HypertensionNCT01538004
Where Should Automated Blood Pressures be Done in Primary Care Offices?
An observational study of Hypertension, run by North Toronto Primary Care Research Network at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The use of automated blood pressure measurement (ABPM) devices in the office setting is increasingly recognized as superior to manual BP measurement. Current guidelines recommend that patients be alone in a quiet room, with no interactions with health care professionals during the readings; in practice, this means… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypertension
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Mar 2014to Nov 2014
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Consecutive consenting patients age eighteen or over will be recruited from the waiting rooms of participating practices in Toronto, Ontario
Who may be able to join
- Age eighteen and over
- Able to consent
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
North Toronto Primary Care Research Network
Toronto, Ontario, M3B 3S6
About this study
Official title: Where Should Automated Blood Pressures be Done? RCT of BpTRU Measurement in Private or Non-private Areas of Primary Care Offices
The use of automated blood pressure measurement (ABPM) devices in the office setting is increasingly recognized as superior to manual BP measurement. Current guidelines recommend that patients be alone in a quiet room, with no interactions with health care professionals during the readings; in practice, this means using an exam room. However, we found no evidence supporting the location of ABPM. Furthermore, exam rooms are constantly being used in primary care offices, so this may not be practical in routine care.
For this study, fifty consecutive consenting patients age 18 or more in each of seven community based primary care offices will randomly be allocated to either ABPM in an exam room, or in a non-private area of the clinic. After being tested in the first location they will then be tested in the second location with the same device. The main outcome will be the mean value of the last five systolic blood pressures for each location within offices. Secondary measures will include blood pressures for patients with or without hypertension, a comparison of the initial and second set of blood pressures and of the effect of office noise in decibels on BP readings.
New technology is more readily adopted if barriers to use are minimized. If we find no differences in BP readings between office locations, clinicians will then have the option to use an additional office area to implement the automated BP measurement device.
Read the detailed description
Following the design of our pilot study, patients consenting to two sets of blood pressure readings will be randomly allocated using a random number table to either automated blood pressure measurement using a BpTRU device in an exam room (private area without any traffic or staff) with the door closed, or BpTRU in an open (non-private area) of the clinic with routine office traffic and noise levels. Patients randomized to the private area first will be subsequently tested in the non-private area and those randomized to the non-private area first will then be tested in the private area. A single portable BpTRU machine will be used for all recordings. A research assistant will be trained on the use of the equipment with at least five supervised training readings. The BpTRU device will be placed on the patient's arm and readings will be recorded by the research assistant. The first reading will be done with the research assistant present to ensure proper placement and recording. The patient will then be left alone for the subsequent five measurements separated by one minute intervals. This will be immediately followed by a second set of readings in the alternate location. During both sets of readings the patient will be seated comfortably in a chair with arms and will be instructed not to talk or cross their legs. The same arm will be used for both sets of measurements with the blood pressure cuff at heart level. The research assistant will record the average of the last five out of six blood pressure readings for each office location, in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and previous studies.
The research assistant will record decibel levels in each location during BP readings using a Reed Sound Level Meter C-322 (Reed Instruments, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada). The sound level meter includes a data logger, and the mean decibel level per location for each set of readings will be recorded. The assistant will be trained in the use of the sound meter and logger and will use it during the five supervised BP training readings. The research assistant will also measure and record the patient's weight in kg, height in cm, and will collect information on patient's gender and self reported history of hypertension.
Planned sample size and analysis Our sample size is based on equivalence of BpTRU measurement done in non private office areas as compared to measurement done in private office areas, using the results of our pilot study. We consider differences of less than 5 mm Hg in systolic blood pressure to be clinically equivalent. In order to demonstrate equivalence for our primary outcome, and accounting for clustering effect in primary care offices, using a power of 80% and a two sided alpha level of 0.05 to conclude equivalency for a difference of 5 mm Hg or less, we will need to recruit 350 patients. Our planned recruitment is therefore fifty patients per office and seven office locations. 175 patients (25 per office location) will be randomly allocated to BpTRU measurement in a private exam room first and 175 will be allocated to an open area first.
Following the analytic methods used in our pilot study, we will use a random effect regression model to account for repeated measures within each participant for analyzing the data. Regression analysis will be undertaken to compare the measures and results will be adjusted for clustering effect. All tests will be two-sided using an alpha level of 0.05.
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Keywords
- Blood pressure determination, Primary health care, Office visits, Reproducibility of results
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertension
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BpTRU readings in private office area | Consenting patients will be randomly allocated using a random number table to BpTRU in an exam room. The first reading will be done with the research assistant present to ensure proper placement and recording and will then be left alone for the subsequent five measurements at one minute intervals. This will be immediately followed by a second set of readings in the alternate location. During both sets of readings the patient will be seated comfortably in a chair with arms and will be instructed not to talk or cross their legs. The same arm will be used for both sets of measurements with the blood pressure cuff at heart level. The average of the last five out of six blood pressure readings for each office location will be recorded. The decibel levels in each location will be recorded during BP readings using a Reed Sound Level Meter C-322. The patient's weight in kg, height in cm, gender and self reported history of hypertension will also be recorded. | |
| BpTRU readings in open office area | Consenting patients will be randomly allocated using a random number table to BpTRU in an open office area The first reading will be done with the research assistant present to ensure proper placement and recording and will then be left alone for the subsequent five measurements at one minute intervals. This will be immediately followed by a second set of readings in the alternate location. During both sets of readings the patient will be seated comfortably in a chair with arms and will be instructed not to talk or cross their legs. The same arm will be used for both sets of measurements with the blood pressure cuff at heart level. The average of the last five out of six blood pressure readings for each office location will be recorded. The decibel levels in each location will be recorded during BP readings using a Reed Sound Level Meter C-322. The patient's weight in kg, height in cm, gender and self reported history of hypertension will also be recorded. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
mean value of the last five systolic blood pressures for each location within the offices
comparison between the mean systolic values of the automated blood pressure measurements using a BpTRU device in private (quiet, no interactions with health care personnel) and non private areas of the offices.
Measured: 1 hour
Secondary outcomes (3)
comparison of first and second sets of blood pressure readings
Determination of rank effect on automated blood pressure measurements
Measured: 1 hour
comparisons of automated BP readings for patients with and without previously documented hypertension
Measured: 1 hour
effect of office decibel levels on automated office BP readings
Measured: 1 hour
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Feb 2012 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2014
- Primary completionSep 2014 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2014 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Not funded
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HypertensionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case crossover
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- North Toronto Primary Care Research Network
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michelle Greiver, North Toronto Primary Care Research Network
- Investigators
- Michelle Greiver, MD MSc, Principal investigator, North Toronto Primary Care Research Network
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01538004
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12-0217
- Status last verified
- Apr 2014
- First submitted
- 17 Feb 2012
- Last updated
- 4 Apr 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Apr 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Where Should Automated Blood Pressures be Done? RCT of BpTRU Measurement in Private or Non-private Areas of Primary Care Offices
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01538004
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 12-0217
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Keywords
- Blood pressure determination, Primary health care, Office visits, Reproducibility of results
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Not funded
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- North Toronto Primary Care Research NetworkResearch network
- Study start
- Mar 2014
- Primary completion
- Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2014 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Feb 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The use of automated blood pressure measurement (ABPM) devices in the office setting is increasingly recognized as superior to manual BP measurement. Current guidelines recommend that patients be alone in a quiet room, with no interactions with health care professionals during the readings; in practice, this means using an exam room. However, we found no evidence supporting the location of ABPM. Furthermore, exam rooms are constantly being used in primary care offices, so this may not be practical in routine care.
For this study, fifty consecutive consenting patients age 18 or more in each of seven community based primary care offices will randomly be allocated to either ABPM in an exam room, or in a non-private area of the clinic. After being tested in the first location they will then be tested in the second location with the same device. The main outcome will be the mean value of the last five systolic blood pressures for each location within offices. Secondary measures will include blood pressures for patients with or without hypertension, a comparison of the initial and second set of blood pressures and of the effect of office noise in decibels on BP readings.
New technology is more readily adopted if barriers to use are minimized. If we find no differences in BP readings between office locations, clinicians will then have the option to use an additional office area to implement the automated BP measurement device.
Detailed description
Following the design of our pilot study, patients consenting to two sets of blood pressure readings will be randomly allocated using a random number table to either automated blood pressure measurement using a BpTRU device in an exam room (private area without any traffic or staff) with the door closed, or BpTRU in an open (non-private area) of the clinic with routine office traffic and noise levels. Patients randomized to the private area first will be subsequently tested in the non-private area and those randomized to the non-private area first will then be tested in the private area. A single portable BpTRU machine will be used for all recordings. A research assistant will be trained on the use of the equipment with at least five supervised training readings. The BpTRU device will be placed on the patient's arm and readings will be recorded by the research assistant. The first reading will be done with the research assistant present to ensure proper placement and recording. The patient will then be left alone for the subsequent five measurements separated by one minute intervals. This will be immediately followed by a second set of readings in the alternate location. During both sets of readings the patient will be seated comfortably in a chair with arms and will be instructed not to talk or cross their legs. The same arm will be used for both sets of measurements with the blood pressure cuff at heart level. The research assistant will record the average of the last five out of six blood pressure readings for each office location, in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and previous studies.
The research assistant will record decibel levels in each location during BP readings using a Reed Sound Level Meter C-322 (Reed Instruments, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada). The sound level meter includes a data logger, and the mean decibel level per location for each set of readings will be recorded. The assistant will be trained in the use of the sound meter and logger and will use it during the five supervised BP training readings. The research assistant will also measure and record the patient's weight in kg, height in cm, and will collect information on patient's gender and self reported history of hypertension.
Planned sample size and analysis Our sample size is based on equivalence of BpTRU measurement done in non private office areas as compared to measurement done in private office areas, using the results of our pilot study. We consider differences of less than 5 mm Hg in systolic blood pressure to be clinically equivalent. In order to demonstrate equivalence for our primary outcome, and accounting for clustering effect in primary care offices, using a power of 80% and a two sided alpha level of 0.05 to conclude equivalency for a difference of 5 mm Hg or less, we will need to recruit 350 patients. Our planned recruitment is therefore fifty patients per office and seven office locations. 175 patients (25 per office location) will be randomly allocated to BpTRU measurement in a private exam room first and 175 will be allocated to an open area first.
Following the analytic methods used in our pilot study, we will use a random effect regression model to account for repeated measures within each participant for analyzing the data. Regression analysis will be undertaken to compare the measures and results will be adjusted for clustering effect. All tests will be two-sided using an alpha level of 0.05.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case crossover
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BpTRU readings in private office area | – | –Consenting patients will be randomly allocated using a random number table to BpTRU in an exam room. The first reading will be done with the research assistant present to ensure proper placement and recording and will then be left alone for the subsequent five measurements at one minute intervals. This will be immediately followed by a second set of readings in the alternate location. During both sets of readings the patient will be seated comfortably in a chair with arms and will be instructed not to talk or cross their legs. The same arm will be used for both sets of measurements with the blood pressure cuff at heart level. The average of the last five out of six blood pressure readings for each office location will be recorded. The decibel levels in each location will be recorded during BP readings using a Reed Sound Level Meter C-322. The patient's weight in kg, height in cm, gender and self reported history of hypertension will also be recorded. |
| BpTRU readings in open office area | – | –Consenting patients will be randomly allocated using a random number table to BpTRU in an open office area The first reading will be done with the research assistant present to ensure proper placement and recording and will then be left alone for the subsequent five measurements at one minute intervals. This will be immediately followed by a second set of readings in the alternate location. During both sets of readings the patient will be seated comfortably in a chair with arms and will be instructed not to talk or cross their legs. The same arm will be used for both sets of measurements with the blood pressure cuff at heart level. The average of the last five out of six blood pressure readings for each office location will be recorded. The decibel levels in each location will be recorded during BP readings using a Reed Sound Level Meter C-322. The patient's weight in kg, height in cm, gender and self reported history of hypertension will also be recorded. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Consecutive consenting patients age eighteen or over will be recruited from the waiting rooms of participating practices in Toronto, Ontario
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age eighteen and over
- Able to consent
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
mean value of the last five systolic blood pressures for each location within the offices
Time frame: 1 hour
comparison between the mean systolic values of the automated blood pressure measurements using a BpTRU device in private (quiet, no interactions with health care personnel) and non private areas of the offices.
3 secondary outcomes
comparison of first and second sets of blood pressure readings
Time frame: 1 hour
comparisons of automated BP readings for patients with and without previously documented hypertension
Time frame: 1 hour
effect of office decibel levels on automated office BP readings
Time frame: 1 hour
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Apr 2014.
Related trials for Hypertension
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Enrolling by invitation
Testing Implementation Strategies to Support Clinic Fidelity to an Outpatient Hypertension Bundle
Pregnancy Related, Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michelle Greiver, MD MSc principal investigator
North Toronto Primary Care Research Network
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Hypertension, run by North Toronto Primary Care Research Network at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
mean value of the last five systolic blood pressures for each location within the offices (time frame: 1 hour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Apr 2014.