AzTrials
AzTrials

ST Segment Elevation Myocardial InfarctionNCT01538303

Microvascular Dysfunction in Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) and Its Relation to Outcome

An observational study of ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction, run by Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven at 1 site in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is first to evaluate absolute myocardial blood flow and resistance over time in the acute and sub-acute phase of myocardial infarction and second, to correlate these parameters to preservation of left ventricular function and long-term outcome. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
Mar 2012to Oct 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population consists of patients with STEMI either in our own hospital either referred by other hospitals or the ambulance.

Who may be able to join

  • STEMI < 12 hours
  • > 10mm ST-segment deviation
  • culprit lesion in proximal or mid segment of a coronary artery with a reference diameter > 3.0mm by visual estimation.
  • hemodynamically stable.

Who cannot join

  • Age > 75 years
  • cardiogenic shock or pre-shock
  • Patients in whom no access to the coronary circulation can be obtained by the femoral artery or in whom femoral access was problematic.
  • Patients with previous myocardial infarction in the culprit area of with previous bypass surgery
  • Tortuous coronary arteries or complex or long-lasting primary PCI
  • Severe concomitant disease or conditions with a life expectancy of less than one year
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Inability to understand and give informed consent either in first instance on the table or in second instance on the coronary care unit.
  • Other known myocardial diseases, such as moderate or severe left ventricular hypertrophy or cardiomyopathy
  • Pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Netherlands1 site
  • Catharina Hospital Eindhoven

    Eindhoven, North Brabant, 5623EJ

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Microvascular Dysfunction in AMI and Its Relation to Outcome

The purpose of this study is first to evaluate absolute myocardial blood flow and resistance over time in the acute and sub-acute phase of myocardial infarction and second, to correlate these parameters to preservation of left ventricular function and long-term outcome.

Read the detailed description

In acute myocardial infarction, early restoration of epicardial and myocardial blood flow is of paramount importance to limit infarct size and create optimum conditions for favorable long-term outcome.

Presently, restoration of epicardial blood flow is preferably obtained by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). PPCI is the treatment of choice for patients with acute myocardial infarction who can be admitted sufficiently fast to a hospital equipped for this type for treatment.

Successful restoration of epicardial blood flow by PPCI is possible in approximately 90% of all patients. Nevertheless, in a number of these patients myocardial hypoperfusion persists due to moderate or severe microvascular dysfunction.

The terminology "no reflow" is often used for this condition. Microvascular thromboembolism, spasm, or intramyocardial oedema are suggested to be responsible for this condition and probably all of these three phenomena play a role. Besides that, inflammatory response of the myocardium can be involved with neutrophil plugging of the capillaries, further compromising restoration of normal myocardial blood flow and function.

It is well known that in patients in whom myocardial reperfusion is absent or limited, despite adequate epicardial reperfusion, prognosis is poor and more severe left ventricular dysfunction can be expected in comparison to those patients in whom also microvascular reperfusion after PPCI is restored. Therefore, it is beyond doubt that knowledge about the actual state of the microvasculature and myocardial (re)perfusion shortly after PPCI, is important from a prognostic point of view.

Moreover, if microvascular reperfusion is still limited immediately after myocardial infarction, but recovers quickly in the days thereafter, this might have important implications for long-term prognosis.

Lastly, knowledge about microvascular reperfusion in the acute phase can be important with respect to choice of adjunct mechanical or medical therapy, such as intra aortic balloon pumping (IABP), Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors or continuation of nitroglycerine.

Despite this undisputed importance of microvascular perfusion and function in the acute phase of myocardial infarction, its assessment has been difficult so far and has been hampered by a number of methodological and technical shortcomings.It should be realized in this context that the function of the microvasculature in general (and specifically in acute myocardial infarction) can be characterized by myocardial blood flow and resistance.

Recently, the investigators have developed a new technique for measuring absolute coronary and myocardial blood flow and absolute and relative coronary and myocardial resistance This has paved the way to study microvascular function in acute myocardial infarction immediately after epicardial reperfusion by PPCI and in the days thereafter.

Keywords
STEMI, absolute flow, microvascular resistance
Medical subject headings
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01538303
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
measurement absolute flow and resistanceNot described

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Feb 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2012
  3. Primary completionOct 2012
  4. Study completionOct 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01538303
Sponsor's protocol ID
NL-3793806011
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
20 Feb 2012
Last updated
10 Feb 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction, run by Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in