AzTrials
AzTrials

Congenital Heart DiseaseNCT01503307

Parenting After Infant Congenital Heart Defect Diagnosis

An observational study of Congenital Heart Disease, run by Medical College of Wisconsin at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this research study is to learn about parents' experiences following diagnosis of a fetal/neonatal Congenital Heart Defect (CHD). Nurses, physicians, and other health-care clinicians will benefit from an improved understanding of what the diagnosis means to parents and what they expect concerning the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 12 weeks
Conditions the study is for
Congenital Heart Disease
How many people
23 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2009to Jul 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 12 weeks
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: In this year-long study, 12 to 16 families (mothers and fathers) will be recruited-6 to 8 of the families from the fetal diagnosis clinic at either Meriter Hospital or Children's Hospital of Wisconsin and 6 to 8 families whose infant is diagnosed soon after birth with a complex CHD at either Meriter Hospital or Children's Hospital of Wisconsin.

Who may be able to join

  • at least 18 years old
  • English speaking and reading
  • not known to have a mental illness or cognitive deficit
  • prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of a complex CHD that requires surgical repair or palliation early in the infant's life (i.e., tetralogy of Fallot, atrial-ventricular canal, ventricular septal defect, pulmonary stenosis, tricuspid atresia, hypoplastic right or left heart, or other complex condition). Infants will not be excluded if they also have congenital syndromes or extra-cardiac defects.

Who cannot join

  • no CHD diagnosis

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • University of Wisconsin Madison

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

  • Children's Hospital of Wisconsin

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this research study is to learn about parents' experiences following diagnosis of a fetal/neonatal Congenital Heart Defect (CHD). Nurses, physicians, and other health-care clinicians will benefit from an improved understanding of what the diagnosis means to parents and what they expect concerning the infant, being a parent, and caregiving tasks and responsibilities. The investigators expect that the knowledge gained will increase clinicians' ability to respond to parents' needs.

Read the detailed description

Parental mental health status is linked to the development and quality of caregiving, as well as physiological and psychosocial outcomes for the infant/child with a heart defect.

This is an evolving population of parents with most challenged prenatally with a fetal diagnosis and later as caregivers for medically complex infants. Parents with pre- and postnatally diagnosed infants are at risk for sub-optimal mental health. Parents' experiences and needs differ by timing of diagnosis.

Several gaps in the literature exist. First, advances in technology raise questions about how becoming a caregiver is experienced considering the timing of the diagnosis. Second, little is known about how the timing of the diagnosis could influence parents' mental health status and caregiving after diagnosis. Finally, more study is needed to identify the type, timing and duration of intervention to support these parents as caregivers and optimize their infants' health.

Data collected for this study included demographic and health information (from parents and infant health records), measures of distress (symptoms of depression, anxiety and trauma), and interviews. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents in person in the hospital and home settings. Interviews with each couple in the prenatally diagnosed group were conducted once during the third trimester of pregnancy and once within 12 weeks after birth. Interviews with each couple or mother in the postnatally diagnosed group were conducted once within 12 weeks after birth. Interviews lasted 1-3 hours, were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim for analysis. Field notes were also written and audio recorded for use in analysis.

Directed content analysis has been used to describe parents' experiences and caregiving motivations in relation to parental distress and severity of infant illness. Analysis of data is ongoing. Additional analyses are expected to further improve knowledge on the differing needs of parents of pre- and postnatally diagnosed infants, as well as parents' experiences and caregiving motivations in the context of discharge from tertiary care.

Keywords
prenatal chd diagnosis, postpartum chd diagnosis, parenting, internal working models
Medical subject headings
Heart Defects, Congenital

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01503307
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Prenatal/Postpartum CHD Diagnosisparent of a baby (prenatal or postpartum)who was recently found to have a heart defect.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Creation of a typology of perinatal internal working models of parenting in congenital heart disease.

    Qualitative analysis of interviews.

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Parent outcomes

    Impact of Event Scale - Stress Reactions Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Depression State-Trait Anxiety Inventory - Anxiety

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jan 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2009
  3. Primary completionJul 2016
  4. Study completionJul 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
23 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01503307
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHW 08/160
Other IDs
GC 728
Status last verified
Oct 2019
First submitted
28 Dec 2011
Last updated
25 Oct 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Congenital Heart Disease, run by Medical College of Wisconsin at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Creation of a typology of perinatal internal working models of parenting in congenital heart disease. (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Oct 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in