AzTrials
AzTrials

Ventilator Associated PneumoniaPhase 4NCT01501227

Ventilator Associated Pneumonia in Taper Guard Versus Normal Tube in ICU Patients

A Phase 4 study testing Taper Guard Endotracheal Tube and Conventional endotracheal tube in people with Ventilator Associated Pneumonia, run by University of Malaya at 1 site in Malaysia.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Ventilator associated pneumonia ( VAP) adds burden to the care of the intensive care patients as they may cause the death of the patient or prolong the intensive care stay or complicate the illness in other ways. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
What is being tested?
Taper Guard Endotracheal Tube and Conventional endotracheal tube
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteMalaysia
Study dates
Feb 2012to Dec 2013
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All adult patients above 18 years old admitted into the Intensive Care unit and who is to be intubated and likely to receive more than 72 hours of ventilation would be admitted into the trial

Who cannot join

  • presence of cavitary lung disease based on chest x-ray findings,
  • primary lung cancer or another metastatic malignancy to the lungs, or known or suspected viral or fungal etiology,
  • pneumocystis carinii pneumonia,
  • legionella OR Mycoplasma pneumonia or active tuberculosis.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Yoo-Kuen CHAN, FFARCSI contact

+6012-2937163

chanyk@ummc.edu.my

Vineya RAI, MAnesth; EDIC contact

+60122157175

vineya74@yahoo.com

Malaysia1 site
  • University of Malaya Medical Centre

    Kuala Lumpur, 50603

    Yoo-Kuen Chan, FFARCSI, +6012-2937163, chanyk@ummc.edu.my

    Vineya Rai, MBBS;MAnesth;EDIC, +60122157175, vineya74@yahoo.com

Other trials in Malaysia

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Incidence of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia in Patients Intubated With the Taper Guard Endotracheal Tube Versus a Normal Endotracheal Tube

Ventilator associated pneumonia ( VAP) adds burden to the care of the intensive care patients as they may cause the death of the patient or prolong the intensive care stay or complicate the illness in other ways. The risk of infection is dependent on the interplay between bacteria load into the lungs and the immune status. There has been a lot of focus on bacteria load reduction and this includes the use of subglottic suctioning in an attempt to reduce the amount of bacteria that may move into the lungs. The Hi Lo tubes which were designed to allow subglottic suctioning was significantly effective in reducing the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia compared to normal tubes. A new generation of endotracheal tubes that not only incorporate subglottic suctioning but provide a more snug fit into the tracheal by a new tapering design may be even more useful to provide the solution for bacterial load reduction. Conventional tubes which may furrow on themselves to allow the creation of microchannels may aid microaspiration. The taper guard which has facilities for subglottic suctioning as well as the strategy to reduce furrowing to the minimum may be the answer to the problem of ventilator associated pneumonia. This study is to determine the extent of protection this tube has against ventilator associated pneumonia compared with conventional endotracheal tubes

Read the detailed description

Methodology This will be a prospective randomized trial with 2 treatment groups with 100 patients in each arm. The control group ( Group C) will be intubated with our conventional endotracheal tubes and the test group ( Group T) will be intubated with the special Taper guard tubes with subglottic suctioning and snug fit facilities.

All adult patients ( > 18 years of age) admitted into the Intensive Care Unit who are likely to receive more than 72 hours of ventilation will be admitted into the trial. The trial has been cleared by the Hospital Ethics and informed consent will be obtained from the patient's next of kin.

All patients will have their demographic data collected, the primary reason for ICU admission, the APACHE 2 scores, presence of infection at admission, antibiotic use and whether they have risk factors for VAP ( previous surgery, trauma, antibiotics usage, reflux disease and use of stress ulcer prophylaxis, decreased immune status ) The following guidelines modified from the American Thoracic Society 2005 will be used as the basis for diagnosing Ventilator Associated Pneumonia.

Guideline for Diagnosis of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP)2

  1. Patient ventilated for more than 48 hours.
  2. Suspicion of ventilation associated pneumonia
  3. Presence of a new or progressive infiltrate on chest radiograph.
  4. At least 2 of the following:
  5. Fever, defined as an oral temperature greater than 38 degree C, a tympanic temperature greater than 38.5 degree C or a rectal /core temperature greater than 39 degree C OR hypothermia, defined as a rectal/core body temperature of less than 35 degree C.
  6. Elevated total peripheral WBC count (greater than 12000/mm3) or greater than 15% bands regardless of total peripheral WBC count; or leucopenia with total peripheral WBC less than 4500/mm3 (caused by the infection)
  7. New onset of purulent sputum production or other respiratory secretions (e.g. tracheal secretions), or a change in the character of sputum or tracheal secretions
  8. Worsening hypoxaemia with reduction in PaO2/ FiO2 greater or equal to 15%

In addition all patients will have aspirants from the oral cavity (control group) or subglottic region (group T) and the lungs ( both group C and group T) sent on alternate days for bacterial culture. All tubes will be inflated to a sealing pressure of no leak or up to 20-25 cm H2O whichever is the lower.

The sample size has been estimated based on the incidence of ventilation-associated pneumonia (VAP) which is the primary outcome measure from other studies1,2. Based on a VAP incidence of 20% and 6% in each group, 1:1 ratio, 80% power and significance value of 0.05, the number required in each group will be 89. Adding 10% for loss to follow-up, the number needed in each group will be 100 giving a total of 200 The assignment of each patient to the study will be randomized according to computer generated random numbers by the statistician who will not be a party in the ongoing clinical part of the research. In addition she will provide the allocation sequencing via an opaque envelope when a suitable patient has been identified for the assignment of the patient to the 2 groups when informed consent has been obtained. The person who intubates the patient with the endotracheal tube will use the tube that has been allocated according to the written instruction inside the now opened opaque envelope.

Patient and the clinical researchers managing the patient cannot be blinded as there are obvious differences between the 2 types of endotracheal tubes. However the assessor that will determine the presence or absence of the soft signs of ventilator associated pneumonia will be blinded to the type of tubes used. The Radiologist who reads the Chest Xrays will not be privy to the type of tubes used and the Microbiologist determining the significance of the bacteria identified in the oral/subglottic secretions and the tracheal secretions will not be aware of the endotracheal tubes used.

The main outcome measure will be the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia on each day the patient is ventilated. The secondary outcomes will be the length of ventilation, the duration of intensive care stay, the duration of hospital stay (pre-intensive care, post-intensive care) and the incidence of mortality of the 2 groups.

Statistics Categorical variables will be analysed using Chi square test while continuous variables will be analysed using ANOVA. Intention to treat analysis will be used. Analysis will be carried out using the SPSS version 15.0 software. All statistical tests will be carried out using a significance level of 0.05.

Being tested
Taper Guard Endotracheal Tube, Conventional endotracheal tube
Keywords
ventilator associated pneumonia
Medical subject headings
Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Taper Guard Endotracheal TubeDevice

    Also called Taperguard Evac

    comparison of two different endotracheal tubes

  • Conventional endotracheal tubeOther

    Sham Comparator

Study groups in NCT01501227
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Taper Guard Endotracheal TubeActive comparatorPatients in the test group will be intubated with the Taper Guard Endotracheal Tube. The incidence of VAP, the length of ventilation, the length of intensive care stay, the length of hospital stay and the mortality rate will be monitored.
Receives: Device: Taper Guard Endotracheal Tube
conventional endotracheal tubeSham comparatorPatients in the placebo comparator group will be intubated with the conventional Endotracheal Tube. The incidence of VAP, the length of ventilation, the length of intensive care stay, the length of hospital stay and the mortality rate will be monitored.
Receives: Other: Conventional endotracheal tube

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia(VAP)

    the incidence of VAP in patients intubated with the Taper guard tube is compared with the incidence of VAP in patients intubated with the ordinary tube. The criteria for diagnosing VAP is from the American Thoracic Society 2005 guidelines for VAP diagnosis. The assessor for VAP diagnosis is blinded

    Measured: 72 hours after ventilation initiated to onset of pneumonia

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Number of days on the ventilator by the time patient is discharged from ICU or hospital or at time of death

    The number of days patient is on the ventilator will be monitored between the 2 groups

    Measured: participants will be followed for the duration of ventilation, an expected average of 2 weeks

  2. The total number of days spent in the intensive care unit by the time of discharge from hospital or death

    The length of stay in the intensive care unit will be monitored between the 2 groups

    Measured: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 weeks

  3. The number of days spent in the hospital by the time of discharge or death

    The length of stay in the hospital will be monitored for the 2 groups

    Measured: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks

  4. number of deaths in each arm

    the rate of mortality between the 2 groups will be monitored

    Measured: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Dec 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2012
  3. Primary completionJul 2013 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2013 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01501227
Sponsor's protocol ID
MEC 859.8
Status last verified
Dec 2011
First submitted
12 Dec 2011
Last updated
29 Dec 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • American Thoracic Society; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Feb 15;171(4):388-416. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200405-644ST. No abstract available.

    PubMed 15699079
  • Bo H, He L, Qu J. [Influence of the subglottic secretion drainage on the morbidity of ventilator associated pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients]. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2000 Aug;23(8):472-4. Chinese.

    PubMed 11778260
  • Smulders K, van der Hoeven H, Weers-Pothoff I, Vandenbroucke-Grauls C. A randomized clinical trial of intermittent subglottic secretion drainage in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest. 2002 Mar;121(3):858-62. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.3.858.

    PubMed 11888973
  • Lorente L, Lecuona M, Jimenez A, Mora ML, Sierra A. Influence of an endotracheal tube with polyurethane cuff and subglottic secretion drainage on pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Dec 1;176(11):1079-83. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200705-761OC. Epub 2007 Sep 13.

    PubMed 17872488
  • Muscedere J, Rewa O, McKechnie K, Jiang X, Laporta D, Heyland DK. Subglottic secretion drainage for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2011 Aug;39(8):1985-91. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318218a4d9.

    PubMed 21478738

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Taper Guard Endotracheal Tube and Conventional endotracheal tube in people with Ventilator Associated Pneumonia, run by University of Malaya at 1 site in Malaysia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Dec 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Malaysia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Yoo-Kuen CHAN, FFARCSI (+6012-2937163, chanyk@ummc.edu.my), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia(VAP) (time frame: 72 hours after ventilation initiated to onset of pneumonia). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01501227, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Dec 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in