Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNCT01504893
Very Low Tidal Volume vs Conventional Ventilatory Strategy for One-lung Ventilation in Thoracic Anesthesia
A study testing Protective one lung ventilation in people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria della Misericordia at 16 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if a protective ventilatory strategy during one-lung ventilation (OLV) based on low tidal volume, PEEP and alveolar recruitment maneuver can reduce Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) and Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after major pulmonary resection. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Protective one lung ventilation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 984 participants
- Where
- 16 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- Sep 2013to Sep 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients ≥ 18 years
- ASA IV
- Elective thoracotomies or thoracoscopic major lung resection surgery (lobectomy, bilobectomy, pneumonectomy)
Who cannot join
- Emergency surgery
- Wedge resection or atypical resection
- Non-resective lung surgery requiring OLV
- Patients < 18 years
- BMI < 20 and BMI > 29
- Heart disease with ejection fraction <50% and/or severe valvulopathy
Show all 12Show fewer
- Pulmonary hypertension
- Renal failure requiring dialytic treatment
- Drug addiction
- Mental retardation, depression and psychiatric disease
- Motor or sensory deficit
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
16 sites in 1 country.
16 sites in 1 country
Italy16 sites
ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII
Bergamo
IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi
Bologna
Ospedale Centrale
Bolzano
Azienda Ospedaliera Brotzu - Ospedale Oncologico Businco
Cagliari
IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
Genova
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori
Milan
IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan
Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria
Modena
Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale
Naples
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria
Padova
IRCCS Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata
Rionero in Vulture
Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena
Rome
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese
Siena
Ospedale di Cattinara
Trieste
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit
Udine, 33100
Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi
Varese
About this study
Official title: Multicenter Randomized Trial on Protective Ventilation Versus Conventional Ventilation During OLV in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery
The purpose of this study is to determine if a protective ventilatory strategy during one-lung ventilation (OLV) based on low tidal volume, PEEP and alveolar recruitment maneuver can reduce Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) and Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after major pulmonary resection.
Primary endpoint: Evaluation of postoperative ARDS incidence
Secondary endpoint: Evaluation od PPC incidence and postoperative outcomes (other complications, unplanned Intensive Care Admission, hospital and ICU length of stay, in-hospital mortality)
Read the detailed description
Pulmonary postoperative complications (PPCs) are the most frequent adverse events after thoracic surgery. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the most severe among PPCs. Injurious mechanical ventilation is a recognized risk factor associated with ARDS and PPCs after major thoracic surgery.
International literature reports a wide use of tidal volume around 5-6 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW) during one lung ventilation (OLV) but variable use of PEEP and alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM).
The aim of this multicenter, randomized, single blind study is to determine if a protective ventilatory strategy during OLV based on low tidal volume, PEEP and alveolar recruitment maneuver compared to conventional strategy can reduce ARDS and PPCs after major pulmonary resection.
Primary outcome is the incidence of in-hospital ARDS.
Secondary outcomes are in-hospital incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), major cardiovascular events, unplanned Intensive Care Unit admission, in-hospital length of stay and mortality
RANDOMIZATION
Patients are randomly assigned to receive protective or conventional OLV according to a computer-generated randomization list (1:1 ratio) before anesthesia induction.
Patients are blinded to the treatment. Anesthesiologists and surgeons are unblinded to the treatment during the surgical procedure and the postoperative outcome assessment.
MEASUREMENTS
Intraoperative collection of ventilatory settings, airway pressures, arterial blood gases analysis at the following time points:
T1: two lung ventilation in supine position before placing the patient in lateral decubitus; T2: 30 minutes after OLV start; T3: 60 minutes after OLV start; T4: 20 minutes after lobectomy/pneumonectomy (during OLV); T5: 15 minutes after ARM in supine position and during two lung ventilation.
Postoperative data collection 1, 12, 24, 36, 48 hours after surgery and at discharge. Arterial blood gas analysis will be performed 1 hour after extubation and 24 and 72 hours after surgery (or in case of respiratory insufficiency).
- Conditions
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- Being tested
- Protective one lung ventilation
- Keywords
- One lung ventilation, PEEP, thoracic surgery, lobectomy and pneumonectomy, ARDS
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Protective one lung ventilationProcedure or surgery
Low tidal volume, PEEP and alveolar recruitment maneuver
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Protective | Experimental | Two-lung ventilation (TLV): tidal volume = 8 mL / kg PBW, peak airway pressure ≤ 25 cm H2O, I: E = 1:2; after lung re-expansion to the closure of the chest will set a PEEP of 5 cmH2O
OLV (OLV): 4 mL / kg PBW, peak airway pressure ≤ 35 cmH2O, respiratory rate <30, I:E = 1:2 / 1:3.
During OLV in case of desaturation (before increasing the FiO2) and every 60 minutes alveolar recruitment maneuvers followed by the setting of PEEP to 5 cmH2O Receives: Procedure: Protective one lung ventilation |
| Conventional | No intervention | Two-lung ventilation (TLV): tidal volume = 8 mL / kg PBW, peak airway pressure ≤ 25 cmH2O; I: E = 1:2; after lung re-expansion to the closure of the chest PEEP set to 5 cmH2O OLV (OLV): 6 mL / kg PBW, peak airway pressure ≤ 35 cmH2O; I: E = 1:2. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) incidence
incidence of ARDS (%)
Measured: Hospital stay (7 days average expected)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs)
Incidence of PPCs (%)
Measured: Hospital stay (7 days average expected)
In-hospital mortality
To determine mortality (%)
Measured: Hospital stay (7 days average aspected)
Postoperative complications
To determine how many patients (%) would have any postoperative complications
Measured: Hospital stay (7 days average expected)
Unplanned Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission
To determine how many patients would require an ICU admission (%)
Measured: Hospital stay (7 days average aspected)
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Length of stay
Length of stay in ICU (days)
Measured: Hospital stay (7 days average aspected)
Length of hospital stay
Duration of hospital length of stay
Measured: Hospital stay (7 days average expected)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2013
- Primary completionAug 2016
- Study completionSep 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 984 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria della Misericordia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Giorgio Della Rocca, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria della Misericordia
- Investigators
- Giorgio Della Rocca, MD, Prof, Principal investigator, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Maria della Misericordia - Udine. Italy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01504893
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ALI01
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 30 Dec 2011
- Last updated
- 2 Dec 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Yang M, Ahn HJ, Kim K, Kim JA, Yi CA, Kim MJ, Kim HJ. Does a protective ventilation strategy reduce the risk of pulmonary complications after lung cancer surgery?: a randomized controlled trial. Chest. 2011 Mar;139(3):530-537. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-2293. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
PubMed 20829341Licker M, Diaper J, Villiger Y, Spiliopoulos A, Licker V, Robert J, Tschopp JM. Impact of intraoperative lung-protective interventions in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. Crit Care. 2009;13(2):R41. doi: 10.1186/cc7762. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
PubMed 19317902
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Dec 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicenter Randomized Trial on Protective Ventilation Versus Conventional Ventilation During OLV in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01504893
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ALI01
- Conditions
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- Keywords
- One lung ventilation, PEEP, thoracic surgery, lobectomy and pneumonectomy, ARDS
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 984 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria della MisericordiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine if a protective ventilatory strategy during one-lung ventilation (OLV) based on low tidal volume, PEEP and alveolar recruitment maneuver can reduce Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) and Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after major pulmonary resection.
Primary endpoint: Evaluation of postoperative ARDS incidence
Secondary endpoint: Evaluation od PPC incidence and postoperative outcomes (other complications, unplanned Intensive Care Admission, hospital and ICU length of stay, in-hospital mortality)
Detailed description
Pulmonary postoperative complications (PPCs) are the most frequent adverse events after thoracic surgery. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the most severe among PPCs. Injurious mechanical ventilation is a recognized risk factor associated with ARDS and PPCs after major thoracic surgery.
International literature reports a wide use of tidal volume around 5-6 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW) during one lung ventilation (OLV) but variable use of PEEP and alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM).
The aim of this multicenter, randomized, single blind study is to determine if a protective ventilatory strategy during OLV based on low tidal volume, PEEP and alveolar recruitment maneuver compared to conventional strategy can reduce ARDS and PPCs after major pulmonary resection.
Primary outcome is the incidence of in-hospital ARDS.
Secondary outcomes are in-hospital incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), major cardiovascular events, unplanned Intensive Care Unit admission, in-hospital length of stay and mortality
RANDOMIZATION
Patients are randomly assigned to receive protective or conventional OLV according to a computer-generated randomization list (1:1 ratio) before anesthesia induction.
Patients are blinded to the treatment. Anesthesiologists and surgeons are unblinded to the treatment during the surgical procedure and the postoperative outcome assessment.
MEASUREMENTS
Intraoperative collection of ventilatory settings, airway pressures, arterial blood gases analysis at the following time points:
T1: two lung ventilation in supine position before placing the patient in lateral decubitus; T2: 30 minutes after OLV start; T3: 60 minutes after OLV start; T4: 20 minutes after lobectomy/pneumonectomy (during OLV); T5: 15 minutes after ARM in supine position and during two lung ventilation.
Postoperative data collection 1, 12, 24, 36, 48 hours after surgery and at discharge. Arterial blood gas analysis will be performed 1 hour after extubation and 24 and 72 hours after surgery (or in case of respiratory insufficiency).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Protective | Experimental | Procedure: Protective one lung ventilationTwo-lung ventilation (TLV): tidal volume = 8 mL / kg PBW, peak airway pressure ≤ 25 cm H2O, I: E = 1:2; after lung re-expansion to the closure of the chest will set a PEEP of 5 cmH2O OLV (OLV): 4 mL / kg PBW, peak airway pressure ≤ 35 cmH2O, respiratory rate <30, I:E = 1:2 / 1:3. During OLV in case of desaturation (before increasing the FiO2) and every 60 minutes alveolar recruitment maneuvers followed by the setting of PEEP to 5 cmH2O |
| Conventional | No intervention | –Two-lung ventilation (TLV): tidal volume = 8 mL / kg PBW, peak airway pressure ≤ 25 cmH2O; I: E = 1:2; after lung re-expansion to the closure of the chest PEEP set to 5 cmH2O OLV (OLV): 6 mL / kg PBW, peak airway pressure ≤ 35 cmH2O; I: E = 1:2. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients ≥ 18 years
- ASA IV
- Elective thoracotomies or thoracoscopic major lung resection surgery (lobectomy, bilobectomy, pneumonectomy)
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Emergency surgery
- Wedge resection or atypical resection
- Non-resective lung surgery requiring OLV
- Patients < 18 years
- BMI < 20 and BMI > 29
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Protective one lung ventilationLow tidal volume, PEEP and alveolar recruitment maneuver | Procedure or surgery | Protective |
Primary outcome
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) incidence
Time frame: Hospital stay (7 days average expected)
incidence of ARDS (%)
6 secondary outcomes
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs)
Time frame: Hospital stay (7 days average expected)
In-hospital mortality
Time frame: Hospital stay (7 days average aspected)
Postoperative complications
Time frame: Hospital stay (7 days average expected)
Unplanned Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission
Time frame: Hospital stay (7 days average aspected)
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Length of stay
Time frame: Hospital stay (7 days average aspected)
Length of hospital stay
Time frame: Hospital stay (7 days average expected)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Dec 2022.
- Background: PubMed 20829341Yang M, Ahn HJ, Kim K, Kim JA, Yi CA, Kim MJ, Kim HJ. Does a protective ventilation strategy reduce the risk of pulmonary complications after lung cancer surgery?: a randomized controlled trial. Chest. 2011 Mar;139(3):530-537. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-2293. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
- Background: PubMed 19317902Licker M, Diaper J, Villiger Y, Spiliopoulos A, Licker V, Robert J, Tschopp JM. Impact of intraoperative lung-protective interventions in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. Crit Care. 2009;13(2):R41. doi: 10.1186/cc7762. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
Related trials for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Early Switch in Moderate ARDS
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Tozorakimab in Patients Hospitalised for Viral Lung Infection Requiring Supplemental Oxygen
Viral Lung Infection and Acute Respiratory Failure
RecruitingPhase 2
PirfenidoneVsPlacebo as Prophylaxis Against Acute Radiation-induced Lung Injury Following HFRT in Breast Cancer Patients
Acute Lung Injury, Prevention
Not yet recruiting
The Hemodynamic Impact of High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Periodic Sighs in Preterm Infants
Preterm, Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Fostamatinib for Treating Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in Hospitalized Adults
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, ARDS
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Giorgio Della Rocca, MD, Prof principal investigator
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Maria della Misericordia - Udine. Italy
16 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Protective one lung ventilation in people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria della Misericordia at 16 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 16 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) incidence (time frame: Hospital stay (7 days average expected)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01504893, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Dec 2022.