Coronary Artery DiseaseLeftMain/NOBLENCT01496651
PCI vs. CABG in the Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Stenosis
A study testing Percutaneous coronary intervention and Coronary artery bypass graft operation in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Evald Hoej Christiansen at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Drug Eluting Stent Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty in the Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Stenosis. In a clinical, randomized, 5-year follow-up study to compare essential clinical outcome parameters in patients with unprotected left main (LMCA) disease, treated with coronary… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- Percutaneous coronary intervention and Coronary artery bypass graft operation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,201 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 6 Nov 2008to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Stable, unstable angina pectoris or ACS.
- Significant lesion* of LMCA ostium, mid-shaft and/or bifurcation and with no more than three additional non-complex** PCI lesions.
- Patient eligible to be treated by CABG and by PCI
- Signed informed consent. *Visually assessed diameter stenosis >50% or fractional flow reserve <0.80. **Length <25 mm, non-CTO, non-2-stent bifurcation, non-calcified and non-tortuous vessel morphology coronary lesion.
Who cannot join
- ST-elevation infarction within 24 hours.
- CABG clearly better treatment option (LMCA stenosis and >3, or complex** additional coronary lesions)
- Patient is in too high risk for CABG.
- Expected survival <1 year.
- Allergy to aspirin, clopidogrel or ticlopidine.
- Allergy to Biolimus. **Length >25 mm, CTO, 2-stent bifurcation, calcified or tortuous vessel morphology coronary lesion.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Nordic-Baltic-British Left Main Revascularization Study (NOBLE)
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Drug Eluting Stent Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty in the Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Stenosis.
In a clinical, randomized, 5-year follow-up study to compare essential clinical outcome parameters in patients with unprotected left main (LMCA) disease, treated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using drug eluting stents (DES).
DES-PCI of unprotected LMCA disease is non-inferior to CABG concerning the 2-year rate of death, myocardial infarction, stroke or new revascularization and concerning the 5-year rate of death.
Read the detailed description
Design:
Randomised open multicentre trial.
Patients:
Number 1,200
Randomisation:
PCI with DES vs CABG
Individuals for inclusion will be recruited among the patients referred to the participating centers for LMCA treatment. The patients will not be recruited by advertising and will receive no honorarium for participation.
Primary and secondary endpoints will be assessed by an independent endpoint committee (IEC). The endpoint committee will consist of experienced cardiac surgeons and cardiologists.
Follow-up All patients will be seen at the outpatient clinic of the participating centers after one month and after 1, 2 ,3 ,4 and 5 years. The outpatient visit may be substituted with a telephone contact and subsequent investigation and documentation of possible study events (MACCE). Finally, there will be a 10-year registry assessment of total mortality.
The index angiograms will be assessed by the QCA-laboratories at the Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark. The left main lesion and the non-left main lesions will be described and classified and a SYNTAX SCORE calculated.
The angiography obtained during the PCI-procedure will be used as index angiography. There should be at least two cine-runs before the procedure and after the procedure with the same angulations and proceeded by 0.1 mg intracoronary nitroglycerine (documented on the angiogram). The diagnostic/guiding catheter should be well visible, near the center of the angiogram and filled with dye. The index lesion should be well visible, near the centre of the angiogram and shown without foreshortening. There should be an angulation difference between the two baseline angiograms of at least 30 degrees. Between the pre and post angiograms all balloon inflations and stent implantations should be documented by short cine-runs.
Statistics and data management:
The statistical analyses will be performed at the Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital.
Analysis population:
The results will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle, i.e. patients randomized to a certain group will be followed and assessed irrespectively of the actual treatment. Protocol violations will be noted and the responsible centers notified.
Sample size calculations:
Primary endpoint of 2-year MACCE Sample size calculation is based on the combined primary endpoint of death, stroke, non-index treatment related MI and new revascularization (PCI or CABG) after 2 years.
The study is planned as a non-inferiority study, where an experimental treatment of a disease (E, here PCI) is compared to a standard treatment (S, here CABG). E is not allowed to be more than clinically insignificantly inferior to S to be declared non-inferior. Calculations are based on the following:
- mean follow-up time 24 months
- all event curves are exponential
- zero dropout
- randomization into 2 equally sized groups
- α = 0.05 (one-sided)
- 1- β (power) = 80% The non-inferiority limit is based on a 12 months MACCE rate of 12% in the CABG and 16% in the PCI group (the SYNTAX study). With exponential event curves (S(t)=exp(-λ*t)) this corresponds to a hazard ratio of 1.36, PCI versus CABG, and, with t in months, λ=0.0107 in the CABG group. In continuation if this, the present study uses hazard ratio 1.35, E versus S, as limit for non-inferiority, and λ=0.011 to describe MACCE in the CABG group. These figures correspond to a 24-month MACCE rate of 30% and 23% in the PCI and CABG group, respectively.
The above preconditions and assumptions result in a necessary number of patients in each randomization group of 593 (and a total number of events - in both groups - of 275). Consequently, 1,186 patients should be randomized.
By including 600 patients in each group, possible dropouts before follow-up and treatment estimation errors are accounted for.
Data management The study is reported to Danish Data Protection Agency, and the agency's guidelines for data management will be followed. Dedicated case record forms will be used and faxed to PCI research, Cardiac Cath. Lab., Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark. Data will be stored in an Access database and double data entry will be used as quality control. There will be a log of accesses and attempt of accesses. Back-up data and original data will be encrypted.
Monitoring of the study:
The study will be monitored according to the GCP rules by independent professionals. During the study period, monitors will have regular contact to the participating departments to ensure that the trial is conducted in compliance with the protocol, GCP and applicable regulatory requirements.
The monitors will ensure that the used products are all right and will review source documents for verification of consistency with the data recorded in the CRFs. The monitors will also provide information and support to the investigator(s).
Investigators and other responsible personnel must be available during the monitoring visits, audits and inspections and should devote sufficient time to these processes.
The investigator should provide a CV or equivalent documentation of suitability to be responsible for the trial. All investigators and other responsible personnel should be listed together with their function in the trial on the signature list.
Publication:
Results, positive as well as negative, will be published in an international cardiovascular journal. Publication and author issues will be decided by the steering committee on basis of general involvement in the study (drafting of protocol, core lab. function, endpoint committee membership, etc.) and on number of included patients. Thus, the sequence of authors will be determined by the inclusions rates of the participating centres and the most including centre will be offered the position as first author.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- Percutaneous coronary intervention, Coronary artery bypass graft operation
- Keywords
- Percutaneous coronary intervention, Coronary artery bypass graft operation, Left Main
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Percutaneous coronary interventionProcedure or surgery
Also called PCI, PTCA
PCI will be performed by the femoral or the transradial approach. In complex distal lesion anatomies, the use of 7-8F guiding catheters and the transfemoral approach may be recommended. Ostial and mid-shaft lesions will be treated with a single stent. For the treatment of distal bifurcation lesions crush, culotte, T-stenting, V-stenting or a single stent strategy may be used according the lesion morphology and the experience of the operator. However, based on the Nordic Bifurcation Studies the culotte technique seems to be associated with especially favorable angiographic and long-term clinical results in these large vessel size bifurcation lesions.
There should be a low threshold for the use of high pressure post dilatation balloons. Generally, final kissing balloon dilatations are encouraged and mandatory when two-stent techniques are used. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in mandatory pre and post stent placement.
Coronary artery bypass graft operationProcedure or surgery
Also called CABG
Patients randomized to the CABG group for the treatment of LMCA stenosis are treated according to current clinical practice. Both off-pump and on-pump techniques can be used and the selection between the used methods is operator dependent. The left internal mammary artery will be used for the revascularization of the left anterior descending coronary artery, whenever feasible. For other lesion location, saphenous venous grafts, free arterial grafts or the right internal mammary artery may be used.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous coronary intervention | Active comparator | Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Drug Eluting Stent Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty in the Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Stenosis Receives: Procedure: Percutaneous coronary intervention |
| Coronary artery bypass graft operation | Active comparator | Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Drug Eluting Stent Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty in the Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Stenosis Receives: Procedure: Coronary artery bypass graft operation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Combined endpoint of death, stroke, non-index treatment related MI and new revascularization (PCI or CABG)
Measured: From date of first randomisation until a total number of 275 events is reached (or max 5 years).
Secondary outcomes (10)
Combined endpoint of death, stroke and non-index treatment related MI
Measured: 30 days, yearly through 5 years and when a total number of 275 events is reached.
Individual endpoints of death, stroke and non-index treatment related MI
Measured: 30 days, yearly through 5 years and when a total number of 275 events is reached.
All cause mortality
Measured: 10 years
New revascularization by CABG or PCI
Measured: 30 days, yearly through 5 years and when a total number of 275 events is reached.
Death
Measured: 30 days, yearly through 5 years and when a total number of 275 events is reached.
Definite stent thrombosis/symptomatic graft occlusion
Measured: 30 days, yearly through 5 years and when a total number of 275 events is reached.
CCS angina score
Measured: 30 days, yearly through 5 years and when a total number of 275 events is reached.
NYHA functional class
Measured: 30 days, yearly through 5 years and when a total number of 275 events is reached.
Duration of admission for index treatment
Measured: Baseline
Syntax score
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Study start6 Nov 2008
- Primary completion22 Jan 2015
- Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,201 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Evald Hoej Christiansen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Evald Hoej Christiansen, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
- Investigators
- Evald H Christiansen, MD, Principal investigator, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01496651
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LeftMain/NOBLE
- Acronym
- LeftMain/NOBLE
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 19 Dec 2011
- Last updated
- 1 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Holck EN, Holm NR, Hildick-Smith D, Lindsay MM, Spence MS, Erglis A, Menown IBA, Steigen T, Hune Mogensen LJ, Modrau IS, Niemela M, Lassen JF, Oldroyd K, Stradins P, Walsh SJ, Endresen PC, Trovik T, Frobert O, Graham ANJ, Anttila V, Trivedi U, Thuesen L, Christiansen EH. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main stenosis: 10-year final results from the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority NOBLE trial. Lancet. 2026 Apr 4;407(10536):1374-1382. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00205-9.
PubMed 41936368Gaba P, Christiansen EH, Nielsen PH, Murphy SA, O'Gara PT, Smith PK, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, Park SJ, Park DW, Stone GW, Sabik JF, Sabatine MS, Holm NR, Bergmark BA. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery for Left Main Disease in Patients With and Without Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Jul 1;8(7):631-639. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.1177.
PubMed 37256598Steigen T, Holm NR, Myrmel T, Endresen PC, Trovik T, Makikallio T, Lindsay M, Spence MS, Erglis A, Menown IBA, Kumsars I, Kellerth T, Davidavicius G, Linder R, Anttila V, Juul Hune Mogensen L, Hostrup Nielsen P, Graham ANJ, Hildick-Smith D, Thuesen L, Christiansen EH; NOBLE Study Investigators. Age-Stratified Outcome in Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A NOBLE Trial Substudy. Cardiology. 2021;146(4):409-418. doi: 10.1159/000515376. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
PubMed 33849035Holm NR, Makikallio T, Lindsay MM, Spence MS, Erglis A, Menown IBA, Trovik T, Kellerth T, Kalinauskas G, Mogensen LJH, Nielsen PH, Niemela M, Lassen JF, Oldroyd K, Berg G, Stradins P, Walsh SJ, Graham ANJ, Endresen PC, Frobert O, Trivedi U, Anttila V, Hildick-Smith D, Thuesen L, Christiansen EH; NOBLE investigators. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial. Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):191-199. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32972-1. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
PubMed 31879028Makikallio T, Holm NR, Lindsay M, Spence MS, Erglis A, Menown IB, Trovik T, Eskola M, Romppanen H, Kellerth T, Ravkilde J, Jensen LO, Kalinauskas G, Linder RB, Pentikainen M, Hervold A, Banning A, Zaman A, Cotton J, Eriksen E, Margus S, Sorensen HT, Nielsen PH, Niemela M, Kervinen K, Lassen JF, Maeng M, Oldroyd K, Berg G, Walsh SJ, Hanratty CG, Kumsars I, Stradins P, Steigen TK, Frobert O, Graham AN, Endresen PC, Corbascio M, Kajander O, Trivedi U, Hartikainen J, Anttila V, Hildick-Smith D, Thuesen L, Christiansen EH; NOBLE study investigators. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2743-2752. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32052-9. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
PubMed 27810312
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Nordic-Baltic-British Left Main Revascularization Study (NOBLE)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01496651
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LeftMain/NOBLE / LeftMain/NOBLE
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Keywords
- Percutaneous coronary intervention, Coronary artery bypass graft operation, Left Main
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,201 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Evald Hoej ChristiansenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Nov 2008 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Jan 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Drug Eluting Stent Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty in the Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Stenosis.
In a clinical, randomized, 5-year follow-up study to compare essential clinical outcome parameters in patients with unprotected left main (LMCA) disease, treated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using drug eluting stents (DES).
DES-PCI of unprotected LMCA disease is non-inferior to CABG concerning the 2-year rate of death, myocardial infarction, stroke or new revascularization and concerning the 5-year rate of death.
Detailed description
Design:
Randomised open multicentre trial.
Patients:
Number 1,200
Randomisation:
PCI with DES vs CABG
Individuals for inclusion will be recruited among the patients referred to the participating centers for LMCA treatment. The patients will not be recruited by advertising and will receive no honorarium for participation.
Primary and secondary endpoints will be assessed by an independent endpoint committee (IEC). The endpoint committee will consist of experienced cardiac surgeons and cardiologists.
Follow-up All patients will be seen at the outpatient clinic of the participating centers after one month and after 1, 2 ,3 ,4 and 5 years. The outpatient visit may be substituted with a telephone contact and subsequent investigation and documentation of possible study events (MACCE). Finally, there will be a 10-year registry assessment of total mortality.
The index angiograms will be assessed by the QCA-laboratories at the Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark. The left main lesion and the non-left main lesions will be described and classified and a SYNTAX SCORE calculated.
The angiography obtained during the PCI-procedure will be used as index angiography. There should be at least two cine-runs before the procedure and after the procedure with the same angulations and proceeded by 0.1 mg intracoronary nitroglycerine (documented on the angiogram). The diagnostic/guiding catheter should be well visible, near the center of the angiogram and filled with dye. The index lesion should be well visible, near the centre of the angiogram and shown without foreshortening. There should be an angulation difference between the two baseline angiograms of at least 30 degrees. Between the pre and post angiograms all balloon inflations and stent implantations should be documented by short cine-runs.
Statistics and data management:
The statistical analyses will be performed at the Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital.
Analysis population:
The results will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle, i.e. patients randomized to a certain group will be followed and assessed irrespectively of the actual treatment. Protocol violations will be noted and the responsible centers notified.
Sample size calculations:
Primary endpoint of 2-year MACCE Sample size calculation is based on the combined primary endpoint of death, stroke, non-index treatment related MI and new revascularization (PCI or CABG) after 2 years.
The study is planned as a non-inferiority study, where an experimental treatment of a disease (E, here PCI) is compared to a standard treatment (S, here CABG). E is not allowed to be more than clinically insignificantly inferior to S to be declared non-inferior. Calculations are based on the following:
- mean follow-up time 24 months
- all event curves are exponential
- zero dropout
- randomization into 2 equally sized groups
- α = 0.05 (one-sided)
- 1- β (power) = 80% The non-inferiority limit is based on a 12 months MACCE rate of 12% in the CABG and 16% in the PCI group (the SYNTAX study). With exponential event curves (S(t)=exp(-λ*t)) this corresponds to a hazard ratio of 1.36, PCI versus CABG, and, with t in months, λ=0.0107 in the CABG group. In continuation if this, the present study uses hazard ratio 1.35, E versus S, as limit for non-inferiority, and λ=0.011 to describe MACCE in the CABG group. These figures correspond to a 24-month MACCE rate of 30% and 23% in the PCI and CABG group, respectively.
The above preconditions and assumptions result in a necessary number of patients in each randomization group of 593 (and a total number of events - in both groups - of 275). Consequently, 1,186 patients should be randomized.
By including 600 patients in each group, possible dropouts before follow-up and treatment estimation errors are accounted for.
Data management The study is reported to Danish Data Protection Agency, and the agency's guidelines for data management will be followed. Dedicated case record forms will be used and faxed to PCI research, Cardiac Cath. Lab., Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark. Data will be stored in an Access database and double data entry will be used as quality control. There will be a log of accesses and attempt of accesses. Back-up data and original data will be encrypted.
Monitoring of the study:
The study will be monitored according to the GCP rules by independent professionals. During the study period, monitors will have regular contact to the participating departments to ensure that the trial is conducted in compliance with the protocol, GCP and applicable regulatory requirements.
The monitors will ensure that the used products are all right and will review source documents for verification of consistency with the data recorded in the CRFs. The monitors will also provide information and support to the investigator(s).
Investigators and other responsible personnel must be available during the monitoring visits, audits and inspections and should devote sufficient time to these processes.
The investigator should provide a CV or equivalent documentation of suitability to be responsible for the trial. All investigators and other responsible personnel should be listed together with their function in the trial on the signature list.
Publication:
Results, positive as well as negative, will be published in an international cardiovascular journal. Publication and author issues will be decided by the steering committee on basis of general involvement in the study (drafting of protocol, core lab. function, endpoint committee membership, etc.) and on number of included patients. Thus, the sequence of authors will be determined by the inclusions rates of the participating centres and the most including centre will be offered the position as first author.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous coronary intervention | Active comparator | Procedure: Percutaneous coronary interventionCoronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Drug Eluting Stent Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty in the Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Stenosis |
| Coronary artery bypass graft operation | Active comparator | Procedure: Coronary artery bypass graft operationCoronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Drug Eluting Stent Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty in the Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Stenosis |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Stable, unstable angina pectoris or ACS.
- Significant lesion* of LMCA ostium, mid-shaft and/or bifurcation and with no more than three additional non-complex** PCI lesions.
- Patient eligible to be treated by CABG and by PCI
- Signed informed consent. *Visually assessed diameter stenosis >50% or fractional flow reserve <0.80. **Length <25 mm, non-CTO, non-2-stent bifurcation, non-calcified and non-tortuous vessel morphology coronary lesion.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- ST-elevation infarction within 24 hours.
- CABG clearly better treatment option (LMCA stenosis and >3, or complex** additional coronary lesions)
- Patient is in too high risk for CABG.
- Expected survival <1 year.
- Allergy to aspirin, clopidogrel or ticlopidine.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous coronary interventionAlso: PCI, PTCAPCI will be performed by the femoral or the transradial approach. In complex distal lesion anatomies, the use of 7-8F guiding catheters and the transfemoral approach may be recommended. Ostial and mid-shaft lesions will be treated with a single stent. For the treatment of distal bifurcation lesions crush, culotte, T-stenting, V-stenting or a single stent strategy may be used according the lesion morphology and the experience of the operator. However, based on the Nordic Bifurcation Studies the culotte technique seems to be associated with especially favorable angiographic and long-term clinical results in these large vessel size bifurcation lesions. There should be a low threshold for the use of high pressure post dilatation balloons. Generally, final kissing balloon dilatations are encouraged and mandatory when two-stent techniques are used. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in mandatory pre and post stent placement. | Procedure or surgery | Percutaneous coronary intervention |
| Coronary artery bypass graft operationAlso: CABGPatients randomized to the CABG group for the treatment of LMCA stenosis are treated according to current clinical practice. Both off-pump and on-pump techniques can be used and the selection between the used methods is operator dependent. The left internal mammary artery will be used for the revascularization of the left anterior descending coronary artery, whenever feasible. For other lesion location, saphenous venous grafts, free arterial grafts or the right internal mammary artery may be used. | Procedure or surgery | Coronary artery bypass graft operation |
Primary outcome
Combined endpoint of death, stroke, non-index treatment related MI and new revascularization (PCI or CABG)
Time frame: From date of first randomisation until a total number of 275 events is reached (or max 5 years).
10 secondary outcomes
Combined endpoint of death, stroke and non-index treatment related MI
Time frame: 30 days, yearly through 5 years and when a total number of 275 events is reached.
Individual endpoints of death, stroke and non-index treatment related MI
Time frame: 30 days, yearly through 5 years and when a total number of 275 events is reached.
All cause mortality
Time frame: 10 years
New revascularization by CABG or PCI
Time frame: 30 days, yearly through 5 years and when a total number of 275 events is reached.
Death
Time frame: 30 days, yearly through 5 years and when a total number of 275 events is reached.
Definite stent thrombosis/symptomatic graft occlusion
Time frame: 30 days, yearly through 5 years and when a total number of 275 events is reached.
CCS angina score
Time frame: 30 days, yearly through 5 years and when a total number of 275 events is reached.
NYHA functional class
Time frame: 30 days, yearly through 5 years and when a total number of 275 events is reached.
Duration of admission for index treatment
Time frame: Baseline
Syntax score
Time frame: Baseline
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 May 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41936368Holck EN, Holm NR, Hildick-Smith D, Lindsay MM, Spence MS, Erglis A, Menown IBA, Steigen T, Hune Mogensen LJ, Modrau IS, Niemela M, Lassen JF, Oldroyd K, Stradins P, Walsh SJ, Endresen PC, Trovik T, Frobert O, Graham ANJ, Anttila V, Trivedi U, Thuesen L, Christiansen EH. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main stenosis: 10-year final results from the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority NOBLE trial. Lancet. 2026 Apr 4;407(10536):1374-1382. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00205-9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37256598Gaba P, Christiansen EH, Nielsen PH, Murphy SA, O'Gara PT, Smith PK, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, Park SJ, Park DW, Stone GW, Sabik JF, Sabatine MS, Holm NR, Bergmark BA. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery for Left Main Disease in Patients With and Without Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Jul 1;8(7):631-639. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.1177.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33849035Steigen T, Holm NR, Myrmel T, Endresen PC, Trovik T, Makikallio T, Lindsay M, Spence MS, Erglis A, Menown IBA, Kumsars I, Kellerth T, Davidavicius G, Linder R, Anttila V, Juul Hune Mogensen L, Hostrup Nielsen P, Graham ANJ, Hildick-Smith D, Thuesen L, Christiansen EH; NOBLE Study Investigators. Age-Stratified Outcome in Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A NOBLE Trial Substudy. Cardiology. 2021;146(4):409-418. doi: 10.1159/000515376. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31879028Holm NR, Makikallio T, Lindsay MM, Spence MS, Erglis A, Menown IBA, Trovik T, Kellerth T, Kalinauskas G, Mogensen LJH, Nielsen PH, Niemela M, Lassen JF, Oldroyd K, Berg G, Stradins P, Walsh SJ, Graham ANJ, Endresen PC, Frobert O, Trivedi U, Anttila V, Hildick-Smith D, Thuesen L, Christiansen EH; NOBLE investigators. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial. Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):191-199. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32972-1. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27810312Makikallio T, Holm NR, Lindsay M, Spence MS, Erglis A, Menown IB, Trovik T, Eskola M, Romppanen H, Kellerth T, Ravkilde J, Jensen LO, Kalinauskas G, Linder RB, Pentikainen M, Hervold A, Banning A, Zaman A, Cotton J, Eriksen E, Margus S, Sorensen HT, Nielsen PH, Niemela M, Kervinen K, Lassen JF, Maeng M, Oldroyd K, Berg G, Walsh SJ, Hanratty CG, Kumsars I, Stradins P, Steigen TK, Frobert O, Graham AN, Endresen PC, Corbascio M, Kajander O, Trivedi U, Hartikainen J, Anttila V, Hildick-Smith D, Thuesen L, Christiansen EH; NOBLE study investigators. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2743-2752. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32052-9. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Evald H Christiansen, MD principal investigator
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Percutaneous coronary intervention and Coronary artery bypass graft operation in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Evald Hoej Christiansen at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Combined endpoint of death, stroke, non-index treatment related MI and new revascularization (PCI or CABG) (time frame: From date of first randomisation until a total number of 275 events is reached (or max 5 years).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01496651, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2025.