AzTrials
AzTrials

Congestive Heart FailureNCT01529463

Effect of Post Discharge Follow-up on Readmission Rates for Congestive Heart Failure Patients

An observational study of Congestive Heart Failure and Systolic Dysfunction, run by Trinity Health Of New England at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that a comprehensive post-discharge disease management system is more effective in reducing the readmission rate for heart failure patients compared to standard care. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
21 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2011to Nov 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients hospitalized with an admitting diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure.

Who may be able to join

  • Age =/or >18
  • Admitted to the Heart Failure Unit with acute decompensated heart failure
  • Referred to the Congestive Heart Failure Disease Management Program

Who cannot join

  • Age<18
  • Mentally incapacitated
  • Discharge to a skilled nursing facility

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center

    Hartford, Connecticut, 06105

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that a comprehensive post-discharge disease management system is more effective in reducing the readmission rate for heart failure patients compared to standard care.

Read the detailed description

Heart failure, a disease that affects a large proportion of the aging population, continues to be associated with poor outcomes especially in patients who require hospitalization. Each year, nearly 1 million Americans are newly diagnosed with congestive heart failure and currently, there are at least 5 million Americans living with this chronic disease. The number of patients with heart failure is expected to reach 10 million by the year 2037.This population consumes a large proportion of health care resources with the main cost being hospitalization. The heart failure 30-day readmission rates hover around 25% nationally, with an approximate cost of $7,000 per hospitalization.

In an effort to improve care and reduce costs, heart failure disease management programs are becoming more prevalent. Recent data suggests that multi-disciplinary disease management programs may reduce mortality and hospitalizations as well as improve costs, patients' ability to self-care, and quality of life. It provides a means to increase the use of evidence-based therapies, improve patient education, and decrease resource usage. Heart failure management programs involve early assessment, optimized treatment, easy access to care, and education and psychosocial support.

Patients hospitalized for decompensated congestive heart failure are among the highest risk group for morbidity and mortality among people with chronic heart failure and a large proportion of this risk occurs early after discharge. Thus, the goals of these programs should include managing the gap between the inpatient and outpatient settings and should ideally involve a multidisciplinary team in order to serve these patients in a comprehensive manner. We propose to determine the relative efficacy of a post-discharge disease management system.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

The primary objective of this study is to determine if the time to first hospital readmission can be lengthened using a disease management model.

STUDY DESIGN:

This is a prospective, one year pilot study that will enroll patients admitted to Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center (SFHMC) with the admitting diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure that have been referred to the Congestive Heart Failure Disease(CHF)Management Program by the attending physician. The patients will be enrolled in the study and followed for a maximum of 90 days post-discharge. A case control group of 60-100 subjects will also be established for primary endpoint analysis.

METHODS:

Patients who meet study criteria, informed consent will be obtained before hospital discharge or at the first Disease Management visit. Patients will be followed for 90 days post-discharge. Clinic visits, homecare agency and visits, heart failure education class attendance, and dates of hospital readmission will be tracked. Descriptive characteristics of patients will be recorded at the time of enrollment. Descriptive characteristics include demographics, etiology of heart failure, symptoms, physical assessment, current medications, lab results, and diagnostic test results.

In everyday practice, the Congestive Heart Failure Disease Management Program administers clinical questionnaires to patients to assess quality of life and heart failure management knowledge. The clinical questionnaires that constitute standard of care for these patients include:

  • Atlanta Heart Failure Knowledge Test: given to each patient at the first Disease Management visit and after attending the Congestive Heart Failure educational series to determine level of understanding of self-management of heart failure.
  • Kansas City Living with Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ): This is a validated quality of life survey. The questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality. This survey is administered to each patient upon enrollment into the Disease Management Program and prior to discharge from the Disease Management Program.

Results from these questionnaires will be collected and enrollment and discharge scores will be compared for improvement in level of understanding of self-management of heart failure and overall quality of life.

One hundred consecutive patients discharged from SFHMC with a primary diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure that have not been referred to the Congestive heart Failure Disease Management Program will undergo retrospective chart review to establish a case control group. The study team will perform a retrospective chart review to abstract the following data: hospital admission date, hospital discharge date, attending physician, age, and ejection fraction.

RISKS AND SAFETY:

There are no physical or psychological risks associated with this study. The study does not involve any experimental treatments or invasive therapies. There is a less than minimal risk of disclosure of clinical information maintained in the file linking the patient's medical record to the data. This file will be kept to allow follow up tracking for heart failure re-admission. The file will be password protected and available solely to the site Principal Investigator and Institutional Review Board-approved study staff. At the end of the study, following data analysis and publication of an abstract and paper in appropriate peer reviewed journal(s), the file linking the patient names to the case report forms will be destroyed.

POTENTIAL BENEFITS:

There are no potential benefits to patients whose records are entered into the database. The potential benefit is to society and future patients diagnosed with heart failure. Implementation of a disease management model may improve functional and clinical outcomes through more productive interactions between patients and providers. A disease management model may decrease hospital re-admission rates and the associated cost. If this disease management model proves effective, the results will provide a framework for expanding care opportunities and for establishing a new model for heart failure patients in this health care system as well as in other systems.

DATA ANALYSIS:

The primary endpoint will be assessed as a continuous variable using Kaplan Meier survival analysis. The time to all-cause readmission and readmission for heart failure will be assessed using this methodology. The time to all-cause readmission and readmission for heart failure in the CHF Disease Management Group will be compared to aggregate hospital readmission data.

The QOL questionnaire will be analyzed using a t-test comparing enrollment and 2 month KCCQ scores. The validity of each individual domain of this questionnaire has been independently established and all components of the summary score are considered valid representations of their intended domains.

Keywords
Congestive Heart Failure
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01529463
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Disease ManagementNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The time from hospital discharge to first hospital readmission or death.

    The primary endpoint will be assessed as a continuous variable. Survival curves will be produced using Kaplan-Meier analysis for both the CHF Disease Management Group and the case control group. A Cox regression-based test will be used to test differences in survival between the CHF Disease Management Group and the case control group. If case control subjects cannot be exactly matched on covariates to CHF Disease Management subjects, inverse probability of treatment weights (obtained via logistic regression) will be applied to correct for covariate imbalances between the two groups.

    Measured: basline and 1 month

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. The time from hospital discharge to unplanned hospital admission for acute decompensated heart failure.

    3 months minus baseline

    Measured: baseline and 3 months

  2. Change in quality of life.

    Kansas City Living with Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire will be analyzed using a paired t-test comparing baseline and 2 month scores.

    Measured: baseline and 2 months

  3. Mean readmission cost for each patient for total cost for each readmission.

    Average costs for the medical management group versus the disease management group will be calculated.

    Measured: baseline and 3 months

  4. Improvement in knowledge of Heart Failure

    Atlanta Heart Failure Knowledge Test baseline score minus 2 month score

    Measured: baseline and 2 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Feb 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2011
  3. Primary completionSep 2012
  4. Study completionNov 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
21 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01529463
Sponsor's protocol ID
11-01-001-E
Status last verified
Dec 2012
First submitted
25 Jan 2011
Last updated
1 Mar 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Congestive Heart Failure and Systolic Dysfunction, run by Trinity Health Of New England at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The time from hospital discharge to first hospital readmission or death. (time frame: basline and 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in