AzTrials
AzTrials

Upper Gastrointestinal SymptomssafendoscopyNCT01492296

Endoscopy With Short Fasting

A study testing endoscopy after short fasting and conventional fasting in people with Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms, run by Universidade de Passo Fundo at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is widely used in the clinical practice. An empty stomach is required to ensure quality and safety. For this reason, endoscopy is conventionally performed after 8 or more hours of fasting, which is potentially related to discomfort to the patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms
What is being tested?
endoscopy after short fasting and conventional fasting
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
115 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
Mar 2011to Nov 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • elective endoscopy

Who cannot join

  • poor clinical condition

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Hospital Sao Vicente de Paulo

    Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Safety, Quality and Comfort of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy With Conscious Sedation After Fasting for Two Hours

Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is widely used in the clinical practice. An empty stomach is required to ensure quality and safety. For this reason, endoscopy is conventionally performed after 8 or more hours of fasting, which is potentially related to discomfort to the patients. In recent studies, surgical cholecystectomy has been described to be safe after two hours of fasting on liquids. The aim of this study is to assess safety, quality and comfort of upper GI endoscopy after two hours of fasting.

Being tested
endoscopy after short fasting, conventional fasting

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • endoscopy after short fastingProcedure or surgery

    patients were evaluated with endoscopy after fasting for two hours

  • conventional fastingProcedure or surgery

    patients were evaluated after fasting for 8 hours

Study groups in NCT01492296
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
conventional fastingActive comparatorpatients were evaluated after fasting for 8 hours
Receives: Procedure: conventional fasting
Short fastingExperimentalpatients who were evaluated with endoscopy after fasting for two hours
Receives: Procedure: endoscopy after short fasting

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. safety

    safety of endoscopy after fasting for two hours will be assessed by means of a questionnaire replied by the endoscopists, questioning occurrence of aspiration and regurgitation of gastric contents into the esophagus.

    Measured: 10 min (endoscopy duration)

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. quality

    Quality of endoscopy will be assessed by means of a questionnaire replied by the endoscopists, including (1) presence of liquid in the gastric lumen (2) quality of mucosa visualization (3)period needed for gastric aspiration

    Measured: 10 min (endoscopy duration)

  2. Endoscopy comfort

    Endoscopy comfort will be evaluated by the patients by means of a questionnaire replied after the procedures. It will include questions about thirst, hunger, anxiety, weakness and nausea.

    Measured: 8 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Dec 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2011
  3. Primary completionNov 2011
  4. Study completionNov 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
115 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01492296
Sponsor's protocol ID
safendoscopy
Acronym
safendoscopy
Status last verified
Dec 2011
First submitted
5 Dec 2011
Last updated
14 Dec 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Koeppe AT, Lubini M, Bonadeo NM, Moraes I Jr, Fornari F. Comfort, safety and quality of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy after 2 hours fasting: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov 9;13:158. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-158.

    PubMed 24209639

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing endoscopy after short fasting and conventional fasting in people with Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms, run by Universidade de Passo Fundo at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Dec 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

safety (time frame: 10 min (endoscopy duration)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01492296, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Dec 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in