GoutPhase 3CLEAR 1NCT01510158
Combining Lesinurad With Allopurinol in Inadequate Responders
A Phase 3 study testing Lesinurad and Allopurinol in people with Gout, run by Ardea Biosciences, Inc. at 165 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study that compare the serum uric acid lowering effects, clinical benefits, and safety of lesinurad in combination with allopurinol to allopurinol alone in subjects with gout who have had an inadequate response to allopurinol. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Gout
- What is being tested?
- Lesinurad and Allopurinol
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 607 participants
- Where
- 165 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2012to Aug 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject is able to understand the study procedures, the risks involved and willing to provide written informed consent before the first study related activity.
- Subject meets the diagnosis of gout as per the American Rheumatism Association Criteria for the Classification of Acute Arthritis of Primary Gout.
- Subject has been taking allopurinol as the sole urate-lowering therapy indicated for the treatment of gout for at least 8 weeks prior to the Screening Visit at a stable, medically appropriate dose, as determined by the investigator, of at least 300 mg per day (at least 200 mg for subjects with moderate renal impairment).
- Subject must be able to take gout flare prophylaxis with colchicine or an Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) (including Cox-2 selective NSAID) ± PPI.
- Subject has an sUA level ≥ 6.5 mg/dL at the Screening Visit and ≥ 6.0 mg/dL at Day -7 Visit.
- Subject has reported at least 2 gout flares in the prior 12 months.
- Body mass index (BMI) < 45 kg/m2
Who cannot join
- Subject with known hypersensitivity or allergy to allopurinol.
- Subject who is taking any other approved urate-lowering medication that is indicated for the treatment of gout other than allopurinol within 8 weeks of the Screening Visit.
- Subject who is pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Subject who consumes more than 14 drinks of alcohol per week (eg, 1 drink = 5 oz [150 mL] of wine, 12 oz [360 mL] of beer, or 1.5 oz [45 mL] of hard liquor).
- Subject with a history or suspicion of drug abuse within the past 5 years.
- Subject that requires or may require systemic immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment.
Show all 18Show fewer
- Subject with known or suspected human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
- Subject with a positive test for active hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection.
- Subject with a history of malignancy within the previous 5 years with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancer that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence, treated cervical dysplasia or treated in situ Grade 1 cervical cancer.
- Subject within the last 12 months with: unstable angina, New York Heart Association class III or IV heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, or deep venous thrombosis; or subjects currently receiving anticoagulants.
- Subject with uncontrolled hypertension.
- Subject with an estimated creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min.
- Subject with active peptic ulcer disease requiring treatment.
- Subject with a history of xanthinuria, active liver disease, or hepatic dysfunction.
- Subject receiving chronic treatment with more than 325 mg of salicylates per day.
- Subject taking valpromide, progabide, or valproic acid.
- Subject who has received an investigational therapy within 8 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the Screening Visit.
- Subject with any other medical or psychological condition, which might create undue risk to the subject or interfere with the subject's ability to comply with the protocol requirements, or to complete the study.
Trial locations and contacts
165 sites in 1 country.
165 sites in 1 country
United States165 sites
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
Study site
Altoona, Pennsylvania, 16602
Study site
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
Study site
Ashland, Oregon, 97520
Study site
Athens, Alabama, 35611
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30328
Study site
Augusta, Georgia, 30909
Study site
Austin, Texas, 78756
Study site
Belle Vernon, Pennsylvania, 15012
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35209
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35213
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35242
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Study site
Bountiful, Utah, 84010
Study site
Brentwood, Tennessee, 37027
Study site
Brooksville, Florida, 34601
Study site
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 52403
Study site
Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320
Study site
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Study site
Clairton, Pennsylvania, 15025
Study site
Clearwater, Florida, 33765
Study site
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80907
Study site
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80918
Study site
Columbia, South Carolina, 29204
Study site
Columbus, Ohio, 43235
Study site
Conyers, Georgia, 30013
Study site
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78414
Study site
Covina, California, 91723
Study site
Dallas, Texas, 75218
Study site
Dayton, Ohio, 45417
Study site
Daytona Beach, Florida, 32114
Study site
Denver, Colorado, 80230
Study site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Study site
East Bradenton, Florida, 34208
Study site
El Paso, Texas, 79902
Study site
Elizabethtown, Kentucky, 41701
Study site
Endwell, New York, 13760
Study site
Englewood, Colorado, 80113
Study site
Eunice, Louisiana, 70535
Study site
Evansville, Indiana, 47714
Study site
Florissant, Missouri, 63031
Study site
Fort Worth, Texas, 76135
Study site
Franklin, Indiana, 46131
Study site
Gainesville, Florida, 32607
Study site
Glendale, Arizona, 85308
Study site
Glendale, California, 91204
Study site
Goodyear, Arizona, 85395
Study site
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27405
Study site
Gulf Shores, Alabama, 36542
Study site
Gurnee, Illinois, 60031
Study site
Hazelwood, Missouri, 63042
Study site
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96814
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77004
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77043
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77062
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77098
Study site
Huntington Beach, California, 92646
Study site
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404
Study site
Inglewood, California, 90301
Study site
Jackson, Mississippi, 39202
Study site
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Study site
Jefferson City, Missouri, 65109
Study site
Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, 19046
Study site
Johns Creek, Georgia, 30097
Study site
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49009
Study site
Kansas City, Missouri, 64114
Study site
Kingwood, Texas, 77339
Study site
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37923
Study site
La Porte, Indiana, 46350
Study site
Lancaster, California, 93534
Study site
Lansdale, Pennsylvania, 19446
Study site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119
Study site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89183
Study site
Lincoln, California, 95648
Study site
Little Rock, Arizona, 72204
Study site
Little Rock, Arizona, 72211
Study site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72206
Study site
Manassas, Virginia, 20110
Study site
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Study site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Study site
Meridian, Idaho, 83642
Study site
Meridian, Idaho, 83646
Study site
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006
Study site
Miami, Florida, 33125
Study site
Miami, Florida, 33135
Study site
Miami, Florida, 33143
Study site
Miami, Florida, 33165
Study site
Miami, Florida, 33186
Study site
Midlothian, Virginia, 23114
Study site
Milford, Connecticut, 06460
Study site
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Study site
Missoula, Montana, 59808
Study site
Mobile, Alabama, 36604
Study site
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Study site
Monroe, Louisiana, 71203
Study site
Monroe, Wisconsin, 53566
Study site
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26505
Study site
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464
Study site
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29588
Study site
Naples, Florida, 34102
Study site
Nassau Bay, Texas, 77058
Study site
Natchitoches, Louisiana, 71457
Study site
New London, Connecticut, 06320
Study site
New York, New York, 10016
Study site
Newnan, Georgia, 30265
Study site
Ocala, Florida, 34474
Study site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
Study site
Orange, California, 92868
Study site
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
Study site
Paducah, Kentucky, 42003
Study site
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33027
Study site
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33029
Study site
Peoria, Arizona, 85381
Study site
Perrysburg, Ohio, 43551
Study site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85050
Study site
Pinson, Alabama, 35126
Study site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15206
Study site
Plabo, Texas, 75024
Study site
Plano, Texas, 75075
Study site
Port Orange, Florida, 32127
Study site
Port Orchard, Washington, 98366
Study site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609
Study site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612
Study site
Richmond, Virginia, 23233
Study site
Richmond, Virginia, 23235
Study site
Rock Hill, South Carolina, 29732
Study site
Sacramento, California, 95825
Study site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84102
Study site
San Angelo, Texas, 76904
Study site
San Antonio, Texas, 78209
Study site
San Antonio, Texas, 78215
Study site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Study site
San Leandro, California, 94578
Study site
Santa Maria, California, 93454
Study site
Sealy, Texas, 77474
Study site
Sellersville, Pennsylvania, 18960
Study site
Shawnee, Kansas, 66218
Study site
Shelby, North Carolina, 28150
Study site
Southfield, Michigan, 48034
Study site
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303
Study site
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Study site
Spokane, Washington, 99208
Study site
St Louis, Missouri, 63117
Study site
St Louis, Missouri, 63128
Study site
Suffolk, Virginia, 23435
Study site
Syracuse, New York, 13210
Study site
Tabor City, North Carolina, 28463
Study site
Tampa, Florida, 33614
Study site
Traverse City, Michigan, 49684
Study site
Tucson, Arizona, 85704
Study site
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104
Study site
Tuscon, Arizona, 85723
Study site
Upper Saint Clair, Pennsylvania, 15241
Study site
Vero Beach, Florida, 32960
Study site
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23462
Study site
Waco, Texas, 76708
Study site
Washington, Missouri, 63090
Study site
West Jordan, Utah, 84088
Study site
Wexford, Pennsylvania, 15090
Study site
Williamsville, New York, 14221
Study site
Willoughby Hills, Ohio, 44904
Study site
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401
Study site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Study site
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled, Combination Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lesinurad and Allopurinol Compared to Allopurinol Alone in Subjects With Gout Who Have Had an Inadequate Hypouricemic Response to Standard of Care Allopurinol.
This study that compare the serum uric acid lowering effects, clinical benefits, and safety of lesinurad in combination with allopurinol to allopurinol alone in subjects with gout who have had an inadequate response to allopurinol.
Read the detailed description
Allopurinol is the standard of care for the treatment of gout. Nevertheless, most patients treated with allopurinol do not achieve the recommended serum urate (sUA) target of < 6.0 mg/dL and need additional therapy to achieve the target. Probenecid and benzbromarone are uric acid transporter 1 (URAT1) inhibitors, generally recommended as second-line agents for patients who are either resistant to or intolerant of allopurinol. However, benzbromarone is not available in the US and probenecid is rarely used. Consequently, there is a clear unmet medical need for a new safe and effective therapy for gout, such as lesinurad, a potent URAT1 inhibitor, that can be used in combination with allopurinol in patients not responding adequately to allopurinol monotherapy so that very high rates of response can be achieved by nearly all gout patients, rather than a minority.The subjects selected for this study will have moderate to severe gout with an inadequate response to allopurinol
- Conditions
- Gout
- Being tested
- Lesinurad, Placebo, Allopurinol
- Medical subject headings
- Gout
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LesinuradDrug
Tablets, 200 mg once daily (qd)
LesinuradDrug
Tablets, 400 mg qd
PlaceboDrug
Tablets, Placebo qd
AllopurinolDrug
Tablets, ≥ 300 mg QD (≥ 200 mg qd for subjects with moderate renal impairment)
AllopurinolDrug
Tablets, ≥ 300 mg QD (≥ 200 mg qd for subjects with moderate renal impairment)
AllopurinolDrug
Tablets, ≥ 300 mg QD (≥ 200 mg qd for subjects with moderate renal impairment)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| lesinurad 200 mg + allopurinol | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Lesinurad; Drug: Allopurinol |
| lesinurad 400 mg + allopurinol | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Lesinurad; Drug: Allopurinol |
| Placebo + allopurinol | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Allopurinol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of Subjects With an sUA Level That is < 6.0 mg/dL
Measured: 6 Months, analysis after all subjects complete 12 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Gout Flares
Mean rate of gout flares requiring treatment for the 6-month period from the end of Month 6 to the end of Month 12
Measured: 12 Months
Tophus
Proportion of subjects with ≥ 1 target tophus at Baseline who experience complete resolution of at least 1 target tophus by Month 12
Measured: 12 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2012
- Primary completionJul 2014
- Study completionAug 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for GoutStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 607 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ardea Biosciences, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Chris Storgard, MD, Study director, Ardea Biosciences, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01510158
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RDEA594-301
- Acronym
- CLEAR 1
- Status last verified
- Jul 2016
- First submitted
- 11 Jan 2012
- Last updated
- 18 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Topless R, Noorbaloochi S, Merriman TR, Singh JA. Change in serum urate level with urate-lowering therapy initiation associates in the immediate term with patient-reported outcomes in people with gout. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2022 Oct;56:152057. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2022.152057. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
PubMed 35835008Saag KG, Fitz-Patrick D, Kopicko J, Fung M, Bhakta N, Adler S, Storgard C, Baumgartner S, Becker MA. Lesinurad Combined With Allopurinol: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in Gout Patients With an Inadequate Response to Standard-of-Care Allopurinol (a US-Based Study). Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Jan;69(1):203-212. doi: 10.1002/art.39840.
PubMed 27564409
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled, Combination Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lesinurad and Allopurinol Compared to Allopurinol Alone in Subjects With Gout Who Have Had an Inadequate Hypouricemic Response to Standard of Care Allopurinol.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01510158
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CLEAR 1 / RDEA594-301
- Conditions
- Gout
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 607 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ardea Biosciences, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2012
- Primary completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Aug 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study that compare the serum uric acid lowering effects, clinical benefits, and safety of lesinurad in combination with allopurinol to allopurinol alone in subjects with gout who have had an inadequate response to allopurinol.
Detailed description
Allopurinol is the standard of care for the treatment of gout. Nevertheless, most patients treated with allopurinol do not achieve the recommended serum urate (sUA) target of < 6.0 mg/dL and need additional therapy to achieve the target. Probenecid and benzbromarone are uric acid transporter 1 (URAT1) inhibitors, generally recommended as second-line agents for patients who are either resistant to or intolerant of allopurinol. However, benzbromarone is not available in the US and probenecid is rarely used. Consequently, there is a clear unmet medical need for a new safe and effective therapy for gout, such as lesinurad, a potent URAT1 inhibitor, that can be used in combination with allopurinol in patients not responding adequately to allopurinol monotherapy so that very high rates of response can be achieved by nearly all gout patients, rather than a minority.The subjects selected for this study will have moderate to severe gout with an inadequate response to allopurinol
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| lesinurad 200 mg + allopurinol | Experimental | Drug: Lesinurad, Drug: Allopurinol |
| lesinurad 400 mg + allopurinol | Experimental | Drug: Lesinurad, Drug: Allopurinol |
| Placebo + allopurinol | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo, Drug: Allopurinol |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Subject is able to understand the study procedures, the risks involved and willing to provide written informed consent before the first study related activity.
- Subject meets the diagnosis of gout as per the American Rheumatism Association Criteria for the Classification of Acute Arthritis of Primary Gout.
- Subject has been taking allopurinol as the sole urate-lowering therapy indicated for the treatment of gout for at least 8 weeks prior to the Screening Visit at a stable, medically appropriate dose, as determined by the investigator, of at least 300 mg per day (at least 200 mg for subjects with moderate renal impairment).
- Subject must be able to take gout flare prophylaxis with colchicine or an Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) (including Cox-2 selective NSAID) ± PPI.
- Subject has an sUA level ≥ 6.5 mg/dL at the Screening Visit and ≥ 6.0 mg/dL at Day -7 Visit.
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Subject with known hypersensitivity or allergy to allopurinol.
- Subject who is taking any other approved urate-lowering medication that is indicated for the treatment of gout other than allopurinol within 8 weeks of the Screening Visit.
- Subject who is pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Subject who consumes more than 14 drinks of alcohol per week (eg, 1 drink = 5 oz [150 mL] of wine, 12 oz [360 mL] of beer, or 1.5 oz [45 mL] of hard liquor).
- Subject with a history or suspicion of drug abuse within the past 5 years.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LesinuradTablets, 200 mg once daily (qd) | Drug | lesinurad 200 mg + allopurinol |
| LesinuradTablets, 400 mg qd | Drug | lesinurad 400 mg + allopurinol |
| PlaceboTablets, Placebo qd | Drug | Placebo + allopurinol |
| AllopurinolTablets, ≥ 300 mg QD (≥ 200 mg qd for subjects with moderate renal impairment) | Drug | lesinurad 200 mg + allopurinol |
| AllopurinolTablets, ≥ 300 mg QD (≥ 200 mg qd for subjects with moderate renal impairment) | Drug | lesinurad 400 mg + allopurinol |
| AllopurinolTablets, ≥ 300 mg QD (≥ 200 mg qd for subjects with moderate renal impairment) | Drug | Placebo + allopurinol |
Primary outcome
Proportion of Subjects With an sUA Level That is < 6.0 mg/dL
Time frame: 6 Months, analysis after all subjects complete 12 months
2 secondary outcomes
Gout Flares
Time frame: 12 Months
Tophus
Time frame: 12 Months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Aug 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35835008Topless R, Noorbaloochi S, Merriman TR, Singh JA. Change in serum urate level with urate-lowering therapy initiation associates in the immediate term with patient-reported outcomes in people with gout. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2022 Oct;56:152057. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2022.152057. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27564409Saag KG, Fitz-Patrick D, Kopicko J, Fung M, Bhakta N, Adler S, Storgard C, Baumgartner S, Becker MA. Lesinurad Combined With Allopurinol: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in Gout Patients With an Inadequate Response to Standard-of-Care Allopurinol (a US-Based Study). Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Jan;69(1):203-212. doi: 10.1002/art.39840.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Gout
RecruitingPhase 4
Treat-to-Target Serum Urate Versus Treat-to-Avoid Symptoms in Gout
Gout
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Dotinurad Versus Allopurinol in Participants With Gout
Gout
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Dotinurad Versus Allopurinol in Tophaceous Gout
Tophaceous Gout
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Combined Metabolic Activator Supplementation in Subjects Diagnosed With Gout
Gout Disease
Enrolling by invitation
The Remote Monitoring of Gout Study
Gout Initiating Urate-loweringUrate-lowering Therapy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chris Storgard, MD study director
Ardea Biosciences, Inc.
165 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Lesinurad and Allopurinol in people with Gout, run by Ardea Biosciences, Inc. at 165 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 165 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Aug 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of Subjects With an sUA Level That is < 6.0 mg/dL (time frame: 6 Months, analysis after all subjects complete 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01510158, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Aug 2016.