Acute Coronary SyndromePhase 1/2NCT01504945
Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
A Phase 1/2 study testing RBC transfusion and Normal saline infusion in people with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Anemia, run by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Patients with a low blood count (anemia) with stable or unstable coronary artery disease consistently show worse clinical outcomes. It is unclear whether this association is confounded since anemic patients tend to be also sicker i.e. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Coronary Syndrome, Anemia
- What is being tested?
- RBC transfusion and Normal saline infusion
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2010to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ACS as defined by a patient who has cardiac chest discomfort and a troponin (cTnT) elevation of greater than 0.1 ng/mL.
- Pt. who is s/p CABG
- Patients with chronic coronary artery disease will be recruited as defined as past history of myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, CABG, or history of coronary artery disease documented in the medical record.
- Anemia as defined by HCT between 21%-30%.
Who cannot join
- Patients with stage III/IV heart failure
- Patients who are actively bleeding requiring immediate transfusion.
- Pregnant patients will be excluded.
- Patients taking sildenafil (Viagra) or other drugs like it, such as vardenafil (Levitra), or tadalafil (Cialis) within 48 hours before the study.
- Patients on iv nitroglycerine infusion.
- Patients who present with ACS or CABG surgery and who are hemodynamically unstable or require immediate revascularization.
- Patients who have received a blood transfusion 24 hours prior to the start of the study.
- Patients with a HCT of < 21% and those that have chest tube drainage greater then 30 mL/h will be excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
About this study
Official title: Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Patients With Acute and Chronic Coronary Syndrome
Patients with a low blood count (anemia) with stable or unstable coronary artery disease consistently show worse clinical outcomes. It is unclear whether this association is confounded since anemic patients tend to be also sicker i.e. have lower ejection fractions or more comorbidities and this would be the reason for the worse outcomes rather than anemia. The coronary arteries are a unique vascular bed insofar that across the cardiac circulation oxygen extraction is close to maximal at rest. Thus increases in demand can only be met by increases in blood flow and hemoglobin concentration since oxygen extraction is maximal at rest. It is natural to assume that maximization of oxygen delivery in the setting of active coronary syndrome (ACS) is beneficial to the patient since oxygen extraction and coronary blood flow is fixed. In fact, in most intensive care units patients with ACS are transfused to a HCT of 30%. However, retrospective analysis of trial data showed at best mixed results in clinical outcome when patients with ACS were transfused and in fact in some studies showed consistently worse outcomes than non-transfused patients. Similar disappointing results have recently published in patient who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
This study is designed to determine the effect of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion on oxygen consumption, cardiac, microcirculatory and endothelial function in patients with active coronary artery disease. For this study active coronary artery disease will be defined as the patient having undergone within the past 4 days of recruitment either a myocardial infarction due to atherothrombosis (AHA type I myocardial infarction) or surgery for coronary artery bypass grafting.
Read more
In specific this study will test the hypothesis whether RBC transfusions improves cardiac and vascular function in patients with a hematocrit of less than 30% with active coronary artery disease.
Aims of this study are to determine whether RBC transfusion in patients with active coronary artery disease and anemia:
- increases oxygen delivery to the peripheral tissues.
- increases whole-body oxygen consumption.
- decreases nitric oxide bioavailability, endothelial, microcirculatory, and myocardial function, and/or increases platelet aggregation
Read the detailed description
Adverse clinical outcomes are reduced when critically ill patients are only transfused if their hematocrit drops below 21%: Hematocrit (HCT) is a measure of the severity of anemia. A HCT is considered normal if it ranges between 38 and 48% of total blood volume. In critically ill patients anemia is very common; about 95% of patients admitted to the intensive care unit have hemoglobin levels below normal by intensive care unit (ICU) day 3.{Corwin, 1995 #8809;Rodriguez, 2001 #8810} The transfusion trigger of "30/10" (HCT < 30%, hemoglobin <10 g/dl) has been suggested in a case series of trauma patients as early as 1942.{Adam, 1942 #8811} Since then these triggers have largely been a matter of faith, without prospective data supporting an improvement in clinical outcome. Several clinical trials conducted in the past two decades have shown at least equivalence in clinical outcomes when a more conservative transfusion trigger of hemoglobin 7-9 g/dL is applied to a critically-ill patient population.{Hebert, 1999 #8812;Vincent, 2002 #8814;Corwin, 2004 #8813} The transfusion trigger in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or recent coronary artery bypass grafting as a subset of critically ill patients is more controversial, and in most intensive care units a more liberal approach to transfusions for these patients is typically chosen.{Gerber, 2008 #8815} However, the efficacy of RBC transfusion appears to be significantly more limited than empirically assumed in patients with active coronary artery disease. The TRICC investigators performed a subset analysis and independent study of their patient cohort of critically-ill patients with cardiovascular disease.{Hebert, 1997 #8835} They found that a transfusion hemoglobin trigger of 7 g/dL is safe. Furthermore, greater end-organ dysfunction was recorded in patients with a liberal transfusion trigger, and the overall mortality was similar between the study cohorts for any time interval (intensive care unit, over the course of hospital stay, at 30-d and 60-d follow-up).{Hebert, 1999 #8812}
ACS patients should receive a transfusion if their HCT is less than 24%: Several retrospective studies have shown that in general, transfusion of RBC in patients with ACS and a hematocrit > 24% is neutral or very slightly beneficial and causes harm if HCT > 30%. {Rao, 2004 #8836;Yang, 2005 #8837;Sabatine, 2005 #8827;Singla, 2007 #8838;Singla, 2007 #8838} Such small (if any) benefit is not intuitive, in light of an increase in arterial oxygen content by a PRBC transfusion and therefore decrease in cardiac output and oxygen consumption. Two very beneficial effects in patients with active coronary artery disease. Indeed, increasing arterial oxygen content by transfusion may either 1) not increase oxygen delivery to the myocardium distal to an anatomic coronary stenosis or 2) have other deleterious biological effects on the cardiovascular system. Despite the results that RBC transfusion in unstable coronary artery disease has very little beneficial effects, most clinicians (standard of care) transfuse patients with ACS to a HCT of 30% regardless of potential adverse side effects of RBC transfusions. The guidelines for transfusion practice at the BIDMC for instance differentiate between hemodynamically stable and bleeding patients. The HCT of bleeding patients should be greater then 30%. In hemodynamically stable patient they further differentiate between patients with and without signs of end-organ ischemia. In patients without end-organ ischemia a HCT of 21% is tolerated and in patients with end-organ ischemia such as active coronary artery disease the HCT should be > 30%.
Storage of RBC before transfusion lowers the function of the RBCs: In a retrospective study in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) a recent study found that RBC transfusions were associated with an increased risk of mortality and short term and long term postoperative complications when patients were transfused with stored RBCs (older than 14 days). This association remained significant even after controlling for the assumption that patients receiving blood transfusions are in general sicker and therefore more prone to complications.{Koch, 2008 #8847} Since the introduction of acid-citrate-dextrose as a preservative it was possible to store blood for several weeks currently up to 42 days. The criteria for the decision when is blood storage too long is based arbitrarily on red blood cell survival in the recipient after 24 hours and should be greater than 70%.{Mollison, 1942 #8848} In the past decades however it has been established that transfused and surviving red blood cells exhibit quite different physiologic properties when compared to native RBCs. This phenomenon is called the storage lesion. There is a rapid depletion of 2,3 diglycerophosphate (2,3-DPG) with storage.{Bunn, 1968 #8849} This has a profound impact on hemoglobin affinity reducing oxygen release from hemoglobin by as much as 25% at similar change in oxygen saturation. Of note within 72h about 50% of the 2,3-DPG is restored in the transfused RBCs. Moreover, there is a marked decrease of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which reduces deformability of transfused RBCs and the ability of the RBCs to navigate the microcirculation.{Dern, 1967 #8850}
Infusion of stored RBCs causes hemolysis which in turn reduces nitric oxide bioavailability: Significant hemolysis (a condition in which RBC burst and the contents of RBC leak outside; in particular free hemoglobin) occurs both during storage and in particular during transfusion.{Sowemimo-Coker, 2002 #8851} Free hemoglobin outside of RBCs scavenges nitric oxide. Nitric oxide (NO) is a colorless gas, which is produced by the inner lining of the vessels (endothelium). It acts as D5W lubricant for vessels. It keeps blood vessels open and "lubricates them" so blood cell can flow through these blood vessels more easily. A decrease in nitric oxide bioavailability causes vasoconstriction and increased RBC adhesion to endothelium which in turn decreases microcirculatory flow.{Reiter, 2002 #6096} RBCs also contain arginase which released into the circulation will further enhance nitric oxide depletion by reducing its precursor arginine.{Kato, 2005 #7955}
The investigators will systematically examine the effects of RBC transfusion on systemic oxygen delivery, whole body oxygen consumption, nitric oxide bioavailability, endothelial function, cardiac performance, microcirculatory function, and platelet aggregation in patients with active coronary artery disease, presenting to the BIDMC with anemia, defined as hematocrit of < 30%. This is to test our hypothesis that depletion of the nitric oxide pool by transfusion-associated hemolysis causes a decrease in microcirculation, endothelial, and platelet function. To the best of our knowledge there is no study to date that explores the physiologic effects of RBC transfusion in patients with active coronary artery disease.
- Conditions
- Acute Coronary Syndrome, Anemia
- Being tested
- RBC transfusion, Normal saline infusion
- Keywords
- chronic coronary artery disease
- Medical subject headings
- Acute Coronary Syndrome, Anemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RBC transfusionOther
1 bag of packed red blood cells
Normal saline infusionOther
500 mL of normal saline infusion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| RBC transfusion | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Other: RBC transfusion |
| Normal saline infusion | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Normal saline infusion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Endothelial function as measured by flow mediated dilation
Measured: within 1 day of transfusion
Secondary outcomes (1)
platelet function
Measured: within one hour of transfusion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2010
- Primary completionDec 2017
- Study completionDec 2017
Why it stopped: Recruitment difficulty
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Coronary SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Heart Association
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michael Donnino, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
- Investigators
- Andre Dejam, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01504945
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2009P000436
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 25 Apr 2011
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Feb 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Patients With Acute and Chronic Coronary Syndrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01504945
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2009P000436
- Conditions
- Acute Coronary Syndrome, Anemia
- Keywords
- chronic coronary artery disease
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Recruitment difficulty
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Heart Association
- Study start
- Feb 2010
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with a low blood count (anemia) with stable or unstable coronary artery disease consistently show worse clinical outcomes. It is unclear whether this association is confounded since anemic patients tend to be also sicker i.e. have lower ejection fractions or more comorbidities and this would be the reason for the worse outcomes rather than anemia. The coronary arteries are a unique vascular bed insofar that across the cardiac circulation oxygen extraction is close to maximal at rest. Thus increases in demand can only be met by increases in blood flow and hemoglobin concentration since oxygen extraction is maximal at rest. It is natural to assume that maximization of oxygen delivery in the setting of active coronary syndrome (ACS) is beneficial to the patient since oxygen extraction and coronary blood flow is fixed. In fact, in most intensive care units patients with ACS are transfused to a HCT of 30%. However, retrospective analysis of trial data showed at best mixed results in clinical outcome when patients with ACS were transfused and in fact in some studies showed consistently worse outcomes than non-transfused patients. Similar disappointing results have recently published in patient who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
This study is designed to determine the effect of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion on oxygen consumption, cardiac, microcirculatory and endothelial function in patients with active coronary artery disease. For this study active coronary artery disease will be defined as the patient having undergone within the past 4 days of recruitment either a myocardial infarction due to atherothrombosis (AHA type I myocardial infarction) or surgery for coronary artery bypass grafting.
In specific this study will test the hypothesis whether RBC transfusions improves cardiac and vascular function in patients with a hematocrit of less than 30% with active coronary artery disease.
Aims of this study are to determine whether RBC transfusion in patients with active coronary artery disease and anemia:
- increases oxygen delivery to the peripheral tissues.
- increases whole-body oxygen consumption.
- decreases nitric oxide bioavailability, endothelial, microcirculatory, and myocardial function, and/or increases platelet aggregation
Detailed description
Adverse clinical outcomes are reduced when critically ill patients are only transfused if their hematocrit drops below 21%: Hematocrit (HCT) is a measure of the severity of anemia. A HCT is considered normal if it ranges between 38 and 48% of total blood volume. In critically ill patients anemia is very common; about 95% of patients admitted to the intensive care unit have hemoglobin levels below normal by intensive care unit (ICU) day 3.{Corwin, 1995 #8809;Rodriguez, 2001 #8810} The transfusion trigger of "30/10" (HCT < 30%, hemoglobin <10 g/dl) has been suggested in a case series of trauma patients as early as 1942.{Adam, 1942 #8811} Since then these triggers have largely been a matter of faith, without prospective data supporting an improvement in clinical outcome. Several clinical trials conducted in the past two decades have shown at least equivalence in clinical outcomes when a more conservative transfusion trigger of hemoglobin 7-9 g/dL is applied to a critically-ill patient population.{Hebert, 1999 #8812;Vincent, 2002 #8814;Corwin, 2004 #8813} The transfusion trigger in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or recent coronary artery bypass grafting as a subset of critically ill patients is more controversial, and in most intensive care units a more liberal approach to transfusions for these patients is typically chosen.{Gerber, 2008 #8815} However, the efficacy of RBC transfusion appears to be significantly more limited than empirically assumed in patients with active coronary artery disease. The TRICC investigators performed a subset analysis and independent study of their patient cohort of critically-ill patients with cardiovascular disease.{Hebert, 1997 #8835} They found that a transfusion hemoglobin trigger of 7 g/dL is safe. Furthermore, greater end-organ dysfunction was recorded in patients with a liberal transfusion trigger, and the overall mortality was similar between the study cohorts for any time interval (intensive care unit, over the course of hospital stay, at 30-d and 60-d follow-up).{Hebert, 1999 #8812}
ACS patients should receive a transfusion if their HCT is less than 24%: Several retrospective studies have shown that in general, transfusion of RBC in patients with ACS and a hematocrit > 24% is neutral or very slightly beneficial and causes harm if HCT > 30%. {Rao, 2004 #8836;Yang, 2005 #8837;Sabatine, 2005 #8827;Singla, 2007 #8838;Singla, 2007 #8838} Such small (if any) benefit is not intuitive, in light of an increase in arterial oxygen content by a PRBC transfusion and therefore decrease in cardiac output and oxygen consumption. Two very beneficial effects in patients with active coronary artery disease. Indeed, increasing arterial oxygen content by transfusion may either 1) not increase oxygen delivery to the myocardium distal to an anatomic coronary stenosis or 2) have other deleterious biological effects on the cardiovascular system. Despite the results that RBC transfusion in unstable coronary artery disease has very little beneficial effects, most clinicians (standard of care) transfuse patients with ACS to a HCT of 30% regardless of potential adverse side effects of RBC transfusions. The guidelines for transfusion practice at the BIDMC for instance differentiate between hemodynamically stable and bleeding patients. The HCT of bleeding patients should be greater then 30%. In hemodynamically stable patient they further differentiate between patients with and without signs of end-organ ischemia. In patients without end-organ ischemia a HCT of 21% is tolerated and in patients with end-organ ischemia such as active coronary artery disease the HCT should be > 30%.
Storage of RBC before transfusion lowers the function of the RBCs: In a retrospective study in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) a recent study found that RBC transfusions were associated with an increased risk of mortality and short term and long term postoperative complications when patients were transfused with stored RBCs (older than 14 days). This association remained significant even after controlling for the assumption that patients receiving blood transfusions are in general sicker and therefore more prone to complications.{Koch, 2008 #8847} Since the introduction of acid-citrate-dextrose as a preservative it was possible to store blood for several weeks currently up to 42 days. The criteria for the decision when is blood storage too long is based arbitrarily on red blood cell survival in the recipient after 24 hours and should be greater than 70%.{Mollison, 1942 #8848} In the past decades however it has been established that transfused and surviving red blood cells exhibit quite different physiologic properties when compared to native RBCs. This phenomenon is called the storage lesion. There is a rapid depletion of 2,3 diglycerophosphate (2,3-DPG) with storage.{Bunn, 1968 #8849} This has a profound impact on hemoglobin affinity reducing oxygen release from hemoglobin by as much as 25% at similar change in oxygen saturation. Of note within 72h about 50% of the 2,3-DPG is restored in the transfused RBCs. Moreover, there is a marked decrease of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which reduces deformability of transfused RBCs and the ability of the RBCs to navigate the microcirculation.{Dern, 1967 #8850}
Infusion of stored RBCs causes hemolysis which in turn reduces nitric oxide bioavailability: Significant hemolysis (a condition in which RBC burst and the contents of RBC leak outside; in particular free hemoglobin) occurs both during storage and in particular during transfusion.{Sowemimo-Coker, 2002 #8851} Free hemoglobin outside of RBCs scavenges nitric oxide. Nitric oxide (NO) is a colorless gas, which is produced by the inner lining of the vessels (endothelium). It acts as D5W lubricant for vessels. It keeps blood vessels open and "lubricates them" so blood cell can flow through these blood vessels more easily. A decrease in nitric oxide bioavailability causes vasoconstriction and increased RBC adhesion to endothelium which in turn decreases microcirculatory flow.{Reiter, 2002 #6096} RBCs also contain arginase which released into the circulation will further enhance nitric oxide depletion by reducing its precursor arginine.{Kato, 2005 #7955}
The investigators will systematically examine the effects of RBC transfusion on systemic oxygen delivery, whole body oxygen consumption, nitric oxide bioavailability, endothelial function, cardiac performance, microcirculatory function, and platelet aggregation in patients with active coronary artery disease, presenting to the BIDMC with anemia, defined as hematocrit of < 30%. This is to test our hypothesis that depletion of the nitric oxide pool by transfusion-associated hemolysis causes a decrease in microcirculation, endothelial, and platelet function. To the best of our knowledge there is no study to date that explores the physiologic effects of RBC transfusion in patients with active coronary artery disease.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| RBC transfusion | Active comparator | Other: RBC transfusion |
| Normal saline infusion | Placebo comparator | Other: Normal saline infusion |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- ACS as defined by a patient who has cardiac chest discomfort and a troponin (cTnT) elevation of greater than 0.1 ng/mL.
- Pt. who is s/p CABG
- Patients with chronic coronary artery disease will be recruited as defined as past history of myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, CABG, or history of coronary artery disease documented in the medical record.
- Anemia as defined by HCT between 21%-30%.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients with stage III/IV heart failure
- Patients who are actively bleeding requiring immediate transfusion.
- Pregnant patients will be excluded.
- Patients taking sildenafil (Viagra) or other drugs like it, such as vardenafil (Levitra), or tadalafil (Cialis) within 48 hours before the study.
- Patients on iv nitroglycerine infusion.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RBC transfusion1 bag of packed red blood cells | Other | RBC transfusion |
| Normal saline infusion500 mL of normal saline infusion | Other | Normal saline infusion |
Primary outcome
Endothelial function as measured by flow mediated dilation
Time frame: within 1 day of transfusion
1 secondary outcome
platelet function
Time frame: within one hour of transfusion
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Recruitment difficulty). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Feb 2018.
Related trials for Acute Coronary Syndrome
Recruiting
CT Stress Myocardial Perfusion, Fractional Flow Reserve and Angiography in Patients With Stable Chest Pain Syndromes
Coronary Artery Disease, Chest Syndrome
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
RecruitingPhase 4
Early Single Antiplatelet Therapy After IVUS-Guided PCI in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes, STEMI
Recruiting
AI-Assisted Interpretation of Cardiac CT in the Emergency Department
Chest Pain, Acute Coronary Syndrome
Enrolling by invitation
Optical Coherence Tomography in Acute Vessel Evaluation
Ischemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Coronary Artery Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andre Dejam, MD, PhD principal investigator
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing RBC transfusion and Normal saline infusion in people with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Anemia, run by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Recruitment difficulty). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Endothelial function as measured by flow mediated dilation (time frame: within 1 day of transfusion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2018.