AzTrials
AzTrials

HypertensionNCT01538004

Where Should Automated Blood Pressures be Done in Primary Care Offices?

An observational study of Hypertension, run by North Toronto Primary Care Research Network at 1 site in Canada.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The use of automated blood pressure measurement (ABPM) devices in the office setting is increasingly recognized as superior to manual BP measurement. Current guidelines recommend that patients be alone in a quiet room, with no interactions with health care professionals during the readings; in practice, this means… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Hypertension
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Mar 2014to Nov 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Consecutive consenting patients age eighteen or over will be recruited from the waiting rooms of participating practices in Toronto, Ontario

Who may be able to join

  • Age eighteen and over
  • Able to consent

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • North Toronto Primary Care Research Network

    Toronto, Ontario, M3B 3S6

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Where Should Automated Blood Pressures be Done? RCT of BpTRU Measurement in Private or Non-private Areas of Primary Care Offices

The use of automated blood pressure measurement (ABPM) devices in the office setting is increasingly recognized as superior to manual BP measurement. Current guidelines recommend that patients be alone in a quiet room, with no interactions with health care professionals during the readings; in practice, this means using an exam room. However, we found no evidence supporting the location of ABPM. Furthermore, exam rooms are constantly being used in primary care offices, so this may not be practical in routine care.

For this study, fifty consecutive consenting patients age 18 or more in each of seven community based primary care offices will randomly be allocated to either ABPM in an exam room, or in a non-private area of the clinic. After being tested in the first location they will then be tested in the second location with the same device. The main outcome will be the mean value of the last five systolic blood pressures for each location within offices. Secondary measures will include blood pressures for patients with or without hypertension, a comparison of the initial and second set of blood pressures and of the effect of office noise in decibels on BP readings.

New technology is more readily adopted if barriers to use are minimized. If we find no differences in BP readings between office locations, clinicians will then have the option to use an additional office area to implement the automated BP measurement device.

Read the detailed description

Following the design of our pilot study, patients consenting to two sets of blood pressure readings will be randomly allocated using a random number table to either automated blood pressure measurement using a BpTRU device in an exam room (private area without any traffic or staff) with the door closed, or BpTRU in an open (non-private area) of the clinic with routine office traffic and noise levels. Patients randomized to the private area first will be subsequently tested in the non-private area and those randomized to the non-private area first will then be tested in the private area. A single portable BpTRU machine will be used for all recordings. A research assistant will be trained on the use of the equipment with at least five supervised training readings. The BpTRU device will be placed on the patient's arm and readings will be recorded by the research assistant. The first reading will be done with the research assistant present to ensure proper placement and recording. The patient will then be left alone for the subsequent five measurements separated by one minute intervals. This will be immediately followed by a second set of readings in the alternate location. During both sets of readings the patient will be seated comfortably in a chair with arms and will be instructed not to talk or cross their legs. The same arm will be used for both sets of measurements with the blood pressure cuff at heart level. The research assistant will record the average of the last five out of six blood pressure readings for each office location, in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and previous studies.

The research assistant will record decibel levels in each location during BP readings using a Reed Sound Level Meter C-322 (Reed Instruments, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada). The sound level meter includes a data logger, and the mean decibel level per location for each set of readings will be recorded. The assistant will be trained in the use of the sound meter and logger and will use it during the five supervised BP training readings. The research assistant will also measure and record the patient's weight in kg, height in cm, and will collect information on patient's gender and self reported history of hypertension.

Planned sample size and analysis Our sample size is based on equivalence of BpTRU measurement done in non private office areas as compared to measurement done in private office areas, using the results of our pilot study. We consider differences of less than 5 mm Hg in systolic blood pressure to be clinically equivalent. In order to demonstrate equivalence for our primary outcome, and accounting for clustering effect in primary care offices, using a power of 80% and a two sided alpha level of 0.05 to conclude equivalency for a difference of 5 mm Hg or less, we will need to recruit 350 patients. Our planned recruitment is therefore fifty patients per office and seven office locations. 175 patients (25 per office location) will be randomly allocated to BpTRU measurement in a private exam room first and 175 will be allocated to an open area first.

Following the analytic methods used in our pilot study, we will use a random effect regression model to account for repeated measures within each participant for analyzing the data. Regression analysis will be undertaken to compare the measures and results will be adjusted for clustering effect. All tests will be two-sided using an alpha level of 0.05.

Conditions
Hypertension
Keywords
Blood pressure determination, Primary health care, Office visits, Reproducibility of results
Medical subject headings
Hypertension

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01538004
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BpTRU readings in private office areaConsenting patients will be randomly allocated using a random number table to BpTRU in an exam room. The first reading will be done with the research assistant present to ensure proper placement and recording and will then be left alone for the subsequent five measurements at one minute intervals. This will be immediately followed by a second set of readings in the alternate location. During both sets of readings the patient will be seated comfortably in a chair with arms and will be instructed not to talk or cross their legs. The same arm will be used for both sets of measurements with the blood pressure cuff at heart level. The average of the last five out of six blood pressure readings for each office location will be recorded. The decibel levels in each location will be recorded during BP readings using a Reed Sound Level Meter C-322. The patient's weight in kg, height in cm, gender and self reported history of hypertension will also be recorded.
BpTRU readings in open office areaConsenting patients will be randomly allocated using a random number table to BpTRU in an open office area The first reading will be done with the research assistant present to ensure proper placement and recording and will then be left alone for the subsequent five measurements at one minute intervals. This will be immediately followed by a second set of readings in the alternate location. During both sets of readings the patient will be seated comfortably in a chair with arms and will be instructed not to talk or cross their legs. The same arm will be used for both sets of measurements with the blood pressure cuff at heart level. The average of the last five out of six blood pressure readings for each office location will be recorded. The decibel levels in each location will be recorded during BP readings using a Reed Sound Level Meter C-322. The patient's weight in kg, height in cm, gender and self reported history of hypertension will also be recorded.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. mean value of the last five systolic blood pressures for each location within the offices

    comparison between the mean systolic values of the automated blood pressure measurements using a BpTRU device in private (quiet, no interactions with health care personnel) and non private areas of the offices.

    Measured: 1 hour

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. comparison of first and second sets of blood pressure readings

    Determination of rank effect on automated blood pressure measurements

    Measured: 1 hour

  2. comparisons of automated BP readings for patients with and without previously documented hypertension

    Measured: 1 hour

  3. effect of office decibel levels on automated office BP readings

    Measured: 1 hour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Feb 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2014
  3. Primary completionSep 2014 (estimated)
  4. Study completionNov 2014 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Not funded

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case crossover
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01538004
Sponsor's protocol ID
12-0217
Status last verified
Apr 2014
First submitted
17 Feb 2012
Last updated
4 Apr 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hypertension, run by North Toronto Primary Care Research Network at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

mean value of the last five systolic blood pressures for each location within the offices (time frame: 1 hour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Apr 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in