Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 2REFLECTIONSNCT01526057
A Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Study Comparing PF-05280586 To Rituximab In Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With An Inadequate Response To TNF Inhibitors (REFLECTIONS B328-01)
A Phase 2 study testing PF-05280586, MabThera and Rituxan in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Pfizer at 84 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
In this study, patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis who are being treated with methotrexate will receive 2 intravenous treatments with either PF-05280586 or Rituxan (Rituximab) or MabThera (Rituximab). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- PF-05280586, MabThera and Rituxan
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 220 participants
- Where
- 84 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- 20 Mar 2012to 7 May 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis
- Meets Class I, II or III of the ACR 1991 Revised Criteria
- RA seropositivity
- Stable dose of methotrexate
- Inadequate response to TNF inhibitors
Who cannot join
- Any prior treatment with lymphocyte depleting therapies
- History of active TB infection
- Known or screen test positive for specific viruses or indicators of viral infection
Trial locations and contacts
84 sites in 10 countries.
84 sites in 10 countries
United States43 sites
Bronson Internal Medicine & Rheumatology
Battle Creek, Michigan, 49015
University of Alabama at Bermingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35249
University of Alabama at Birmingham - Arthritis Clinical Intervention Program (ACIP) SRC 076
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Loyola Center for Health at Burr Ridge
Burr Ridge, Illinois, 60527
Box Arthritis & Rheumatology of the Carolinas, PLLC
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
Cincinnati Rheumatic Disease Study Group, Inc.
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Klein & Associates, M.D., P.A.
Cumberland, Maryland, 21502
Metroplex Clinical Research Center
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Altoona Center for Clinical Research
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
ArthroCare, Arthritis Care & Research, PC
Gilbert, Arizona, 85234
North Shore-LIJ Health System - Division of Rheumatology and Allergy-Clinical Immunology
Great Neck, New York, 11021
Klein & Associates, M.D., P.A.
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740
Hickory Family Practice Associates
Hickory, North Carolina, 28601
PMG Research of Hickory, LLC - PI's Main Office (Subject visit, IP Storage, Infusion, & Lab Draws)
Hickory, North Carolina, 28602
PMG Research of Hickory
Hickory, North Carolina, 28602
Arthritis Associates, PLLC
Hixson, Tennessee, 37343
Mercy Clinic Hot Springs Communities
Hot Springs, Arkansas, 71913
Center For Clinical Trials Of Houston
Houston, Texas, 77004
Rheumatology Associates of North Alabama, PC
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Arthritis Clinic
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
West Tennessee Research Institute
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Rheumatology/Arthritis Center
Lansing, Michigan, 48910
University Of Nevada School Of Medicine
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89102
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
Bluegrass Community Research, Inc.
Lexington, Kentucky, 40504
UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1670
Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Loyola Medical Medical Center Outpatient Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
Loyola University Medical Center Pharmacy
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
Southwest Rheumatology Research LLC.
Mesquite, Texas, 75150
Illinois Bone and Joint Institute
Morton Grove, Illinois, 60053
Loyola Center for health at Oakbrook Terrace North
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, 60181
Health Research of Oklahoma
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
Arthritis Associates
Orlando, Florida, 32804
Desert Medical Advances
Palm Desert, California, 92260
The Arthritis Group
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19152
Advances In Medicine
Rancho Mirage, California, 92270
University of South Florida - College of Medicine, Frank and Carol Morsani Center
Tampa, Florida, 33612
New England Research Assoc. LLC
Trumbull, Connecticut, 06611
Clinical Pharmacology Study Group
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605
UMass Memorial Medical Center - Memorial Campus
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605
UMass Memorial Medical Center-Rheumatology Center-Memorial Campus
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605
Clinical Research Center of Reading, LLP
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610
Colombia12 sites
Cediul S.A.
Barranquilla, Atlántico
Centro de Reumatologia y Ortopedia
Barranquilla, Atlántico
Clinica Bonnadona - Prevenir S.A.
Barranquilla, Atlántico
Clinica de la Costa Ltdz.
Barranquilla, Atlántico
IPS Centro Integral de Reumatologia del Cairbe, CIRCARIBE S.A.S.
Barranquilla, Atlántico
Sabbag Radiologos Ltda.
Barranquilla, Atlántico
Cerid S.A.
Barranquilla, Colombia, Atlántico
Congregacion de las Hemanas Franciscanas Misioneras de Maria Auxiliadora - Clinica La Asuncion
Barranquilla, Colombia, Atlántico
IPS Clinica General del Norte S.A.
Barranquilla, Colombia, Atlántico
Clinica Medellin S.A Sede Centro
Medellín, Antioquia
Mix Supplier S.A
Medellín, Antioquia
Rodrigo Botero S.A.S.
Medellín, Antioquia
Russia8 sites
GBUZ City Clinical Hospital #7
Kazan', Tatarstan Republic, 420103
State Institution of Healthcare "Regional Clinical Hospital for Wars' Veterans"
Kemerovo, 650000
State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare of Nizhegorodskiy Region
Nizhny Novgorod, 603005
LLC CDCR "Healthy Joints"
Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk Oblast, 630091
St. Petersburg state Healthcare lnstitution 'Clinical Rheumatology Hospital No25
Saint Petersburg, 190068
Llc Ava-Peter
Saint Petersburg, 191014
State Institute of Healthcare Samara Regional Clinical Hospital named after M.I.Kalinin
Samara, 443095
Regional State Budget Institution of Healthcare "Tomsk Regional Clinical Hospital"
Tomsk, 634063
Canada5 sites
Pharmacie Matte et Petit
Québec, Quebec, G1V 3M7
Centre de Rhumatologie St-Louis
Québec, Quebec, G1W 4R4
Centre de Rhumatologie de l'Est du Quebec
Rimouski, Quebec, G5L 8W1
Clinique Medicale du Phare
Rimouski, Quebec, G5L IJ5
Centre de Recherche Musculo-Squelettique
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, G8Z 1Y2
United Kingdom5 sites
Bexley Wing - St. James's University Hospital
Leeds, UK, LS9 7TF
Pharmacy Department, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Leeds, LS1 3EX
"The University of Leeds,
Leeds, LS7 4SA
Pharmacy Dispensing - Bexley Wing - St. James's University Hospital
Leeds, LS9 7TF
Whipps Cross University Hospital
London, E11 1NR
Mexico4 sites
Centro De Investigacion Y Atencion Integral Durango CIAID
Durango, 34270
Private Office
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 06726
Cliditer, S.A. de C.V.
México, D.F., 06700
Centro de Alta Especialidad en Reumatologia e Investigacion del Potosi S.C.
San Luis Potosí City, 78200
Australia3 sites
St. Vincent's Hospital (Melbourne)
Fitzroy, Victoria, 03065
Rheumatology Research Unit
Maroochydore, Queensland, 4558
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Department of Rheumatology
Woodville South, South Australia, 5011
South Africa2 sites
Dr. Jan Fourie Medical Centre
Dundee, KwaZulu-Natal, 3000
Panorama Medical Centre
Panorama, CAPE TOWN, 7500
Israel1 site
The Chaim Sheba Medical Center Department of Internal Medicine B
Ramat Gan, 52621
About this study
Official title: A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, STUDY COMPARING THE PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, AND ASSESSING THE SAFETY OF PF-05280586 AND RITUXIMAB IN SUBJECTS WITH ACTIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS ON A BACKGROUND OF METHOTREXATE WHO HAVE HAD AN INADEQUATE RESPONSE TO ONE OR MORE TNF ANTAGONIST THERAPIES
In this study, patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis who are being treated with methotrexate will receive 2 intravenous treatments with either PF-05280586 or Rituxan (Rituximab) or MabThera (Rituximab). During the course of the study, the effects of the drugs will be assessed by sampling the levels of drug in the blood, blood cell counts, and by comparing these levels among the different treatments. Safety, tolerability and immunologic response also will be evaluated throughout.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- PF-05280586, MabThera, Rituxan
- Keywords
- rheumatoid arthritis, rituximab, methotrexate, anti-TNF
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PF-05280586Biological
1000 mg, IV on days 1 and 15
MabTheraBiological
1000 mg, IV on days 1 and 15
RituxanBiological
1000 mg, IV on days 1 and 15
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A - PF-05280586 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: PF-05280586 |
| B - Rituximab EU | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Biological: MabThera |
| C- Rituximab-US | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Biological: Rituxan |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Rituximab
Cmax is the peak serum concentration of study drug (rituximab) after a dose has been administered.
Measured: Predose (Day 1) and 3, 4.25 (immediately before 1st infusion end), 72, 168, 335 (Day 15 within 1.5 hours before 2nd infusion), 337.5, 339.25 (Day 15 immediately before 2nd infusion end), 408, 504, 672, 1344, and 2016 hours after start of 1st infusion
AUC 0-inf of Rituximab
The AUC 0-inf refers to the concentration in serum of the drug over time. It represents the total drug exposure over time, from time 0 (the point of drug administration) extrapolated to infinity.
Measured: Predose (Day 1) and 3, 4.25 (immediately before 1st infusion end), 72, 168, 335 (Day 15 within 1.5 hours before 2nd infusion), 337.5, 339.25 (Day 15 immediately before 2nd infusion end), 408, 504, 672, 1344, and 2016 hours after start of 1st infusion
Secondary outcomes (24)
Rituximab AUC From Time 0 to 2 Weeks (AUC 0-2wk)
The AUC 0-2wk refers to the concentration in serum of the drug over time. It represents the total drug exposure over time, from time 0 (the point of drug administration) to 2 weeks after drug administration.
Measured: Predose (Day 1) and 3, 4.25 (immediately before 1st infusion end), 72, 168, 335 (Day 15 within 1.5 hours before 2nd infusion), 337.5, 339.25 (Day 15 immediately before 2nd infusion end), 408, 504, 672, 1344, and 2016 hours after start of 1st infusion
Rituximab AUC From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC 0-T)
The AUC 0-T refers to the concentration in serum of the drug over time. It represents the total drug exposure over time, from time 0 (the point of drug administration) to the last measured concentration at time T.
Measured: Predose (Day 1) and 3, 4.25 (immediately before 1st infusion end), 72, 168, 335 (Day 15 within 1.5 hours before 2nd infusion), 337.5, 339.25 (Day 15 immediately before 2nd infusion end), 408, 504, 672, 1344, and 2016 hours after start of 1st infusion
CD19+ B-cell Count AUC From Time 0 to the Last Measurement at Time T (AUC 0-T,B-cell)
The AUC 0-T,B-cell refers to the concentration in serum of B-cells. It represents the total B-cells over time from time 0 (the point of drug administration) to the last measurement taken at time T.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)
Minimum Post-Baseline CD19+ B-cell Count (/uL)
The lowest CD19+ B-cell count measured in a participant's blood post-baseline.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)
Time to Minimum Post-Baseline CD19+ B-cell Count (Weeks)
The amount of time in weeks from baseline to the lowest observed CD19+ B-cell count.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)
Duration of B-cell Depletion (τB-cell) (Days)
The τB-cell is defined as the time interval over which the B-cell count was <0.3 cells/uL or the detection limit.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)
Percentage of Participants With CD19+ B-cell Count Recovery
The percentage of participants with CD19+ B-cell counts which fell to <50% of Baseline value during treatment and which recovered to ≥50% of Baseline value at End of Treatment.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Area Under the CD19+ B-cell Count Concentration-time Profile (AUC 0-T, B-cell)
The AUC 0-T, B-cell refers to the CD19+ B-cell count over time. It represents the total B-cells over time, from time 0 (the point of drug administration) to the last measured count at time T.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)
Baseline and Change From Baseline in Circulating Immunoglobulin-M (IgM) by Visit (Grams Per Liter (g/L])
The level of IgM in serum at Baseline and the change from Baseline at each subsequent visit.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)
Percent (%) Change From Baseline in Circulating IgM by Visit (g/L)
The percentage change from Baseline in circulating IgM by visit.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response by Visit
ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (≥)20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Non-responder imputation categorized participants as having a non-response if they did not have data available at a visit due to missing data or study discontinuation. Participants who rolled over to the extension study were not included in the non-responder imputation from that point on.
Measured: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Percentage of Participants With ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response by Visit
ACR70 response: ≥70% improvement in tender joint count; ≥70% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Non-responder imputation categorized participants as having a non-response if they did not have data available at a visit due to missing data or study discontinuation. Participantss who rolled over to the extension study were not included in the non-responder imputation from that point on.
Measured: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)
Percentage of Participants With ACR 50% Improvement (ACR50) Response by Visit
ACR50 response: ≥50% improvement in tender joint count; ≥50% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Non-responder imputation categorized participants as having a non-response if they did not have data available at a visit due to missing data or study discontinuation. Participants who rolled over to the extension study were not included in the non-responder imputation from that point on.
Measured: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Percentage of Participants by Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Status
Presence of anti-rituximab antibodies in blood. Participants with a positive antibody status at any time during the study were defined as having overall positive antibody status; participants with a negative antibody status throughout the study were defined as having overall negative antibody status.
Measured: Days 1 up to Day 169.
Percentage of Participants With Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) in Participants With a Positive ADA by Visit
Measured: Day 1 up to Day 169
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP)
DAS28-CRP was calculated from the swollen joint count and tender joint count using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-CRP less than or equal to (≤)3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS28-CRP greater than (>)3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-CRP less than (<)2.6 implied remission.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Percent Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP by Visit
DAS28-CRP was calculated from the swollen joint count and tender joint count using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-CRP less than or equal to (≤)3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS28-CRP greater than (>)3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-CRP less than (<)2.6 implied remission.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Percentage of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) by Visit
The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 ≤3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to ≤5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to ≤1.2 with DAS28 ≤5.1; non-responders: change from baseline ≤0.6, or change from baseline >0.6 and ≤1.2 with DAS28 >5.1.
Measured: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Percentage of Participants With Moderate EULAR Response Based on Disease Activity Score Based on DAS28 by Visit
The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 ≤3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to ≤5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to ≤1.2 with DAS28 ≤5.1; non-responders: change from baseline ≤0.6, or change from baseline >0.6 and ≤1.2 with DAS28 >5.1.
Measured: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Percentage of Participants With No EULAR Response Based on DAS28 by Visit
The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 ≤3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to ≤5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to ≤1.2 with DAS28 ≤5.1; non-responders: change from baseline ≤0.6, or change from baseline >0.6 and ≤1.2 with DAS28 >5.1.
Measured: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity Score (DAS <=3.2) by Visit
DAS28-CRP was calculated from the swollen joint count and tender joint count using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 implied low disease activity. p-value of 9999 indicates p-value is not applicable.
Measured: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Percentage of Participants With DAS Remission (DAS <2.6) by Visit
DAS28-CRP was calculated from the swollen joint count and tender joint count using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-CRP <2.6 implied remission. p-value of 9999 indicates p-value is not applicable.
Measured: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) by Visit
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Measured: Baseline, Week 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Percent Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score by Visit
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Measured: Baseline, Week 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Feb 2012 (estimated)
- Study start20 Mar 2012
- Primary completion13 Aug 2013
- Study completion7 May 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 220 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01526057
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B3281001
- Other IDs
- ICON 9002/010, 2011-002896-40
- Acronym
- REFLECTIONS
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 1 Feb 2012
- Last updated
- 19 Nov 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Publications
Williams JH, Hutmacher MM, Zierhut ML, Becker JC, Gumbiner B, Spencer-Green G, Melia LA, Liao KH, Suster M, Yin D, Li R, Meng X. Comparative assessment of clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis between PF-05280586, a proposed rituximab biosimilar, and rituximab. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Dec;82(6):1568-1579. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13094. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
PubMed 27530379
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Nov 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, STUDY COMPARING THE PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, AND ASSESSING THE SAFETY OF PF-05280586 AND RITUXIMAB IN SUBJECTS WITH ACTIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS ON A BACKGROUND OF METHOTREXATE WHO HAVE HAD AN INADEQUATE RESPONSE TO ONE OR MORE TNF ANTAGONIST THERAPIES
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01526057
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REFLECTIONS / B3281001
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Keywords
- rheumatoid arthritis, rituximab, methotrexate, anti-TNF
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 220 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 20 Mar 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Aug 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 May 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Feb 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Nov 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this study, patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis who are being treated with methotrexate will receive 2 intravenous treatments with either PF-05280586 or Rituxan (Rituximab) or MabThera (Rituximab). During the course of the study, the effects of the drugs will be assessed by sampling the levels of drug in the blood, blood cell counts, and by comparing these levels among the different treatments. Safety, tolerability and immunologic response also will be evaluated throughout.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A - PF-05280586 | Experimental | Biological: PF-05280586 |
| B - Rituximab EU | Active comparator | Biological: MabThera |
| C- Rituximab-US | Active comparator | Biological: Rituxan |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis
- Meets Class I, II or III of the ACR 1991 Revised Criteria
- RA seropositivity
- Stable dose of methotrexate
- Inadequate response to TNF inhibitors
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Any prior treatment with lymphocyte depleting therapies
- History of active TB infection
- Known or screen test positive for specific viruses or indicators of viral infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PF-052805861000 mg, IV on days 1 and 15 | Biological | A - PF-05280586 |
| MabThera1000 mg, IV on days 1 and 15 | Biological | B - Rituximab EU |
| Rituxan1000 mg, IV on days 1 and 15 | Biological | C- Rituximab-US |
Primary outcome
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Rituximab
Time frame: Predose (Day 1) and 3, 4.25 (immediately before 1st infusion end), 72, 168, 335 (Day 15 within 1.5 hours before 2nd infusion), 337.5, 339.25 (Day 15 immediately before 2nd infusion end), 408, 504, 672, 1344, and 2016 hours after start of 1st infusion
Cmax is the peak serum concentration of study drug (rituximab) after a dose has been administered.
AUC 0-inf of Rituximab
Time frame: Predose (Day 1) and 3, 4.25 (immediately before 1st infusion end), 72, 168, 335 (Day 15 within 1.5 hours before 2nd infusion), 337.5, 339.25 (Day 15 immediately before 2nd infusion end), 408, 504, 672, 1344, and 2016 hours after start of 1st infusion
The AUC 0-inf refers to the concentration in serum of the drug over time. It represents the total drug exposure over time, from time 0 (the point of drug administration) extrapolated to infinity.
24 secondary outcomes
Rituximab AUC From Time 0 to 2 Weeks (AUC 0-2wk)
Time frame: Predose (Day 1) and 3, 4.25 (immediately before 1st infusion end), 72, 168, 335 (Day 15 within 1.5 hours before 2nd infusion), 337.5, 339.25 (Day 15 immediately before 2nd infusion end), 408, 504, 672, 1344, and 2016 hours after start of 1st infusion
Rituximab AUC From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC 0-T)
Time frame: Predose (Day 1) and 3, 4.25 (immediately before 1st infusion end), 72, 168, 335 (Day 15 within 1.5 hours before 2nd infusion), 337.5, 339.25 (Day 15 immediately before 2nd infusion end), 408, 504, 672, 1344, and 2016 hours after start of 1st infusion
CD19+ B-cell Count AUC From Time 0 to the Last Measurement at Time T (AUC 0-T,B-cell)
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)
Minimum Post-Baseline CD19+ B-cell Count (/uL)
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)
Time to Minimum Post-Baseline CD19+ B-cell Count (Weeks)
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)
Duration of B-cell Depletion (τB-cell) (Days)
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)
Percentage of Participants With CD19+ B-cell Count Recovery
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Area Under the CD19+ B-cell Count Concentration-time Profile (AUC 0-T, B-cell)
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)
Baseline and Change From Baseline in Circulating Immunoglobulin-M (IgM) by Visit (Grams Per Liter (g/L])
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)
Percent (%) Change From Baseline in Circulating IgM by Visit (g/L)
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response by Visit
Time frame: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Percentage of Participants With ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response by Visit
Time frame: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)
Percentage of Participants With ACR 50% Improvement (ACR50) Response by Visit
Time frame: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Percentage of Participants by Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Status
Time frame: Days 1 up to Day 169.
Percentage of Participants With Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) in Participants With a Positive ADA by Visit
Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 169
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP)
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Percent Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP by Visit
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Percentage of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) by Visit
Time frame: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Percentage of Participants With Moderate EULAR Response Based on Disease Activity Score Based on DAS28 by Visit
Time frame: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Percentage of Participants With No EULAR Response Based on DAS28 by Visit
Time frame: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity Score (DAS <=3.2) by Visit
Time frame: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Percentage of Participants With DAS Remission (DAS <2.6) by Visit
Time frame: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) by Visit
Time frame: Baseline, Week 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Percent Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score by Visit
Time frame: Baseline, Week 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Nov 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27530379Williams JH, Hutmacher MM, Zierhut ML, Becker JC, Gumbiner B, Spencer-Green G, Melia LA, Liao KH, Suster M, Yin D, Li R, Meng X. Comparative assessment of clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis between PF-05280586, a proposed rituximab biosimilar, and rituximab. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Dec;82(6):1568-1579. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13094. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
84 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing PF-05280586, MabThera and Rituxan in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Pfizer at 84 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 84 sites in United States, Colombia, Russia, Canada, United Kingdom and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Nov 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Rituximab (time frame: Predose (Day 1) and 3, 4.25 (immediately before 1st infusion end), 72, 168, 335 (Day 15 within 1.5 hours before 2nd infusion), 337.5, 339.25 (Day 15 immediately before 2nd infusion end), 408, 504, 672, 1344, and 2016 hours after start of 1st infusion). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01526057, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2019.