AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal NeoplasmsNCT01521091

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy for Predicting Histology of Colorectal Lesions

An observational study of Colorectal Neoplasms, run by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Chromoendoscopy (indigo carmine or acetic acid) and Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) could make accurate evaluation in predicting of invasive depth of colorectal neoplasia. NBI could be the first choice. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Colorectal Neoplasms
How many people
565 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Jan 2009to Dec 2010
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: consecutive adult patients undergoing colonoscopy and find out more than one lesion ≧ 6mm from Jan 2009 to Dec 2010.

Who may be able to join

  • Consecutive patients with more than one lesion ≧ 6mm .

Who cannot join

  • Patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease, advanced cancer, insufficient bowel preparation, familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)
  • Lesions ≦ 5mm and submucosal tumor (SMT).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Departments of Gastroenterology and Clinical Laboratory, Shanghai Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

    Shanghai, 200001

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy for Predicting Histology of Colorectal Lesions Using Magnifying Colonoscopy With Narrow Band Imaging, Indigo Carmine, and Acetic Acid Staining

Chromoendoscopy (indigo carmine or acetic acid) and Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) could make accurate evaluation in predicting of invasive depth of colorectal neoplasia. NBI could be the first choice.

Read the detailed description

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of chromoendoscopy indigo carmine or acetic acid and NBI for differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal lesions, differentiating adenomas from carcinomas, and differentiating early carcinomas from invasive ones.

Included colorectal lesions consecutively distribute in a 1:1 ratio to 2 groups.

Keywords
narrow band imaging(NBI), indigo carmine, acetic acid, colorectal lesions, predicting histology
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jan 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2009
  3. Primary completionDec 2010
  4. Study completionDec 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
565 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01521091
Sponsor's protocol ID
rjxhnk01
Status last verified
Jan 2012
First submitted
24 Jan 2012
Last updated
2 Oct 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Colorectal Neoplasms, run by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in