Peripheral NeuropathyNCT01513148
Effects of Light Emitting Diode Irradiation on the Conduction Parameters of the Superficial Radial Nerve
A study testing Superluminous light diode in people with Peripheral Neuropathy, run by Shenandoah University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The introduction of light emitting diode (LED) devices as a novel treatment for pain relief in place of low-level laser warrants fundamental research on the effect of LED devices on one of the potential explanatory mechanisms: peripheral neurophysiology in vivo. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Peripheral Neuropathy
- What is being tested?
- Superluminous light diode
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2006to Sep 2008
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- no history of neurological disease, polyneuropathy, peripheral neuropathy or cervical radiculopathy
Who cannot join
- positive findings during the clinical screening examination suggestive of an underlying neurological disease, polyneuropathy, peripheral neuropathy or cervical radiculopathy.
- a history of a neurological disease, polyneuropathy, peripheral neuropathy or cervical radiculopathy.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Shenandoah University Divsion of Physical Therapy
Winchester, Virginia, 22601
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Light Therapy on Superficial Radial Nerve Conduction Using a Clustered Array of Infrared Super Luminous and Red Light Emitting Diodes
The introduction of light emitting diode (LED) devices as a novel treatment for pain relief in place of low-level laser warrants fundamental research on the effect of LED devices on one of the potential explanatory mechanisms: peripheral neurophysiology in vivo. A randomized controlled study will be conducted by measuring nerve conduction on the superficial radial nerve of healthy subjects (n=64). One baseline measurement and five post-irradiation recordings (2-min interval each) will be performed of the nerve conduction velocity (NCV) and peak latency (PL) and peak amplitude (PA). The experimental group (=32) will receive an irradiation of 2 J/cm2 with an infrared LED device (Dynatronics Solaris Model 705), while the placebo group will be treated by sham irradiation. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of LED light on the conduction velocity and amplitude of the superficial radial nerve.
- Conditions
- Peripheral Neuropathy
- Being tested
- Superluminous light diode
- Medical subject headings
- Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Superluminous light diodeDevice
Also called Dynatronics Solaris Model 705
900W, 880nm, 1.6 J/cm2 for 30sec
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Superluminous Light Diode Irradiation | Experimental | Application of super luminous diodes light irradiation over the superficial radial nerve Receives: Device: Superluminous light diode |
| Sham Superluminous Light Diode Irradiation | Placebo comparator | Sham Superluminous Light Diode Irradiation over the Superficial Radial Nerve for the same time period as the intervention group Receives: Device: Superluminous light diode |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Nerve Conduction Velocity (Meters Per Second)
Change in nerve conduction velocity (m/s) from pre-treatment to 0 minute (immediately after treatment), and at 2 min intervals after treatment until 10 minutes post treatment occurs. Calculated difference scores at each time point = nerve conduction velocity (NCV) - baseline NCV. A positive variance represented an increase from baseline and is interpreted as being an increase or faster velocity.
Measured: pre-treatment, 0 min, 2 min, 4 min, 6 min, 8 min and 10 min after treatment
Secondary outcomes (2)
Negative Peak Latency (Milliseconds)
Change in negative peak latency (ms) from pre-treatment to 0 minute (immediately after treatment), and at 2 min intervals after treatment until 10 minutes post treatment occurs. Calculated difference scores at each time period = negative peak latency NPL - baseline NPL. A positive variance can be interpreted as being increase from baseline or a prolonged or slowed NPL.
Measured: pre-treatment, 0 min, 2 min, 4 min, 6 min, 8 min and 10 min after treatment
Temperature (Degrees C)
Change in superficial skin temperature (degrees C) from pre-treatment to 0 minute (immediately after treatment), and at 2 min intervals after treatment until 10 minutes post treatment occurs. Calculated difference scores at each time point = Temperature - Temperature at baseline. A positive variance int his calculation can be interpreted as being an increase from baseline or an increase in skin temperature
Measured: pre-treatment, 0 min, 2 min, 4 min, 6 min, 8 min and 10 min after treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2006
- Primary completionSep 2008
- Study completionSep 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Peripheral NeuropathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shenandoah University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Todd Telemeco, Shenandoah University
- Investigators
- Todd A Telemeco, PhD, Principal investigator, Shenandoah University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01513148
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 06-750
- Status last verified
- Jul 2013
- First submitted
- 9 Jan 2012
- Last updated
- 29 Jul 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Greathouse DG, Currier DP, Gilmore RL. Effects of clinical infrared laser on superficial radial nerve conduction. Phys Ther. 1985 Aug;65(8):1184-7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/65.8.1184.
PubMed 4023064Downie AW, Scott TR. An improved technique for radial nerve conduction studies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1967 Aug;30(4):332-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.30.4.332. No abstract available.
PubMed 4293407Snyder-Mackler L, Bork CE. Effect of helium-neon laser irradiation on peripheral sensory nerve latency. Phys Ther. 1988 Feb;68(2):223-5. doi: 10.1093/ptj/68.2.223.
PubMed 3340661
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jul 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Light Therapy on Superficial Radial Nerve Conduction Using a Clustered Array of Infrared Super Luminous and Red Light Emitting Diodes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01513148
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 06-750
- Conditions
- Peripheral Neuropathy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Shenandoah UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2006
- Primary completion
- Sep 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 4 Jul 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The introduction of light emitting diode (LED) devices as a novel treatment for pain relief in place of low-level laser warrants fundamental research on the effect of LED devices on one of the potential explanatory mechanisms: peripheral neurophysiology in vivo. A randomized controlled study will be conducted by measuring nerve conduction on the superficial radial nerve of healthy subjects (n=64). One baseline measurement and five post-irradiation recordings (2-min interval each) will be performed of the nerve conduction velocity (NCV) and peak latency (PL) and peak amplitude (PA). The experimental group (=32) will receive an irradiation of 2 J/cm2 with an infrared LED device (Dynatronics Solaris Model 705), while the placebo group will be treated by sham irradiation. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of LED light on the conduction velocity and amplitude of the superficial radial nerve.
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Superluminous Light Diode Irradiation | Experimental | Device: Superluminous light diodeApplication of super luminous diodes light irradiation over the superficial radial nerve |
| Sham Superluminous Light Diode Irradiation | Placebo comparator | Device: Superluminous light diodeSham Superluminous Light Diode Irradiation over the Superficial Radial Nerve for the same time period as the intervention group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- no history of neurological disease, polyneuropathy, peripheral neuropathy or cervical radiculopathy
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- positive findings during the clinical screening examination suggestive of an underlying neurological disease, polyneuropathy, peripheral neuropathy or cervical radiculopathy.
- a history of a neurological disease, polyneuropathy, peripheral neuropathy or cervical radiculopathy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Superluminous light diodeAlso: Dynatronics Solaris Model 705900W, 880nm, 1.6 J/cm2 for 30sec | Device | Sham Superluminous Light Diode Irradiation, Superluminous Light Diode Irradiation |
Primary outcome
Nerve Conduction Velocity (Meters Per Second)
Time frame: pre-treatment, 0 min, 2 min, 4 min, 6 min, 8 min and 10 min after treatment
Change in nerve conduction velocity (m/s) from pre-treatment to 0 minute (immediately after treatment), and at 2 min intervals after treatment until 10 minutes post treatment occurs. Calculated difference scores at each time point = nerve conduction velocity (NCV) - baseline NCV. A positive variance represented an increase from baseline and is interpreted as being an increase or faster velocity.
2 secondary outcomes
Negative Peak Latency (Milliseconds)
Time frame: pre-treatment, 0 min, 2 min, 4 min, 6 min, 8 min and 10 min after treatment
Temperature (Degrees C)
Time frame: pre-treatment, 0 min, 2 min, 4 min, 6 min, 8 min and 10 min after treatment
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jul 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 4023064Greathouse DG, Currier DP, Gilmore RL. Effects of clinical infrared laser on superficial radial nerve conduction. Phys Ther. 1985 Aug;65(8):1184-7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/65.8.1184.
- Background: PubMed 4293407Downie AW, Scott TR. An improved technique for radial nerve conduction studies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1967 Aug;30(4):332-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.30.4.332. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 3340661Snyder-Mackler L, Bork CE. Effect of helium-neon laser irradiation on peripheral sensory nerve latency. Phys Ther. 1988 Feb;68(2):223-5. doi: 10.1093/ptj/68.2.223.
Related trials for Peripheral Neuropathy
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Postural Control and Balance Performance in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Postural Assessment
Active, not recruiting
The AIUR Trial: Surgical Gloves to Prevent Peripheral Neuropathy
Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Whole-body Electrical Muscle Stimulation Exercise on Adults With Neuromuscular Disease
Neuromuscular Diseases (NMD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Todd A Telemeco, PhD principal investigator
Shenandoah University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Superluminous light diode in people with Peripheral Neuropathy, run by Shenandoah University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jul 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Jul 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Nerve Conduction Velocity (Meters Per Second) (time frame: pre-treatment, 0 min, 2 min, 4 min, 6 min, 8 min and 10 min after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01513148, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jul 2013.