Stage III Lung Non-Small Cell Cancer AJCC v7Phase 2NCT01507428
Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography in Guiding Radiation Therapy for Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing 18F-Fluoromisonidazole, Carboplatin and Computed Tomography in people with Stage III Lung Non-Small Cell Cancer AJCC v7 and Stage IIIA Lung Non-Small Cell Cancer AJCC v7, run by National Cancer Institute (NCI) at 31 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This randomized phase II trial studies how well positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)-guided radiation therapy works compared to standard radiation therapy in treating patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stage III Lung Non-Small Cell Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IIIA Lung Non-Small Cell Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IIIB Lung Non-Small Cell Cancer AJCC v7
- What is being tested?
- 18F-Fluoromisonidazole, Carboplatin and Computed Tomography
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 138 participants
- Where
- 31 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 22 Feb 2012to 20 May 2022
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must have FDG-avid (maximum SUV >= 4.0) (from PET scan of any date, any scanner) and histologically or cytologically proven non-small cell lung cancer
- Patients must be clinical American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage IIIA or IIIB (AJCC, 7th ed.) with non-operable disease; non-operable disease will be determined by a multi-disciplinary treatment team, involving evaluation by at least 1 thoracic surgeon within 8 weeks prior to registration; Note: For patients who are clearly nonresectable, the case can be determined by the treating radiation oncologist and a medical oncologist, or pulmonologist
- Patients with multiple, ipsilateral pulmonary nodules (T3 or T4) are eligible if a definitive course of daily fractionated radiation therapy (RT) is planned
- History/physical examination, including documentation of weight, within 2 weeks prior to registration
- FDG-PET/CT scan for staging and RT plan within 4 weeks prior to registration
- CT scan or sim CT of chest and upper abdomen (IV contrast is recommended unless medically contraindicated) within 6 weeks prior to registration
Show all 17Show fewer
- CT scan of the brain (contrast is recommended unless medically contraindicated) or MRI of the brain within 6 weeks prior to registration
- Pulmonary function tests, including diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO), within 6 weeks prior to registration; patients must have forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) >= 1.2 Liter or >= 50% predicted without bronchodilator
- Zubrod performance status 0-1
- Able to tolerate PET/CT imaging required to be performed at an American College of Radiology (ACR) Imaging Core Laboratory (Lab) qualified facility
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >= 1,500 cells/mm^3 (within 2 weeks prior to registration on study)
- Platelets >= 100,000 cells/mm^3 (within 2 weeks prior to registration on study)
- Hemoglobin (Hgb) >= 10.0 g/dL (note: the use of transfusion or other intervention to achieve Hgb >= 10.0 g/dL is acceptable) (within 2 weeks prior to registration on study)
- Serum creatinine within normal institutional limits or a creatinine clearance >= 60 ml/min within 2 weeks prior to registration
- Negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 3 days prior to registration for women of childbearing potential
- Women of childbearing potential and male participants must agree to use a medically effective means of birth control throughout their participation in the treatment phase of the study
- The patient must provide study-specific informed consent prior to study entry
Who cannot join
- Patients with any component of small cell lung carcinoma are excluded
- Patients with evidence of a malignant pleural or pericardial effusion are excluded
- Prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) unless disease free for a minimum of 3 years (for example, carcinoma in situ of the breast, oral cavity, or cervix are all permissible)
- Prior systemic chemotherapy for the study cancer; note that prior chemotherapy for a different cancer is allowable
- Prior radiotherapy to the region of the study cancer that would result in overlap of radiation therapy fields
- Severe, active co-morbidity, defined as follows:
Show all 15Show fewer
- Unstable angina and/or congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization within the last 6 months
- Transmural myocardial infarction within the last 6 months
- Acute bacterial or fungal infection requiring intravenous antibiotics at the time of registration
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation or other respiratory illness requiring hospitalization or precluding study therapy at the time of registration
- Hepatic insufficiency resulting in clinical jaundice and/or coagulation defects; note, however, that laboratory tests for liver function and coagulation parameters are not required for entry into this protocol
- Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) based upon current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) definition; note, however, that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing is not required for entry into this protocol
- Pregnancy or women of childbearing potential and men who are sexually active and not willing/able to use medically acceptable forms of contraception
- Poorly controlled diabetes (defined as fasting glucose level > 200 mg/dL) despite attempts to improve glucose control by fasting duration and adjustment of medications; patients with diabetes will preferably be scheduled in the morning and instructions for fasting and use of medications will be provided in consultation with the patients' primary physicians
- Patients with T4 disease with radiographic evidence of massive invasion of a large pulmonary artery and tumor causing significant narrowing and destruction of that artery are excluded
Trial locations and contacts
31 sites in 2 countries.
31 sites in 2 countries
United States29 sites
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Augusta University Medical Center
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
Memorial Sloan Kettering Basking Ridge
Basking Ridge, New Jersey, 07920
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center/Fairview Hospital
Cleveland, Ohio, 44111
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Memorial Sloan Kettering Commack
Commack, New York, 11725
Memorial Sloan Kettering Westchester
Harrison, New York, 10604
Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center Independence
Independence, Ohio, 44131
Indiana University/Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216
Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
The James Graham Brown Cancer Center at University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
Hillcrest Hospital Cancer Center
Mayfield Heights, Ohio, 44124
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10065
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Stanford Cancer Institute Palo Alto
Palo Alto, California, 94304
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111
Temple University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140
Memorial Sloan Kettering Sleepy Hollow
Sleepy Hollow, New York, 10591
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center Strongsville
Strongsville, Ohio, 44136
Memorial Sloan Kettering Nassau
Uniondale, New York, 11553
Reading Hospital
West Reading, Pennsylvania, 19611
Cleveland Clinic Wooster Family Health and Surgery Center
Wooster, Ohio, 44691
Canada2 sites
McGill University Department of Oncology
Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1S6
Saskatoon Cancer Centre
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 4H4
About this study
Official title: Randomized Phase II Trial of Individualized Adaptive Radiotherapy Using During-Treatment FDG-PET/CT and Modern Technology in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
This randomized phase II trial studies how well positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)-guided radiation therapy works compared to standard radiation therapy in treating patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Using imaging procedures, such as PET and CT scans, to guide the radiation therapy, may help doctors deliver higher doses directly to the tumor and cause less damage to healthy tissue.
Read the detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- To determine whether tumor dose can be escalated to improve the freedom from local-regional progression-free (LRPF) rate at 2 years when an individualized adaptive radiation treatment (RT) plan is applied by the use of a fludeoxyglucose F 18 (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scan acquired during the course of fractionated RT in patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project [NSABP], Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG], Gynecologic Oncology Group [GOG] [NRG] Oncology) II. To determine whether the relative change in standard uptake value (SUV) peak from the baseline to the during-treatment FDG-PET/CT, defined as (during-treatment SUVpeak - baseline SUVpeak)/baseline SUV peak x 100%, can predict the LRPF rate with a 2-year follow up. (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG]-American College of Radiology Imaging Network [ACRIN])
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To determine whether an individualized dose escalation improves overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), lung cancer cause-specific survival, and delays time to local-regional progression compared to a conventional RT plan. (NRG Oncology) II. To compare the rate of severe (grade 3+ Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE], v. 4) radiation-induced lung toxicity (RILT) defined as severe RILT pneumonitis or clinical fibrosis. (NRG Oncology) III. To compare other severe adverse events, including grade 3+ (CTCAE, v. 4) esophagitis or grade 2 pericardial effusions, or any grade cardiac adverse events related to chemoradiation between a PET/CT-guided adaptive approach and a conventional RT plan. (NRG Oncology) IV. To evaluate the association of baseline 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO), a PET/CT imaging agent, uptake (tumor-to-blood pool ratio) with LRPF (i.e., the assessment of using baseline FMISO-PET uptake as a prognostic marker). (ECOG-ACRIN) V. To determine if the relative change in SUVpeak from baseline to during-treatment FDG-PET/CT and/or baseline FMISO uptake (tumor-to-blood pool ratio) predicts the differential benefit of the adaptive therapy, i.e., the association of uptake parameters with LRPF rate depending on the assigned treatment thus, assessing if these uptake parameters can be useful in guiding therapies, i.e., predictive markers. (ECOG-ACRIN) VI. To determine if other PET-imaging uptake parameters (SUV peak during-treatment for FDG-PET, maximum SUV, or relative change of maximum SUVs from pre- to during-treatment FDG-PET/CT, change in metabolic tumor volume, FMISO total hypoxic volume, FMISO tumor to mediastinum ratio, EORTC or University of Michigan/Kong's response criteria) will predict OS, LRPF rate, and lung cancer cause-specific (LCS) survival as well as to explore the optimal threshold for differentiating responders from non-responders. (ECOG-ACRIN)
CORRELATIVE SCIENCE OBJECTIVES:
- To study whether a model of combining current clinical and/or imaging factors with blood markers, including osteopontin (OPN) [for hypoxia marker], carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin fragment (CYFRA) 21-1 (for tumor burden), and interleukin (IL)-6 (inflammation) will predict the 2-year LRPF rate and survival better than a current model using clinical factors and radiation dose as well as imaging factors.
II. To determine/validate whether a model of combining mean lung dose (MLD), transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF beta1) and IL-8 will improve the predictive accuracy for clinical significant RILT better comparing to the current model of using MLD alone.
III. To explore, in a preliminary manner, whether proteomic and genomic markers in the blood prior to and during the early course of treatment are associated with tumor response after completion of treatment, LRPF rate, PFS, OS, and pattern of failure and treatment-related adverse events, such as radiation pneumonitis, esophagitis, and pericardial effusion. (exploratory)
OUTLINE:
Prior to treatment, patients undergo fludeoxyglucose F 18 (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) scans at baseline and periodically during study. A subset of patients also undergo 18F-fluoromisonidazole PET/CT scan at baseline. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms:
ARM I (standard chemoradiotherapy): Patients undergo radiotherapy once daily (QD) 5 days a week for 30 fractions. Patients also receive paclitaxel intravenously (IV) over 1 hour and carboplatin IV over 30 minutes once weekly for 6 weeks. Patients undergo FDG-PET/CT imaging between fractions 18 and 19.
ARM II (experimental chemoradiotherapy): Patients undergo an individualized dose of image-guided radiotherapy QD 5 days a week for 30 fractions and undergo 18 F FDG-PET/CT between fractions 18 and 19. Based on the scan results, patients undergo individualized adaptive radiotherapy for the final 9 fractions. Patients also receive paclitaxel and carboplatin as in Arm I.
CONSOLIDATION CHEMOTHERAPY: Beginning 4-6 weeks after chemoradiotherapy, patients receive paclitaxel IV over 3 hours and carboplatin IV over 30 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 3 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 month, every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually for 2 years.
- Conditions
- Stage III Lung Non-Small Cell Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IIIA Lung Non-Small Cell Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IIIB Lung Non-Small Cell Cancer AJCC v7
- Being tested
- 18F-Fluoromisonidazole, Carboplatin, Computed Tomography, External Beam Radiation Therapy, Fludeoxyglucose F-18
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
18F-FluoromisonidazoleDrug
Also called 18F-MISO, 18F-Misonidazole, FLUOROMISONIDAZOLE F-18, FMISO
Undergo FMISO PET/CT (Correlative studies)
CarboplatinDrug
Also called Blastocarb, Carboplat, Carboplatin Hexal, Carboplatino
Given IV
Computed TomographyProcedure or surgery
Also called CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography
Undergo FDG PET/CT
Computed TomographyProcedure or surgery
Also called CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography
Undergo FMISO PET/CT (Correlative studies)
External Beam Radiation TherapyRadiation
Also called Definitive Radiation Therapy, EBRT, External Beam Radiation, External Beam Radiotherapy
Undergo radiotherapy
Fludeoxyglucose F-18Drug
Also called 18FDG, FDG, Fludeoxyglucose (18F), fludeoxyglucose F 18
Undergo FDG PET/CT
Image-Guided Adaptive Radiation TherapyRadiation
Also called IGART
Undergo individualized adaptive radiotherapy
Laboratory Biomarker AnalysisOther
Correlative studies
PaclitaxelDrug
Also called Anzatax, Asotax, Bristaxol, Praxel
Given IV
Positron Emission TomographyProcedure or surgery
Also called Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, PET, PET Scan, Positron Emission Tomography Scan
Undergo FDG PET/CT
Positron Emission TomographyProcedure or surgery
Also called Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, PET, PET Scan, Positron Emission Tomography Scan
Undergo FMISO PET/CT (Correlative studies)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I (standard chemoradiotherapy) | Active comparator | Patients undergo radiotherapy QD 5 days a week for 30 fractions. Patients also receive paclitaxel IV over 1 hour and carboplatin IV over 30 minutes once weekly for 6 weeks. Patients undergo FDG-PET/CT imaging between fractions 18 and 19. Receives: Drug: 18F-Fluoromisonidazole; Drug: Carboplatin; Procedure: Computed Tomography; Radiation: External Beam Radiation Therapy; Drug: Fludeoxyglucose F-18; Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis; Drug: Paclitaxel; Procedure: Positron Emission Tomography |
| Arm II (experimental chemoradiotherapy) | Experimental | Patients undergo an individualized dose of image-guided radiotherapy QD 5 days a week for 30 fractions and undergo 18 F FDG-PET/CT between fractions 18 and 19. Based on the scan results, patients undergo individualized adaptive radiotherapy for the final 9 fractions. Patients also receive paclitaxel and carboplatin as in Arm I. Receives: Drug: 18F-Fluoromisonidazole; Drug: Carboplatin; Procedure: Computed Tomography; Drug: Fludeoxyglucose F-18; Radiation: Image-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy; Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis; Drug: Paclitaxel; Procedure: Positron Emission Tomography |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Alive Without Local-regional Progression [Local-regional Progression-free (LRPF) Survival] at Two Years (NRG)
LRPF survival is defined as survival without local-regional progression (LRP) as determined by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria with integration of 8F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT), and reviewed centrally based on submitted CT scans. LRP is defined as any of the following:
- ≥ 20% increase in any of the target lesions (primary and nodal disease),
- ≥ 20% increase in the peak SUV of target lesions,
- appearance of one or more new lesions within previously irradiated regions.
LRPF-free survival time is defined as time from registration to the date of first local-regional progression, distant recurrence (censored), death without documented LRP (censored), or death. LRPF survival rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: Randomization to 2 years
Relative Change in SUVpeak From the Baseline to the During-treatment Fludeoxyglucose F 18 (FDG)-Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) to LRPF With a 2-year Follow up. (ECOG-ACRIN)
To determine whether the relative change in SUVpeak (from the baseline to the during-treatment FDG-PET/CT) can predict the LRPF with a 2-year follow up.
Relative ΔSUVpeak = (Mid-treatment SUVpeak - baseline SUVpeak)/baseline SUVpeak x 100 LRPF was determined from Randomization up to 2 years
Measured: Baseline to during-treatment (approximately between fractions 18-19) Randomization to 2 years
Secondary outcomes (25)
Percentage of Participants With Local-regional Progression (NRG)
Local-regional progression (LRP) is determined by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria with integration of 8F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT), and reviewed centrally based on submitted CT scans. LRP is defined as any of the following:
- ≥ 20% increase in any of the target lesions (primary and nodal disease),
- ≥ 20% increase in the peak SUV of target lesions,
- appearance of one or more new lesions within previously irradiated regions.
LRP time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first LRP, distant metastasis without LRP (competing risk), death without LRP (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). LRP rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Two-year rates are provided.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up: weekly during treatment, then 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months after end of protocol treatment, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of reporting was 7.3 years. Two-year rates reported here.
Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Survival) (NRG)
Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Survival rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of survival times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Two-year rates are provided.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up: weekly during treatment, then 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months after end of protocol treatment, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of reporting was 7.3 years. Two-year rates reported here.
Percentage of Participants Alive Without Progression (Progression-free Survival) (NRG)
Progression is defined as the first of the following: local, regional, distant progression, or death due to any cause. Progression-free survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first progression, death, or last known follow-up (censored). Progression-free survival rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Two-year estimates are provided.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up: weekly during treatment, then 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months after end of protocol treatment, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of reporting was 7.3 years. Two-year rates reported here.
Percentage of Participants With Death Due to Lung Cancer (NRG)
A lung cancer death is defined as cause of death designated as lung cancer or death with any evidence of disease progression at any site without a direct evidence of other cause of death. Time to lung cancer death is defined as time from randomization to the date of lung cancer death, last known follow-up (censored), or death without lung cancer (competing risk). Lung cancer death rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Two-year rates are provided.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up: weekly during treatment, then 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months after end of protocol treatment, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of reporting was 7.3 years. Two-year rates reported here.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3+ Radiation-induced Lung Toxicity [RILT] at Any Time (NRG)
RILT is defined as clinical radiation pneumonitis and clinical fibrosis. Grading is defined in the protocol as follows (grade 3 and higher):
- Clinical pneumonitis:
- Grade 3: Severe cough, unresponsive to narcotic antitussive agent and /or dyspnea at rest, with radiographic evidence of acute pneumonitis, and requiring oxygen (intermittent or continuous) for treatment;
- Grade 4: Radiation pneumonitis causes respiratory insufficiency, requiring assisted ventilation;
- Grade 5: Radiation pneumonitis directly contributes to the cause of the death;
- Clinical fibrosis:
- Grade 3: Radiographic evidence of radiation fibrosis causing dyspnea at rest, interfering with activities of daily living, and home oxygen indicated;
- Grade 4: Radiation fibrosis causes respiratory insufficiency, requiring assisted ventilation;
- Grade 5: Radiation fibrosis directly contributes to the cause of the death.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up: weekly during treatment, then 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months after end of protocol treatment, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of reporting was 7.3 years.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3+ Esophagitis, Pericardial Effusion, and Any Cardiac Adverse Events at Any Time (NRG)
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; See Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up: weekly during treatment, then 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months after end of protocol treatment, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of reporting was 7.3 years.
Baseline 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) Uptake (Tumor-to-blood Pool Ratio) Measures Association With LRPF 2-years Post Registration (ECOG-ACRIN)
Baseline PET-MISO measures are normalized to blood uptake (ie., tumor-to-blood pool ratio) : Tumor SUV Mean, Tumor SUV Max, Tumor SUV Peak Association with LRPF 2-years post registration (That is, evaluate baseline FMISO-PET uptake as a prognostic marker of LRPF)
Measured: Baseline and 2-years after randomization
Baseline 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) Tumor Hypoxic Volume Association With LRPF 2-years Post Registration (ECOG-ACRIN)
Tumor Hypoxic Volume (PET-MISO measure) is defined as the number of pixels in the gross tumor volume with a tumor-to-blood pool ratio of > 1.2, Association With LRPF 2-years Post Registration
Measured: Baseline and 2-years after randomization
Relative Change in SUV Peak From the Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT Prediction of the Differential Benefit of the Adaptive Therapy (ECOG-ACRIN)
Relative change in SUVpeak defined as ΔSUVpeak = (during-treatment SUVpeak - baseline SUVpeak)/baseline SUVpeak x 100%), Outcomes evaluated at 5 years. Overall Survival (OS): True if Alive 5 years from registration Progression Free Survival (PFS): True if Alive and no Progression 5 years from registration Lung Cancer Cause-specific Survival (LCCS): True if Alive and no Lung Cancer 5 years from registration
Measured: Baseline to up to 5 years after randomization
SUVmax at Baseline Prediction of OS and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
FDG SUVmax as measured at baseline PET imaging will be assessed in its ability to predict Overall Survival (OS) at year 5.
Measured: Baseline to up to 5 years
FDG ΔSUVmax, From Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, to Predict OS and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
FDG ΔSUVmax as measured at baseline PET imaging will be assessed in its ability to predict Overall Survival (OS) at year 5.
Relative change in FDG SUVmax defined as ΔSUVmax = (during-treatment SUVmax - baseline SUVmax )/baseline SUVmax x 100%), Outcomes evaluated at 5 years. Overall Survival (OS): True if Alive 5 years from registration.
Measured: Baseline to up to 5 years
ΔSUVpeak Prediction of Overall Survival, Progression Free Survival, and Lung Cancer Cause-specific Survival (ECOG-ACRIN)
ΔSUVpeak will be measured as 100* (SUVpeak Mid-treatment - SUVpeak baseline)/(SUVpeak baseline) All survival measures will be measured in days from registration up to 5 years.
Measured: Up to 5 years
FDG ΔSUVpeak From Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, to Predict Overall Survival and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
FDG ΔSUVpeak, as measured from Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, will be assessed in its ability to predict Overall Survival (OS) and an Optimal Threshold (OT) for differentiating responders from non-responders will be identified ΔSUVpeak defined as ((during-treatment measure - baseline measure)/baseline measure) x 100%) OS defined as Alive 5 years post registration (Responders) OT defined as the ΔSUVpeak value corresponding to the maximum Youden index
Measured: Baseline to up to 5 years
FDG ΔMTV From Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, to Predict Overall Survival and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
FDG ΔMTV, as measured from Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, will be assessed in its ability to predict Overall Survival (OS) and an Optimal Threshold (OT) for differentiating responders from non-responders will be identified FDG ΔMTV defined as ((during-treatment measure - baseline measure)/baseline measure) x 100%) OS defined as Alive 5 years post registration (Responders) OT defined as the ΔMTV value corresponding to the maximum Youden index
Measured: Baseline to up to 5 years
FMISO Hypoxic Tumor Volume (HV) @Baseline, to Predict Overall Survival and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
FMISO Hypoxic tumor volume @baseline, will be assessed in its ability to predict Overall Survival (OS) and an Optimal Threshold (OT) for differentiating responders from non-responders will be identified HV defined as the number of pixels in the gross tumor volume with a tumor-to-blood pool ratio of > 1.2 in cc OS defined as Alive 5 years post registration (Responders) OT defined as the HV value corresponding to the maximum Youden index
Measured: Baseline to up to 5 years
FDG SUVmax @ Baseline FDG PET/CT, to Predict Lung Cancer Cause-specific Survival and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
SUVmax, as measured at Baseline, will be assessed in its ability to predict Lung Cancer Cause-specific Survival (LCCS) and an Optimal Threshold (OT) for differentiating responders from non-responders will be identified LCCS defined as NO Lung Cancer Cause-specific disease 5 years post registration (Responders) OT defined as the SUVmax value corresponding to the maximum Youden index
Measured: Baseline to up to 5 years
FDG ΔSUVmax From Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, to Predict Lung Cancer Cause-specific Survival and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
FDG ΔSUVmax, as measured from Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, will be assessed in its ability to predict Lung Cancer Cause-specific Survival (LCCS) and an Optimal Threshold (OT) for differentiating responders from non-responders will be identified ΔSUVmax defined as ((during-treatment measure - baseline measure)/baseline measure) x 100%) LCCS defined as NO Lung Cancer Cause-specific disease 5 years post registration (Responders) OT defined as the ΔSUVmax value corresponding to the maximum Youden index
Measured: Baseline to up to 5 years
FDG ΔSUVpeak From Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, to Predict Lung Cancer Cause-specific Survival and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
FDG ΔSUVpeak, as measured from Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, will be assessed in its ability to predict Lung Cancer Cause-specific Survival (LCCS) and an Optimal Threshold (OT) for differentiating responders from non-responders will be identified ΔSUVpeak defined as ((during-treatment measure - baseline measure)/baseline measure) x 100%) LCCS defined as NO Lung Cancer Cause-specific disease 5 years post registration (Responders) OT defined as the ΔSUVpeak value corresponding to the maximum Youden index
Measured: Baseline to up to 5 years
FDG ΔMTV From Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, to Predict Lung Cancer Cause-specific Survival and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
FDG ΔMTV, as measured from Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, will be assessed in its ability to predict Lung Cancer Cause-specific Survival (LCCS) and an Optimal Threshold (OT) for differentiating responders from non-responders will be identified FDG ΔMTV defined as ((during-treatment measure - baseline measure)/baseline measure) x 100%) LCCS defined as NO Lung Cancer Cause-specific disease 5 years post registration (Responders) OT defined as the ΔMTV value corresponding to the maximum Youden index
Measured: Baseline to up to 5 years
FMISO Hypoxic Tumor Volume (HV) @Baseline, to Predict Lung Cancer Cause-specific Survival and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
FMISO Hypoxic tumor volume @baseline, will be assessed in its ability to predict Lung Cancer Cause-specific Survival (LCCS) and an Optimal Threshold (OT) for differentiating responders from non-responders will be identified HV defined as the number of pixels in the gross tumor volume with a tumor-to-blood pool ratio of > 1.2 in cc LCCS defined as NO Lung Cancer Cause-specific disease 5 years post registration (Responders) OT defined as the HV value corresponding to the maximum Youden index
Measured: Baseline to up to 5 years
FDG SUVmax @ Baseline FDG PET/CT, to Predict Local-Regional Progression-Free and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
SUVmax, as measured at Baseline, will be assessed in its ability to predict Local-Regional Progression-Free(LRPF) and an Optimal Threshold (OT) for differentiating responders from non-responders will be identified LRPF defined as as NO progressive lung cancer within 1 cm from the planning target volume.or Progressive disease in any of the 14 nodal stations beyond 1cm 2 Years from regitration (Responders) OT defined as the SUVmax value corresponding to the maximum Youden index
Measured: Baseline to up to 5 years
FDG ΔSUVmax From Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, to Predict Local-Regional Progression-Free and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
FDG ΔSUVmax, as measured from Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, will be assessed in its ability to predict Local-Regional Progression-Free (LRPF) and an Optimal Threshold (OT) for differentiating responders from non-responders will be identified ΔSUVmax defined as ((during-treatment measure - baseline measure)/baseline measure) x 100%) LRPF defined as as NO progressive lung cancer within 1 cm from the planning target volume.or Progressive disease in any of the 14 nodal stations beyond 1cm 2 Years from regitration (Responders) OT defined as the ΔSUVmax value corresponding to the maximum Youden index
Measured: Baseline to up to 5 years
FDG ΔSUVpeak From Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, to Predict Local-Regional Progression-Free and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
FDG ΔSUVpeak, as measured from Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, will be assessed in its ability to predict Local-Regional Progression-Free (LRPF) and an Optimal Threshold (OT) for differentiating responders from non-responders will be identified ΔSUVpeak defined as ((during-treatment measure - baseline measure)/baseline measure) x 100%) LRPF defined as as NO progressive lung cancer within 1 cm from the planning target volume.or Progressive disease in any of the 14 nodal stations beyond 1cm 2 Years from regitration (Responders) OT defined as the ΔSUVpeak value corresponding to the maximum Youden index
Measured: Baseline to up to 5 years
FDG ΔMTV From Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, to Predict Local-Regional Progression-Free and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
FDG ΔMTV, as measured from Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, will be assessed in its ability to predict Local-Regional Progression-Free (LRPF) and an Optimal Threshold (OT) for differentiating responders from non-responders will be identified FDG ΔMTV defined as ((during-treatment measure - baseline measure)/baseline measure) x 100%) LRPF defined as as NO progressive lung cancer within 1 cm from the planning target volume.or Progressive disease in any of the 14 nodal stations beyond 1cm 2 Years from regitration (Responders) OT defined as the ΔMTV value corresponding to the maximum Youden index
Measured: Baseline to up to 5 years
FMISO Hypoxic Tumor Volume @Baseline, to Predict Local-Regional Progression-Free and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
FMISO Hypoxic tumor volume (HV) @baseline, will be assessed in its ability to predict Local-Regional Progression-Free (LRPF) and an Optimal Threshold (OT) for differentiating responders from non-responders will be identified HV defined as the number of pixels in the grLRPFs tumor volume with a tumor-to-blood pool ratio of > 1.2 in cc LRPF defined as as NO progressive lung cancer within 1 cm from the planning target volume.or Progressive disease in any of the 14 nodal stations beyond 1cm 2 Years from regitration (Responders) OT defined as the HV value corresponding to the maximum Youden index
Measured: Baseline to up to 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Study start22 Feb 2012
- Primary completion17 Aug 2020
- Study completion20 May 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Stage III Lung Non-Small Cell Cancer AJCC v7Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Cancer Institute (NCI)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 138 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- NRG Oncology
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Feng-Ming (Spring) P Kong, Principal investigator, NRG Oncology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01507428
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NCI-2012-00107
- Other IDs
- NCI-2012-00107, CDR0000721619, ACRIN-6697, RTOG-1106, RTOG-1106, U10CA180868, U10CA021661
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 5 Jan 2012
- Last updated
- 21 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Kong FS, Hu C, Pryma DA, Duan F, Matuszak M, Xiao Y, Ten Haken R, Siegel MJ, Hanna L, Curran WJ, Dunphy M, Gelblum D, Piert M, Jolly S, Robinson CG, Quon A, Loo BW, Srinivas S, Videtic GM, Faria SL, Ferguson C, Dunlap NE, Kundapur V, Paulus R, Siegel BA, Bradley JD, Machtay M. Primary Results of NRG-RTOG1106/ECOG-ACRIN 6697: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Individualized Adaptive (chemo)Radiotherapy Using Midtreatment 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Nov 20;42(33):3935-3946. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00022. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
PubMed 39365957
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Phase II Trial of Individualized Adaptive Radiotherapy Using During-Treatment FDG-PET/CT and Modern Technology in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01507428
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NCI-2012-00107
- Conditions
- Stage III Lung Non-Small Cell Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IIIA Lung Non-Small Cell Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IIIB Lung Non-Small Cell Cancer AJCC v7
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 138 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- NRG Oncology
- Study start
- 22 Feb 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 May 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Apr 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized phase II trial studies how well positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)-guided radiation therapy works compared to standard radiation therapy in treating patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Using imaging procedures, such as PET and CT scans, to guide the radiation therapy, may help doctors deliver higher doses directly to the tumor and cause less damage to healthy tissue.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- To determine whether tumor dose can be escalated to improve the freedom from local-regional progression-free (LRPF) rate at 2 years when an individualized adaptive radiation treatment (RT) plan is applied by the use of a fludeoxyglucose F 18 (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scan acquired during the course of fractionated RT in patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project [NSABP], Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG], Gynecologic Oncology Group [GOG] [NRG] Oncology) II. To determine whether the relative change in standard uptake value (SUV) peak from the baseline to the during-treatment FDG-PET/CT, defined as (during-treatment SUVpeak - baseline SUVpeak)/baseline SUV peak x 100%, can predict the LRPF rate with a 2-year follow up. (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG]-American College of Radiology Imaging Network [ACRIN])
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To determine whether an individualized dose escalation improves overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), lung cancer cause-specific survival, and delays time to local-regional progression compared to a conventional RT plan. (NRG Oncology) II. To compare the rate of severe (grade 3+ Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE], v. 4) radiation-induced lung toxicity (RILT) defined as severe RILT pneumonitis or clinical fibrosis. (NRG Oncology) III. To compare other severe adverse events, including grade 3+ (CTCAE, v. 4) esophagitis or grade 2 pericardial effusions, or any grade cardiac adverse events related to chemoradiation between a PET/CT-guided adaptive approach and a conventional RT plan. (NRG Oncology) IV. To evaluate the association of baseline 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO), a PET/CT imaging agent, uptake (tumor-to-blood pool ratio) with LRPF (i.e., the assessment of using baseline FMISO-PET uptake as a prognostic marker). (ECOG-ACRIN) V. To determine if the relative change in SUVpeak from baseline to during-treatment FDG-PET/CT and/or baseline FMISO uptake (tumor-to-blood pool ratio) predicts the differential benefit of the adaptive therapy, i.e., the association of uptake parameters with LRPF rate depending on the assigned treatment thus, assessing if these uptake parameters can be useful in guiding therapies, i.e., predictive markers. (ECOG-ACRIN) VI. To determine if other PET-imaging uptake parameters (SUV peak during-treatment for FDG-PET, maximum SUV, or relative change of maximum SUVs from pre- to during-treatment FDG-PET/CT, change in metabolic tumor volume, FMISO total hypoxic volume, FMISO tumor to mediastinum ratio, EORTC or University of Michigan/Kong's response criteria) will predict OS, LRPF rate, and lung cancer cause-specific (LCS) survival as well as to explore the optimal threshold for differentiating responders from non-responders. (ECOG-ACRIN)
CORRELATIVE SCIENCE OBJECTIVES:
- To study whether a model of combining current clinical and/or imaging factors with blood markers, including osteopontin (OPN) [for hypoxia marker], carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin fragment (CYFRA) 21-1 (for tumor burden), and interleukin (IL)-6 (inflammation) will predict the 2-year LRPF rate and survival better than a current model using clinical factors and radiation dose as well as imaging factors.
II. To determine/validate whether a model of combining mean lung dose (MLD), transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF beta1) and IL-8 will improve the predictive accuracy for clinical significant RILT better comparing to the current model of using MLD alone.
III. To explore, in a preliminary manner, whether proteomic and genomic markers in the blood prior to and during the early course of treatment are associated with tumor response after completion of treatment, LRPF rate, PFS, OS, and pattern of failure and treatment-related adverse events, such as radiation pneumonitis, esophagitis, and pericardial effusion. (exploratory)
OUTLINE:
Prior to treatment, patients undergo fludeoxyglucose F 18 (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) scans at baseline and periodically during study. A subset of patients also undergo 18F-fluoromisonidazole PET/CT scan at baseline. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms:
ARM I (standard chemoradiotherapy): Patients undergo radiotherapy once daily (QD) 5 days a week for 30 fractions. Patients also receive paclitaxel intravenously (IV) over 1 hour and carboplatin IV over 30 minutes once weekly for 6 weeks. Patients undergo FDG-PET/CT imaging between fractions 18 and 19.
ARM II (experimental chemoradiotherapy): Patients undergo an individualized dose of image-guided radiotherapy QD 5 days a week for 30 fractions and undergo 18 F FDG-PET/CT between fractions 18 and 19. Based on the scan results, patients undergo individualized adaptive radiotherapy for the final 9 fractions. Patients also receive paclitaxel and carboplatin as in Arm I.
CONSOLIDATION CHEMOTHERAPY: Beginning 4-6 weeks after chemoradiotherapy, patients receive paclitaxel IV over 3 hours and carboplatin IV over 30 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 3 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 month, every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually for 2 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I (standard chemoradiotherapy) | Active comparator | Drug: 18F-Fluoromisonidazole, Drug: Carboplatin, Procedure: Computed Tomography, Radiation: External Beam Radiation Therapy, Drug: Fludeoxyglucose F-18, Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Drug: Paclitaxel, Procedure: Positron Emission TomographyPatients undergo radiotherapy QD 5 days a week for 30 fractions. Patients also receive paclitaxel IV over 1 hour and carboplatin IV over 30 minutes once weekly for 6 weeks. Patients undergo FDG-PET/CT imaging between fractions 18 and 19. |
| Arm II (experimental chemoradiotherapy) | Experimental | Drug: 18F-Fluoromisonidazole, Drug: Carboplatin, Procedure: Computed Tomography, Drug: Fludeoxyglucose F-18, Radiation: Image-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy, Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Drug: Paclitaxel, Procedure: Positron Emission TomographyPatients undergo an individualized dose of image-guided radiotherapy QD 5 days a week for 30 fractions and undergo 18 F FDG-PET/CT between fractions 18 and 19. Based on the scan results, patients undergo individualized adaptive radiotherapy for the final 9 fractions. Patients also receive paclitaxel and carboplatin as in Arm I. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Patients must have FDG-avid (maximum SUV >= 4.0) (from PET scan of any date, any scanner) and histologically or cytologically proven non-small cell lung cancer
- Patients must be clinical American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage IIIA or IIIB (AJCC, 7th ed.) with non-operable disease; non-operable disease will be determined by a multi-disciplinary treatment team, involving evaluation by at least 1 thoracic surgeon within 8 weeks prior to registration; Note: For patients who are clearly nonresectable, the case can be determined by the treating radiation oncologist and a medical oncologist, or pulmonologist
- Patients with multiple, ipsilateral pulmonary nodules (T3 or T4) are eligible if a definitive course of daily fractionated radiation therapy (RT) is planned
- History/physical examination, including documentation of weight, within 2 weeks prior to registration
- FDG-PET/CT scan for staging and RT plan within 4 weeks prior to registration
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Patients with any component of small cell lung carcinoma are excluded
- Patients with evidence of a malignant pleural or pericardial effusion are excluded
- Prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) unless disease free for a minimum of 3 years (for example, carcinoma in situ of the breast, oral cavity, or cervix are all permissible)
- Prior systemic chemotherapy for the study cancer; note that prior chemotherapy for a different cancer is allowable
- Prior radiotherapy to the region of the study cancer that would result in overlap of radiation therapy fields
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 18F-FluoromisonidazoleAlso: 18F-MISO, 18F-Misonidazole, FLUOROMISONIDAZOLE F-18, FMISOUndergo FMISO PET/CT (Correlative studies) | Drug | Arm I (standard chemoradiotherapy), Arm II (experimental chemoradiotherapy) |
| CarboplatinAlso: Blastocarb, Carboplat, Carboplatin Hexal, CarboplatinoGiven IV | Drug | Arm I (standard chemoradiotherapy), Arm II (experimental chemoradiotherapy) |
| Computed TomographyAlso: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial TomographyUndergo FDG PET/CT | Procedure or surgery | Arm I (standard chemoradiotherapy), Arm II (experimental chemoradiotherapy) |
| Computed TomographyAlso: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial TomographyUndergo FMISO PET/CT (Correlative studies) | Procedure or surgery | Arm I (standard chemoradiotherapy), Arm II (experimental chemoradiotherapy) |
| External Beam Radiation TherapyAlso: Definitive Radiation Therapy, EBRT, External Beam Radiation, External Beam RadiotherapyUndergo radiotherapy | Radiation | Arm I (standard chemoradiotherapy) |
| Fludeoxyglucose F-18Also: 18FDG, FDG, Fludeoxyglucose (18F), fludeoxyglucose F 18Undergo FDG PET/CT | Drug | Arm I (standard chemoradiotherapy), Arm II (experimental chemoradiotherapy) |
| Image-Guided Adaptive Radiation TherapyAlso: IGARTUndergo individualized adaptive radiotherapy | Radiation | Arm II (experimental chemoradiotherapy) |
| Laboratory Biomarker AnalysisCorrelative studies | Other | Arm I (standard chemoradiotherapy), Arm II (experimental chemoradiotherapy) |
| PaclitaxelAlso: Anzatax, Asotax, Bristaxol, PraxelGiven IV | Drug | Arm I (standard chemoradiotherapy), Arm II (experimental chemoradiotherapy) |
| Positron Emission TomographyAlso: Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, PET, PET Scan, Positron Emission Tomography ScanUndergo FDG PET/CT | Procedure or surgery | Arm I (standard chemoradiotherapy), Arm II (experimental chemoradiotherapy) |
| Positron Emission TomographyAlso: Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, PET, PET Scan, Positron Emission Tomography ScanUndergo FMISO PET/CT (Correlative studies) | Procedure or surgery | Arm I (standard chemoradiotherapy), Arm II (experimental chemoradiotherapy) |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Alive Without Local-regional Progression [Local-regional Progression-free (LRPF) Survival] at Two Years (NRG)
Time frame: Randomization to 2 years
LRPF survival is defined as survival without local-regional progression (LRP) as determined by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria with integration of 8F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT), and reviewed centrally based on submitted CT scans. LRP is defined as any of the following: * ≥ 20% increase in any of the target lesions (primary and nodal disease), * ≥ 20% increase in the peak SUV of target lesions, * appearance of one or more new lesions within previously irradiated regions. LRPF-free survival time is defined as time from registration to the date of first local-regional progression, distant recurrence (censored), death without documented LRP (censored), or death. LRPF survival rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Relative Change in SUVpeak From the Baseline to the During-treatment Fludeoxyglucose F 18 (FDG)-Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) to LRPF With a 2-year Follow up. (ECOG-ACRIN)
Time frame: Baseline to during-treatment (approximately between fractions 18-19) Randomization to 2 years
To determine whether the relative change in SUVpeak (from the baseline to the during-treatment FDG-PET/CT) can predict the LRPF with a 2-year follow up. Relative ΔSUVpeak = (Mid-treatment SUVpeak - baseline SUVpeak)/baseline SUVpeak x 100 LRPF was determined from Randomization up to 2 years
25 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Local-regional Progression (NRG)
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up: weekly during treatment, then 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months after end of protocol treatment, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of reporting was 7.3 years. Two-year rates reported here.
Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Survival) (NRG)
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up: weekly during treatment, then 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months after end of protocol treatment, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of reporting was 7.3 years. Two-year rates reported here.
Percentage of Participants Alive Without Progression (Progression-free Survival) (NRG)
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up: weekly during treatment, then 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months after end of protocol treatment, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of reporting was 7.3 years. Two-year rates reported here.
Percentage of Participants With Death Due to Lung Cancer (NRG)
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up: weekly during treatment, then 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months after end of protocol treatment, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of reporting was 7.3 years. Two-year rates reported here.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3+ Radiation-induced Lung Toxicity [RILT] at Any Time (NRG)
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up: weekly during treatment, then 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months after end of protocol treatment, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of reporting was 7.3 years.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3+ Esophagitis, Pericardial Effusion, and Any Cardiac Adverse Events at Any Time (NRG)
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up: weekly during treatment, then 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months after end of protocol treatment, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of reporting was 7.3 years.
Baseline 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) Uptake (Tumor-to-blood Pool Ratio) Measures Association With LRPF 2-years Post Registration (ECOG-ACRIN)
Time frame: Baseline and 2-years after randomization
Baseline 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) Tumor Hypoxic Volume Association With LRPF 2-years Post Registration (ECOG-ACRIN)
Time frame: Baseline and 2-years after randomization
Relative Change in SUV Peak From the Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT Prediction of the Differential Benefit of the Adaptive Therapy (ECOG-ACRIN)
Time frame: Baseline to up to 5 years after randomization
SUVmax at Baseline Prediction of OS and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
Time frame: Baseline to up to 5 years
FDG ΔSUVmax, From Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, to Predict OS and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
Time frame: Baseline to up to 5 years
ΔSUVpeak Prediction of Overall Survival, Progression Free Survival, and Lung Cancer Cause-specific Survival (ECOG-ACRIN)
Time frame: Up to 5 years
FDG ΔSUVpeak From Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, to Predict Overall Survival and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
Time frame: Baseline to up to 5 years
FDG ΔMTV From Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, to Predict Overall Survival and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
Time frame: Baseline to up to 5 years
FMISO Hypoxic Tumor Volume (HV) @Baseline, to Predict Overall Survival and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
Time frame: Baseline to up to 5 years
FDG SUVmax @ Baseline FDG PET/CT, to Predict Lung Cancer Cause-specific Survival and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
Time frame: Baseline to up to 5 years
FDG ΔSUVmax From Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, to Predict Lung Cancer Cause-specific Survival and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
Time frame: Baseline to up to 5 years
FDG ΔSUVpeak From Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, to Predict Lung Cancer Cause-specific Survival and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
Time frame: Baseline to up to 5 years
FDG ΔMTV From Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, to Predict Lung Cancer Cause-specific Survival and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
Time frame: Baseline to up to 5 years
FMISO Hypoxic Tumor Volume (HV) @Baseline, to Predict Lung Cancer Cause-specific Survival and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
Time frame: Baseline to up to 5 years
FDG SUVmax @ Baseline FDG PET/CT, to Predict Local-Regional Progression-Free and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
Time frame: Baseline to up to 5 years
FDG ΔSUVmax From Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, to Predict Local-Regional Progression-Free and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
Time frame: Baseline to up to 5 years
FDG ΔSUVpeak From Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, to Predict Local-Regional Progression-Free and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
Time frame: Baseline to up to 5 years
FDG ΔMTV From Baseline to the During-treatment FDG PET/CT, to Predict Local-Regional Progression-Free and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
Time frame: Baseline to up to 5 years
FMISO Hypoxic Tumor Volume @Baseline, to Predict Local-Regional Progression-Free and Optimal Threshold (ECOG-ACRIN)
Time frame: Baseline to up to 5 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Apr 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39365957Kong FS, Hu C, Pryma DA, Duan F, Matuszak M, Xiao Y, Ten Haken R, Siegel MJ, Hanna L, Curran WJ, Dunphy M, Gelblum D, Piert M, Jolly S, Robinson CG, Quon A, Loo BW, Srinivas S, Videtic GM, Faria SL, Ferguson C, Dunlap NE, Kundapur V, Paulus R, Siegel BA, Bradley JD, Machtay M. Primary Results of NRG-RTOG1106/ECOG-ACRIN 6697: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Individualized Adaptive (chemo)Radiotherapy Using Midtreatment 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Nov 20;42(33):3935-3946. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00022. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
Related trials for Stage III Lung Non-Small Cell Cancer AJCC v7
Not yet recruiting
Moderately Hypofractionated Versus Conventional Chemoradiotherapy With Consolidation Immunotherapy in Patients With Unresectable, Non-Targetable Stage III Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Stage III NSCLC
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate Pumitamig Versus Durvalumab Following Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy in Participants With Unresectable Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) (ROSETTA Lung-201)
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing Osimertinib as a Treatment for Lung Cancers With an EGFR Exon 20 Change
Advanced Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma, Recurrent Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of JNJ-90301900 in Combination With Chemoradiation Followed by Consolidation Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Reduced-Dose vs Standard-Dose Thoracic Radiotherapy After Induction Chemoimmunotherapy in Older or Frail Stage III NSCLC
Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Feng-Ming (Spring) P Kong principal investigator
NRG Oncology
31 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing 18F-Fluoromisonidazole, Carboplatin and Computed Tomography in people with Stage III Lung Non-Small Cell Cancer AJCC v7 and Stage IIIA Lung Non-Small Cell Cancer AJCC v7, run by National Cancer Institute (NCI) at 31 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 31 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Apr 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Alive Without Local-regional Progression [Local-regional Progression-free (LRPF) Survival] at Two Years (NRG) (time frame: Randomization to 2 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01507428, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Apr 2026.