InfluenzaPhase 4NCT01538940
Immunogenicity of Influenza Vaccines in HIV-infected Persons in Thailand
A Phase 4 study testing Intradermal vaccine and Intramuscular vaccine in people with Influenza, run by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at 1 site in Thailand.
Trial summary
This study will assess the efficacy of a new intradermal formulation of the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine compared to the standard intramuscular vaccine in HIV-infected men who have sex with men in Bangkok, Thailand. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Influenza
- What is being tested?
- Intradermal vaccine and Intramuscular vaccine
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 415 participants
- Where
- 1 siteThailand
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2011to Oct 2015
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Thai men by nationality who have sex with men
- HIV-infected or HIV-uninfected men
- At least 18 years of age
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent
- Availability and commitment for 12 months of study follow-up (3 study visits)
Who cannot join
- Men with severe allergies to chicken eggs (they will specifically be asked about severe egg allergies during the screening visit; appendix C1)
- Men > 60 years of age
- Men who have had a severe reaction to influenza vaccine in the past
- Men with a history of Guillain-Barré Syndrome
- Men who received influenza vaccine within 12 months prior to enrollment
- Men who are on steroid therapy or other immunosuppressant medications
Show all 10Show fewer
- Men who received any vaccine in the 4 weeks prior to the first study visit or who plan to receive a vaccine (other than influenza vaccine provided through the study protocol) in the 4 weeks following the first study visit
- Men who received an experimental agent (vaccine, drug, biologic, device, blood product, medication) within 1 month prior to enrollment in this study, or expect to receive an experimental agent during the 12 month study period
- Men who have any condition, in the opinion of the investigator, that would place them at an unacceptable risk of injury or render them unable to meet requirements of the protocol. (e.g., severe reaction to another vaccine, blood clotting disorder, inflammatory skin condition).
- Foreign (non-Thai) nationality
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Immunogenicity of Intramuscular Versus Intradermal Trivalent Inactivated Split Virion Influenza Vaccine in HIV-infected Men Who Have Sex With Men in Bangkok, Thailand
This study will assess the efficacy of a new intradermal formulation of the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine compared to the standard intramuscular vaccine in HIV-infected men who have sex with men in Bangkok, Thailand. Relative efficacy of the two different formulations of influenza vaccine will be assessed by comparing immunologic responses to vaccine between the two study arms.
Read the detailed description
This study will assess the efficacy of a new intradermal formulation of the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) compared to standard intramuscular TIV in HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) in Bangkok, Thailand. Eligible participants will be randomized to receive standard full-dose intramuscular vaccine versus full-dose intradermal vaccine. Full dose (15 micrograms) intradermal TIV will be licensed for use in adult's ≥ 60 years of age in Thailand in mid-2011. In this study, intradermal TIV will be used off-label as the 15 microgram dose will be administered to individuals \< 60 years of age. Efficacy of the two different formulations of influenza vaccine will be assessed by comparing immunologic responses to vaccine between the two HIV-infected study arms. Both humoral (influenza antibody) and cell-mediated (influenza- specific CD4 and CD8 T cell) immune responses will be evaluated. Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses among HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts less than 200 per microliter will also be compared to immune responses in HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts of 200 per microliter or greater. A small HIV-uninfected MSM control group will also be enrolled (with persons randomized into either an intramuscular or intradermal TIV arm) to serve as a comparator group for the cell-mediated immunity studies.
- Conditions
- Influenza
- Being tested
- Intradermal vaccine, Intramuscular vaccine
- Keywords
- Influenza, Vaccine, Thailand
- Medical subject headings
- Influenza, Human
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intradermal vaccineBiological
15ug
Intramuscular vaccineBiological
15ug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HIV+, CD4<200, ID vaccine | Active comparator | Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses among HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts less than 200 per microliter will be compared to immune responses in HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts of 200 per microliter or greater. Receives: Biological: Intradermal vaccine |
| HIV+, CD4<200, IM vaccine | Active comparator | Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses among HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts less than 200 per microliter will be compared to immune responses in HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts of 200 per microliter or greater. Receives: Biological: Intramuscular vaccine |
| HIV+, CD4>=200, ID vaccine | Active comparator | Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses among HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts less than 200 per microliter will be compared to immune responses in HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts of 200 per microliter or greater. Receives: Biological: Intradermal vaccine |
| HIV+, CD4 >=200, IM vaccine | Active comparator | Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses among HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts less than 200 per microliter will be compared to immune responses in HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts of 200 per microliter or greater. Receives: Biological: Intramuscular vaccine |
| HIV-, ID vaccine | Other | A small HIV-uninfected MSM control group will be enrolled (with persons randomized into either an intramuscular or intradermal TIV arm) to serve as a comparator group for the cell-mediated immunity studies. Receives: Biological: Intradermal vaccine |
| HIV-, IM vaccine | Other | A small HIV-uninfected MSM control group will be enrolled (with persons randomized into either an intramuscular or intradermal TIV arm) to serve as a comparator group for the cell-mediated immunity studies. Receives: Biological: Intramuscular vaccine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Antibody titers
Frequency of 4-fold or greater increase in serum hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers against each viral strain in the vaccine
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
Antibody titers
Frequency of 4-fold or greater increase in serum hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers against each viral strain in the vaccine
Measured: 6 months
Antibody titers
Frequency of 4-fold or greater increase in serum hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers against each viral strain in the vaccine
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Feb 2012 (estimated)
- Study start1 Nov 2011
- Primary completion9 Sep 2013
- Study completionOct 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for InfluenzaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 415 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, Thailand
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Charung Muangchana, MD, Principal investigator, Ministry of Health, ThailandPrasert Thongcharoen, MD, Principal investigator, Influenza Foundation of Thailand
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01538940
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDC-NCIRD-6181
- Other IDs
- 1U01GH000152
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 21 Feb 2012
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Amoah S, Mishina M, Praphasiri P, Cao W, Kim JH, Liepkalns JS, Guo Z, Carney PJ, Chang JC, Fernandez S, Garg S, Beacham L, Holtz TH, Curlin ME, Dawood F, Olsen SJ, Gangappa S, Stevens J, Sambhara S. Standard-Dose Intradermal Influenza Vaccine Elicits Cellular Immune Responses Similar to Those of Intramuscular Vaccine in Men With and Those Without HIV Infection. J Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 31;220(5):743-751. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz205.
PubMed 31045222Garg S, Thongcharoen P, Praphasiri P, Chitwarakorn A, Sathirapanya P, Fernandez S, Rungrojcharoenkit K, Chonwattana W, Mock PA, Sukwicha W, Katz JM, Widdowson MA, Curlin ME, Gibbons RV, Holtz TH, Dawood FS, Olsen SJ. Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Immunogenicity of Standard-Dose Intramuscular Versus Intradermal Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in HIV-Infected Men Who Have Sex With Men in Bangkok, Thailand. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Feb 1;62(3):383-391. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ884. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
PubMed 26486702
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Immunogenicity of Intramuscular Versus Intradermal Trivalent Inactivated Split Virion Influenza Vaccine in HIV-infected Men Who Have Sex With Men in Bangkok, Thailand
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01538940
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDC-NCIRD-6181
- Conditions
- Influenza
- Keywords
- Influenza, Vaccine, Thailand
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 415 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centers for Disease Control and PreventionUS federal agency
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, Thailand
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 Sep 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Feb 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will assess the efficacy of a new intradermal formulation of the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine compared to the standard intramuscular vaccine in HIV-infected men who have sex with men in Bangkok, Thailand. Relative efficacy of the two different formulations of influenza vaccine will be assessed by comparing immunologic responses to vaccine between the two study arms.
Detailed description
This study will assess the efficacy of a new intradermal formulation of the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) compared to standard intramuscular TIV in HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) in Bangkok, Thailand. Eligible participants will be randomized to receive standard full-dose intramuscular vaccine versus full-dose intradermal vaccine. Full dose (15 micrograms) intradermal TIV will be licensed for use in adult's ≥ 60 years of age in Thailand in mid-2011. In this study, intradermal TIV will be used off-label as the 15 microgram dose will be administered to individuals \< 60 years of age. Efficacy of the two different formulations of influenza vaccine will be assessed by comparing immunologic responses to vaccine between the two HIV-infected study arms. Both humoral (influenza antibody) and cell-mediated (influenza- specific CD4 and CD8 T cell) immune responses will be evaluated. Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses among HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts less than 200 per microliter will also be compared to immune responses in HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts of 200 per microliter or greater. A small HIV-uninfected MSM control group will also be enrolled (with persons randomized into either an intramuscular or intradermal TIV arm) to serve as a comparator group for the cell-mediated immunity studies.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 6
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HIV+, CD4<200, ID vaccine | Active comparator | Biological: Intradermal vaccineHumoral and cell-mediated immune responses among HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts less than 200 per microliter will be compared to immune responses in HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts of 200 per microliter or greater. |
| HIV+, CD4<200, IM vaccine | Active comparator | Biological: Intramuscular vaccineHumoral and cell-mediated immune responses among HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts less than 200 per microliter will be compared to immune responses in HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts of 200 per microliter or greater. |
| HIV+, CD4>=200, ID vaccine | Active comparator | Biological: Intradermal vaccineHumoral and cell-mediated immune responses among HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts less than 200 per microliter will be compared to immune responses in HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts of 200 per microliter or greater. |
| HIV+, CD4 >=200, IM vaccine | Active comparator | Biological: Intramuscular vaccineHumoral and cell-mediated immune responses among HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts less than 200 per microliter will be compared to immune responses in HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts of 200 per microliter or greater. |
| HIV-, ID vaccine | Other | Biological: Intradermal vaccineA small HIV-uninfected MSM control group will be enrolled (with persons randomized into either an intramuscular or intradermal TIV arm) to serve as a comparator group for the cell-mediated immunity studies. |
| HIV-, IM vaccine | Other | Biological: Intramuscular vaccineA small HIV-uninfected MSM control group will be enrolled (with persons randomized into either an intramuscular or intradermal TIV arm) to serve as a comparator group for the cell-mediated immunity studies. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Thai men by nationality who have sex with men
- HIV-infected or HIV-uninfected men
- At least 18 years of age
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent
- Availability and commitment for 12 months of study follow-up (3 study visits)
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Men with severe allergies to chicken eggs (they will specifically be asked about severe egg allergies during the screening visit; appendix C1)
- Men > 60 years of age
- Men who have had a severe reaction to influenza vaccine in the past
- Men with a history of Guillain-Barré Syndrome
- Men who received influenza vaccine within 12 months prior to enrollment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intradermal vaccine15ug | Biological | HIV+, CD4<200, ID vaccine, HIV+, CD4>=200, ID vaccine, HIV-, ID vaccine |
| Intramuscular vaccine15ug | Biological | HIV+, CD4 >=200, IM vaccine, HIV+, CD4<200, IM vaccine, HIV-, IM vaccine |
Primary outcome
Antibody titers
Time frame: 30 days
Frequency of 4-fold or greater increase in serum hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers against each viral strain in the vaccine
2 secondary outcomes
Antibody titers
Time frame: 6 months
Antibody titers
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31045222Amoah S, Mishina M, Praphasiri P, Cao W, Kim JH, Liepkalns JS, Guo Z, Carney PJ, Chang JC, Fernandez S, Garg S, Beacham L, Holtz TH, Curlin ME, Dawood F, Olsen SJ, Gangappa S, Stevens J, Sambhara S. Standard-Dose Intradermal Influenza Vaccine Elicits Cellular Immune Responses Similar to Those of Intramuscular Vaccine in Men With and Those Without HIV Infection. J Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 31;220(5):743-751. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz205.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26486702Garg S, Thongcharoen P, Praphasiri P, Chitwarakorn A, Sathirapanya P, Fernandez S, Rungrojcharoenkit K, Chonwattana W, Mock PA, Sukwicha W, Katz JM, Widdowson MA, Curlin ME, Gibbons RV, Holtz TH, Dawood FS, Olsen SJ. Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Immunogenicity of Standard-Dose Intramuscular Versus Intradermal Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in HIV-Infected Men Who Have Sex With Men in Bangkok, Thailand. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Feb 1;62(3):383-391. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ884. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
- Website for clinic where the study is being conducted.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Influenza
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
RecruitingPhase 2
BPL-1357 Against H1N1 Influenza Virus Challenge
Influenza, Human
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Immunogenicity of Chimeric Hemagglutinin mRNA Vaccine Candidates
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 1
pH1N1 Blinded Challenge Study
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK-1406/CD388 for Prevention of Influenza (MK-1406-005/CD388.SQ.3.06)
Influenza
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Charung Muangchana, MD principal investigator
Ministry of Health, Thailand
Prasert Thongcharoen, MD principal investigator
Influenza Foundation of Thailand
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Intradermal vaccine and Intramuscular vaccine in people with Influenza, run by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at 1 site in Thailand.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Antibody titers (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01538940, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.