AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 2REFLECTIONSNCT01526057

A Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Study Comparing PF-05280586 To Rituximab In Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With An Inadequate Response To TNF Inhibitors (REFLECTIONS B328-01)

A Phase 2 study testing PF-05280586, MabThera and Rituxan in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Pfizer at 84 sites in 10 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this study, patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis who are being treated with methotrexate will receive 2 intravenous treatments with either PF-05280586 or Rituxan (Rituximab) or MabThera (Rituximab). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
PF-05280586, MabThera and Rituxan
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
220 participants
Where
84 sitesin 10 countries
Study dates
20 Mar 2012to 7 May 2014
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis
  • Meets Class I, II or III of the ACR 1991 Revised Criteria
  • RA seropositivity
  • Stable dose of methotrexate
  • Inadequate response to TNF inhibitors

Who cannot join

  • Any prior treatment with lymphocyte depleting therapies
  • History of active TB infection
  • Known or screen test positive for specific viruses or indicators of viral infection

Trial locations and contacts

84 sites in 10 countries.

84 sites in 10 countries

United States43 sites
  • Bronson Internal Medicine & Rheumatology

    Battle Creek, Michigan, 49015

  • University of Alabama at Bermingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35249

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham - Arthritis Clinical Intervention Program (ACIP) SRC 076

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • Loyola Center for Health at Burr Ridge

    Burr Ridge, Illinois, 60527

  • Box Arthritis & Rheumatology of the Carolinas, PLLC

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210

  • Cincinnati Rheumatic Disease Study Group, Inc.

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219

  • Klein & Associates, M.D., P.A.

    Cumberland, Maryland, 21502

  • Metroplex Clinical Research Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Altoona Center for Clinical Research

    Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635

  • ArthroCare, Arthritis Care & Research, PC

    Gilbert, Arizona, 85234

  • North Shore-LIJ Health System - Division of Rheumatology and Allergy-Clinical Immunology

    Great Neck, New York, 11021

  • Klein & Associates, M.D., P.A.

    Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740

  • Hickory Family Practice Associates

    Hickory, North Carolina, 28601

  • PMG Research of Hickory, LLC - PI's Main Office (Subject visit, IP Storage, Infusion, & Lab Draws)

    Hickory, North Carolina, 28602

  • PMG Research of Hickory

    Hickory, North Carolina, 28602

  • Arthritis Associates, PLLC

    Hixson, Tennessee, 37343

  • Mercy Clinic Hot Springs Communities

    Hot Springs, Arkansas, 71913

  • Center For Clinical Trials Of Houston

    Houston, Texas, 77004

  • Rheumatology Associates of North Alabama, PC

    Huntsville, Alabama, 35801

  • Arthritis Clinic

    Jackson, Tennessee, 38305

  • West Tennessee Research Institute

    Jackson, Tennessee, 38305

  • Rheumatology/Arthritis Center

    Lansing, Michigan, 48910

  • University Of Nevada School Of Medicine

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89102

  • Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center

    Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756

  • Bluegrass Community Research, Inc.

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40504

  • UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine

    Los Angeles, California, 90095-1670

  • Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • Loyola Medical Medical Center Outpatient Center

    Maywood, Illinois, 60153

  • Loyola University Medical Center Pharmacy

    Maywood, Illinois, 60153

  • Southwest Rheumatology Research LLC.

    Mesquite, Texas, 75150

  • Illinois Bone and Joint Institute

    Morton Grove, Illinois, 60053

  • Loyola Center for health at Oakbrook Terrace North

    Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, 60181

  • Health Research of Oklahoma

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103

  • Arthritis Associates

    Orlando, Florida, 32804

  • Desert Medical Advances

    Palm Desert, California, 92260

  • The Arthritis Group

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19152

  • Advances In Medicine

    Rancho Mirage, California, 92270

  • University of South Florida - College of Medicine, Frank and Carol Morsani Center

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

  • New England Research Assoc. LLC

    Trumbull, Connecticut, 06611

  • Clinical Pharmacology Study Group

    Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605

  • UMass Memorial Medical Center - Memorial Campus

    Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605

  • UMass Memorial Medical Center-Rheumatology Center-Memorial Campus

    Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605

  • Clinical Research Center of Reading, LLP

    Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610

Other trials in United States

Colombia12 sites
  • Cediul S.A.

    Barranquilla, Atlántico

  • Centro de Reumatologia y Ortopedia

    Barranquilla, Atlántico

  • Clinica Bonnadona - Prevenir S.A.

    Barranquilla, Atlántico

  • Clinica de la Costa Ltdz.

    Barranquilla, Atlántico

  • IPS Centro Integral de Reumatologia del Cairbe, CIRCARIBE S.A.S.

    Barranquilla, Atlántico

  • Sabbag Radiologos Ltda.

    Barranquilla, Atlántico

  • Cerid S.A.

    Barranquilla, Colombia, Atlántico

  • Congregacion de las Hemanas Franciscanas Misioneras de Maria Auxiliadora - Clinica La Asuncion

    Barranquilla, Colombia, Atlántico

  • IPS Clinica General del Norte S.A.

    Barranquilla, Colombia, Atlántico

  • Clinica Medellin S.A Sede Centro

    Medellín, Antioquia

  • Mix Supplier S.A

    Medellín, Antioquia

  • Rodrigo Botero S.A.S.

    Medellín, Antioquia

Other trials in Colombia

Russia8 sites
  • GBUZ City Clinical Hospital #7

    Kazan', Tatarstan Republic, 420103

  • State Institution of Healthcare "Regional Clinical Hospital for Wars' Veterans"

    Kemerovo, 650000

  • State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare of Nizhegorodskiy Region

    Nizhny Novgorod, 603005

  • LLC CDCR "Healthy Joints"

    Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk Oblast, 630091

  • St. Petersburg state Healthcare lnstitution 'Clinical Rheumatology Hospital No25

    Saint Petersburg, 190068

  • Llc Ava-Peter

    Saint Petersburg, 191014

  • State Institute of Healthcare Samara Regional Clinical Hospital named after M.I.Kalinin

    Samara, 443095

  • Regional State Budget Institution of Healthcare "Tomsk Regional Clinical Hospital"

    Tomsk, 634063

Other trials in Russia

Canada5 sites
  • Pharmacie Matte et Petit

    Québec, Quebec, G1V 3M7

  • Centre de Rhumatologie St-Louis

    Québec, Quebec, G1W 4R4

  • Centre de Rhumatologie de l'Est du Quebec

    Rimouski, Quebec, G5L 8W1

  • Clinique Medicale du Phare

    Rimouski, Quebec, G5L IJ5

  • Centre de Recherche Musculo-Squelettique

    Trois-Rivières, Quebec, G8Z 1Y2

Other trials in Canada

United Kingdom5 sites
  • Bexley Wing - St. James's University Hospital

    Leeds, UK, LS9 7TF

  • Pharmacy Department, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

    Leeds, LS1 3EX

  • "The University of Leeds,

    Leeds, LS7 4SA

  • Pharmacy Dispensing - Bexley Wing - St. James's University Hospital

    Leeds, LS9 7TF

  • Whipps Cross University Hospital

    London, E11 1NR

Other trials in United Kingdom

Mexico4 sites
  • Centro De Investigacion Y Atencion Integral Durango CIAID

    Durango, 34270

  • Private Office

    Guadalajara, Jalisco, 06726

  • Cliditer, S.A. de C.V.

    México, D.F., 06700

  • Centro de Alta Especialidad en Reumatologia e Investigacion del Potosi S.C.

    San Luis Potosí City, 78200

Other trials in Mexico

Australia3 sites
  • St. Vincent's Hospital (Melbourne)

    Fitzroy, Victoria, 03065

  • Rheumatology Research Unit

    Maroochydore, Queensland, 4558

  • The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Department of Rheumatology

    Woodville South, South Australia, 5011

Other trials in Australia

South Africa2 sites
  • Dr. Jan Fourie Medical Centre

    Dundee, KwaZulu-Natal, 3000

  • Panorama Medical Centre

    Panorama, CAPE TOWN, 7500

Other trials in South Africa

Germany1 site
  • Schlosspark-Klinik GMBH, Internal Medicine II

    Berlin, 14059

Other trials in Germany

Israel1 site
  • The Chaim Sheba Medical Center Department of Internal Medicine B

    Ramat Gan, 52621

Other trials in Israel

About this study

Official title: A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, STUDY COMPARING THE PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, AND ASSESSING THE SAFETY OF PF-05280586 AND RITUXIMAB IN SUBJECTS WITH ACTIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS ON A BACKGROUND OF METHOTREXATE WHO HAVE HAD AN INADEQUATE RESPONSE TO ONE OR MORE TNF ANTAGONIST THERAPIES

In this study, patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis who are being treated with methotrexate will receive 2 intravenous treatments with either PF-05280586 or Rituxan (Rituximab) or MabThera (Rituximab). During the course of the study, the effects of the drugs will be assessed by sampling the levels of drug in the blood, blood cell counts, and by comparing these levels among the different treatments. Safety, tolerability and immunologic response also will be evaluated throughout.

Being tested
PF-05280586, MabThera, Rituxan
Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis, rituximab, methotrexate, anti-TNF
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PF-05280586Biological

    1000 mg, IV on days 1 and 15

  • MabTheraBiological

    1000 mg, IV on days 1 and 15

  • RituxanBiological

    1000 mg, IV on days 1 and 15

Study groups in NCT01526057
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
A - PF-05280586ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Biological: PF-05280586
B - Rituximab EUActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Biological: MabThera
C- Rituximab-USActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Biological: Rituxan

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Rituximab

    Cmax is the peak serum concentration of study drug (rituximab) after a dose has been administered.

    Measured: Predose (Day 1) and 3, 4.25 (immediately before 1st infusion end), 72, 168, 335 (Day 15 within 1.5 hours before 2nd infusion), 337.5, 339.25 (Day 15 immediately before 2nd infusion end), 408, 504, 672, 1344, and 2016 hours after start of 1st infusion

  2. AUC 0-inf of Rituximab

    The AUC 0-inf refers to the concentration in serum of the drug over time. It represents the total drug exposure over time, from time 0 (the point of drug administration) extrapolated to infinity.

    Measured: Predose (Day 1) and 3, 4.25 (immediately before 1st infusion end), 72, 168, 335 (Day 15 within 1.5 hours before 2nd infusion), 337.5, 339.25 (Day 15 immediately before 2nd infusion end), 408, 504, 672, 1344, and 2016 hours after start of 1st infusion

Secondary outcomes (24)
  1. Rituximab AUC From Time 0 to 2 Weeks (AUC 0-2wk)

    The AUC 0-2wk refers to the concentration in serum of the drug over time. It represents the total drug exposure over time, from time 0 (the point of drug administration) to 2 weeks after drug administration.

    Measured: Predose (Day 1) and 3, 4.25 (immediately before 1st infusion end), 72, 168, 335 (Day 15 within 1.5 hours before 2nd infusion), 337.5, 339.25 (Day 15 immediately before 2nd infusion end), 408, 504, 672, 1344, and 2016 hours after start of 1st infusion

  2. Rituximab AUC From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC 0-T)

    The AUC 0-T refers to the concentration in serum of the drug over time. It represents the total drug exposure over time, from time 0 (the point of drug administration) to the last measured concentration at time T.

    Measured: Predose (Day 1) and 3, 4.25 (immediately before 1st infusion end), 72, 168, 335 (Day 15 within 1.5 hours before 2nd infusion), 337.5, 339.25 (Day 15 immediately before 2nd infusion end), 408, 504, 672, 1344, and 2016 hours after start of 1st infusion

  3. CD19+ B-cell Count AUC From Time 0 to the Last Measurement at Time T (AUC 0-T,B-cell)

    The AUC 0-T,B-cell refers to the concentration in serum of B-cells. It represents the total B-cells over time from time 0 (the point of drug administration) to the last measurement taken at time T.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)

  4. Minimum Post-Baseline CD19+ B-cell Count (/uL)

    The lowest CD19+ B-cell count measured in a participant's blood post-baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)

  5. Time to Minimum Post-Baseline CD19+ B-cell Count (Weeks)

    The amount of time in weeks from baseline to the lowest observed CD19+ B-cell count.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)

  6. Duration of B-cell Depletion (τB-cell) (Days)

    The τB-cell is defined as the time interval over which the B-cell count was <0.3 cells/uL or the detection limit.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)

  7. Percentage of Participants With CD19+ B-cell Count Recovery

    The percentage of participants with CD19+ B-cell counts which fell to <50% of Baseline value during treatment and which recovered to ≥50% of Baseline value at End of Treatment.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

  8. Area Under the CD19+ B-cell Count Concentration-time Profile (AUC 0-T, B-cell)

    The AUC 0-T, B-cell refers to the CD19+ B-cell count over time. It represents the total B-cells over time, from time 0 (the point of drug administration) to the last measured count at time T.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)

  9. Baseline and Change From Baseline in Circulating Immunoglobulin-M (IgM) by Visit (Grams Per Liter (g/L])

    The level of IgM in serum at Baseline and the change from Baseline at each subsequent visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)

  10. Percent (%) Change From Baseline in Circulating IgM by Visit (g/L)

    The percentage change from Baseline in circulating IgM by visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

  11. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response by Visit

    ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (≥)20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).

    Non-responder imputation categorized participants as having a non-response if they did not have data available at a visit due to missing data or study discontinuation. Participants who rolled over to the extension study were not included in the non-responder imputation from that point on.

    Measured: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

  12. Percentage of Participants With ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response by Visit

    ACR70 response: ≥70% improvement in tender joint count; ≥70% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

    Non-responder imputation categorized participants as having a non-response if they did not have data available at a visit due to missing data or study discontinuation. Participantss who rolled over to the extension study were not included in the non-responder imputation from that point on.

    Measured: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)

  13. Percentage of Participants With ACR 50% Improvement (ACR50) Response by Visit

    ACR50 response: ≥50% improvement in tender joint count; ≥50% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

    Non-responder imputation categorized participants as having a non-response if they did not have data available at a visit due to missing data or study discontinuation. Participants who rolled over to the extension study were not included in the non-responder imputation from that point on.

    Measured: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

  14. Percentage of Participants by Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Status

    Presence of anti-rituximab antibodies in blood. Participants with a positive antibody status at any time during the study were defined as having overall positive antibody status; participants with a negative antibody status throughout the study were defined as having overall negative antibody status.

    Measured: Days 1 up to Day 169.

  15. Percentage of Participants With Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) in Participants With a Positive ADA by Visit

    Measured: Day 1 up to Day 169

  16. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP)

    DAS28-CRP was calculated from the swollen joint count and tender joint count using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-CRP less than or equal to (≤)3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS28-CRP greater than (>)3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-CRP less than (<)2.6 implied remission.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

  17. Percent Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP by Visit

    DAS28-CRP was calculated from the swollen joint count and tender joint count using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-CRP less than or equal to (≤)3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS28-CRP greater than (>)3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-CRP less than (<)2.6 implied remission.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

  18. Percentage of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) by Visit

    The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 ≤3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to ≤5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to ≤1.2 with DAS28 ≤5.1; non-responders: change from baseline ≤0.6, or change from baseline >0.6 and ≤1.2 with DAS28 >5.1.

    Measured: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

  19. Percentage of Participants With Moderate EULAR Response Based on Disease Activity Score Based on DAS28 by Visit

    The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 ≤3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to ≤5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to ≤1.2 with DAS28 ≤5.1; non-responders: change from baseline ≤0.6, or change from baseline >0.6 and ≤1.2 with DAS28 >5.1.

    Measured: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

  20. Percentage of Participants With No EULAR Response Based on DAS28 by Visit

    The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 ≤3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to ≤5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to ≤1.2 with DAS28 ≤5.1; non-responders: change from baseline ≤0.6, or change from baseline >0.6 and ≤1.2 with DAS28 >5.1.

    Measured: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

  21. Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity Score (DAS <=3.2) by Visit

    DAS28-CRP was calculated from the swollen joint count and tender joint count using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 implied low disease activity. p-value of 9999 indicates p-value is not applicable.

    Measured: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

  22. Percentage of Participants With DAS Remission (DAS <2.6) by Visit

    DAS28-CRP was calculated from the swollen joint count and tender joint count using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-CRP <2.6 implied remission. p-value of 9999 indicates p-value is not applicable.

    Measured: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

  23. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) by Visit

    HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

  24. Percent Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score by Visit

    HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Feb 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study start20 Mar 2012
  3. Primary completion13 Aug 2013
  4. Study completion7 May 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
220 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01526057
Sponsor's protocol ID
B3281001
Other IDs
ICON 9002/010, 2011-002896-40
Acronym
REFLECTIONS
Status last verified
Oct 2019
First submitted
1 Feb 2012
Last updated
19 Nov 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Publications

  • Williams JH, Hutmacher MM, Zierhut ML, Becker JC, Gumbiner B, Spencer-Green G, Melia LA, Liao KH, Suster M, Yin D, Li R, Meng X. Comparative assessment of clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis between PF-05280586, a proposed rituximab biosimilar, and rituximab. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Dec;82(6):1568-1579. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13094. Epub 2016 Sep 22.

    PubMed 27530379

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing PF-05280586, MabThera and Rituxan in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Pfizer at 84 sites in 10 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 84 sites in United States, Colombia, Russia, Canada, United Kingdom and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Nov 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Rituximab (time frame: Predose (Day 1) and 3, 4.25 (immediately before 1st infusion end), 72, 168, 335 (Day 15 within 1.5 hours before 2nd infusion), 337.5, 339.25 (Day 15 immediately before 2nd infusion end), 408, 504, 672, 1344, and 2016 hours after start of 1st infusion). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01526057, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in