Surgical Site InfectionPhase 3CHGNCT01495117
Study of Chlorhexidine Gluconate as a Preoperative Antisepsis
A Phase 3 study testing Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine gluconate in people with Surgical Site Infection, run by Seung Duk Lee at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine which drug (chlorhexidine gluconate vs. povidone iodine) as a preoperative antisepsis in clean-contaminated abdominal surgery (liver, hepatobiliary, small or large bowel, stomach) is effective. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Surgical Site Infection
- What is being tested?
- Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine gluconate
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 534 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Oct 2011to Oct 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Resection of following organs (clean-contaminated open surgery)
- Liver, Pancreas, Bile duct, Duodenum
- Stomach
- Colon, Small bowel
- Aged 20 - 85 years old
- Use Prophylactic antibiotics
Show all 14Show fewer
- Use Preoperative bowel preparation
- Elective operation
- ASA classification 1-2 ASA I : no known systemic disease ASA II : single systemic disease \& mild or well controlled ASA III : multiple systemic diseases or moderately controlled systemic disease ASA IV : poorly controlled systemic diseases
- adequate organ functions defined as indicated below:
- WBC 3000 ~ 12 000/mm3
- > Hb 8.0 g/dl
- > Plt 100 000/mm3
- < Cr 1.2 mg/dl
Who cannot join
- allergy to chlorhexidine or povidone
- clean surgery or contaminated surgery
- patients who cannot be followed up during 1 month
- patients taking immunosuppressant drugs or chemotherapy agents
- emergent surgery and reoperation
- uncontrolled diabetes, BMI > 30 kg/m2
- vulnerable patients
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Korea1 site
National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea
Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 410-769
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Chlorhexidine Gluconate and Povidone Iodine as a Preoperative Antisepsis in Clean-contaminated Abdominal Surgery : a Randomized Prospective Trial
The purpose of this study is to determine which drug (chlorhexidine gluconate vs. povidone iodine) as a preoperative antisepsis in clean-contaminated abdominal surgery (liver, hepatobiliary, small or large bowel, stomach) is effective.
- Conditions
- Surgical Site Infection
- Being tested
- Povidone-Iodine, Chlorhexidine gluconate
- Keywords
- surgical site infection, chlorhexidine gluconate, povidone iodine
- Medical subject headings
- Surgical Wound Infection
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Povidone-IodineDrug
Also called 7.5% POVICLEAN BRUSH (SUNGKWANG PHARM), 10% POVIDONE IODINE SOLUTION (SUNGKWANG PHARM)
7.5% povidone iodine soaping 10% povidone iodine painting
Chlorhexidine gluconateDrug
Also called 4% HEXICLEN BRUSH (SUNGKWANG PHARM), 5% CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE SOLUTION (SUNGKWANG PHARM)
4% chlorhexidine gluconate soaping 2% chlorhexidine gluconate painting
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Povidone Iodine | Active comparator | 7.5% povidone iodine soaping 10% povidone iodine painting Receives: Drug: Povidone-Iodine |
| Chlorhexidine Gluconate | Active comparator | 4% chlorhexidine gluconate soaping 2% chlorhexidine gluconate painting Receives: Drug: Chlorhexidine gluconate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of patients with Surgical Site infection within 1month
Check the surgical site infection (SSI) rate within one month Superficial SSI, Deep SSI, Organ Site SSI decided by physician CDC Definition in 1999 Superficial incisional infection : involving only the skin or subcutaneous tissue of the incision Deep incisional Infection : involving the deep tissues (i.e. fascial and muscle layers) Organ Space Infection : involving any part of the anatomy (i.e. organ/space), other than the incision
Measured: within 1 month
Secondary outcomes (3)
Identify the infection source
If SSI occur, we check the infection source including types of bacteriae using culture.
Measured: within 1month
Number of patients with Drug Side effect.
We check the side effect of our drugs including chlorhexidine and povidione iodine.
For example, itching sense, pruritis, ulticaria, redness, anaphylaxis
Measured: Within 1 month
Number of patients with the postoperative sepsis induced by wound infection
Definition of Sepsis
- Proven infection (by culture, stain) or a clinical syndrome pathognomonic for infection (WBC, imaging finding or petechiae, purpura, or purpura fulminans)
- Body temperature (<36 or >38 Celsus Degree)
- Heart rate > 90 beats per minute
- Respiratory rate > 20 breaths per minute or, on blood gas, a PaCO2 less than 32 mmHg
- WBC count <4000 cells/mm3 or >12000 cells/mm3
Measured: within 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2011
- Primary completionOct 2014
- Study completionOct 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Surgical Site InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 534 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seung Duk Lee
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Seung Duk Lee, National Cancer Center, Korea
- Investigators
- Sung-Sik Han, Ph.D., Principal investigator, Liver Cancer Center, National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01495117
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NCCCTS-11-563
- Acronym
- CHG
- Status last verified
- Dec 2016
- First submitted
- 14 Oct 2011
- Last updated
- 21 Dec 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Park HM, Han SS, Lee EC, Lee SD, Yoon HM, Eom BW, Kim SH, Ryu KW, Park SJ, Kim YW, Park B. Randomized clinical trial of preoperative skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate or povidone-iodine. Br J Surg. 2017 Jan;104(2):e145-e150. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10395. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
PubMed 27879993
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Dec 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Chlorhexidine Gluconate and Povidone Iodine as a Preoperative Antisepsis in Clean-contaminated Abdominal Surgery : a Randomized Prospective Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01495117
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHG / NCCCTS-11-563
- Conditions
- Surgical Site Infection
- Keywords
- surgical site infection, chlorhexidine gluconate, povidone iodine
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 534 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Seung Duk LeeOther government
- Study start
- Oct 2011
- Primary completion
- Oct 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine which drug (chlorhexidine gluconate vs. povidone iodine) as a preoperative antisepsis in clean-contaminated abdominal surgery (liver, hepatobiliary, small or large bowel, stomach) is effective.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Povidone Iodine | Active comparator | Drug: Povidone-Iodine7.5% povidone iodine soaping 10% povidone iodine painting |
| Chlorhexidine Gluconate | Active comparator | Drug: Chlorhexidine gluconate4% chlorhexidine gluconate soaping 2% chlorhexidine gluconate painting |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Resection of following organs (clean-contaminated open surgery)
- Aged 20 - 85 years old
- Use Prophylactic antibiotics
- Use Preoperative bowel preparation
- Elective operation
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- allergy to chlorhexidine or povidone
- clean surgery or contaminated surgery
- patients who cannot be followed up during 1 month
- patients taking immunosuppressant drugs or chemotherapy agents
- emergent surgery and reoperation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Povidone-IodineAlso: 7.5% POVICLEAN BRUSH (SUNGKWANG PHARM), 10% POVIDONE IODINE SOLUTION (SUNGKWANG PHARM)7.5% povidone iodine soaping 10% povidone iodine painting | Drug | Povidone Iodine |
| Chlorhexidine gluconateAlso: 4% HEXICLEN BRUSH (SUNGKWANG PHARM), 5% CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE SOLUTION (SUNGKWANG PHARM)4% chlorhexidine gluconate soaping 2% chlorhexidine gluconate painting | Drug | Chlorhexidine Gluconate |
Primary outcome
Number of patients with Surgical Site infection within 1month
Time frame: within 1 month
Check the surgical site infection (SSI) rate within one month Superficial SSI, Deep SSI, Organ Site SSI decided by physician CDC Definition in 1999 Superficial incisional infection : involving only the skin or subcutaneous tissue of the incision Deep incisional Infection : involving the deep tissues (i.e. fascial and muscle layers) Organ Space Infection : involving any part of the anatomy (i.e. organ/space), other than the incision
3 secondary outcomes
Identify the infection source
Time frame: within 1month
Number of patients with Drug Side effect.
Time frame: Within 1 month
Number of patients with the postoperative sepsis induced by wound infection
Time frame: within 1 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Dec 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27879993Park HM, Han SS, Lee EC, Lee SD, Yoon HM, Eom BW, Kim SH, Ryu KW, Park SJ, Kim YW, Park B. Randomized clinical trial of preoperative skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate or povidone-iodine. Br J Surg. 2017 Jan;104(2):e145-e150. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10395. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
Related trials for Surgical Site Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pilot Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of OPTILENE® SILVER MESH ELASTIC in Prevention of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) and Incisional Hernia (IH)
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Morbid Obesity
RecruitingPhase 2
A Single Arm Phase II Trial in p16-positive Oropharynx Cancer of Selective Dose De-escalation of nodAl VolumEs at Minimal Risk and Primary Site Disease (SAVED)
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer
Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of NTP in Thyroid Surgery: Pilot Study on Morbidity Prevention and Adjuvant Oncological Control
Thyroid Diseases, Wound Healing
RecruitingObservational study
Novosyn® CHD vs Polyglactin 910 Suture to Close Wounds After Emergency or Elective Laparotomy or Laparoscopic Surgery
Surgical Site Infection
Not yet recruiting
Safety Assessment of Placing a Single Dental Implant Without Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Simple Cases: A Pilot Study
Tooth Loss and Rehabillitation, Dental Implant Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sung-Sik Han, Ph.D. principal investigator
Liver Cancer Center, National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine gluconate in people with Surgical Site Infection, run by Seung Duk Lee at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Dec 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of patients with Surgical Site infection within 1month (time frame: within 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01495117, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Dec 2016.