Acute LeukaemiaPhase 1/2NCT01521611
Targeted Radiotherapy in HSCT for Poor Risk Haematological Malignancy
A Phase 1/2 study testing Targeted radiotherapy in people with Acute Leukaemia and Chronic Leukaemia, run by University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
To determine whether a radiolabelled antibody that targets the bone marrow (the 'anti-CD66') can be administered safely to patients as part of the preparative treatment prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation ('a bone marrow transplant'). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Leukaemia, Chronic Leukaemia, Myeloma
- What is being tested?
- Targeted radiotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 62 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Jan 2002to 1 Jul 2018
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- An underlying haematological malignancy including acute myeloid leukaemia in first complete remission (CR1) but with poor prognostic features or in >CR1 or in relapse; acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; transformed myelodysplasia, chronic myeloid leukaemia (accelerated phase or blast transformation, poor response or intolerance of tyrosine kinase inhibitors), myeloma. Patients may be in remission, partial remission or relapse.
- No concurrent or recent (within 3 weeks) chemotherapy for the underlying haematological condition
- For patients with relapsed leukaemia, bone marrow (BM) blasts must represent < 20% of BM nucleated cells.
- Although the BM remission status is not important, patients must have cellularity > 10%.
- As malignant plasma cells may or may not express CD66 antigens, patients with myeloma must have less than 30% plasma cells (as a percentage of total nucleated cells) in the BM at the time of the study.
- Age = or >18 yrs.
Show all 14Show fewer
- WHO performance status of 0, 1 or 2 (Appendix 5).
- Predicted life-expectancy of greater than four months.
- Patients must be negative for human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA).
- Peripheral blood counts:
- Wbc < 30 x 10e9/l (absolute neutrophil count >0.5 x 10e9/L) platelets > 50 x 10e9/l (platelet support is permitted)
- Biochemical indices:
- Plasma creatinine < 120 micromol/l (or creatinine clearance or Ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) clearance > 50 ml/min) Plasma bilirubin < 30 micromol/l Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) no more than 2.5 x upper limit of the normal range.
- Patient must be able to provide written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Any serious intercurrent disease.
- Patients with BM cellularity < 10%.
- History of atopic asthma, eczema or allergy to rodent protein, confirmed history of severe allergic reactions to penicillin or streptomycin.
- Positive Human anti-murine antibodies (HAMA).
- Patients unable to provide informed consent or who are unable to co-operate for reasons of poor mental or physical health.
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom2 sites
Royal Free Hospital and University College London
London
Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust
Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD
About this study
Official title: Radiolabelled Anti-CD66 Monoclonal Antibody in the Conditioning Regimen Prior to Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Phase I Study in Patients With Poor-risk Disease.
To determine whether a radiolabelled antibody that targets the bone marrow (the 'anti-CD66') can be administered safely to patients as part of the preparative treatment prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation ('a bone marrow transplant'). Can the radiolabelled antibody be shown to effectively target the bone marrow in these patients. If it can, could this result in better outcomes after transplantation.
Read the detailed description
The aim of this clinical research study is to establish whether a radiolabelled antibody can be used to safely deliver radiotherapy to the bone marrow prior to stem cell transplantation for haematological malignancies.
With current chemotherapy regimens 60-90% of adult patients with acute leukaemia (AML and ALL) achieve a complete remission. However in a significant proportion of these patients the disease will recur. Although allogeneic and autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are established as effective treatment options for haematological malignancies, resulting in long term disease free survival in a significant proportion of patients, the results of transplantation for patients with poor risk disease are disappointing. Further intensification of the treatment used prior to transplantation has been shown to reduce the risk of relapse, but the toxicity of the drugs or external beam radiotherapy causes an increase in transplant related deaths. The introduction of reduced intensity conditioning protocols allows the use of HSCT for older patients or those with significant additional medical problems but retrospective analysis indicates an increased rate of relapse. This is the 'Transplantation dilemma' - how to reduce the risk of disease relapse by intensifying therapy, but without an increase in toxicity to other organs causing an increase in transplant related deaths in remission.
Normal haematopoietic tissue and the malignant cells arising from it are very radiosensitive. Theoretically intensification of the conditioning therapy, particularly total body irradiation (TBI), prior to transplantation could increase tumour reduction leading to improved disease free survival rates for patients with poor risk disease. Targeted radiotherapy could allow treatment intensification without the toxicity to non-haematological tissues. In addition, the continuous, low dose rate delivered by the natural decay of a targeted radionuclide may have a greater destructive effect upon tumour cells than single dose or fractionated external beam radiation.
- Conditions
- Acute Leukaemia, Chronic Leukaemia, Myeloma, Lymphoma
- Being tested
- Targeted radiotherapy
- Keywords
- Radioimmunotherapy, Transplant, Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT), yttrium, indium
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Plasma Cell, Lymphoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Targeted radiotherapyRadiation
Also called Y-90-anti-CD66
Yttrium-90 labelled anti-CD66 monoclonal antibody.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Targeted radiotherapy | Experimental | Patients receive therapy with an yttrium-90 labelled anti-CD66 following favourable dosimetry with the same antibody radiolabelled with indium-111. Receives: Radiation: Targeted radiotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Toxicities related to radiolabelled antibody.
To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of targeted radiotherapy delivered by a murine anti-CD66 monoclonal antibody radiolabelled with yttrium-90 (Y-90) and determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in patients with haematological malignancies who are undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Toxicities are assessed using WHO Toxicity Scale with 28 parameters.
Measured: Up to 1 year post transplant World Health Organisation (WHO) toxicity criteria
Secondary outcomes (1)
Dosimetry model
Dosimetry is determined by whole body and SPECT-CT of the thorax and abdomen on days 1, 2, 4 and 5 post infusion of an indium-111 radiolabelled anti-CD66. Dosimetry determines whether patients proceed to therapy with the yttrium-90 labelled anti-CD66.
Measured: 5 days post infusion of an Indium-111 radiolabelled anti-CD66
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2002
- Primary completion1 Jul 2017
- Study completion1 Jul 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute LeukaemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Royal Free and University College Medical School
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Kim H Orchard, MBBS PhD, Principal investigator, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01521611
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RHMCAN0227
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 26 Jan 2012
- Last updated
- 8 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Trial fully recruited. Data will be summarised upon completion of study.
Publications
Orchard K, Langford J, Guy M, Lewis G, Michopoulou S, Cooper M, Zvavamwe C, Richardson D, Lewington V. Efficient bone marrow irradiation and low uptake by non-haematological organs with an yttrium-90-anti-CD66 antibody prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024 Sep;59(9):1247-1257. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02317-z. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
PubMed 38867006
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Radiolabelled Anti-CD66 Monoclonal Antibody in the Conditioning Regimen Prior to Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Phase I Study in Patients With Poor-risk Disease.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01521611
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RHMCAN0227
- Conditions
- Acute Leukaemia, Chronic Leukaemia, Myeloma, Lymphoma
- Keywords
- Radioimmunotherapy, Transplant, Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT), yttrium, indium
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Royal Free and University College Medical School
- Study start
- Jan 2002 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To determine whether a radiolabelled antibody that targets the bone marrow (the 'anti-CD66') can be administered safely to patients as part of the preparative treatment prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation ('a bone marrow transplant'). Can the radiolabelled antibody be shown to effectively target the bone marrow in these patients. If it can, could this result in better outcomes after transplantation.
Detailed description
The aim of this clinical research study is to establish whether a radiolabelled antibody can be used to safely deliver radiotherapy to the bone marrow prior to stem cell transplantation for haematological malignancies.
With current chemotherapy regimens 60-90% of adult patients with acute leukaemia (AML and ALL) achieve a complete remission. However in a significant proportion of these patients the disease will recur. Although allogeneic and autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are established as effective treatment options for haematological malignancies, resulting in long term disease free survival in a significant proportion of patients, the results of transplantation for patients with poor risk disease are disappointing. Further intensification of the treatment used prior to transplantation has been shown to reduce the risk of relapse, but the toxicity of the drugs or external beam radiotherapy causes an increase in transplant related deaths. The introduction of reduced intensity conditioning protocols allows the use of HSCT for older patients or those with significant additional medical problems but retrospective analysis indicates an increased rate of relapse. This is the 'Transplantation dilemma' - how to reduce the risk of disease relapse by intensifying therapy, but without an increase in toxicity to other organs causing an increase in transplant related deaths in remission.
Normal haematopoietic tissue and the malignant cells arising from it are very radiosensitive. Theoretically intensification of the conditioning therapy, particularly total body irradiation (TBI), prior to transplantation could increase tumour reduction leading to improved disease free survival rates for patients with poor risk disease. Targeted radiotherapy could allow treatment intensification without the toxicity to non-haematological tissues. In addition, the continuous, low dose rate delivered by the natural decay of a targeted radionuclide may have a greater destructive effect upon tumour cells than single dose or fractionated external beam radiation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Targeted radiotherapy | Experimental | Radiation: Targeted radiotherapyPatients receive therapy with an yttrium-90 labelled anti-CD66 following favourable dosimetry with the same antibody radiolabelled with indium-111. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- An underlying haematological malignancy including acute myeloid leukaemia in first complete remission (CR1) but with poor prognostic features or in >CR1 or in relapse; acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; transformed myelodysplasia, chronic myeloid leukaemia (accelerated phase or blast transformation, poor response or intolerance of tyrosine kinase inhibitors), myeloma. Patients may be in remission, partial remission or relapse.
- No concurrent or recent (within 3 weeks) chemotherapy for the underlying haematological condition
- For patients with relapsed leukaemia, bone marrow (BM) blasts must represent < 20% of BM nucleated cells.
- Although the BM remission status is not important, patients must have cellularity > 10%.
- As malignant plasma cells may or may not express CD66 antigens, patients with myeloma must have less than 30% plasma cells (as a percentage of total nucleated cells) in the BM at the time of the study.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Any serious intercurrent disease.
- Patients with BM cellularity < 10%.
- History of atopic asthma, eczema or allergy to rodent protein, confirmed history of severe allergic reactions to penicillin or streptomycin.
- Positive Human anti-murine antibodies (HAMA).
- Patients unable to provide informed consent or who are unable to co-operate for reasons of poor mental or physical health.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Targeted radiotherapyAlso: Y-90-anti-CD66Yttrium-90 labelled anti-CD66 monoclonal antibody. | Radiation | Targeted radiotherapy |
Primary outcome
Toxicities related to radiolabelled antibody.
Time frame: Up to 1 year post transplant World Health Organisation (WHO) toxicity criteria
To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of targeted radiotherapy delivered by a murine anti-CD66 monoclonal antibody radiolabelled with yttrium-90 (Y-90) and determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in patients with haematological malignancies who are undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Toxicities are assessed using WHO Toxicity Scale with 28 parameters.
1 secondary outcome
Dosimetry model
Time frame: 5 days post infusion of an Indium-111 radiolabelled anti-CD66
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Apr 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38867006Orchard K, Langford J, Guy M, Lewis G, Michopoulou S, Cooper M, Zvavamwe C, Richardson D, Lewington V. Efficient bone marrow irradiation and low uptake by non-haematological organs with an yttrium-90-anti-CD66 antibody prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024 Sep;59(9):1247-1257. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02317-z. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Trial fully recruited. Data will be summarised upon completion of study.
Related trials for Acute Leukaemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) in Children With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
Anti-CRLF2-R/TSLPR Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells (TSLPR-CART) in Participants With Recurrent or Refractory CRLF2-R/TSLPR-Overexpressing B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL)
B-All, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
CD22 CAR T-cells to Extend Remission Following Commercial CD19 CAR T-cells in Children, Adolescents, and Adults With Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, B-All
RecruitingPhase 1
Autologous T Cells Transduced With Retroviral Vectors Expressing TCRs for Participant-specific Neoantigens in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies
Malignancy, Hematologic, Neoplasms, Hematologic
RecruitingPhase 3
International Study for Treatment of Childhood Relapsed Precursor B-Cell ALL 2020 (IntReALL BCP 2020)
B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kim H Orchard, MBBS PhD principal investigator
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Targeted radiotherapy in people with Acute Leukaemia and Chronic Leukaemia, run by University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Toxicities related to radiolabelled antibody. (time frame: Up to 1 year post transplant World Health Organisation (WHO) toxicity criteria). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01521611, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2019.