AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseasePHARAOHNCT01489917

A-priori Versus Provisional Heparin on Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Coronary Angiography and Patent Hemostasis

A study testing Patent hemostasis and heparin in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Olivier F. Bertrand at 3 sites in 3 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The Provisional Heparin TherApy on Radial Artery Occlusion after transradial coronary angiography and patent Hemostasis (PHARAOH) study compares the strategy of standard a-priori heparin use in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography to a strategy of provisional heparin administration only if patent… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Artery Disease
What is being tested?
Patent hemostasis and heparin
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
428 participants
Where
3 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
May 2009to Dec 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • all diagnostic cardiac cath patients

Who cannot join

  • warfarin therapy
  • previous ipsilateral TRA
  • lack of consent
  • abnormal (type D) Barbeau test
  • scleroderma
  • thrombocytopenia
  • or other contraindications to heparin

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 3 countries.

3 sites in 3 countries

United States1 site
  • Commonwealth Medical College,

    Scranton, Pennsylvania, 18509

Other trials in United States

Canada1 site
  • IUCPQ

    Québec, Quebec

Other trials in Canada

India1 site
  • Sheth VS General Hospital,

    Ahmedabad

Other trials in India

About this study

Official title: Comparison of A-priori Versus Provisional Heparin Therapy on Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Coronary Angiography and Patent Hemostasis

The Provisional Heparin TherApy on Radial Artery Occlusion after transradial coronary angiography and patent Hemostasis (PHARAOH) study compares the strategy of standard a-priori heparin use in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography to a strategy of provisional heparin administration only if patent hemostasis is not achievable.

Read the detailed description

Transradial access use for coronary angiography and intervention is increasing. Its efficacy in lowering access site complications, as well as increased patient comfort, has been proven unequivocally. One of the complications of transradial access is radial artery occlusion (RAO) that occurs with a variable incidence. It is population specific, with a higher prevalence in subsets, such as women, and patient's with small radial arteries. RAO is also known to be higher at hospital discharge and radial recanalization may spontaneously occur at later times. It is usually asymptomatic. Its main adverse impact is by limiting future transradial access from that radial artery. Since most of the patient's with atherosclerotic vascular disease may undergo several invasive procedures during their lifetime, prevention of RAO is of paramount importance.

Heparinization, during the procedure, has been shown to be of benefit in lowering the incidence of RAO. Maintaining patency of the radial artery during hemostasis, has also been shown to be effective in prevention of RAO following transradial access. As maintenance of flow has potent antithrombotic effect, it is unclear whether systemic anticoagulation is still required in all cases.

In some cases, it would be preferable to avoid heparin administration prior to coronary angiography. It is currently unknown whether it would be safe to refrain from heparin administration in case of transradial catheterization and patent hemostasis technique.

Being tested
Patent hemostasis and heparin
Keywords
radial artery occlusion, hemostasis, coronary intervention, radial approach
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease, Arterial Occlusive Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Patent hemostasis and heparinOther

    Radial artery patency is verified. If not maintained, then a bolus of heparin 50 U/kg or a maximum of 5000 units is administered and the compression (TR band) is left in place for 2 hours.

Study groups in NCT01489917
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Compression without adjustmentNo interventionTR band (Terumo medical) applied. The TR band is then deflated gradually till pulsatile bleeding is observed under the transparent plastic inflatable chamber and then 1-2 cc of air is placed back in the TR band chamber to stop bleeding. The band is left in place for 2 hours and not adjusted further unless patient complained of symptoms or bleeding occurred.
Patent hemostasis & heparinExperimentalTR-band is placed and positioned similarly to the other study arm. However, in theses cases, patency is evaluated at the time of application of the TR-band, and monitored every 15 minutes afterwards till the band is removed and hemostasis completed. After TR-band placement, if maintenance of radial artery patency is obtained, no heparin is administered and TR band is left in place for 1-hour. If radial artery patency is not maintained, a bolus of heparin 50 U/kg or a maximum of 5000 units is administered and the band is left in place for 2 hours.
Receives: Other: Patent hemostasis and heparin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Radial artery occlusion

    Plethysmography, confirmed with duplex Doppler ultrasonography

    Measured: At 30 days after the cathlab procedure

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Radial artery occlusion

    Plethysmography, confirmed with duplex Doppler ultrasonography

    Measured: At 24 hours after the cathlab procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Dec 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2009
  3. Primary completionDec 2011
  4. Study completionDec 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
428 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01489917
Sponsor's protocol ID
PHARAOH
Acronym
PHARAOH
Status last verified
Dec 2011
First submitted
1 Dec 2011
Last updated
8 May 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Patent hemostasis and heparin in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Olivier F. Bertrand at 3 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States, Canada, India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Radial artery occlusion (time frame: At 30 days after the cathlab procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in