Stress Urinary IncontinencePhase 4NCT01505439
A Study to Estimate the Efficacy and Safety of Solifenacin in Female With Stress Urinary Incontinence and Urgency Urinary Incontinence
A Phase 4 study testing solifenacin in people with Stress Urinary Incontinence and Urgency Urinary Incontinence, run by Jeong Gu Lee at 6 sites in South Korea.
Trial summary
This study is to investigate the effects of solifenacin on urgency urinary incontinence symptoms and incontinence quality-of-life (I-QoL) in female patients with clinically significant stress urinary incontinence accompanied by urgency urinary incontinence. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Stress Urinary Incontinence, Urgency Urinary Incontinence
- What is being tested?
- solifenacin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 311 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Jun 2011to Jun 2014
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients are selected from those who meets one of criteria
- Patients with a positive cough provocation test
- Based on 3-day voiding diary, patients with:
- Urinary frequency (eight or more micturitions per day or 24 hours)
- Urinary urgency (two or more episodes per day or 24 hours)
- Urge incontinence (three or more episodes for 3 days)
Who cannot join
- Breast-feeding women or females of childbearing potential with the intention to become pregnant during the study
- Post-void residual urine volume (PRV) of 150 cc or more
- Patients who experienced acute ureteral obstruction requiring an indwelling catheter
- Patients who experienced clinically significant pelvic organ prolapse or lower urinary tract surgery within 6 months prior to the initiation of the present study
- Patients who underwent a urinary incontinence operation within 1 year
- Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, is a contraindication for anticholinergic treatment, including severe narrow-angled glaucoma, urinary retention, gastric retention, severe myasthenia, severe hepatic insufficiency or severe ulcerative colitis
Show all 19Show fewer
- Significant hepatic or renal disease, defined as having greater than twice the upper limit of the reference ranges for serum concentrations of aspartate aminotransferase (AST [SGOT]), alanine aminotransferase (ALT [SGPT]), alkaline phosphatase or creatinine
- Patients who have any of neurological disorders such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, and Parkinson's disease
- Patients who use an indwelling catheter or practice intermittent self-catheterization
- Recurrent UTIs defined as having been treated for symptomatic UTIs 3 times or more in the last year
- Symptomatic acute urinary tract infection (UTI) during the run-in period
- Patients who received any of the following prohibited concomitant drugs within 14 days prior to randomization: Treatment performed within the 14 days preceding randomization, or expected to initiate treatment during the study with:
- Any anticholinergics other than the trial drug
- Any drug treatment for overactive bladder. Estrogen treatment started more than 2 months prior to inclusion is allowed
- Patients taking an unstable dosage of any drug with anticholinergic side effects, or expected to start such treatment during the study
- Patients with chronic constipation or history of severe constipation
- Treatment with any of potent CYP3A4 inhibitors, such as cyclosporine, vinblastine, macrolide antibiotics (e.g. erythromycin, clarithromycin, azithromycin) or antifungal agents (e.g. ketoconazole, itraconazole, micronazole)
- Sexually active females of childbearing potential not using reliable contraception for at least 1 month prior to study initiation and not agreeing to use such methods during the entire study period and for at least 1 month thereafter. Reliable contraceptive methods are defined as intrauterine devices (IUDs), combination type contraceptive pills, hormonal implants, double barrier method, injectable contraceptives, surgical procedures (tubal ligation or vasectomy), or continence
- Any other condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the patient unsuitable for inclusion
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
South Korea6 sites
Site KR00003
Daegu
SIte KR00004
Incheon
Site KR00001
Jeonam
Site KR00002
Jungnam
Site KR00005
Pusan
Site KR00006
Seoul
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Open Label, Single Arm, Multicenter Study to Estimate the Efficacy and Safety of Solifenacin in Female With Clinically Significant Stress Urinary Incontinence and Urgency Urinary Incontinence
This study is to investigate the effects of solifenacin on urgency urinary incontinence symptoms and incontinence quality-of-life (I-QoL) in female patients with clinically significant stress urinary incontinence accompanied by urgency urinary incontinence.
- Being tested
- solifenacin
- Keywords
- solifenacin, bladder symptom
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Incontinence, Stress
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
solifenacinDrug
Also called Vesicare
oral
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Solifenacin group | Experimental | Once daily Receives: Drug: solifenacin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in the number of urge urinary incontinence episodes per 24 hours between baseline and week 12
Measured: Baseline and week 12
Secondary outcomes (10)
Percent change in the mean number of urge urinary incontinence episodes per 24 hours
Measured: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Change in the mean number of urge urinary incontinence episodes per 24 hours
urgency episodes: defined as those with a Bladder Sensation Scale rating of ≥ 3 in the voiding diary
Measured: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Change in the mean frequency of urination per 24 hours
Measured: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Percent change in the mean frequency of urination
Measured: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Changes in the mean and sum rating on the Bladder Sensation Scale per 24 hours
Measured: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Change in the mean number of severe urgency episodes per 24 hours
severe urgency episodes: defined as those with a Bladder Sensation Scale rating of ≥ 4 in the voiding diary
Measured: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Changes in overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) questionnaire
Change in total and each of OABSS items
Measured: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Changes in short urogenital distress inventory (UDI-6)
Change in total and each UDI-6 items
Measured: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Changes in short incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ-7)
Change in total and each of IIQ-7 items
Measured: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Safety assessed by the incidence and severity of side effects
Measured: For 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2011
- Primary completionJun 2014
- Study completionJun 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Stress Urinary IncontinenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 311 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jeong Gu Lee
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Astellas Pharma Korea, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Jeong Gu Lee, Korea University Anam Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01505439
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VENUS-MUI
- Status last verified
- Jun 2016
- First submitted
- 4 Jan 2012
- Last updated
- 15 Jun 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jun 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Open Label, Single Arm, Multicenter Study to Estimate the Efficacy and Safety of Solifenacin in Female With Clinically Significant Stress Urinary Incontinence and Urgency Urinary Incontinence
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01505439
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VENUS-MUI
- Keywords
- solifenacin, bladder symptom
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 311 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Jeong Gu LeeUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Astellas Pharma Korea, Inc.
- Study start
- Jun 2011
- Primary completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is to investigate the effects of solifenacin on urgency urinary incontinence symptoms and incontinence quality-of-life (I-QoL) in female patients with clinically significant stress urinary incontinence accompanied by urgency urinary incontinence.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Solifenacin group | Experimental | Drug: solifenacinOnce daily |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients are selected from those who meets one of criteria
- Patients with a positive cough provocation test
- Based on 3-day voiding diary, patients with:
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Breast-feeding women or females of childbearing potential with the intention to become pregnant during the study
- Post-void residual urine volume (PRV) of 150 cc or more
- Patients who experienced acute ureteral obstruction requiring an indwelling catheter
- Patients who experienced clinically significant pelvic organ prolapse or lower urinary tract surgery within 6 months prior to the initiation of the present study
- Patients who underwent a urinary incontinence operation within 1 year
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| solifenacinAlso: Vesicareoral | Drug | Solifenacin group |
Primary outcome
Changes in the number of urge urinary incontinence episodes per 24 hours between baseline and week 12
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
10 secondary outcomes
Percent change in the mean number of urge urinary incontinence episodes per 24 hours
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Change in the mean number of urge urinary incontinence episodes per 24 hours
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Change in the mean frequency of urination per 24 hours
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Percent change in the mean frequency of urination
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Changes in the mean and sum rating on the Bladder Sensation Scale per 24 hours
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Change in the mean number of severe urgency episodes per 24 hours
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Changes in overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Changes in short urogenital distress inventory (UDI-6)
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Changes in short incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ-7)
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Safety assessed by the incidence and severity of side effects
Time frame: For 12 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jun 2016.
Related trials for Stress Urinary Incontinence
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Orforglipron in Female Participants With Stress Urinary Incontinence Who Have Obesity or Overweight
Urinary Incontinence,Stress
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Return to Physical Activity After Retropublic Transvaginal Sling and Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
Stress Urinary Incontinence, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
RecruitingPhase 1
Allogeneic Use of Expanded Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived From Adipose Tissue (HC106), Female Urinary Incontinence Women Over 50 Years Old
Urinary Incontinence Stress
Recruiting
The Application of Somatosensory Interactive Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Men Underwent Radical Prostatectomy
Prostate Cancer (Post Prostatectomy)
RecruitingObservational study
Standardized 4D Transperineal Ultrasound Assessment of Urethrovesical Junction Mobility After Vaginal Laser Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Urinary Incontinence , Stress, Laser Therapy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing solifenacin in people with Stress Urinary Incontinence and Urgency Urinary Incontinence, run by Jeong Gu Lee at 6 sites in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in the number of urge urinary incontinence episodes per 24 hours between baseline and week 12 (time frame: Baseline and week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2016.