AzTrials
AzTrials

Peristomal Skin ComplicationPhase 4NCT01534039

A Clinical Comparison of Two Marketed Skin Barriers on Healthy Volunteers

A Phase 4 study testing Sur-Fit Natura and FormaFlex in people with Peristomal Skin Complication, run by Independent Nurse Consultants LLC at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A comparison of two skin barriers on healthy volunteers with a colostomy, ileostomy or urostomy. Endpoints of comparison include the ability to maintain a secure fit around the stoma, skin protection, wear-time, ease of use, ease of teaching, and comfort. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Peristomal Skin Complication
What is being tested?
Sur-Fit Natura and FormaFlex
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Dec 2011to May 2012
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Existing fecal or urinary ostomy for at least three months,consenting age, able to perform independent ostomy care, willing to not use accessory products, currently wearing a 2 piece marketed product.
  • Able to participate for four weeks.

Who cannot join

  • Needing convexity.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Independent Nurse Consultants LLC

    Tucson, Arizona, 85742

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Phase 4-A Clinical Comparison of a Marketed Moldable Skin Barrier Versus a Marketed Stretch-to-Fit Skin Barrier in Healthy Volunteers

A comparison of two skin barriers on healthy volunteers with a colostomy, ileostomy or urostomy.

Endpoints of comparison include the ability to maintain a secure fit around the stoma, skin protection, wear-time, ease of use, ease of teaching, and comfort.

Read the detailed description

Study to include 60 subjects, three centers, total of 4 weeks, 2 weeks in each product. Subjects recruited from a population of persons who have had an existing fecal or urinary stoma for a duration of at least three months. There is no restriction on primary diagnosis for ostomy surgery. Subjects must be of legal consenting age, must currently be managing their own stoma with a two piece pouching system, either a pre-cut, cut to fit, moldable or stretch-to-fit, any manufacturer. Subjects may not require convexity and be willing to not to use any accessory products during the study.

Being tested
Sur-Fit Natura, FormaFlex

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sur-Fit NaturaDevice

    Also called ConvaTec Moldable Skin Barrier

    ConvaTec Moldable Skin Barrier for ostomy patients

  • FormaFlexDevice

    Also called Hollister FormaFlex

    Hollister skin barrier for ostomy patients

Study groups in NCT01534039
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Sur-Fit Natura/FormaFlexActive comparatorSubject will be on Surfit Moldable for 2 weeks then crossover to Formaflex
Receives: Device: Sur-Fit Natura
FormaFlex/Sur-Fit NaturaActive comparatorSubject will be on Formaflex for 2 weeks then crossover to Surfit Moldable
Receives: Device: FormaFlex

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Ability to maintain secure (snug) fit around stoma

    1. Subject assessment of barrier fit based on questionnaire at each skin barrier change up to 2 weeks
    2. Barrier gap assessment performed by nurse at 2 weeks
    3. Barrier gap assessment performed by subject at each skin barrier change up to 2 weeks

    Measured: Two weeks

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Skin Protection

    1. SACS assessment by patient at each barrier change up to 2 weeks
    2. SACS assessment by nurse at 2 weeks

    Measured: Two weeks

  2. Wear Time

    1. Time of barrier change recorded

    Measured: Two weeks

  3. Ease of use

    1. Assessment by subject response to questionnaire

    Measured: Two weeks

  4. Ease of teaching

    1. Assessment by nurse of ability to teach subject to use barrier

    Measured: Two weeks

  5. Comfort

    1. Subject assessment of comfort of barrier at each change

    Measured: Two weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Feb 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2011
  3. Primary completionMay 2012
  4. Study completionMay 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01534039
Sponsor's protocol ID
INC#001
Status last verified
Sep 2013
First submitted
19 Dec 2011
Last updated
24 Sep 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Sur-Fit Natura and FormaFlex in people with Peristomal Skin Complication, run by Independent Nurse Consultants LLC at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Ability to maintain secure (snug) fit around stoma (time frame: Two weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in