Breast CancerINCANCT01510964
The Involvement of Breast Cancer Patients During Oncological Consultations
A study testing prompt-sheet in people with Breast Cancer, run by Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The main aim of the study is to assess if a pre consultation intervention facilitates greater participation of patients (and accompanying key persons when present) in the consultation process by determining an increase in questioning and/or in the number of different illness related issues (e.g. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- prompt-sheet
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Jun 2011to May 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- all consecutive patients
- age between 18 and 75 years
- attending the Oncology Out-patient Clinics of the participating centres
- recent diagnosis of breast cancer at an early stage
Who cannot join
- presence of metastasis or relapse
- severe mental deterioration
- comprehension difficulties of the Italian language.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Involvement of Breast Cancer Patients During Oncological Consultations. A Multi-centre Randomized Controlled Trial. The Study Protocol
The main aim of the study is to assess if a pre consultation intervention facilitates greater participation of patients (and accompanying key persons when present) in the consultation process by determining an increase in questioning and/or in the number of different illness related issues (e.g. diagnosis, treatment, prognosis) being discussed with the oncologist.
Other aims are to assess the effect of the intervention on the oncologist's level of patient involvement, on patient satisfaction and coping and to explore the role of key persons accompanying the patient.
The investigators expect that patients who have the opportunity to rehearse their informative needs before the consultation will ask a greater number of questions which in turn will determine their greater involvement by the physician and a greater number of satisfied needs. The investigators expect also that the straightforward use of a list of printed questions of potential relevance for cancer patients and their companions at an early stage of illness, by modifying the process of information exchange, increases their participation and satisfaction with the consultation, with potential benefits for treatment adherence and consequently treatment efficacy.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- prompt-sheet, control group
- Keywords
- Breast cancer, Patient involvement, Question prompt-sheet, Doctor-patient communication, RCT
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Patient Participation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
prompt-sheetBehavioural
Prompt sheet is a form on which to write the reply to the following request: "Please indicate the arguments which you want to discuss today with your oncologist" and a written list of possible questions the patient (companion) would like to ask to the oncology.
control groupBehavioural
Patients and companions of the control group receive a form on which to write their reply to the following request: "Please indicate the arguments which you want to discuss today with your oncologist"
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| prompt-sheet | Experimental | Patients and companions of intervention group receive a form on which to write their reply to the following request: "Please indicate the arguments which you want to discuss today with your oncologist" and the prompt sheet. An introduction explains the importance of asking questions during the consultations. The patient (companion) is invited to select among a written list of about 50 possible questions those, if any, s/he would like to ask today to the oncology. Receives: Behavioral: prompt-sheet |
| control group | Other | Patients and companions of the control group receive a form on which to write their reply to the following request: "Please indicate the arguments which you want to discuss today with your oncologist" Receives: Behavioral: control group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
number of question during the consultation
The intervention prompt-sheet aims to increase the number of question by giving the opportunity to patients and companions to reflect on their informative needs on the basis of a wide range of possible questions from which to choose those perceived as most relevant in view of the subsequent consultation. Question asking is considered an index for patient participation during the consultation. The total number of patient questions during the consultation regarding diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and other issues is the primary outcome measure.
Measured: 1 hour after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Secondary outcomes (8)
The number of informative needs not met during the consultation.
This measure is derived by comparing the number of questions indicated by patients and their companion before the consultation with those actually raised during the consultation
Measured: 1 hour after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Ability to cope with the illness
the Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) is a questionnaire of six items on a Likert scale from 0 (same or less) to 2 (much better, much more), administered after the consultation.
Measured: 2 hours after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Patient involvement (SDM-Q and OPTION)
The SDM-Q is a self administered questionnaire of 9 items on a Likert scale from 1 to 6 and assesses patients' perception of the decisional process and their level of involvement during the consultation. The OPTION Scale is composed of 12 items of operational definitions of different patient involving skills, rated on a Likert scale from 0 to 4. The scale is applied by trained raters to the audio-recording of the consultation
Measured: 2 hours after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Satisfaction with decisions (SWD).
Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SWD) is a questionnaireof 6 items on a Likert scale from 0 (completely disagree) to 5 (agree completely), administered after the consultation.
Measured: 2 hours after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Recalling and understanding of information
The Recall Questionnaire consists of six questions which ask the patient's to recall the received information on treatment decisions and pathology. We added three other questions, rated on a 0 (no at al) to 5 (very much) likert scale asking whether the patient succeeded in their purpose of question asking, whether the oncologist answered the questions properly and how much more information she would have needed.
Measured: 2 hours after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Overall consultation atmosphere (VR-COPE, RIAS, AIMIT on the audio-recorded consultation)
VRCOPE assesses the content, the process and relational aspects of patient-centred communication during medical consultations on the basis of a multidimensional evaluation and comprises nine items. RIAS is a coding system of medical consultations, composed by 40 categories describing interactions between doctors and patients. AIMIT is a coding system to assess in the therapeutic dialogue the activity of interpersonal motivational systems that guide the verbal and non verbal behaviors during interactions.
Measured: 1 hour after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Perceived Patient-doctor relationship (PDRQ-9 and DDPRQ-10)
PDRQ-9 is a self-administered (after the consultation) questionnaire of 9 items on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, to measure the relationship between the doctor and the patient, from a patient point of view.The DDPRQ-10 is a self-report instrument of 10 items on a Likert scale from 1 to 6, completed by physicians after an encounter with a patient.
Measured: 2 hours after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Perceived role preference of the patient (CPS)
CPS (Oncologist version) assesses how the oncologist perceives the role that patient might prefer regarding the decision making process.
Measured: 2 hours after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2011
- Primary completionMay 2013
- Study completionMay 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Claudia Goss, Principal investigator, Universita di Verona
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01510964
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- INCA (CE.Prot. 1719)
- Acronym
- INCA
- Status last verified
- Dec 2011
- First submitted
- 22 Dec 2011
- Last updated
- 13 Aug 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Buizza C, Cela H, Ferrari C, Goss C, Bottacini A, Mazzi MA, Del Piccolo L, Ghilardi A. Does being accompanied make a difference in communication during breast cancer consultations? Results from a multi-centered randomized controlled trial. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2021;39(2):189-203. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2020.1829775. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
PubMed 33089767Buizza C, Ghilardi A, Mazzardi P, Barbera D, Fremondi V, Bottacini A, Mazzi MA, Goss C. Effects of a Question Prompt Sheet on the Oncologist-Patient Relationship: a Multi-centred Randomised Controlled Trial in Breast Cancer. J Cancer Educ. 2020 Jun;35(3):621-628. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01505-6.
PubMed 30852786Bottacini A, Goss C, Mazzi MA, Ghilardi A, Buizza C, Molino A, Fiorio E, Nortilli R, Amoroso V, Vassalli L, Brown RF. The involvement of early stage breast cancer patients during oncology consultations in Italy: a multi-centred, randomized controlled trial of a question prompt sheet versus question listing. BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 11;7(8):e015079. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015079.
PubMed 28801395Goss C, Ghilardi A, Deledda G, Buizza C, Bottacini A, Del Piccolo L, Rimondini M, Chiodera F, Mazzi MA, Ballarin M, Bighelli I, Strepparava MG, Molino A, Fiorio E, Nortilli R, Caliolo C, Zuliani S, Auriemma A, Maspero F, Simoncini EL, Ragni F, Brown R, Zimmermann C. INvolvement of breast CAncer patients during oncological consultations: a multicentre randomised controlled trial--the INCA study protocol. BMJ Open. 2013 May 2;3(5):e002266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002266.
PubMed 23645911
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Aug 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Involvement of Breast Cancer Patients During Oncological Consultations. A Multi-centre Randomized Controlled Trial. The Study Protocol
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01510964
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INCA / INCA (CE.Prot. 1719)
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- Breast cancer, Patient involvement, Question prompt-sheet, Doctor-patient communication, RCT
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata VeronaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2011
- Primary completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main aim of the study is to assess if a pre consultation intervention facilitates greater participation of patients (and accompanying key persons when present) in the consultation process by determining an increase in questioning and/or in the number of different illness related issues (e.g. diagnosis, treatment, prognosis) being discussed with the oncologist.
Other aims are to assess the effect of the intervention on the oncologist's level of patient involvement, on patient satisfaction and coping and to explore the role of key persons accompanying the patient.
The investigators expect that patients who have the opportunity to rehearse their informative needs before the consultation will ask a greater number of questions which in turn will determine their greater involvement by the physician and a greater number of satisfied needs. The investigators expect also that the straightforward use of a list of printed questions of potential relevance for cancer patients and their companions at an early stage of illness, by modifying the process of information exchange, increases their participation and satisfaction with the consultation, with potential benefits for treatment adherence and consequently treatment efficacy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| prompt-sheet | Experimental | Behavioral: prompt-sheetPatients and companions of intervention group receive a form on which to write their reply to the following request: "Please indicate the arguments which you want to discuss today with your oncologist" and the prompt sheet. An introduction explains the importance of asking questions during the consultations. The patient (companion) is invited to select among a written list of about 50 possible questions those, if any, s/he would like to ask today to the oncology. |
| control group | Other | Behavioral: control groupPatients and companions of the control group receive a form on which to write their reply to the following request: "Please indicate the arguments which you want to discuss today with your oncologist" |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- all consecutive patients
- age between 18 and 75 years
- attending the Oncology Out-patient Clinics of the participating centres
- recent diagnosis of breast cancer at an early stage
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- presence of metastasis or relapse
- severe mental deterioration
- comprehension difficulties of the Italian language.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| prompt-sheetPrompt sheet is a form on which to write the reply to the following request: "Please indicate the arguments which you want to discuss today with your oncologist" and a written list of possible questions the patient (companion) would like to ask to the oncology. | Behavioural | prompt-sheet |
| control groupPatients and companions of the control group receive a form on which to write their reply to the following request: "Please indicate the arguments which you want to discuss today with your oncologist" | Behavioural | control group |
Primary outcome
number of question during the consultation
Time frame: 1 hour after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
The intervention prompt-sheet aims to increase the number of question by giving the opportunity to patients and companions to reflect on their informative needs on the basis of a wide range of possible questions from which to choose those perceived as most relevant in view of the subsequent consultation. Question asking is considered an index for patient participation during the consultation. The total number of patient questions during the consultation regarding diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and other issues is the primary outcome measure.
8 secondary outcomes
The number of informative needs not met during the consultation.
Time frame: 1 hour after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Ability to cope with the illness
Time frame: 2 hours after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Patient involvement (SDM-Q and OPTION)
Time frame: 2 hours after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Satisfaction with decisions (SWD).
Time frame: 2 hours after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Recalling and understanding of information
Time frame: 2 hours after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Overall consultation atmosphere (VR-COPE, RIAS, AIMIT on the audio-recorded consultation)
Time frame: 1 hour after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Perceived Patient-doctor relationship (PDRQ-9 and DDPRQ-10)
Time frame: 2 hours after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Perceived role preference of the patient (CPS)
Time frame: 2 hours after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Aug 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33089767Buizza C, Cela H, Ferrari C, Goss C, Bottacini A, Mazzi MA, Del Piccolo L, Ghilardi A. Does being accompanied make a difference in communication during breast cancer consultations? Results from a multi-centered randomized controlled trial. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2021;39(2):189-203. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2020.1829775. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30852786Buizza C, Ghilardi A, Mazzardi P, Barbera D, Fremondi V, Bottacini A, Mazzi MA, Goss C. Effects of a Question Prompt Sheet on the Oncologist-Patient Relationship: a Multi-centred Randomised Controlled Trial in Breast Cancer. J Cancer Educ. 2020 Jun;35(3):621-628. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01505-6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28801395Bottacini A, Goss C, Mazzi MA, Ghilardi A, Buizza C, Molino A, Fiorio E, Nortilli R, Amoroso V, Vassalli L, Brown RF. The involvement of early stage breast cancer patients during oncology consultations in Italy: a multi-centred, randomized controlled trial of a question prompt sheet versus question listing. BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 11;7(8):e015079. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015079.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23645911Goss C, Ghilardi A, Deledda G, Buizza C, Bottacini A, Del Piccolo L, Rimondini M, Chiodera F, Mazzi MA, Ballarin M, Bighelli I, Strepparava MG, Molino A, Fiorio E, Nortilli R, Caliolo C, Zuliani S, Auriemma A, Maspero F, Simoncini EL, Ragni F, Brown R, Zimmermann C. INvolvement of breast CAncer patients during oncological consultations: a multicentre randomised controlled trial--the INCA study protocol. BMJ Open. 2013 May 2;3(5):e002266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002266.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Claudia Goss principal investigator
Universita di Verona
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing prompt-sheet in people with Breast Cancer, run by Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
number of question during the consultation (time frame: 1 hour after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01510964, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2013.