AzTrials
AzTrials

InfertilityNCT01537276

Improve Hysterosalpingographic Accuracy by Real-time Fluoroscopy

A study testing diagnose under real-time fluoroscopy in people with Infertility, run by YiYang Zhu at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

As an essential step of the infertile work-up, hysterosalpingogram (HSG) has some advantages including the lack of need for anesthesia, a non-invasive procedure with less cost and relative easy to put into practice. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Infertility
What is being tested?
diagnose under real-time fluoroscopy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
263 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Jan 2010to Nov 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • women seeking for a infertility laparoscopy

Who cannot join

  • acute low reproductive duct infection
  • a known hypersensitivity to iodine
  • genital bleeding or malignancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province

    Linhai, Zhejiang, 317000

Other trials in China

About this study

As an essential step of the infertile work-up, hysterosalpingogram (HSG) has some advantages including the lack of need for anesthesia, a non-invasive procedure with less cost and relative easy to put into practice. However, it would be failed to detect the extra-tubal and peritoneal pathology and would be also difficult to distinguish the obstruction caused by the spasm of intramural segment. Obviously, imaging quality plays a key role in diagnostic accuracy of the HSG, studies had taken four roentgenograms and combined with the fluoroscopy were reported a higher sensitivity and specificity than those only taken two images in the examination. And hybridized radiography with CT or MRI system may provide the good-quality of the HSG. It is also reported that the sonosalpingography (SSG), which detect the tubal patency in real time, can show pelvic pathologies better than HSG. However, no parallel study was designed to verify the hypothesis that combined the fluoroscopy and taken more images can improving the diagnostic quality of the HSG. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the accuracy of HSG can be improved by real-time evaluating under the fluoroscopy.

Read the detailed description

Tubal disease is responsible for 30-40% of female infertility in China. The lesions of fallopian tube include occlusion, hydrosalpinx, and adhesion. Many techniques were developed to assess the tubal pathology. Although laparoscopy can visualize the morphological abnormalities of fallopian tubes directly and is widely accepted as a gold standard for investigation of tubal patency, it is an invasive procedure and may carry of some risk. Hysterosalpingography, which uses contrast media and radiographic techniques to visualize the uterine cavity and tubal lumen, remains the first line screening since it was described by Carey.

As an essential step of the infertile work-up, HSG has some advantages including the lack of need for anesthesia, a non-invasive procedure with less cost and relative easy to put into practice. Additional, HSG may have a potential therapeutic effect with the use of oil soluble contrast media for examination. However, it would be failed to detect the extra-tubal and peritoneal pathology and would be also difficult to distinguish the obstruction caused by the spasm of intramural segment. In an early meta-analysis, HSG was regard as the limited use of evaluating the peritubal adhesions because of its low sensitivity. But in a recently small sample's report, the authors argued that the diagnostic accuracy of HSG in peritubal adhesion can be improved by analyzing some special signs on the radiographs.

Obviously, imaging quality plays a key role in diagnostic accuracy of the HSG, studies had taken four roentgenograms and combined with the fluoroscopy were reported a higher sensitivity and specificity than those only taken two images in the examination. And hybridized radiography with CT or MRI system may provide the good-quality of the HSG. It is also reported that the sonosalpingography (SSG), which detect the tubal patency in real time, can show pelvic pathologies better than HSG. However, no parallel study was designed to verify the hypothesis that combined the fluoroscopy and taken more images can improving the diagnostic quality of the HSG. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the accuracy of HSG can be improved by real-time evaluating under the fluoroscopy.

Conditions
Infertility
Being tested
diagnose under real-time fluoroscopy
Keywords
hysterosalpingography, Fluoroscopy, diagnostic accuracy
Medical subject headings
Infertility

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • diagnose under real-time fluoroscopyProcedure or surgery

    Also called dynamic fluoroscopy

    radiologists evaluating the tubal patency under fluoroscopy real-timely.Findings of fluoroscopy were blind to the investigators when the static radiographs were re-analyzed by the same team of radiologists.

Study groups in NCT01537276
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
real-time fluoroscopyExperimentalevaluating the tubal patency and pathology under fluoroscopy real-timely
Receives: Procedure: diagnose under real-time fluoroscopy
respective imageNo interventionevaluating the tubal patency and pathology by Two supine and two oblique static images.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of HSG in detecting tubal pathologies

    The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) of HSG for diagnosis of tubal pathlogies. The pathlogies of tube is classified as the normal HSG, the proximal tubal obstruction, the hydrosalpinx (distal tubal obstruction), and the peritubal adhesions (at least one tube is patent) ,which is confirmed by laparoscopy in six month after HSG.

    Measured: participants will be followed by laparoscopy in 6 month after HSG

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of HSG in detecting tubal patency

    The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) of HSG for diagnosis of tubal patency. The patency of tube is classified as two-sided occlusion, one-sided occlusion and two side patency,which is confirmed by laparoscopy in six month after HSG.

    Measured: participants will be followed by laparoscopy in 6 month after HSG

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Feb 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2010
  3. Primary completionNov 2011
  4. Study completionNov 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
263 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01537276
Sponsor's protocol ID
taizhou201101
Status last verified
Feb 2012
First submitted
12 Feb 2012
Last updated
23 Feb 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing diagnose under real-time fluoroscopy in people with Infertility, run by YiYang Zhu at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of HSG in detecting tubal pathologies (time frame: participants will be followed by laparoscopy in 6 month after HSG). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2012.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT01537276 | AzTrials