AzTrials
AzTrials

Peripheral NeuropathyNCT01513148

Effects of Light Emitting Diode Irradiation on the Conduction Parameters of the Superficial Radial Nerve

A study testing Superluminous light diode in people with Peripheral Neuropathy, run by Shenandoah University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The introduction of light emitting diode (LED) devices as a novel treatment for pain relief in place of low-level laser warrants fundamental research on the effect of LED devices on one of the potential explanatory mechanisms: peripheral neurophysiology in vivo. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Peripheral Neuropathy
What is being tested?
Superluminous light diode
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
32 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2006to Sep 2008
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • no history of neurological disease, polyneuropathy, peripheral neuropathy or cervical radiculopathy

Who cannot join

  • positive findings during the clinical screening examination suggestive of an underlying neurological disease, polyneuropathy, peripheral neuropathy or cervical radiculopathy.
  • a history of a neurological disease, polyneuropathy, peripheral neuropathy or cervical radiculopathy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Shenandoah University Divsion of Physical Therapy

    Winchester, Virginia, 22601

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Light Therapy on Superficial Radial Nerve Conduction Using a Clustered Array of Infrared Super Luminous and Red Light Emitting Diodes

The introduction of light emitting diode (LED) devices as a novel treatment for pain relief in place of low-level laser warrants fundamental research on the effect of LED devices on one of the potential explanatory mechanisms: peripheral neurophysiology in vivo. A randomized controlled study will be conducted by measuring nerve conduction on the superficial radial nerve of healthy subjects (n=64). One baseline measurement and five post-irradiation recordings (2-min interval each) will be performed of the nerve conduction velocity (NCV) and peak latency (PL) and peak amplitude (PA). The experimental group (=32) will receive an irradiation of 2 J/cm2 with an infrared LED device (Dynatronics Solaris Model 705), while the placebo group will be treated by sham irradiation. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of LED light on the conduction velocity and amplitude of the superficial radial nerve.

Being tested
Superluminous light diode
Medical subject headings
Peripheral Nervous System Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Superluminous light diodeDevice

    Also called Dynatronics Solaris Model 705

    900W, 880nm, 1.6 J/cm2 for 30sec

Study groups in NCT01513148
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Superluminous Light Diode IrradiationExperimentalApplication of super luminous diodes light irradiation over the superficial radial nerve
Receives: Device: Superluminous light diode
Sham Superluminous Light Diode IrradiationPlacebo comparatorSham Superluminous Light Diode Irradiation over the Superficial Radial Nerve for the same time period as the intervention group
Receives: Device: Superluminous light diode

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Nerve Conduction Velocity (Meters Per Second)

    Change in nerve conduction velocity (m/s) from pre-treatment to 0 minute (immediately after treatment), and at 2 min intervals after treatment until 10 minutes post treatment occurs. Calculated difference scores at each time point = nerve conduction velocity (NCV) - baseline NCV. A positive variance represented an increase from baseline and is interpreted as being an increase or faster velocity.

    Measured: pre-treatment, 0 min, 2 min, 4 min, 6 min, 8 min and 10 min after treatment

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Negative Peak Latency (Milliseconds)

    Change in negative peak latency (ms) from pre-treatment to 0 minute (immediately after treatment), and at 2 min intervals after treatment until 10 minutes post treatment occurs. Calculated difference scores at each time period = negative peak latency NPL - baseline NPL. A positive variance can be interpreted as being increase from baseline or a prolonged or slowed NPL.

    Measured: pre-treatment, 0 min, 2 min, 4 min, 6 min, 8 min and 10 min after treatment

  2. Temperature (Degrees C)

    Change in superficial skin temperature (degrees C) from pre-treatment to 0 minute (immediately after treatment), and at 2 min intervals after treatment until 10 minutes post treatment occurs. Calculated difference scores at each time point = Temperature - Temperature at baseline. A positive variance int his calculation can be interpreted as being an increase from baseline or an increase in skin temperature

    Measured: pre-treatment, 0 min, 2 min, 4 min, 6 min, 8 min and 10 min after treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jan 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2006
  3. Primary completionSep 2008
  4. Study completionSep 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
32 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01513148
Sponsor's protocol ID
06-750
Status last verified
Jul 2013
First submitted
9 Jan 2012
Last updated
29 Jul 2013
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Greathouse DG, Currier DP, Gilmore RL. Effects of clinical infrared laser on superficial radial nerve conduction. Phys Ther. 1985 Aug;65(8):1184-7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/65.8.1184.

    PubMed 4023064
  • Downie AW, Scott TR. An improved technique for radial nerve conduction studies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1967 Aug;30(4):332-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.30.4.332. No abstract available.

    PubMed 4293407
  • Snyder-Mackler L, Bork CE. Effect of helium-neon laser irradiation on peripheral sensory nerve latency. Phys Ther. 1988 Feb;68(2):223-5. doi: 10.1093/ptj/68.2.223.

    PubMed 3340661

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Superluminous light diode in people with Peripheral Neuropathy, run by Shenandoah University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jul 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Jul 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Nerve Conduction Velocity (Meters Per Second) (time frame: pre-treatment, 0 min, 2 min, 4 min, 6 min, 8 min and 10 min after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01513148, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jul 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in