AzTrials
AzTrials

IUC Insertion After Medical AbortionNCT01537562

Intrauterine Contraception (IUC) After Medical Abortion

A study testing Timing of IUC insertion in people with IUC Insertion After Medical Abortion, run by Karolinska Institutet at 1 site in Sweden.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Today a large proportion of early abortions are medical, in accordance to the woman's choice. The main objective of the present study was to compare, in a randomised fashion, initiation of intrauterine contraception (IUC) at about 1 week versus 3 to 4 weeks post medical abortion with regard to expulsions and safety. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
IUC Insertion After Medical Abortion
What is being tested?
Timing of IUC insertion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
129 participants
Where
1 siteSweden
Study dates
Feb 2007to Oct 2010
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • age above 18
  • elective medical abortion up to 9 weeks (63 days) of amenorrhea
  • general good health and
  • good understanding of Swedish language.

Who cannot join

  • pathological pregnancies or abnormality of the uterus
  • complications after the medical abortion, such as on-going pregnancy retained gestational sac or endometritis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sweden1 site
  • WHO centre, Karolinska University Hospital

    Stockholm, 17176

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: Early Versus Delayed Insertion of Intrauterine Contraception After Medical Abortion- a Randomized Controlled Trial

Today a large proportion of early abortions are medical, in accordance to the woman's choice. The main objective of the present study was to compare, in a randomised fashion, initiation of intrauterine contraception (IUC) at about 1 week versus 3 to 4 weeks post medical abortion with regard to expulsions and safety.

Being tested
Timing of IUC insertion
Keywords
Copper IUD, LNG-IUS, intrauterine contraception, medical abortion, postabortion contraception

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Timing of IUC insertionOther

    Also called Women were free to chose the type of IUC

    Patients randomised to early insertion had their IUC inserted on day 5-9 after mifepristone treatment while patients randomised to delayed insertion had the IUC insertion at about 3 to 4 weeks after mifepristone.

Study groups in NCT01537562
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Delayed IUC insertionActive comparatorPatients randomised to delayed, routine, insertion had their IUC inserted at 3-4 weeks (day 21-35 after mifepristone treatment
Receives: Other: Timing of IUC insertion
Early IUC insertionActive comparatorPatients randomised to early insertion had their IUC inserted on day 5-9 after mifepristone treatment.
Receives: Other: Timing of IUC insertion

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Expulsion

    Expulsions are recorded up to 6 months after the IUC insertion

    Measured: 6 months after IUC insertion

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. PID

    Pelvic inflammatory disease reported or diagnosed at FU

    Measured: within 6 months of IUC insertion

  2. serum hemoglobin

    S-Hb was measured at IUC insertion and at 4 weeks post insertion

    Measured: 4 weeks post IUC insertion

  3. Compliance

    impact on the number of women who return for IUC insertion, and compliance with IUC use during the first 6 months following insertion

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Bleeding patterns

    Bleeding patterns during the first 4 weeks post IUC insertion

    Measured: 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Feb 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2007
  3. Primary completionApr 2010
  4. Study completionOct 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
129 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01537562
Sponsor's protocol ID
WIUC12
Status last verified
Feb 2012
First submitted
15 Feb 2012
Last updated
23 Feb 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Saav I, Stephansson O, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Early versus delayed insertion of intrauterine contraception after medical abortion - a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048948. Epub 2012 Nov 14.

    PubMed 23155432

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Timing of IUC insertion in people with IUC Insertion After Medical Abortion, run by Karolinska Institutet at 1 site in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Expulsion (time frame: 6 months after IUC insertion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01537562, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in