Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)Phase 3OSCILLATENCT01506401
The Oscillation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Treated Early (OSCILLATE) Trial
A Phase 3 study testing SensorMedics 3100B High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilator and Lung Protective Ventilation in people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), run by Canadian Critical Care Trials Group at 38 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
What is the effect of early high frequency oscillation (HFO) versus a lung-protective conventional ventilation (CV) strategy (using HFO only as rescue therapy), on all-cause hospital mortality among patients with severe early acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)? Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
- What is being tested?
- SensorMedics 3100B High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilator and Lung Protective Ventilation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 548 participants
- Where
- 38 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2009to Sep 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Acute onset of respiratory failure, with fewer than 2 weeks of new pulmonary symptoms;
- Endotracheal intubation or tracheostomy;
- Hypoxaemia - defined as a partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) less than or equal to 200mmHg on FiO2 greater than or equal to 0.5, regardless of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP)
- Bilateral alveolar consolidation (airspace disease) seen on frontal chest radiograph
- In addition, to qualify for randomization, patients are assessed on the following ventilator settings:
- Mode: pressure control or volume control or pressure support
Show all 10Show fewer
- FiO2 greater than 0.6 (or higher if necessary to keep pulse oximetric saturation [SpO2] greater than 90%)
- PEEP greater than 10 cm H2O (or greater if necessary to keep SpO2 greater than 90%)
- Tidal volume 6 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW)
- After at least 30 minutes on these settings, we sample arterial blood to assess oxygenation. If PaO2 is less than or equal to 200 mmHg, the patient qualifies for randomization; if PaO2/FiO2 greater than 200 mmHg, standardized hypoxaemia assessments are repeated at least once daily for the following 72 hours (providing eligibility criteria are still met).
Who cannot join
- Remaining duration of mechanical ventilation less than 48 hours, as judged by the attending physician
- Primary cause of acute respiratory failure judged by attending physician to be circulatory overload due to, for example, congestive heart failure, hyper-resuscitation, or need for dialysis
- Suspected pulmonary haemorrhage syndrome
- Lack of commitment to ongoing life support (note that this does not include the presence of a "Do Not Resuscitate" order alone, if there is a commitment to ongoing life support
- Aged less than 16 years or greater than 85 years
- Weight less than 35 kg
Show all 20Show fewer
- Severe chronic respiratory disease, as indicated by any of:
- Baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) less than 20 ml/kg predicted body weight
- Pre-existing chronic interstitial lung disease with chronic interstitial infiltration on chest x-ray
- Documented chronic carbon dioxide (CO2) retention (partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood [PaCO2] less than 50 mmHg) and/or chronic hypoxaemia(PaO2 less than 55 mmHg on FiO2=0.21)
- Chronic restrictive, obstructive, neuromuscular, chest wall or pulmonary vascular disease resulting in severe exercise restriction (e.g., unable to climb stairs or perform household duties), secondary polycythaemia, severe pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary arterial pressure [PAP] greater than 40 mmHg), or ventilator dependency
- Morbid obesity - defined as greater than 1 kg/cm body height
- Underlying pre-existing condition with expected 6-month mortality greater than 50%
- Neurological conditions with risk of intracranial hypertension (where hypercapnia should be avoided)
- Neuromuscular disease that will result in prolonged need for mechanical ventilation, including (but not limited to):
- Guillain Barre syndrome
- Cervical spinal cord injury
- Previous randomization in this trial
- All inclusion criteria present for greater than 73 hours in study intensive care unit (ICU)
- On HFO at the time of screening
Trial locations and contacts
38 sites in 5 countries.
38 sites in 5 countries
Canada24 sites
Royal Victoria Hospital
Barrie, Ontario, L4M 6M2
Peter Lougheed Centre/Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T1Y 6J4
University of Alberta Medical Centre
Edmonton, Alberta
St. Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6
Hamilton Health Sciences
Hamilton, Ontario
University of Western Ontario - University Hospital
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5
University of Western Ontario - Victoria Hospital
London, Ontario, N6C 6B5
Maisonneuve Rosemont
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
Centre Hosptialier de liUniersite de Montreal - CHUM- Saint Luc
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 3J4
Patrick Bellemare
Montreal, Quebec, H4J 1C5
Ottawa Hospital - Civic Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9
Ottawa Hospital-General Campus
Ottawa, Ontario
Hopital de l'Enfant-Jesus
Québec, Quebec, G1J 1Z4
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS)
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5
St Josephs
Toronto, Ontario, M6R 1B5
St Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Toronto, Ontario
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario
William Osler Health Centre
Toronto, Ontario
St Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia
Vancouver Island Health Research Centre
Victoria, British Columbia, V8R 1J8
Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg
Winnipeg, Manitoba
United States8 sites
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-5033
Parkland Memorial Hospital
Dallas, Texas, 75390-8558
Denver Health Medical Centre
Denver, Colorado, 80204
Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University
Greenville, North Carolina, 27858
University of Texas HSC
Houston, Texas, 77030
Orlando Regional Medical Centre
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Hospital of the University ofPennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Texas A&M HSC College of Medicine, Scott & White Hospital
Temple, Texas, 76508
Saudi Arabia3 sites
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre
Jeddah
King Fahad National Guard Hospital
Riyadh
Riyadh Armed Forces
Riyadh
Chile2 sites
Clinica Las Lilas
Santiago
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Santiago
About this study
Official title: The Oscillation for ARDS Treated Early (OSCILLATE) Trial
What is the effect of early high frequency oscillation (HFO) versus a lung-protective conventional ventilation (CV) strategy (using HFO only as rescue therapy), on all-cause hospital mortality among patients with severe early acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)?
Read the detailed description
High frequency oscillation is theoretically ideal for lung protection. Based on a strong physiological rationale, rapidly expanding use internationally, and promising results in early small RCTS, a definitive RCT to establish the impact of HFO versus current conventional ventilation on mortality is needed. We have completed a pilot multicentre RCT in preparation for this trial, with goals of investigating patient recruitment, protocol acceptance, and crossover rates. The pilot study met all objectives including recruitment that exceeded expectations (94 patients), and very good adherence to protocol. Results of the multinational OSCILLATE Trial will establish the impact of HFO versus conventional ventilation on mortality rates among adults with severe ARDS.
- Being tested
- SensorMedics 3100B High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilator, Lung Protective Ventilation
- Keywords
- ARDS, ventilator-induced lung injury, lung protective ventilation, high frequency oscillation
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SensorMedics 3100B High Frequency Oscillatory VentilatorDevice
High Frequency Oscillation
Lung Protective VentilationProcedure or surgery
Tidal Volume 6ml/kg; plateau pressure < or = 35cmH20; Prescribed PEEP/FiO2 chart
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional Ventilation | Active comparator | Low tidal volumes, relatively high PEEP. Receives: Procedure: Lung Protective Ventilation |
| High Frequency Oscillation | Experimental | Open-lung strategy for high frequency oscillation. Receives: Device: SensorMedics 3100B High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilator |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
All-cause hospital mortality
all-cause hospital mortality
Measured: Randomised patients will be ventilated according to their assigned ventilation strategy for up to 60 days, until they die on the ventilator or are successfully (for >24 hours) liberated from mechanical ventilation.
Secondary outcomes (6)
Mortality at other time-points
mortality at other time-points (ICU discharge, 60 days)
Measured: Duration of hospitalization (ICU discharge, 60 days)
Barotrauma
Barotrauma
Measured: ICU discharge or 60 days
Organ Dysfunction
Organ Dysfunction
Measured: Duration of hospitalization or 60 days
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Measured: Duration of hospitalization or 60 days
Duration of ICU & Hospital Stay
Duration of ICU \& Hospital Stay
Measured: Duration of hospitalization which may exceed 60 days
Quality of Life at 6 months
Quality of Life at 6 months post randomization
Measured: 6 months post randomization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2009
- Primary completionSep 2012
- Study completionSep 2012
Why it stopped: Enrolment halted by Steering Committee on advice from Data Monitoring Committee.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 548 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Canadian Critical Care Trials Group
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), McMaster University, University of Toronto
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Niall D Ferguson, MD, MSc, Principal investigator, University of TorontoMaureen O Meade, MD, MSc, Principal investigator, McMaster University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01506401
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MCT94829
- Other IDs
- ISRCTN87124254
- Acronym
- OSCILLATE
- Status last verified
- Sep 2012
- First submitted
- 14 Dec 2011
- Last updated
- 6 Aug 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Arabi YM, Cook DJ, Zhou Q, Smith O, Hand L, Turgeon AF, Matte A, Mehta S, Graham R, Brierley K, Adhikari NK, Meade MO, Ferguson ND; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Characteristics and Outcomes of Eligible Nonenrolled Patients in a Mechanical Ventilation Trial of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Dec 1;192(11):1306-13. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201501-0172OC.
PubMed 26192398Ferguson ND, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Mehta S, Hand L, Austin P, Zhou Q, Matte A, Walter SD, Lamontagne F, Granton JT, Arabi YM, Arroliga AC, Stewart TE, Slutsky AS, Meade MO; OSCILLATE Trial Investigators; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. High-frequency oscillation in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 28;368(9):795-805. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1215554. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
PubMed 23339639
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Aug 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Oscillation for ARDS Treated Early (OSCILLATE) Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01506401
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OSCILLATE / MCT94829
- Keywords
- ARDS, ventilator-induced lung injury, lung protective ventilation, high frequency oscillation
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Enrolment halted by Steering Committee on advice from Data Monitoring Committee.
- Enrolment
- 548 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Canadian Critical Care Trials GroupUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), McMaster University, University of Toronto
- Study start
- Jun 2009
- Primary completion
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
What is the effect of early high frequency oscillation (HFO) versus a lung-protective conventional ventilation (CV) strategy (using HFO only as rescue therapy), on all-cause hospital mortality among patients with severe early acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)?
Detailed description
High frequency oscillation is theoretically ideal for lung protection. Based on a strong physiological rationale, rapidly expanding use internationally, and promising results in early small RCTS, a definitive RCT to establish the impact of HFO versus current conventional ventilation on mortality is needed. We have completed a pilot multicentre RCT in preparation for this trial, with goals of investigating patient recruitment, protocol acceptance, and crossover rates. The pilot study met all objectives including recruitment that exceeded expectations (94 patients), and very good adherence to protocol. Results of the multinational OSCILLATE Trial will establish the impact of HFO versus conventional ventilation on mortality rates among adults with severe ARDS.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional Ventilation | Active comparator | Procedure: Lung Protective VentilationLow tidal volumes, relatively high PEEP. |
| High Frequency Oscillation | Experimental | Device: SensorMedics 3100B High Frequency Oscillatory VentilatorOpen-lung strategy for high frequency oscillation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Acute onset of respiratory failure, with fewer than 2 weeks of new pulmonary symptoms;
- Endotracheal intubation or tracheostomy;
- Hypoxaemia - defined as a partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) less than or equal to 200mmHg on FiO2 greater than or equal to 0.5, regardless of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP)
- Bilateral alveolar consolidation (airspace disease) seen on frontal chest radiograph
- In addition, to qualify for randomization, patients are assessed on the following ventilator settings:
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Remaining duration of mechanical ventilation less than 48 hours, as judged by the attending physician
- Primary cause of acute respiratory failure judged by attending physician to be circulatory overload due to, for example, congestive heart failure, hyper-resuscitation, or need for dialysis
- Suspected pulmonary haemorrhage syndrome
- Lack of commitment to ongoing life support (note that this does not include the presence of a "Do Not Resuscitate" order alone, if there is a commitment to ongoing life support
- Aged less than 16 years or greater than 85 years
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SensorMedics 3100B High Frequency Oscillatory VentilatorHigh Frequency Oscillation | Device | High Frequency Oscillation |
| Lung Protective VentilationTidal Volume 6ml/kg; plateau pressure < or = 35cmH20; Prescribed PEEP/FiO2 chart | Procedure or surgery | Conventional Ventilation |
Primary outcome
All-cause hospital mortality
Time frame: Randomised patients will be ventilated according to their assigned ventilation strategy for up to 60 days, until they die on the ventilator or are successfully (for >24 hours) liberated from mechanical ventilation.
all-cause hospital mortality
6 secondary outcomes
Mortality at other time-points
Time frame: Duration of hospitalization (ICU discharge, 60 days)
Barotrauma
Time frame: ICU discharge or 60 days
Organ Dysfunction
Time frame: Duration of hospitalization or 60 days
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Duration of hospitalization or 60 days
Duration of ICU & Hospital Stay
Time frame: Duration of hospitalization which may exceed 60 days
Quality of Life at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months post randomization
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Enrolment halted by Steering Committee on advice from Data Monitoring Committee.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Aug 2015.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26192398Arabi YM, Cook DJ, Zhou Q, Smith O, Hand L, Turgeon AF, Matte A, Mehta S, Graham R, Brierley K, Adhikari NK, Meade MO, Ferguson ND; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Characteristics and Outcomes of Eligible Nonenrolled Patients in a Mechanical Ventilation Trial of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Dec 1;192(11):1306-13. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201501-0172OC.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23339639Ferguson ND, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Mehta S, Hand L, Austin P, Zhou Q, Matte A, Walter SD, Lamontagne F, Granton JT, Arabi YM, Arroliga AC, Stewart TE, Slutsky AS, Meade MO; OSCILLATE Trial Investigators; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. High-frequency oscillation in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 28;368(9):795-805. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1215554. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
Related trials for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Multicenter Validation of an Explainable System for Neonatal ARDS-Compatible Phenotyping
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of Blood Viscosity in ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
ARDS
Recruiting
Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants
Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
Recruiting
REspiratory MEchanics for Delivering Individualised Exogenous Surfactant
Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Niall D Ferguson, MD, MSc principal investigator
University of Toronto
Maureen O Meade, MD, MSc principal investigator
McMaster University
38 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing SensorMedics 3100B High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilator and Lung Protective Ventilation in people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), run by Canadian Critical Care Trials Group at 38 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 38 sites in Canada, United States, Saudi Arabia, Chile, India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Enrolment halted by Steering Committee on advice from Data Monitoring Committee.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
All-cause hospital mortality (time frame: Randomised patients will be ventilated according to their assigned ventilation strategy for up to 60 days, until they die on the ventilator or are successfully (for >24 hours) liberated from mechanical ventilation.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01506401, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2015.