Wound Healing DisorderSAWHINCT01528033
Treatment Study of Vacuum Assisted Closure for Postsurgical Subcutaneous Abdominal Wound Healing Impairments
A study testing Vacuum Assisted Closure® and Standard conventional wound therapy in people with Wound Healing Disorder and Impaired Wound Healing, run by University of Witten/Herdecke at 15 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This clinical study is performed in several German, Dutch and Belgian hospitals to evaluate the efficacy of Vacuum Assisted Closure® (V.A.C.®) for the treatment of postsurgical abdominal wound healing impairments after surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Wound Healing Disorder, Impaired Wound Healing, Abdominal Wound Healing Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Vacuum Assisted Closure® and Standard conventional wound therapy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 539 participants
- Where
- 15 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 2 Aug 2011to 11 Jun 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Written informed consent
- Post-surgical subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment
- Minimum wound size eligible for the application of the randomized treatment- Inclusion, randomization, adequate wound pre-treatment (Debridement) and start of therapy within 48 hours after reopening of the wound, diagnosis for nonclosable wound or in case of spontaneous wound dehiscence
Who cannot join
- Age < 18
- Noncompliance with study procedures, visit schedule and follow up
- Pregnancy
- Present or nonclosable defect of the abdominal fascia
- Any pre-existing or ongoing organ system failure, that cannot be stabilized or solved by appropriate medical treatment
- Necrotic tissue with eschar present
Show all 11Show fewer
- Non-enteric and unexplored fistulas
- Malignancy of the wound
- Use of any other device based on the principle of negative pressure wound therapy on the study wound within ≤ 8 days prior to screening
- Competing therapies or procedures
- Simultaneous participation in other clinical trials
Trial locations and contacts
15 sites in 2 countries.
15 sites in 2 countries
Germany13 sites
Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg (Berlin)
Berlin, 10365
Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie
Berlin, 12683
St. Josef-Hospital gGmbH Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Bochum, 44791
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
Göttingen, 37075
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Klinik für Allgemeine Chirurgie, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie
Homburg, 66421
UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität
Mainz, 55131
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg Chirurgische Klinik
Mannheim, 68167
Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar
München, 81675
Ruppiner Kliniken GmbH
Neuruppin, 16816
Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Klinik für Allgemein- und Visceralchirurgie
Potsdam, 14467
Diakoniekrankenhaus Rotenburg
Rotenburg (Wümme), 27356
Thüringen-Kliniken "Georgius Agricola" GmbH
Saalfeld, 07318
GRN-Klinik Sinsheim, Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie
Sinsheim, 74889
Belgium2 sites
UZ Brussel
Brussels, 1090
Department of Abdominal Surgery Gasthuisberg University Hospital
Leuven, 3000
About this study
Official title: Treatment of Subcutaneous Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment After Surgery Without Fascial Dehiscence by Vacuum Assisted Closure™(SAWHI-V.A.C.® Study) Versus Standard Conventional Wound Therapy
This clinical study is performed in several German, Dutch and Belgian hospitals to evaluate the efficacy of Vacuum Assisted Closure® (V.A.C.®) for the treatment of postsurgical abdominal wound healing impairments after surgery. Therefore the underlying layer of fibrous tissue that permeates the internal organs must be intact.
Main outcome measure is the time until complete wound closure that sustained for a minimum of 14 days. Furthermore the therapy options will be examined regarding several other clinical, safety, patient reported and economic parameters.
Read more
Patients will be assigned equally and by chance to both treatment groups. Study participants as well as the attending doctors and nurses will be informed about the assignment to the respective treatment arm.
The primary outcome measure and some of the secondary parameters like reappearance of the wound and the development of the wound size over time, examined within an active study treatment time of 42 days, will be photographed and analysed under the use of a central computer system. The central analysing personal will not be informed about patient details or therapy allocation.
Patients with at first closed belly wounds with wound healing disorder in the postoperative course after surgery without an opening of the underlying layer of fibrous tissue are eligible to be included in the trial if the diagnosis of a wound healing impairment in the postoperative course is manifested as a wound with spontaneous dehiscence, a wound that requires an active reopening of the suture by the treating physician or a wound that cannot be closed by primary intention and requires further treatment to achieve permanent closure.
Study participants will be selected and enrolled within clinical surgical departments which provide the respective personal, structural and scientific background for the conduction of the trial project.
Trial therapy will be started in-hospital and may be continued in ambulatory care. It is very important to examine the therapy options also in the ambulant care setting thus study participants with good health who are able to continue the specific wound treatment in ambulant should be transferred to the ambulant service as soon as possible.
Read the detailed description
The Institute for Research in Operative Medicine as part of the Private University of Witten /Herdecke is planning and performing a clinical trial project to evaluate the efficacy of Vacuum Assisted Closure® (V.A.C.®) Therapy for the treatment of postsurgical abdominal wound healing impairments after surgery without fascial dehiscence. The clinical trial project is fully financed by Kinetic Concepts Incorporated (KCI). The V.A.C.® Therapy devices that will be used in this study include the ActiV.A.C.® Therapy System, InfoV.A.C.® Therapy System, and V.A.C. Freedom® Therapy System. All V.A.C.® Therapy devices to be utilized in this study bear the CE mark and will be operated within normal conditions of use and according to manufacturer's specifications.
Background of the clinical trial project is the decision of the Joint Federal Committee of Germany (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschusses (G-BA)) that Vacuum assisted closure therapy is inadmissible to be a standard benefit of health insurance companies in Germany.
This decision is based on systematic review \& meta-analysis of existing trials performed by Institute for Quality and Economic Efficiency in the Healthcare System (Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG)) which showed an insufficient state of evidence regarding the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of acute and chronic wounds.
This study project compares Vacuum Assisted Closure® and standard conventional wound therapy in the treatment of acute abdominal wounds after surgery without fascial dehiscence and will be conducted in abdominal surgical hospital departments with the required structural, manpower, and scientific qualifications. Patients will be stratified according to hospital and wound size. Trial therapy will be started in-hospital and may be continued in ambulatory care.
The study is designed as a multinational, multicentre, prospective randomized controlled, adaptive design, clinical superiority trial, with blinded photographic analysis of the primary endpoint.
The primary objective is to compare the clinical, safety, and economic outcomes of V.A.C.® Therapy and SCWT in postsurgical abdominal wound healing impairments without fascial dehiscence.
The primary outcome to be observed in this study is time to complete abdominal wound closure where closure is observed at or before day 42 and is confirmed to have been sustained for a period of at least 14 consecutive days. This study design also will allow detailed description of specific covariates to determine their effect on response variables (healing).
This study's hypothesis is that the use of the V.A.C.® Therapy System, when compared to SCWT in the management of post-surgical abdominal wound healing impairments with intact fascia, will result in a decrease in the time to achieve complete wound closure with confirmation after subsequent 14 days.
Using V.A.C.® Therapy is an effective and safe treatment option for hospitals as well as for outpatient care for treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds with wound healing impairment in the postoperative course.
Randomisation to treatment arms will be performed at a 1:1 ratio. Randomisation will be performed via a centralized system with an Internet-based tool. To address issues of blinding, wound photo documentation will be obtained during the trial and confirmation of wound closure will be assessed via blinded photographic analysis, which will serve as the method of primary endpoint analysis.
Primary closed abdominal wounds with wound healing disorder in the postoperative course after surgical intervention without fascial dehiscence are eligible to be included in the trial if the diagnosis of a wound healing impairment in the postoperative course is manifested as a wound with spontaneous dehiscence, a wound that requires an active reopening of the suture by the treating physician or a wound that cannot be closed by primary intention and requires further treatment to achieve permanent closure.
During active recruitment phase, the pre-trial estimates indicate approximately 600 patients will be required to yield the target of 552 evaluable participants. Using an adaptive design study sample-size calculations will be re-estimated upon planed interim analysis of study data of 250 patients. Patients will be enrolled from approximately 25 centres in Germany, the United Kingdom, Belgium and the Netherlands.
The evaluation of the primary Endpoint defined as time (number of days) to achieve complete wound closure verified by photo documentation and blinded, computer-based wound quality assessment as well as wound closure confirmation after 14 consecutive days and secondary endpoints including clinical endpoints like recurrences, safety endpoints, patient reported outcome parameters and economic-based outcome measures will provide data regarding efficacy and efficiency of NPWT therapy for the treatment of acute post-surgical abdominal wound healing impairment in hospital as well as in the ambulant setting.
The results of the study will be provided to make a contribution to the final decision of the Joint Federal Committee about NPWT to be a standard benefit of health insurance companies in Germany for inpatient and / or outpatient care.
- Conditions
- Wound Healing Disorder, Impaired Wound Healing, Abdominal Wound Healing Disorder, Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment, Acute Postsurgical Subcutaneous Wound
- Being tested
- Vacuum Assisted Closure®, Standard conventional wound therapy
- Keywords
- surgical wound, wound healing disorder, Wound healing impairment, post surgical wound healing disorder, abdominal wound healing impairment, Vacuum Assisted Closure, negative pressure wound therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Surgical Wound
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Vacuum Assisted Closure®Device
Also called Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Vacuum Assisted Closure® (V.A.C.®) Therapy within a maximum study treatment time of 42 days.
VAC® Therapy Systems used within the trial are ActiV.A.C.®, InfoV.A.C.®, V.A.C. Freedom®, V.A.C. Via® and VAC Ulta®. All used systems are equally eligible for the treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds and should be used according to availability and local preferences within the trial site.
Systems differ regarding user surface and display and processing of data. For the treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds the V.A.C.® Granufoam Dressing (size medium and big) is recommended.
Standard conventional wound therapyOther
Standard conventional wound therapy (SCWT) according to institutional clinical standards within a maximum study treatment time of 42 days
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Vacuum Assisted Closure® | Experimental | Negative pressure wound therapy Receives: Device: Vacuum Assisted Closure® |
| Standard conventional wound therapy | Active comparator | According to institutional clinical standards Receives: Other: Standard conventional wound therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to Complete Wound Closure
Time (number of days) to achieve complete wound closure verified by photo documentation and blinded, computer-based wound quality assessment as well as wound closure confirmation after 14 consecutive days (14 days -0 / + 3)
Complete wound closure is defined as:
100% epithelialization No drainage from the wound No need for adjuvant therapy or dressing No presence of sutures
Measured: 42 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
Incidence of Confirmed and Verified Wound Closure
Incidence of confirmed and verified wound closure achieved after a maximum study observation / treatment period of 42 days (+ 14 days to observe sustained closure)
Measured: 42 days
Recurrence
Recurrence of wound opening after confirmed wound closure
Measured: 132 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Feb 2012 (estimated)
- Study start2 Aug 2011
- Primary completion14 Mar 2018
- Study completion11 Jun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Wound Healing DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 539 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Witten/Herdecke
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- KCI Europe Holding B.V.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Doerthe Seidel, University of Witten/Herdecke
- Investigators
- Doerthe Seidel, Principal investigator, Witten / Herdecke University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01528033
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VAC2010-56
- Other IDs
- 00000648
- Acronym
- SAWHI
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 2 Feb 2012
- Last updated
- 25 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Seidel D, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA. Treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment after surgery without fascial dehiscence by vacuum assisted closure (SAWHI-V.A.C.(R)-study) versus standard conventional wound therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Nov 20;14:394. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-394.
PubMed 24252551Seidel D, Diedrich S, Herrle F, Thielemann H, Marusch F, Schirren R, Talaulicar R, Gehrig T, Lehwald-Tywuschik N, Glanemann M, Bunse J, Huttemann M, Braumann C, Heizmann O, Miserez M, Kronert T, Gretschel S, Lefering R. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Conventional Wound Treatment in Subcutaneous Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment: The SAWHI Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2020 Jun 1;155(6):469-478. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0414.
PubMed 32293657Seidel D; SAWHI study group. Ambulatory negative pressure wound therapy of subcutaneous abdominal wounds after surgery: results of the SAWHI randomized clinical trial. BMC Surg. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01863-x.
PubMed 36503505
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Treatment of Subcutaneous Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment After Surgery Without Fascial Dehiscence by Vacuum Assisted Closure™(SAWHI-V.A.C.® Study) Versus Standard Conventional Wound Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01528033
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SAWHI / VAC2010-56
- Conditions
- Wound Healing Disorder, Impaired Wound Healing, Abdominal Wound Healing Disorder, Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment, Acute Postsurgical Subcutaneous Wound
- Keywords
- surgical wound, wound healing disorder, Wound healing impairment, post surgical wound healing disorder, abdominal wound healing impairment, Vacuum Assisted Closure, negative pressure wound therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 539 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Witten/HerdeckeUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- KCI Europe Holding B.V.
- Study start
- 2 Aug 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Feb 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 Jun 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This clinical study is performed in several German, Dutch and Belgian hospitals to evaluate the efficacy of Vacuum Assisted Closure® (V.A.C.®) for the treatment of postsurgical abdominal wound healing impairments after surgery. Therefore the underlying layer of fibrous tissue that permeates the internal organs must be intact.
Main outcome measure is the time until complete wound closure that sustained for a minimum of 14 days. Furthermore the therapy options will be examined regarding several other clinical, safety, patient reported and economic parameters.
Patients will be assigned equally and by chance to both treatment groups. Study participants as well as the attending doctors and nurses will be informed about the assignment to the respective treatment arm.
The primary outcome measure and some of the secondary parameters like reappearance of the wound and the development of the wound size over time, examined within an active study treatment time of 42 days, will be photographed and analysed under the use of a central computer system. The central analysing personal will not be informed about patient details or therapy allocation.
Patients with at first closed belly wounds with wound healing disorder in the postoperative course after surgery without an opening of the underlying layer of fibrous tissue are eligible to be included in the trial if the diagnosis of a wound healing impairment in the postoperative course is manifested as a wound with spontaneous dehiscence, a wound that requires an active reopening of the suture by the treating physician or a wound that cannot be closed by primary intention and requires further treatment to achieve permanent closure.
Study participants will be selected and enrolled within clinical surgical departments which provide the respective personal, structural and scientific background for the conduction of the trial project.
Trial therapy will be started in-hospital and may be continued in ambulatory care. It is very important to examine the therapy options also in the ambulant care setting thus study participants with good health who are able to continue the specific wound treatment in ambulant should be transferred to the ambulant service as soon as possible.
Detailed description
The Institute for Research in Operative Medicine as part of the Private University of Witten /Herdecke is planning and performing a clinical trial project to evaluate the efficacy of Vacuum Assisted Closure® (V.A.C.®) Therapy for the treatment of postsurgical abdominal wound healing impairments after surgery without fascial dehiscence. The clinical trial project is fully financed by Kinetic Concepts Incorporated (KCI). The V.A.C.® Therapy devices that will be used in this study include the ActiV.A.C.® Therapy System, InfoV.A.C.® Therapy System, and V.A.C. Freedom® Therapy System. All V.A.C.® Therapy devices to be utilized in this study bear the CE mark and will be operated within normal conditions of use and according to manufacturer's specifications.
Background of the clinical trial project is the decision of the Joint Federal Committee of Germany (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschusses (G-BA)) that Vacuum assisted closure therapy is inadmissible to be a standard benefit of health insurance companies in Germany.
This decision is based on systematic review \& meta-analysis of existing trials performed by Institute for Quality and Economic Efficiency in the Healthcare System (Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG)) which showed an insufficient state of evidence regarding the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of acute and chronic wounds.
This study project compares Vacuum Assisted Closure® and standard conventional wound therapy in the treatment of acute abdominal wounds after surgery without fascial dehiscence and will be conducted in abdominal surgical hospital departments with the required structural, manpower, and scientific qualifications. Patients will be stratified according to hospital and wound size. Trial therapy will be started in-hospital and may be continued in ambulatory care.
The study is designed as a multinational, multicentre, prospective randomized controlled, adaptive design, clinical superiority trial, with blinded photographic analysis of the primary endpoint.
The primary objective is to compare the clinical, safety, and economic outcomes of V.A.C.® Therapy and SCWT in postsurgical abdominal wound healing impairments without fascial dehiscence.
The primary outcome to be observed in this study is time to complete abdominal wound closure where closure is observed at or before day 42 and is confirmed to have been sustained for a period of at least 14 consecutive days. This study design also will allow detailed description of specific covariates to determine their effect on response variables (healing).
This study's hypothesis is that the use of the V.A.C.® Therapy System, when compared to SCWT in the management of post-surgical abdominal wound healing impairments with intact fascia, will result in a decrease in the time to achieve complete wound closure with confirmation after subsequent 14 days.
Using V.A.C.® Therapy is an effective and safe treatment option for hospitals as well as for outpatient care for treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds with wound healing impairment in the postoperative course.
Randomisation to treatment arms will be performed at a 1:1 ratio. Randomisation will be performed via a centralized system with an Internet-based tool. To address issues of blinding, wound photo documentation will be obtained during the trial and confirmation of wound closure will be assessed via blinded photographic analysis, which will serve as the method of primary endpoint analysis.
Primary closed abdominal wounds with wound healing disorder in the postoperative course after surgical intervention without fascial dehiscence are eligible to be included in the trial if the diagnosis of a wound healing impairment in the postoperative course is manifested as a wound with spontaneous dehiscence, a wound that requires an active reopening of the suture by the treating physician or a wound that cannot be closed by primary intention and requires further treatment to achieve permanent closure.
During active recruitment phase, the pre-trial estimates indicate approximately 600 patients will be required to yield the target of 552 evaluable participants. Using an adaptive design study sample-size calculations will be re-estimated upon planed interim analysis of study data of 250 patients. Patients will be enrolled from approximately 25 centres in Germany, the United Kingdom, Belgium and the Netherlands.
The evaluation of the primary Endpoint defined as time (number of days) to achieve complete wound closure verified by photo documentation and blinded, computer-based wound quality assessment as well as wound closure confirmation after 14 consecutive days and secondary endpoints including clinical endpoints like recurrences, safety endpoints, patient reported outcome parameters and economic-based outcome measures will provide data regarding efficacy and efficiency of NPWT therapy for the treatment of acute post-surgical abdominal wound healing impairment in hospital as well as in the ambulant setting.
The results of the study will be provided to make a contribution to the final decision of the Joint Federal Committee about NPWT to be a standard benefit of health insurance companies in Germany for inpatient and / or outpatient care.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Vacuum Assisted Closure® | Experimental | Device: Vacuum Assisted Closure®Negative pressure wound therapy |
| Standard conventional wound therapy | Active comparator | Other: Standard conventional wound therapyAccording to institutional clinical standards |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Written informed consent
- Post-surgical subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment
- Minimum wound size eligible for the application of the randomized treatment- Inclusion, randomization, adequate wound pre-treatment (Debridement) and start of therapy within 48 hours after reopening of the wound, diagnosis for nonclosable wound or in case of spontaneous wound dehiscence
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Age < 18
- Noncompliance with study procedures, visit schedule and follow up
- Pregnancy
- Present or nonclosable defect of the abdominal fascia
- Any pre-existing or ongoing organ system failure, that cannot be stabilized or solved by appropriate medical treatment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Vacuum Assisted Closure®Also: Negative Pressure Wound TherapyVacuum Assisted Closure® (V.A.C.®) Therapy within a maximum study treatment time of 42 days. VAC® Therapy Systems used within the trial are ActiV.A.C.®, InfoV.A.C.®, V.A.C. Freedom®, V.A.C. Via® and VAC Ulta®. All used systems are equally eligible for the treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds and should be used according to availability and local preferences within the trial site. Systems differ regarding user surface and display and processing of data. For the treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds the V.A.C.® Granufoam Dressing (size medium and big) is recommended. | Device | Vacuum Assisted Closure® |
| Standard conventional wound therapyStandard conventional wound therapy (SCWT) according to institutional clinical standards within a maximum study treatment time of 42 days | Other | Standard conventional wound therapy |
Primary outcome
Time to Complete Wound Closure
Time frame: 42 days
Time (number of days) to achieve complete wound closure verified by photo documentation and blinded, computer-based wound quality assessment as well as wound closure confirmation after 14 consecutive days (14 days -0 / + 3) Complete wound closure is defined as: 100% epithelialization No drainage from the wound No need for adjuvant therapy or dressing No presence of sutures
2 secondary outcomes
Incidence of Confirmed and Verified Wound Closure
Time frame: 42 days
Recurrence
Time frame: 132 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jun 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 24252551Seidel D, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA. Treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment after surgery without fascial dehiscence by vacuum assisted closure (SAWHI-V.A.C.(R)-study) versus standard conventional wound therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Nov 20;14:394. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-394.
- Results publication: PubMed 32293657Seidel D, Diedrich S, Herrle F, Thielemann H, Marusch F, Schirren R, Talaulicar R, Gehrig T, Lehwald-Tywuschik N, Glanemann M, Bunse J, Huttemann M, Braumann C, Heizmann O, Miserez M, Kronert T, Gretschel S, Lefering R. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Conventional Wound Treatment in Subcutaneous Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment: The SAWHI Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2020 Jun 1;155(6):469-478. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0414.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36503505Seidel D; SAWHI study group. Ambulatory negative pressure wound therapy of subcutaneous abdominal wounds after surgery: results of the SAWHI randomized clinical trial. BMC Surg. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01863-x.
- Study WebsiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- SponsorLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Wound Healing Disorder
Active, not recruitingObservational study
NovoX®Cup as Primary Dressing After Breast Reduction
Wound Healing Disorder, Post-Surgical Complication
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Patients Referred to the Chronic Pain Unit for Palliative Treatment With Ozone Therapy Between 2022 and 2025
Radiation Toxicity, Chemotherapeutic Toxicity
RecruitingObservational study
Patients Referred to the Chronic Pain Unit for Palliative Treatment With Ozone Therapy Between 2026 and 2029.
Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy, Radiation Toxicity
Not yet recruitingObservational study
INJECTHEAL - Investigation of Chronic Wound Exudate and Biofilm
Chronic Ulcers: Non-healing Deep Cavity Wounds (e.g., Diabetic Foot Ulcers, Arterial Ulcers, Post-surgical Wound Healing Disorders)
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Solutions Used in Burn Wound Irrigation on Healing, Pain, Fear and Anxiety: Randomized Controlled Study
Burn, Burn Wound
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Doerthe Seidel principal investigator
Witten / Herdecke University
15 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Vacuum Assisted Closure® and Standard conventional wound therapy in people with Wound Healing Disorder and Impaired Wound Healing, run by University of Witten/Herdecke at 15 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 15 sites in Germany, Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jun 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to Complete Wound Closure (time frame: 42 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01528033, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.