Type 2 Diabetes MellitusPhase 3NCT01517412
Comparison of Lixisenatide Injected Prior to the Main Meal of the Day Versus Prior to Breakfast in Type 2 Diabetic Patients on Metformin
A Phase 3 study testing Lixisenatide (AVE0010), Self-injector pen device (OptiClik®) and Metformin in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Sanofi at 82 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
Primary Objective: To compare the two treatment regimens in terms of change of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to endpoint (Week 24) Secondary Objective: To assess the effect of the 2 lixisenatide regimens on: The percentage of participants who reached the target of HbA1c < 7% or ≤ 6.5% at Week 24… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- Lixisenatide (AVE0010), Self-injector pen device (OptiClik®) and Metformin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 451 participants
- Where
- 82 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- Feb 2012to May 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus, diagnosed for at least 1 year before screening visit
- Metformin treatment at a stable dose of at least 1.5 g/day for at least 3 months prior to screening visit.
Who cannot join
- Screening HbA1c < 7.0% and > 10.0%
- Fasting plasma glucose at screening > 250 mg/dL (> 13.9 mmol/L)
- Treatment with glucose-lowering agent(s) other than metformin in a period of 3 months prior to screening, previous use of insulin
- Participants who usually did not eat breakfast
- Type 1 diabetes mellitus
- Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤ 20 kg/m^2 and > 40 kg/m^2
Show all 15Show fewer
- Pregnancy or lactation, women of childbearing potential with no effective contraceptive method
- Amylase and/or lipase > 3 times the upper limit of the normal laboratory range ( ULN) at screening
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 3 ULN at screening
- Calcitonin ≧ 20 pg/ml (5.9 pmol/L) at screening
- History of unexplained pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatectomy.
- Personal or immediate family history of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) or genetic conditions that predisposes to MTC (e.g. multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes)
- Any contra-indication related to metformin
- Any previous treatment with lixisenatide
- The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Trial locations and contacts
82 sites in 10 countries.
82 sites in 10 countries
United States17 sites
Investigational Site Number 840115
Billings, Montana, 59103
Investigational Site Number 840122
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Investigational Site Number 840119
Chicago, Illinois, 60616
Investigational Site Number 840111
Fargo, North Dakota, 58103
Investigational Site Number 840120
Flint, Michigan, 48504
Investigational Site Number 840112
Glendale, Arizona, 85306
Investigational Site Number 840113
Mesa, Arizona, 85213
Investigational Site Number 840116
Mission Viejo, California, 92691
Investigational Site Number 840103
Northridge, California, 91325
Investigational Site Number 840105
Phoenix, Arizona, 85028
Investigational Site Number 840118
Redlands, California, 92374
Investigational Site Number 840101
Sea Girt, New Jersey, 08750
Investigational Site Number 840114
Springfield, Illinois, 62704
Investigational Site Number 840104
Temecula, California, 92591
Investigational Site Number 840102
Tempe, Arizona, 85282
Investigational Site Number 840107
Tempe, Arizona
Investigational Site Number 840110
West Jordan, Utah, 84088
Canada11 sites
Investigational Site Number 124102
Brampton, L6R 3J5
Investigational Site Number 124108
Coquitlam, V3K 3P4
Investigational Site Number 124106
Etobicoke, M9R 4E1
Investigational Site Number 124113
Kelowna, V1Y 1Z9
Investigational Site Number 124110
Laval, H7T 2P5
Investigational Site Number 124103
Newmarket, L3Y 5G8
Investigational Site Number 124101
Oakville, L6H 3P1
Investigational Site Number 124111
Saint Romuald, G6W 5M6
Investigational Site Number 124104
Thornhill, L4J 8L7
Investigational Site Number 124105
Toronto, M9V 4B4
Investigational Site Number 124112
Vancouver, V5Z 1M9
Russia9 sites
Investigational Site Number 643103
Moscow, 119435
Investigational Site Number 643101
Moscow, 125367
Investigational Site Number 643106
Nizhny Novgorod, 603018
Investigational Site Number 643107
Saint Petersburg, 194291
Investigational Site Number 643105
Saint Petersburg, 194354
Investigational Site Number 643110
Saint Petersburg, 195257
Investigational Site Number 643102
Samara, 443067
Investigational Site Number 643108
Vladimir, 600023
Investigational Site Number 643104
Voronezh, 394018
Poland8 sites
Investigational Site Number 616106
Bytom, 41-902
Investigational Site Number 616102
Gdansk, 80-858
Investigational Site Number 616101
Krakow, 31-450
Investigational Site Number 616103
Lublin, 20-538
Investigational Site Number 616108
Oświęcim, 32-600
Investigational Site Number 616105
Wroclaw, 50-127
Investigational Site Number 616104
Wroclaw, 50-306
Investigational Site Number 616107
Wroclaw, 50-403
Spain8 sites
Investigational Site Number 724107
A Coruña, 15006
Investigational Site Number 724104
Barcelona, 08020
Investigational Site Number 724103
Barcelona, 08041
Investigational Site Number 724102
Ferrol, 15403
Investigational Site Number 724101
Hostalets de Balenyà, 08550
Investigational Site Number 724106
Málaga, 29010
Investigational Site Number 724108
Segovia, 40002
Investigational Site Number 724105
Seville, 41014
Germany7 sites
Investigational Site Number 276103
Aßlar, 35614
Investigational Site Number 276102
Bad Mergentheim, 97980
Investigational Site Number 276107
Berlin, 13125
Investigational Site Number 276101
Heidelberg, 69115
Investigational Site Number 276104
Künzing, 94550
Investigational Site Number 276105
Pirna, 01796
Investigational Site Number 276108
Saint Ingbert-Oberwürzbach, 66386
Ukraine7 sites
Investigational Site Number 804108
Kharkiv, 61002
Investigational Site Number 804105
Kharkiv, 61022
Investigational Site Number 804102
Kiev, 2091
Investigational Site Number 804103
Kyiv, 04114
Investigational Site Number 804104
Mykolaiv, 54003
Investigational Site Number 804106
Poltava, 36011
Investigational Site Number 804101
Zaporozhie, 69600
Czechia6 sites
Investigational Site Number 203104
Pilsen, 32600
Investigational Site Number 203102
Prague, 10000
Investigational Site Number 203101
Prague, 10034
Investigational Site Number 203105
Prague, 12808
Investigational Site Number 203103
Trutnov, 54101
Investigational Site Number 203106
Újezd u Brna, 664 53
Romania5 sites
Investigational Site Number 642101
Bucharest, 050538
Investigational Site Number 642105
Oradea, 410169
Investigational Site Number 642102
Ploieşti, 100097
Investigational Site Number 642104
Reşiţa, 320076
Investigational Site Number 642103
Timișoara, 300456
France4 sites
Investigational Site Number 250108
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000
Investigational Site Number 250102
Menton, 06500
Investigational Site Number 250103
Nanterre, 92014
Investigational Site Number 250105
Rennes, 35700
About this study
Official title: A 24-week, Open-label, Randomized, 2-arm Parallel Group, Multinational, Multi-center Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lixisenatide Injected Prior to the Main Meal of the Day Versus Lixisenatide Injected Prior to Breakfast in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Not Adequately Controlled on Metformin
Primary Objective:
- To compare the two treatment regimens in terms of change of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to endpoint (Week 24)
Secondary Objective:
- To assess the effect of the 2 lixisenatide regimens on:
- The percentage of participants who reached the target of HbA1c < 7% or ≤ 6.5% at Week 24
- Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
- 7-point Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) profiles
- Body weight
- To assess the safety and tolerability of the 2 lixisenatide regimens
Read the detailed description
The maximum study duration was 28 weeks per participant, including a 24-week randomized treatment period.
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- Lixisenatide (AVE0010), Self-injector pen device (OptiClik®), Metformin
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lixisenatide (AVE0010)Drug
Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection; Route of administration: Subcutaneous
Self-injector pen device (OptiClik®)Device
MetforminDrug
Also called Route of administration: Oral
To be kept at stable dose (≥1.5 g/day) throughout the study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lixisenatide Main Meal | Experimental | Lixisenatide 10 mcg once daily (QD) within 1 hour before "main meal of the day" for 2 weeks, then at a maintenance dose of 20 mcg QD up to Week 24. Receives: Drug: Lixisenatide (AVE0010); Device: Self-injector pen device (OptiClik®); Drug: Metformin |
| Lixisenatide Breakfast | Active comparator | Lixisenatide 10 mcg QD within 1 hour before "breakfast" for 2 weeks, then at a maintenance dose of 20 mcg QD up to Week 24. Receives: Drug: Lixisenatide (AVE0010); Device: Self-injector pen device (OptiClik®); Drug: Metformin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 24
Change in HbA1C was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline HbA1c assessment during on-treatment period.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Secondary outcomes (9)
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c Level <7 % or ≤6.5% at Week 24
Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline HbA1c assessment during on-treatment period.
Measured: Week 24
Change in Average 7-point SMPG Profiles From Baseline to Week 24
Participants recorded a 7-point plasma glucose profile measured before and 2 hours after each meal and at bedtime two times in a week before baseline, before visit Week 8, before visit Week 12 and before visit week 24. The average value across the profiles performed in the week a visit for the 7-time points was calculated. Change in average 7-point SMPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to the day of last dose of study drug. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline 7-point SMPG assessment during on-treatment period.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 24
Change in FPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was the time from the first dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline FPG assessment during on-treatment period.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 24
Change in body weight was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline body weight assessment during on-treatment period.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7% at Week 24 And Did Not Experience Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycemia (Plasma Glucose [PG] <60 mg/dL [3.3 mmol/L]) During 24-Week Treatment Period
Symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an event with clinical symptoms that were considered to result from hypoglycemic episode with an accompanying PG<60 mg/dL (3.3 mmol/L) or associated with prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate if no PG measurement was available. On-treatment period for symptomatic hypoglycemia assessment was defined as time from first dose of study drug up to 1 day after last dose of study drug. Participants without any post-baseline on-treatment value for HbA1c were counted as non-responders if they experienced at least one symptomatic hypoglycemia. Otherwise, they were counted as missing.
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7% And Had No Body Weight Gain at Week 24
Participants without post-baseline on-treatment values for (HbA1c and body weight) that were no more than 30 days apart were counted as non-responders if at least one of the components (HbA1c and/or body weight) was available and showed no response. Otherwise, they were counted as missing.
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7% And Had No Body Weight Gain at Week 24 And Did Not Experience Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycemia (PG<60 mg/dL [3.3 mmol/L]) During the 24-Week Treatment Period
Participants without post-baseline on-treatment values (for HbA1c and body weight) that were no more than 30 days apart not more than 30-days apart were counted as non-responders if at least one of components (HbA1c and/or body weight) was available and showed no response. Otherwise, they were counted as missing.
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7% And Had a 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) <140mg/dL After Breakfast or Main Meal At Week 24
On-treatment period for 2-hour PPG assessment was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to the day of last dose of study drug. Participants without post-baseline on-treatment values (for HbA1c and 2-hour PPG) that were no more than 30-days apart were counted as non-responders if at least one of the components (HbA1cand/or 2-hour PPG) was available and showed no response. Otherwise, they were counted as missing.
Measured: Week 24
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Score (DTSQs) From Baseline to Week 24
DTSQ is a validated measure to assess how satisfied participants with diabetes are with their treatment and how they perceive hyper- and hypoglycemia. It consists of 8 questions which are answered on a Likert scale from 0 to 6. DTSQ treatment satisfaction score is the sum of question 1, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 scores and ranges between 0 and 36, where higher scores indicate more treatment satisfaction. On-treatment period for treatment satisfaction assessment was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with both baseline and Week 24 DTSQ score assessment during on-treatment period.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2012
- Primary completionMay 2013
- Study completionMay 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 2 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 451 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Sciences & Operations, Study director, Sanofi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01517412
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EFC12261
- Other IDs
- 2011-002416-85, U1111-1118-0841
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 16 Jan 2012
- Last updated
- 14 Oct 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Ahren B, Vorokhobina N, Souhami E, Demil N, Ye J, Aronson R. Equal improvement in glycaemia with lixisenatide given before breakfast or the main meal of the day. J Diabetes Complications. 2014 Sep-Oct;28(5):735-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.05.012. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
PubMed 25012990
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Oct 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 24-week, Open-label, Randomized, 2-arm Parallel Group, Multinational, Multi-center Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lixisenatide Injected Prior to the Main Meal of the Day Versus Lixisenatide Injected Prior to Breakfast in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Not Adequately Controlled on Metformin
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01517412
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EFC12261
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 451 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SanofiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2012
- Primary completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 14 Oct 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary Objective:
- To compare the two treatment regimens in terms of change of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to endpoint (Week 24)
Secondary Objective:
- To assess the effect of the 2 lixisenatide regimens on:
- The percentage of participants who reached the target of HbA1c < 7% or ≤ 6.5% at Week 24
- Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
- 7-point Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) profiles
- Body weight
- To assess the safety and tolerability of the 2 lixisenatide regimens
Detailed description
The maximum study duration was 28 weeks per participant, including a 24-week randomized treatment period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lixisenatide Main Meal | Experimental | Drug: Lixisenatide (AVE0010), Device: Self-injector pen device (OptiClik®), Drug: MetforminLixisenatide 10 mcg once daily (QD) within 1 hour before "main meal of the day" for 2 weeks, then at a maintenance dose of 20 mcg QD up to Week 24. |
| Lixisenatide Breakfast | Active comparator | Drug: Lixisenatide (AVE0010), Device: Self-injector pen device (OptiClik®), Drug: MetforminLixisenatide 10 mcg QD within 1 hour before "breakfast" for 2 weeks, then at a maintenance dose of 20 mcg QD up to Week 24. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus, diagnosed for at least 1 year before screening visit
- Metformin treatment at a stable dose of at least 1.5 g/day for at least 3 months prior to screening visit.
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Screening HbA1c < 7.0% and > 10.0%
- Fasting plasma glucose at screening > 250 mg/dL (> 13.9 mmol/L)
- Treatment with glucose-lowering agent(s) other than metformin in a period of 3 months prior to screening, previous use of insulin
- Participants who usually did not eat breakfast
- Type 1 diabetes mellitus
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lixisenatide (AVE0010)Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection; Route of administration: Subcutaneous | Drug | Lixisenatide Breakfast, Lixisenatide Main Meal |
| Self-injector pen device (OptiClik®) | Device | Lixisenatide Breakfast, Lixisenatide Main Meal |
| MetforminAlso: Route of administration: OralTo be kept at stable dose (≥1.5 g/day) throughout the study. | Drug | Lixisenatide Breakfast, Lixisenatide Main Meal |
Primary outcome
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change in HbA1C was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline HbA1c assessment during on-treatment period.
9 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c Level <7 % or ≤6.5% at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Change in Average 7-point SMPG Profiles From Baseline to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7% at Week 24 And Did Not Experience Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycemia (Plasma Glucose [PG] <60 mg/dL [3.3 mmol/L]) During 24-Week Treatment Period
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7% And Had No Body Weight Gain at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7% And Had No Body Weight Gain at Week 24 And Did Not Experience Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycemia (PG<60 mg/dL [3.3 mmol/L]) During the 24-Week Treatment Period
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7% And Had a 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) <140mg/dL After Breakfast or Main Meal At Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Score (DTSQs) From Baseline to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Oct 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 25012990Ahren B, Vorokhobina N, Souhami E, Demil N, Ye J, Aronson R. Equal improvement in glycaemia with lixisenatide given before breakfast or the main meal of the day. J Diabetes Complications. 2014 Sep-Oct;28(5):735-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.05.012. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Sciences & Operations study director
Sanofi
82 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Lixisenatide (AVE0010), Self-injector pen device (OptiClik®) and Metformin in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Sanofi at 82 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 82 sites in United States, Canada, Russia, Poland, Spain and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Oct 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 24 (time frame: Baseline, Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01517412, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Oct 2016.