AzTrials
AzTrials

HypertensionPhase 2EVIDENCENCT01522950

A Study Examining the Effects of Nebivolol Compared to Atenolol on Endothelial Function

A Phase 2 study testing Nebivolol and atenolol in people with Hypertension, run by University of Minnesota at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy of nebivolol and atenolol at improving small artery elasticity and reducing cardiovascular disease risk in subjects with early vascular disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Hypertension
What is being tested?
Nebivolol and atenolol
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
76 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2010to Oct 2016
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • borderline blood pressure (120-145/80-90 mm Hg);
  • borderline or abnormal small artery elasticity (C2) as measured by pulse contour analysis;
  • treatment-naive for all blood pressure medications including diuretics for at least 30 days prior to baseline visit;
  • able to walk on a treadmill for 3 minutes;
  • female patients with reproductive potential must use an approved contraceptive method if appropriate (for example, intrauterine device [IUD], birth control pills, or barrier device during and for 1 month after the last dose of study drug;
  • voluntary written informed consent before performance of any study-related procedure not part of normal medical care, with the understanding that consent may be withdrawn by the subject at any time without prejudice to future medical care.

Who cannot join

  • history of intolerance to beta-blockers or clear contraindications to their use; current pharmaceutical treatment of blood pressure;
  • known history of cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, unstable angina, uncontrolled arrhythmias, stroke, etc.);
  • known history of diabetes; known history of hepatic, renal or gastrointestinal disorder;
  • known history of any illness that may cause additional risk (as determined by study investigator);
  • pregnant or lactating women [when used during pregnancy, beta-blockers may cause fetal harm];
  • participation in a concomitant clinical trial.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Minnesota

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Study Examining the Effects of Nebivolol Compared to Atenolol on Endothelial Function and Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Early Vascular Disease

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy of nebivolol and atenolol at improving small artery elasticity and reducing cardiovascular disease risk in subjects with early vascular disease. Approximately 75 subjects with borderline/elevated blood pressures and impaired endothelial function, as measured by arterial elasticity scores, will be recruited and assigned to treatment groups using a block randomization scheme. Patients will be randomly allocated to nebivolol, atenolol or placebo, and then followed for 9 months.

Read the detailed description

The Rasmussen Disease Score (RDS) test panel is the chosen methodology for this study. The 10 parameters of the RDS were selected because of their ability to quantify early structural and functional abnormalities in the vasculature and left ventricle which appear long before cardiovascular disease is present.

The RDS tests include: large and small artery elasticity (measured by pulse contour analysis), resting blood pressure, mild treadmill exercise test, carotid IMT, left ventricle mass, ECG, retinal vasculature evaluation, as well as quantification of serum NT-proBNP, and microalbuminuria. Quantitative results from these tests are converted into categorical classifications based on values stratified by age and gender when appropriate. The categorical data is scored as follows: normal = 0 points, borderline = 1 point, abnormal = 2 points. Point values from all parameters are summed to create the RDS, with values ranging from 0-20. Scores of 0-2 are classified as normal, 3-5 as early disease, and 6+ as advanced disease. Previous research has shown that the RDS is a powerful predictor of future cardiovascular events.

The small artery elasticity (C2) parameter is of particular interest as it is responsive to changes in NO levels and is an effective and reliable predictor of future hypertension and other cardiovascular events. Changes in C2 will serve as the primary outcome of this study. Similar studies using anti-hypertensive or lipid-lowering interventions have found significant improvements in C2 values.

Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) measurements will also be measured as an index of endothelial function, although this method appears to be less sensitive to functional changes related to NO bioavailability than C2. Utilizing both FMD and C2 will allow comparison with previous studies and take advantage of a large sample size to further examine the relative sensitivity of each method for reliably measuring endothelial dysfunction.

The duration of intervention for this study is 9 months which is the minimum time to adequately detect improvement in left ventricle (LV) mass values. LV mass measurements are a critical component of a comprehensive assessment of cardiovascular health and have improved within this temporal window as a result of anti-hypertensive intervention.

Conditions
Hypertension
Being tested
Nebivolol, atenolol, placebo
Keywords
hypertension, prevention, endothelial function
Medical subject headings
Hypertension

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NebivololDrug

    5 mg daily or 10 mg daily

  • atenololDrug

    25 mg daily or 50 mg daily

  • placeboDrug

    one tablet daily

Study groups in NCT01522950
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NebivololActive comparator5 mg, continue for 1 month; dose titration to 10 mg, continue for 8 months. Dose may be returned to initiation levels if side effects occur.
Receives: Drug: Nebivolol
AtenololActive comparator25 mg, continue for 1 month; dose titration to 50 mg, continue for 8 months. Dose may be returned to initiation levels if side effects occur.
Receives: Drug: atenolol
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorContinue for 1 month; dose titration to "high dose" placebo, continue for 8 months. Dose may be returned to initiation levels if side effects occur.
Receives: Drug: placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Small Artery Elasticity

    Change in small artery elasticity (a marker for endothelial function) from baseline to 9 months after intervention initiation.

    Measured: baseline, 9 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Change in Large Artery Elasticity

    Change in large artery elasticity (a marker for endothelial function) from baseline to 9 months after intervention initiation.

    Measured: baseline, 9 months

  2. Change in Systolic Blood Pressure

    Change in systolic blood pressure as measured by sphygmomanometer from baseline to 9 months after intervention initiation.

    Measured: baseline, 9 months

  3. Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Change in diastolic blood pressure as measured by sphygmomanometer from baseline to 9 months after intervention initiation.

    Measured: baseline, 9 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Feb 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2010
  3. Primary completionOct 2016
  4. Study completionOct 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
76 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01522950
Sponsor's protocol ID
CV-2014-20226
Acronym
EVIDENCE
Status last verified
Jul 2020
First submitted
17 Jan 2012
Last updated
17 Jul 2020
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Duprez DA, Florea N, Duval S, Koukol C, Cohn JN. Effect of nebivolol or atenolol vs. placebo on cardiovascular health in subjects with borderline blood pressure: the EVIDENCE study. J Hum Hypertens. 2017 Dec;32(1):20-25. doi: 10.1038/s41371-017-0019-9. Epub 2017 Nov 28.

    PubMed 29184167

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Nebivolol and atenolol in people with Hypertension, run by University of Minnesota at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Jan 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Small Artery Elasticity (time frame: baseline, 9 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01522950, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in