AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute PancreatitisNCT01503320

Efficacy of Enteral Glutamine Supplementation in Patients With Predicted Severe Acute Pancreatitis- A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

A study testing Enteral glutamine in people with Acute Pancreatitis, run by Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India at 1 site in India.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a potentially serious illness characterized by inflammation of the pancreas with variable involvement of peri-pancreatic tissues and/ or remote organ systems. AP is hyper catabolic condition due to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS without any proven specific treatments. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Pancreatitis
What is being tested?
Enteral glutamine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
Jan 2012to Dec 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients over the age 18.
  • Patient admitted within 72hrs of onset of abdominal pain for over 24hr with raised (>3- fold) serum lipase/amylase on admission.
  • Marshall Score of ≥ 2 in any one organ, excluding the liver component
  • Pancreatic necrosis >30% on Computed tomography (CT) scan or a modified CT severity index of ≥6.
  • Apache II score ≥8.
  • BUN at admission of >20mg/dL or an BUN elevation of >5mg/dL within 48hrs of admission.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic insufficiency requiring pancreatic enzyme supplements.
  • Pre-existing chronic renal insufficiency requiring hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.
  • Patients with ARF.
  • Pre-existing end-stage liver disease with ascites, coagulopathy and encephalopathy.
  • Pancreatic cancer.
  • Current somatostatin or corticosteroid therapy.
  • Any form of artificial feeding since commencement of acute pancreatitis symptoms.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

India1 site
  • Asian Institute of Gastroenterology

    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500082

Other trials in India

About this study

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a potentially serious illness characterized by inflammation of the pancreas with variable involvement of peri-pancreatic tissues and/ or remote organ systems. AP is hyper catabolic condition due to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS without any proven specific treatments. Therefore, current therapy for AP is directed to intensive medical care, nutrition support and infection control.

Nutritional support is very crucial in the treatment of AP. Enteral nutrition (EN) is the preferred modality since parenteral nutrition is associated with various complications. EN could preserve the intestinal permeability, which would be the best barrier for prevention of certain complications.

Read more

Glutamine is the most abundant free amino acid in the body and is used as a major fuel and nucleotide substrate. When a nutritional deficiency arises in critical illness including SAP, glutamine tends to be conditionally depleted.

We hypothesize that enteral glutamine supplementation in patients with severe and predicted severe acute pancreatitis helps in their early recovery and prevention of adverse outcomes.

In this study, we aim to evaluate the therapeutic effect of enteral glutamine on clinical outcomes, gut permeability, systemic inflammation, oxidative stress and plasma glutamine levels.

Read the detailed description

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a potentially serious illness characterized by inflammation of the pancreas with variable involvement of peri-pancreatic tissues and/ or remote organ systems. AP contributes to thousands of annual hospital admissions, of which severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) accounts for 10-20%. The course of SAP tends to be prolonged and the patients usually are hyper metabolic and high protein catabolic due to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) induced by acute local inflammatory process and subsequent vital organ dysfunction. There are currently no specific proven treatments. Therefore, current therapy for AP is directed to intensive medical care, nutrition support, infection control and medicine administration.

Nutritional support plays an important role in the management of patients with SAP, which is very critical and complex. Thus, if nutritional support is not appropriately administered to match the rapidly increasing demand in the treatment of SAP, the patients consequently come down with gross metabolic imbalance and nutrition deficiency. This is considered to increase mortality due to impaired immune function, increased risk of infections and intractable vital- organ failure.

Despite the recently reported encouraging results on early enteral feeding in patients with acute pancreatitis, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is still frequently performed in the management of patients with AP. However, longer periods of TPN are known to be associated with mucosal atrophy and increased gastrointestinal permeability, two established risk factors for endotoxemia and bacteriemia.

Artificial nutrition can prevent complications and provide long term nutritional support for SAP patients. Enteral nutrition is preferred to parenteral nutrition for improving patient outcomes and has largely replaced the parenteral route. Early nasogastric enteral nutrition (NGEN) was considered potentially to lead to pancreatic-unrest and thereby prove to be harmful to the early acute phase of AP. However, Eatock et al introduced the early nasogastric feeding into the nutritional management of SAP and Pandey et al applied oral re-feeding in patients with SAP, suggesting that the nasogastric feeding is feasible in up to 80% cases. A meta-analysis and a recent randomized controlled trial showed that early NGEN would be as effective and safe as early Naso Jejunal enteral nutrition (NJEN) or TPN in SAP patients, without increase in mortality and pain on re-feeding.

EN could preserve the intestinal permeability, proven by the assessment of excretion of polyethylene glycol and antiendotoxin core antibody IgM levels, which would be the best barrier for prevention of certain complications. Serum interleukin-6 levels are elevated very early in patients with necrosis infection and C-reactive protein (CRP) is considered a valuable independent predictor of mortality. IL-6 and CRP levels play a similar role in the control of systematic inflammatory response of early EN and TPN groups at each time point. Moreover, biochemical/ nutritional parameters such as serum albumin and prealbumin concentration in early EN are well preserved without any significant difference.

Glutamine is the most abundant free amino acid in the body. When a nutritional deficiency arises in critical illness including SAP, glutamine, readily synthesized under most situations, tends to be conditionally depleted. The low concentration of plasma glutamine was found to be an independent predictive factor for a poor outcome in critical illness. Glutamine is used as a major fuel and nucleotide substrate for rapidly dividing cells such as intestinal mucosal cells and the gut-associated immunocytes. Glutamine can prevent atrophy of the intestinal epithelial cells through HSP 70 generation and improve the intestinal immune barrier. A meta-analysis by Novak et al revealed that glutamine could reduce the infectious morbidity (RR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.68-1.03) and mortality (RR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.56-0.98) in critical illness.

Standard TPN does not contain glutamine. Parenteral nutrition supplemented with glutamine showed a beneficial effect on preservation of the intestinal integrity, improving lymphocyte function and improving antioxidant capacity compared to a standard TPN; and glutamine administration was related to a clinically significant decrease in morbidity and mortality.

We hypothesize that enteral glutamine supplementation in patients with severe and predicted severe acute pancreatitis helps in their early recovery and prevention of adverse outcomes.

In this study, we aim to evaluate the therapeutic effect of enteral glutamine on clinical outcomes, gut permeability, systemic inflammation, oxidative stress and plasma glutamine levels.

Being tested
Enteral glutamine, Placebo
Keywords
To evaluate, efficacy, enteral glutamine
Medical subject headings
Pancreatitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Enteral glutamineDietary supplement

    Dosage of glutamine: 0.57g/kg, ~ 30g/day= 3sachets

  • PlaceboDietary supplement

    Similar appearing nutritional supplement without glutamine.

Study groups in NCT01503320
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Enteral glutamineExperimentalNot described
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Enteral glutamine
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Development of infected (peri)pancreatic necrosis

    Measured: Baseline; 7 days; 6 months

  2. Mortality

    Measured: Baseline; 7 days; 6 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change in levels of HS- CRP.

    Measured: Baseline, 7 days, 14 days

  2. Change in mucosal permeability

    Measured: Baseline, 7 days, 14 days

  3. Change in level of oxidative stress

    Measured: Baseline, 7 days, 14 days

  4. Change in cytokine levels in serum

    Measured: Baseline, 7 days, 14 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jan 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2012
  3. Primary completionOct 2014
  4. Study completionDec 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01503320
Sponsor's protocol ID
AIG-GI-2011-05
Status last verified
Jun 2015
First submitted
1 Jan 2012
Last updated
8 Jun 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Arutla M, Raghunath M, Deepika G, Jakkampudi A, Murthy HVV, Rao GV, Reddy DN, Talukdar R. Efficacy of enteral glutamine supplementation in patients with severe and predicted severe acute pancreatitis- A randomized controlled trial. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug;38(4):338-347. doi: 10.1007/s12664-019-00962-7. Epub 2019 Oct 14.

    PubMed 31612309

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Enteral glutamine in people with Acute Pancreatitis, run by Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Development of infected (peri)pancreatic necrosis (time frame: Baseline; 7 days; 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01503320, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in