AzTrials
AzTrials

Urothelial Carcinoma of the BladderPhase 1/2NCT01520038

Adjuvant Proton Therapy or IMRT for the Treatment of Bladder Cancer

A Phase 1/2 study testing Proton therapy and IMRT in people with Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder, run by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Invasive urothelial bladder cancer is a common malignancy causing 14,000 deaths annually in the United States. The primary objective of the feasibility/Phase I portion of the study is to establish the feasibility and safety of proton and the safety of IMRT for patients with pure or mixed variant urothelial carcinoma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder
What is being tested?
Proton therapy and IMRT
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
2 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2012to Dec 2013
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Pure or mixed variant urothelial carcinoma o Allowable mixed variant subtypes include: squamous differentiation glandular differentiation nested pattern microcystic micropapillary lymphoepthelioma-like plasmacytoid and lymphoma-like sarcomatoid/carcinosarcoma giant cell trophoblastic differentiation clear cell lipid cell undifferentiated Radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection within the prior 48 weeks Pathologic T3 or higher stage disease, N0-2, M0 (AJCC, 7th Ed., Appendix C) No clinical evidence of residual or recurrent disease based on the following minimum diagnostic work-up within 8 weeks of a patients consent to participate.
  • History and physical examination
  • Chest imaging by x-ray (PA and lateral views) or CT scan (with or without IV contrast);
  • Axial abdominal and pelvic imaging by MRI (preferably with gadolinium)
  • Bone scan
  • Patients with microscopically involved (positive) surgical margins, but no grossly evident residual disease by imaging or physical exam are eligible.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • The patient is a candidate for definitive external beam radiotherapy;
  • No prior radiotherapy to the region of study;
  • No inflammatory bowel disease, active collagen vascular or connective tissue disorders, and no other medical or social contraindications to radiotherapy, as determined by a participating radiation oncologist; Age ³18 years ECOG performance status: 0-2 Concurrent noninvestigational medications will be permitted Informed consent: Patients must have the ability to understand and be willing to sign the study-specific informed consent indicating their understanding of the investigational nature and the risks of this study before any of the protocol related studies are preformed (this does not include routine laboratory testing or imaging studies required to establish study eligibility);

Who cannot join

  • Unstable renal function in the month prior to registration defined as a creatinine rise of 1 mg/dL Prior partial or complete small bowel obstruction either before or after radical cystectomy Prior radiotherapy to the pelvis; o Prior radiation therapy for a different cancer or disease process is allowed, provided there will be no overlap of radiation therapy fields between the participants prior and current course of radiation therapy, radiotherapy was completed more than four weeks from enrolling in this study.
  • Planned concurrent chemotherapy or other investigational drug to be given with radiation treatments o Prior chemotherapy or investigational drug for bladder cancer or a different cancer is allowed, provided that: The therapy was completed more than two weeks prior to the start of adjuvant pelvic radiation The participant has recovered to Grade 1 toxicity from agents previously administered Subtotal surgical resection with clinically evident residual disease by physical exam or axial imaging.
  • Prior or concurrent second invasive malignancy other than prostate and non-melanoma skin cancers, unless disease free for a minimum of five years. If a patient had a concurrent prostate cancer, then it must have been resected to negative margins.
  • Known severe, active co-morbidity, defined as follows:
  • o Any clinically significant unrelated systemic illness, medical condition, or other factor, which at the discretion of the Principal Investigators, would interfere in the safe and timely completion of study procedures, compromise the patients ability to tolerate the protocol therapy, or is likely to interfere with the study procedures or results.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Feasibility and Phase 1/II Trial of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Urothelial Bladder Cancer Using Proton Therapy or IMRT

Invasive urothelial bladder cancer is a common malignancy causing 14,000 deaths annually in the United States. The primary objective of the feasibility/Phase I portion of the study is to establish the feasibility and safety of proton and the safety of IMRT for patients with pure or mixed variant urothelial carcinoma.

Read the detailed description

Invasive urothelial bladder cancer is a common malignancy causing 14,000 deaths annually in the United States. The primary objective of the feasibility/Phase I portion of the study is to establish the feasibility and safety of proton and the safety of IMRT. Safety will be based on acute toxicity. The primary objective of the phase II study is to generate estimates of the local failure rate for intermediate and high risk patients treated with either proton therapy or IMRT. The study, however, is not explicitly designed to compare outcomes of proton therapy and IMRT. Secondary objectives include further evaluation of acute and late toxicity, quality of life and estimation of overall survival.

Being tested
Proton therapy, IMRT

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Proton therapyRadiation

  • IMRTRadiation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Applies to Proton only

    Measured: withion 14 days of estimated date of treatment completion

  2. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Applies to Both Proton and IMRT

    Measured: within 90 days of radiation therapy

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Late toxicty

    Measured: later than 90 days from start of radiation therapy

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jan 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2012
  3. Primary completionDec 2013
  4. Study completionDec 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01520038
Sponsor's protocol ID
UPCC 19811
Status last verified
Nov 2019
First submitted
25 Jan 2012
Last updated
26 Nov 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Proton therapy and IMRT in people with Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder, run by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Nov 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (time frame: withion 14 days of estimated date of treatment completion). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Nov 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in