AzTrials
AzTrials

Nerve InjuryNCT01528397

Reconstruction of Proper Digital Nerve Defects in the Thumb Using a Pedicled Nerve Graft

A study testing pedicled nerve graft in people with Nerve Injury, run by The Second Hospital of Tangshan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A proper digital nerve (PDN) defect in the thumb can produce partial or complete sensory loss which can result in functional disability. This article reports the treatment of the thumb PDN defect using a pedicled nerve graft harvested from the dorsal branch of the PDN. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Nerve Injury
What is being tested?
pedicled nerve graft
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
14 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
May 2005to May 2010
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • thumb PDN defects between the middle of the distal phalanx and the metacarpophalangeal joint;
  • PDN defects of single or both sides;
  • PDN defects 1-4 cm in length.

Who cannot join

  • injury to the course of the pedicle or the donor sites;
  • PDN defects less than 1 cm or longer than 4 cm;
  • no Doppler sound at the location of the second dorsal metacarpal artery (SDMA).

About this study

A proper digital nerve (PDN) defect in the thumb can produce partial or complete sensory loss which can result in functional disability. This article reports the treatment of the thumb PDN defect using a pedicled nerve graft harvested from the dorsal branch of the PDN. Fourteen patients with the thumb PDN defect underwent a new surgical procedure in which the pedicled nerve graft was used to bridge nerve defect. For comparison, the investigators also collected a consecutive series of 21 patients with thumb PDN defects treated using a nonvascularized sural nerve graft. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of pedicled nerve grafting for PDN defects in the thumb.

Read the detailed description

At final follow-up, the investigators measured the sensibility of the thumb pulps and the donor sites using the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test and static 2-point discrimination (2PD) test. The test points were at the centers of the radial and ulnar portions of the thumb pulp and the donor sites separately. Each area was tested 3 times with a Dellon-Mackinnon discriminator. Two out of 3 correct answers were considered proof of perception before proceeding to another lower value.

Conditions
Nerve Injury
Being tested
pedicled nerve graft
Keywords
defect, dorsal branch of the proper digital nerve, proper digital nerve, second dorsal metacarpal artery, pedicled nerve graft.

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • pedicled nerve graftProcedure or surgery

    Also called Vascularized nerve graft

    A pedicled nerve graft harvested from the dorsal branch of the PDN can be used for reconstruction of such defects. The graft is based on the second dorsal metacarpal artery.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. static 2-point discrimination (2PD) test

    The test points were at the centers of the radial and ulnar portions of the thumb pulp and the donor sites separately. Each area was tested 3 times with a Dellon-Mackinnon discriminator. Two out of 3 correct answers were considered proof of perception before proceeding to another lower value.

    Measured: 22 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Feb 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2005
  3. Primary completionSep 2009
  4. Study completionMay 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
14 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01528397
Sponsor's protocol ID
TSChen3885
Status last verified
Jan 2012
First submitted
31 Jan 2012
Last updated
8 Feb 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Chen C, Tang P, Zhang X. Reconstruction of proper digital nerve defects in the thumb using a pedicle nerve graft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Nov;130(5):1089-1097. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318267d56b.

    PubMed 23096609

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing pedicled nerve graft in people with Nerve Injury, run by The Second Hospital of Tangshan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

static 2-point discrimination (2PD) test (time frame: 22 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01528397, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in