periprosthetic fractures
- Pathological fractures
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Complication rate
Time frame: 3-months
The 3-month medical complication rate
1 secondary outcome
Mortality rate
Time frame: 1-year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2014.
Related trials for Hip Fractures
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Ondansetron on the Incidence of Spinal Anaesthesia-Induced Hypotension in Elderly Patients Undergoing Fracture Hip Surgery
Spinal Anaesthesia Induced Hypotension
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus PENG Block for Hip Fracture Surgery
Femur Neck Fracture, Hip Fractures
Active, not recruiting
Lumbar-Sacral Plexus Block vs Fascia Iliaca Block Plus Low-Dose Spinal Anesthesia for Femoral Neck Fracture Surgery
Femoral Neck Fractures, Nerve Block
RecruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence of SI-BONE's iFuse TORQ TNT Advancing Treatment of Pelvic Ring Fractures
Fracture; Pelvic, Insufficiency Fractures
Not yet recruiting
A Decision Support Tool for Common Surgical Fixations of Hip Fractures
Hip Fracture Surgeries, High Risk Population of Hip Fractures
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Olof Skoldenebrg, MD, PhD principal investigator
Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Hip Fractures, run by Danderyd Hospital at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Complication rate (time frame: 3-months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2014.