Sleep Apnea, ObstructiveNCT01517763
Comparison Study of the ICON™ Auto Series With and Without SensAwake™ and ThermoSmart™ and Conventional Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients
A study testing Conventional CPAP Therapy, Fixed pressure ICON™ without ThermoSmart™ and Auto ICON™ with SensAwake™ and ThermoSmart™ in people with Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, run by Fisher and Paykel Healthcare at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
A total of 216 patients will be randomized into a partially single blind, randomized, parallel-arm trial to determine whether the ICON™ AT with SensAwake™ and ThermoSmart™ can improve therapy adherence when compared to standard care with a fixed pressure Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) device and compared… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
- What is being tested?
- Conventional CPAP Therapy, Fixed pressure ICON™ without ThermoSmart™ and Auto ICON™ with SensAwake™ and ThermoSmart™
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2012to Sep 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged 18-70 years with moderate-to-severe OSA (Apnea Hypopnea Index equal to or greater than 10 per hour).
- Successful titration Polysomnography (PSG).
- Fluency in both written and spoken English.
Who cannot join
- Participants prescribed and fitted with any PAP device in the past 2 years.
- Contraindicated for CPAP or AutoCPAP therapy.
- Any known factor or disease that might interfere with treatment adherence, study conduct or interpretation of the results such as severe psychiatric disease, history of non adherence to medical regimens, or unwillingness to comply with study requirements as determined by the principal investigator.
- Other significant sleep disorder(s) that would interfere with their ability to wear CPAP as determined by the principal investigator.
- Previous surgery for OSA or snoring or any surgery of the mouth, nose, sinuses or airways.
- If SensAwake™ or ThermoSmart™ was disabled on the treatment arm (or conversely) during the study protocol.
- If participants are required, by the nature of their employment, to comply with therapy. For example truck drivers or airline pilots.
- If the physician objects to their patient taking part in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
A total of 216 patients will be randomized into a partially single blind, randomized, parallel-arm trial to determine whether the ICON™ AT with SensAwake™ and ThermoSmart™ can improve therapy adherence when compared to standard care with a fixed pressure Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) device and compared to a less aesthetically pleasing CPAP device without technologies (AutoCPAP, SensAwake™, ThermoSmart™) in patients previously diagnosed with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
- Conditions
- Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
- Being tested
- Conventional CPAP Therapy, Fixed pressure ICON™ without ThermoSmart™, Auto ICON™ with SensAwake™ and ThermoSmart™
- Keywords
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Humidification, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, ICON, ThermoSmart, SensAwake
- Medical subject headings
- Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Conventional CPAP TherapyDevice
HC244 devices without Thermosmart or SensAwake
Fixed pressure ICON™ without ThermoSmart™Device
Fixed pressure CPAP therapy using ICON™ without ThermoSmart™ or SensAwake™
Auto ICON™ with SensAwake™ and ThermoSmart™Device
APAP therapy using Auto ICON™ with SensAwake™ and ThermoSmart™
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional CPAP | Placebo comparator | Fisher \& Paykel HC244™ Receives: Device: Conventional CPAP Therapy |
| CPAP without Humidification | Active comparator | Fixed pressure ICON™ without ThermoSmart™ Receives: Device: Fixed pressure ICON™ without ThermoSmart™ |
| APAP with all technologies | Experimental | Auto ICON™ with SensAwake™ and ThermoSmart™ Receives: Device: Auto ICON™ with SensAwake™ and ThermoSmart™ |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Adherence With Treatment Per Night Averaged Over Total Time Period Measured Via Internal Software on the Device and Reported on Using InfoSmart™ Software.
Measured: On day 90 after randomization
Secondary outcomes (1)
Adherence (Hours of Usage Per Night) and Acceptance (Number of Drop-outs). Complaints During Follow up Calls and Visit.
Measured: On day 90 after randomization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2012
- Primary completionSep 2014
- Study completionSep 2014
Why it stopped: The site closed down, therefore the study has been terminated.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Sleep Apnea, ObstructiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Fisher and Paykel HealthcareThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fisher and Paykel Healthcare
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Sleep Health Centers
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01517763
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FPH-SA09-01
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 17 Jan 2012
- Last updated
- 10 Jun 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jun 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison Study of the ICON™ Auto Series With and Without SensAwake™ and ThermoSmart™ and Conventional Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01517763
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FPH-SA09-01
- Conditions
- Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
- Keywords
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Humidification, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, ICON, ThermoSmart, SensAwake
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The site closed down, therefore the study has been terminated.
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fisher and Paykel HealthcareIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Sleep Health Centers
- Study start
- Jan 2012
- Primary completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Jun 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A total of 216 patients will be randomized into a partially single blind, randomized, parallel-arm trial to determine whether the ICON™ AT with SensAwake™ and ThermoSmart™ can improve therapy adherence when compared to standard care with a fixed pressure Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) device and compared to a less aesthetically pleasing CPAP device without technologies (AutoCPAP, SensAwake™, ThermoSmart™) in patients previously diagnosed with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional CPAP | Placebo comparator | Device: Conventional CPAP TherapyFisher \& Paykel HC244™ |
| CPAP without Humidification | Active comparator | Device: Fixed pressure ICON™ without ThermoSmart™Fixed pressure ICON™ without ThermoSmart™ |
| APAP with all technologies | Experimental | Device: Auto ICON™ with SensAwake™ and ThermoSmart™Auto ICON™ with SensAwake™ and ThermoSmart™ |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Aged 18-70 years with moderate-to-severe OSA (Apnea Hypopnea Index equal to or greater than 10 per hour).
- Successful titration Polysomnography (PSG).
- Fluency in both written and spoken English.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Participants prescribed and fitted with any PAP device in the past 2 years.
- Contraindicated for CPAP or AutoCPAP therapy.
- Any known factor or disease that might interfere with treatment adherence, study conduct or interpretation of the results such as severe psychiatric disease, history of non adherence to medical regimens, or unwillingness to comply with study requirements as determined by the principal investigator.
- Other significant sleep disorder(s) that would interfere with their ability to wear CPAP as determined by the principal investigator.
- Previous surgery for OSA or snoring or any surgery of the mouth, nose, sinuses or airways.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional CPAP TherapyHC244 devices without Thermosmart or SensAwake | Device | Conventional CPAP |
| Fixed pressure ICON™ without ThermoSmart™Fixed pressure CPAP therapy using ICON™ without ThermoSmart™ or SensAwake™ | Device | CPAP without Humidification |
| Auto ICON™ with SensAwake™ and ThermoSmart™APAP therapy using Auto ICON™ with SensAwake™ and ThermoSmart™ | Device | APAP with all technologies |
Primary outcome
Adherence With Treatment Per Night Averaged Over Total Time Period Measured Via Internal Software on the Device and Reported on Using InfoSmart™ Software.
Time frame: On day 90 after randomization
1 secondary outcome
Adherence (Hours of Usage Per Night) and Acceptance (Number of Drop-outs). Complaints During Follow up Calls and Visit.
Time frame: On day 90 after randomization
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jun 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
RecruitingObservational study
Development and Validation of a Multimodal Deep Learning Model Using Peripheral Oxygen Saturation and Ballistocardiography Signals for Predicting Apnea-Hypopnea Index in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Monthly Dosing Study Medicine Called Berobenatide in Adults With Breathing Problems During Sleep and Overweight or Obesity Who Do Not Use a Breathing Machine (PAP) (VESPER-OSA 2)
Apnea, Sleep Disorders
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Supplemental Oxygen for Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Adults With Chronic Opioid Use.
Sleep-disordered Breathing, Chronic Opioid Use
Recruiting
Nightly Wearable Monitoring During Home-Based Submental Electrical Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
RecruitingPhase 1/2
DRonabinol Treatment of OSA
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Conventional CPAP Therapy, Fixed pressure ICON™ without ThermoSmart™ and Auto ICON™ with SensAwake™ and ThermoSmart™ in people with Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, run by Fisher and Paykel Healthcare at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jun 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Adherence With Treatment Per Night Averaged Over Total Time Period Measured Via Internal Software on the Device and Reported on Using InfoSmart™ Software. (time frame: On day 90 after randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2019.