Advanced Hepatocellular CarcinomaPhase 2NCT01539018
Sorafenib Plus Tegafur-uracil (UFT) Versus Sorafenib as First Line Systemic Treatment for Patients With Advanced Stage HCC, Unresectable & Not Eligible for Local Ablation and/or TACE
A Phase 2 study testing Sorafenib and sorafenib plus tegafur-uracil in people with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Egyptian Society of Liver Cancer at 5 sites in Egypt.
Trial summary
Unlike the Asian and western regions, The vast majority of the Egyptian/Arabic Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) patients are hepatitis C virus (HCV) associated. According to the SHARP study subgroup analysis, it seems that HCV associated HCC patients derive the max benefit of Sorafenib, the absolute gain between the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Sorafenib and sorafenib plus tegafur-uracil
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 77 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesEgypt
- Study dates
- Jan 2012to Jan 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 1-The patient must provide written informed consent prior to enrollment into the study.
- 2-The patient must be at least 18 years of age. 3-Patients must have histologically or cytologically confirmed or radiologically confirmed (according to AASLD criteria) advanced (unresectable, and/or metastatic) HCC not eligible for local ablation or TACE.
- 4-Patients must have measurable disease according to RECIST criteria (at least one uni-dimensional lesion measurable by CT-scan or MRI) 5-Patients must have a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks 6-Patients must have an Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 -2, Child-Pugh class A and only B7 7-Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function as assessed by the following laboratory requirements to be conducted within 7 days prior to screening:
- Hemoglobin ≥ 9.0 g/dl
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,500/mm3
- Platelet count ≥ 100,000/μl
Show all 13Show fewer
- Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal
- ALT and AST < 5 x upper limit of normal
- Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 5 x upper limit of normal
- PT-INR/PTT < 1.5 x upper limit of normal
- Serum creatinine < 1.5 x upper limit
- Amylase and lipase < 1.5 X the upper limit of normal 8-For patients, who have had major surgery or injury, the wound must be completely healed prior to receiving sorafenib treatment (4 weeks).
- 9-Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation. Men use adequate birth control for at least 3 months after the last administration of sorafenib
Who cannot join
- Excluded medical conditions:
- History of cardiac disease: congestive heart failure > NYHA class 2; active CAD (MI more than 6 mo prior to study entry is allowed); cardiac arrythmias requiring anti-arrythmic therapy (beta blockers or digoxin are permitted) or uncontrolled hypertension
- History of HIV infection
- Patients with Child-Pugh class C hepatic impairment
- Patients with Child-Pugh class B (except 7 ) hepatic impairment
- Active clinically serious infections (grade 2 NCI-CTC version 3.0)
Show all 24Show fewer
- Symptomatic metastatic brain or meningeal tumors
- Patients with seizure disorder requiring medication (such as steroids or antiepileptics)
- History of organ allograft
- Patients with evidence or history of bleeding due to OV
- Patients undergoing renal dialysis
- Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from the cancer being evaluated in this study EXCEPT cervical carcinoma in situ, treated basal cell carcinoma
- Patients not fulfilling inclusion criteria.
- Excluded therapies and medications, previous and concomitant:
- Prior systemic anticancer chemotherapy or immunotherapy or targeted therapy is not allowed before study entry.
- Hormonal therapy shouldn't be given within 2 weeks before study entry and is not allowed during the study.
- Patients who failed previous transcatheter arterial chemoembolism must have at least 4 weeks treatment free interval before entering the study
- Radiotherapy during study or within 3 weeks of start of study drug.
- Major surgery within 4 weeks of start of study
- Investigational drug therapy outside of this trial during or within 4 weeks of study entry
- Pregnant or breast-feeding patients. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test performed within 7 days of the start of treatment. Both men and women enrolled in this trial must use adequate barrier birth control measures during the course of the trial and two weeks after the completion of trial.
- Substance abuse, medical, psychological or social conditions that may interfere with the patient's participation in the study or evaluation of the study results
- Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agent or any agent given in association with this trial
- Any condition that is unstable or could jeopardize the safety of the patient and their compliance in the study
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
Egypt5 sites
Ain shams university
Cairo
Cairo University Hospitals
Cairo
National cancer institute
Cairo
NHTMRI
Cairo
National Liver Institute
Monofeiya
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Trial of Sorafenib Plus Tegafur-uracil (UFT) vs. Sorafenib as First Line Systemic Treatment for Patients With Advanced Stage HCC, Unresectable & Not Eligible for Local Ablation &/or TACE
- Unlike the Asian and western regions, The vast majority of the Egyptian/Arabic Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) patients are hepatitis C virus (HCV) associated.
- According to the SHARP study subgroup analysis, it seems that HCV associated HCC patients derive the max benefit of Sorafenib, the absolute gain between the Sorafenib arm \& the placebo in m OS = 7 months, HR=0.58 (95% CI: 0.37-0.91).
- In spite of improvement in terms of overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP), in all studies where Sorafenib was compared to placebo, the Sorafenib arm was not accompanied by a significant volumetric reduction, and this may explains the lack of any symptomatic improvement (time to symptomatic progression (TTSP) almost identical)
- Reviewing the chemotherapy outcome, although there is no convincing evidence in survival benefit to patients with advanced HCC, however true shrinkage (reduction in tumor size), has been consistently reported although the magnitude of response is lacking consistency.
This indicates the need for coupling Sorafenib to a chemotherapeutic agent but:
Read more
- For patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, the toxicity profile of any chemotherapeutic agent of choice to be added to Sorafenib should be take in consideration
- The agent to be added to Sorafenib should be effective in terms of Tumor Shrinkage \& with minimal toxicity regarding:
- Cardio-toxicity
- HFSR
- Diarrhea
- Hepato-toxicity
- Bone marrow suppression (although not relevant to the toxicity profile of Sorafenib, yet the HCC patients may have HCV related thrombocytopenia and variable degree of hypersplenism related pancytopenia)
Circulatory Overload (Hypertension) Why Tegafur-uracil (UFT)?
- Efficacy: For UFT, although the efficacy data in HCC are not as extensive as Doxorubicin, however in one phase II study UFT could improve survival when compared with conservative management.
- UFT Toxicity Profile:
In a phase III trial to asses the compare Efficacy \& Safety of UFT with that of 5 FU in treatment of m CRC, Hematological toxicities were minimal (0% Grade ¾ leukopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia \& was 3% for anemia), while the most commonly seen SE was grade I \& II Diarrhea
•Accordingly UFT may be considered as a potential partner to Sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC.
- Conditions
- Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Sorafenib, sorafenib plus tegafur-uracil
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SorafenibDrug
Also called nexavar alone
Sorafenib 400 mg p.o. twice daily until progression or intolerable toxicity alone.
sorafenib plus tegafur-uracilDrug
Also called nexavar plus UFT
Sorafenib 400 mg p.o. twice daily until progression or intolerable toxicity and TEGAFUR-URACIL 125mg/m2 PO BID For 4 weeks and to be repeated on day 36 till progression or intolerance
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sorafenib alone. | Active comparator | Sorafenib 400 mg p.o. twice daily until progression or intolerable toxicity alone. Receives: Drug: Sorafenib |
| sorafenib plus tegafur-uracil | Experimental | Sorafenib 400 mg p.o. twice daily continuously and UFT 125mg/m2 PO BID For 4 weeks and to be repeated on day 36 till progression or intolerance Receives: Drug: sorafenib plus tegafur-uracil |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
time to progression (TTP):recist criteria
Measured: one year
Secondary outcomes (3)
progression free survival (PFS):recist criteria
Measured: one year
Time to symptomatic improvement:FHSI-8 questionnaire
Measured: one year
Quality of Life Using EQ-5D questionnaire.
Measured: one year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Feb 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2012
- Primary completionJan 2015
- Study completionJan 2015
Why it stopped: After interim results data showed no evidence of a difference between both groups
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Advanced Hepatocellular CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 77 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Egyptian Society of Liver Cancer
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hamdy Abdelazim, MD/PhD, Study chair, Cairo UniversityHesham Atef, MD/PhD, Principal investigator, Cairo UniversityAshraf Abdelaziz, MD/PhD, Principal investigator, Cairo UniversityMohammed Shaker, MD/PhD, Principal investigator, Ain Shams UniversityImam Waked, MD/PhD, Principal investigator, Monofeiya universityHeba Elzawahry, MD/PhD, Principal investigator, Cairo university, national cancer instituteMohammed Ezz alarab, MD/PhD, Principal investigator, NTMRIOmar Abdel-Rahman, M.D./M.Sc., Study director, Ain Shams University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01539018
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ESLC1 (SADAT study)
- Status last verified
- Aug 2015
- First submitted
- 21 Feb 2012
- Last updated
- 5 Aug 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Aug 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Trial of Sorafenib Plus Tegafur-uracil (UFT) vs. Sorafenib as First Line Systemic Treatment for Patients With Advanced Stage HCC, Unresectable & Not Eligible for Local Ablation &/or TACE
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01539018
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ESLC1 (SADAT study)
- Conditions
- Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: After interim results data showed no evidence of a difference between both groups
- Enrolment
- 77 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Egyptian Society of Liver CancerUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2012
- Primary completion
- Jan 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Feb 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
- Unlike the Asian and western regions, The vast majority of the Egyptian/Arabic Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) patients are hepatitis C virus (HCV) associated.
- According to the SHARP study subgroup analysis, it seems that HCV associated HCC patients derive the max benefit of Sorafenib, the absolute gain between the Sorafenib arm \& the placebo in m OS = 7 months, HR=0.58 (95% CI: 0.37-0.91).
- In spite of improvement in terms of overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP), in all studies where Sorafenib was compared to placebo, the Sorafenib arm was not accompanied by a significant volumetric reduction, and this may explains the lack of any symptomatic improvement (time to symptomatic progression (TTSP) almost identical)
- Reviewing the chemotherapy outcome, although there is no convincing evidence in survival benefit to patients with advanced HCC, however true shrinkage (reduction in tumor size), has been consistently reported although the magnitude of response is lacking consistency.
This indicates the need for coupling Sorafenib to a chemotherapeutic agent but:
- For patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, the toxicity profile of any chemotherapeutic agent of choice to be added to Sorafenib should be take in consideration
- The agent to be added to Sorafenib should be effective in terms of Tumor Shrinkage \& with minimal toxicity regarding:
- Cardio-toxicity
- HFSR
- Diarrhea
- Hepato-toxicity
- Bone marrow suppression (although not relevant to the toxicity profile of Sorafenib, yet the HCC patients may have HCV related thrombocytopenia and variable degree of hypersplenism related pancytopenia)
Circulatory Overload (Hypertension) Why Tegafur-uracil (UFT)?
- Efficacy: For UFT, although the efficacy data in HCC are not as extensive as Doxorubicin, however in one phase II study UFT could improve survival when compared with conservative management.
- UFT Toxicity Profile:
In a phase III trial to asses the compare Efficacy \& Safety of UFT with that of 5 FU in treatment of m CRC, Hematological toxicities were minimal (0% Grade ¾ leukopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia \& was 3% for anemia), while the most commonly seen SE was grade I \& II Diarrhea
•Accordingly UFT may be considered as a potential partner to Sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sorafenib alone. | Active comparator | Drug: SorafenibSorafenib 400 mg p.o. twice daily until progression or intolerable toxicity alone. |
| sorafenib plus tegafur-uracil | Experimental | Drug: sorafenib plus tegafur-uracilSorafenib 400 mg p.o. twice daily continuously and UFT 125mg/m2 PO BID For 4 weeks and to be repeated on day 36 till progression or intolerance |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- 1-The patient must provide written informed consent prior to enrollment into the study.
- 2-The patient must be at least 18 years of age. 3-Patients must have histologically or cytologically confirmed or radiologically confirmed (according to AASLD criteria) advanced (unresectable, and/or metastatic) HCC not eligible for local ablation or TACE.
- 4-Patients must have measurable disease according to RECIST criteria (at least one uni-dimensional lesion measurable by CT-scan or MRI) 5-Patients must have a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks 6-Patients must have an Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 -2, Child-Pugh class A and only B7 7-Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function as assessed by the following laboratory requirements to be conducted within 7 days prior to screening:
- 9-Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation. Men use adequate birth control for at least 3 months after the last administration of sorafenib
Key exclusion criteria (24 listed)
- History of cardiac disease: congestive heart failure > NYHA class 2; active CAD (MI more than 6 mo prior to study entry is allowed); cardiac arrythmias requiring anti-arrythmic therapy (beta blockers or digoxin are permitted) or uncontrolled hypertension
- History of HIV infection
- Patients with Child-Pugh class C hepatic impairment
- Patients with Child-Pugh class B (except 7 ) hepatic impairment
- Active clinically serious infections (grade 2 NCI-CTC version 3.0)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SorafenibAlso: nexavar aloneSorafenib 400 mg p.o. twice daily until progression or intolerable toxicity alone. | Drug | Sorafenib alone. |
| sorafenib plus tegafur-uracilAlso: nexavar plus UFTSorafenib 400 mg p.o. twice daily until progression or intolerable toxicity and TEGAFUR-URACIL 125mg/m2 PO BID For 4 weeks and to be repeated on day 36 till progression or intolerance | Drug | sorafenib plus tegafur-uracil |
Primary outcome
time to progression (TTP):recist criteria
Time frame: one year
3 secondary outcomes
progression free survival (PFS):recist criteria
Time frame: one year
Time to symptomatic improvement:FHSI-8 questionnaire
Time frame: one year
Quality of Life Using EQ-5D questionnaire.
Time frame: one year
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: After interim results data showed no evidence of a difference between both groups). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Aug 2015.
Related trials for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Ivonescimab as Second-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), HCC - Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Durvalumab and Tremelimumab in Combination With Propranolol and Chemotherapy for Treatment of Advanced Hepatopancreabiliary Tumors (BLOCKED)
Pancreatic Cancer, Hepatocellular Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase 1 and 2 Study of VMD-102 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Other Solid Tumors
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), Metastatic Uveal Melanoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of BGB-B2033 in Participants With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Hepatocellular Cancer, Liver Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hamdy Abdelazim, MD/PhD study chair
Cairo University
Hesham Atef, MD/PhD principal investigator
Cairo University
Ashraf Abdelaziz, MD/PhD principal investigator
Cairo University
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Sorafenib and sorafenib plus tegafur-uracil in people with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Egyptian Society of Liver Cancer at 5 sites in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: After interim results data showed no evidence of a difference between both groups). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
time to progression (TTP):recist criteria (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2015.