Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaPhase 3NCT01540136
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Nedaplatin Versus Cisplatin in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
A Phase 3 study testing Nedaplatin and Cisplatin in people with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This is a Phase III trial to study the effectiveness of nedaplatin versus cisplatin with IMRT chemoradiotherapy in treating patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Nedaplatin and Cisplatin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 402 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Feb 2012to Jul 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with newly histologically confirmed non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma, including WHO II or III
- Original clinical staged as T1-4N1-3 or T3-4N0(according to the 7th AJCC edition)
- No evidence of distant metastasis (M0)
- Male and no pregnant female
- Age between 18-65
- WBC ≥ 4,000/mm3 and PLT ≥ 100,000/mm3
Show all 11Show fewer
- With normal liver function test (ALT、AST ≤ 2.5×ULN)
- With normal renal function test (Creatinine ≤ 1.5×ULN)
- Satisfactory performance status: Karnofsky scale (KPS)> 70
- Without radiotherapy or chemotherapy
- Patients must give signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients have evidence of relapse or distant metastasis
- The presence of uncontrolled life-threatening illness
- Receiving other ways of anti-cancer therapy
- Receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy
- Pregnancy or lactation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Phase III Non-inferiority Study of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Nedaplatin Versus Cisplatin in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
This is a Phase III trial to study the effectiveness of nedaplatin versus cisplatin with IMRT chemoradiotherapy in treating patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Read the detailed description
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is endemic in Southern China and Southeast Asia. Several prospective randomized trials have demonstrated that concurrent chemoradiotherapy was superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locoregionally advanced NPC. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been shown to have higher response rates in NPC than noncisplatin regimens. However, the patients' compliance was unsatisfactory because the obvious gastrointestinal toxicity of cisplatin. Nedaplatin is the new second generation platinum and it has slight gastrointestinal reaction. Our trial is in order to study the effectiveness of nedaplatin or cisplatin with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) chemoradiotherapy in treating patients with locoregionally advanced NPC.
- Conditions
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Nedaplatin, Cisplatin
- Medical subject headings
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NedaplatinDrug
Also called NDP
Nedaplatin 100mg/m2(3 weekly),D1,D22,D43 of RT
CisplatinDrug
Also called DDP
Cisplatin 100mg/m2(3 weekly),D1,D22,D43 of RT
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Nedaplatin | Experimental | Nedplatin combine with IMRT Receives: Drug: Nedaplatin |
| Cisplatin | Active comparator | Cisplatin combine with IMRT Receives: Drug: Cisplatin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progress-free survival
Progress-free survival is calculated from the date of randomization to the date of the first progress at any site.
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (8)
Determine the toxic effects, both quantitatively and qualitatively, and quality of life (QoL) of these regimens in these patients.
Administration and Monitoring Patients will be evaluated in the clinic and eligibility and informed consent obtained. Patients will be monitored for clinical toxicity by standard NIH criteria. QoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTCQLQ-C30) and EORTC QLQ Head and Neck. A time period of 4 weeks will constitute the time for clinical safety monitoring.
Measured: 4 weeks
Complete Response (CR)
CR assessed by independent reviewers, according to the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Disease response evaluated after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy treatment. Complete response defined as the complete disappearance of the target and non-target lesion(s) identified at baseline after radiological evaluation by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) only.
Measured: after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy treatment (up to 9 weeks)
Overall Survival(OS)
The OS was defined as the duration from the date of random assignment to the date of death from any cause or censored at the date of the last follow-up.
Measured: 2 years
Locoregional Relapse-Free Survival(LRRFS)
The LRRFS is evaluated and calculated from the date of random assignment until the day of first locoregional relapse or until the date of the last follow-up visit.
Measured: 2 years
Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS)
The DMFS is evaluated and calculated from the date of random assignment until the day of first distant metastases or until the date of the last follow-up visit.
Measured: 2 years
Anti-neoplasms sensitization effects of chemotherapy to radiotherapy
Tumor response will be evaluated by physical examination and nasopharyngoscopy when radiotherapy in 20Gy、40Gy、70Gy.
Measured: radiotherapy in 20Gy、40Gy、70Gy
Cost-effectiveness analysis
The determination of cost, including direct cost drug fees, inspection fees, expenses and nursing cost; cost-effectiveness analysis, such as cost-effectiveness ratio (ratio of the direct cost and short - and long-term curative effect) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (i.e., increasing costs and increase short or long-term efficacy ratio).
Measured: completion of chemoradiotherapy
Correlate effects of CCRT with biomarkers of response and predictors of long-term outcome
Early identification of patients who will have more aggressive disease soon after diagnosis has been a major goal, we will investigate the correlate effects of CCRT with biomarkers of response and predictors of long-term outcome in these patients.
Measured: before chemoradiotherapy and after chemoradiotherapy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Feb 2012 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2012
- Primary completionMay 2014
- Study completionJul 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sun Yat-sen UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 402 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Guangzhou Medical University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Meizhou City Hospital Of Guangdong Provience
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hai-Qiang Mai,MD,PhD, Sun Yat-sen University
- Investigators
- HaiQiang Mai, MD,Ph.D, Principal investigator, Cancer center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01540136
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Sun Yat-sen University
- Status last verified
- Mar 2013
- First submitted
- 22 Feb 2012
- Last updated
- 28 Oct 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Zheng J, Wang G, Yang GY, Wang D, Luo X, Chen C, Zhang Z, Li Q, Xu W, Li Z, Wang D. Induction chemotherapy with nedaplatin with 5-FU followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy concurrent with chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010 May;40(5):425-31. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyp183. Epub 2010 Jan 19.
PubMed 20085903Fuwa N, Kodaira T, Tachibana H, Nakamura T, Daimon T. Dose escalation study of nedaplatin with 5-fluorouracil in combination with alternating radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007 Mar;37(3):161-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyl138. Epub 2007 Mar 1.
PubMed 17332057Tanaka T, Yukawa K, Umesaki N. Radiation reduces carboplatin sensitivity and enhances nedaplatin sensitivity in cervical squamous cell carcinoma in vitro. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2007;28(5):352-5.
PubMed 17966212Chen QY, Wen YF, Guo L, Liu H, Huang PY, Mo HY, Li NW, Xiang YQ, Luo DH, Qiu F, Sun R, Deng MQ, Chen MY, Hua YJ, Guo X, Cao KJ, Hong MH, Qian CN, Mai HQ. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: phase III randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Dec 7;103(23):1761-70. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr432. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
PubMed 22056739Chan AT, Teo PM, Ngan RK, Leung TW, Lau WH, Zee B, Leung SF, Cheung FY, Yeo W, Yiu HH, Yu KH, Chiu KW, Chan DT, Mok T, Yuen KT, Mo F, Lai M, Kwan WH, Choi P, Johnson PJ. Concurrent chemotherapy-radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: progression-free survival analysis of a phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Apr 15;20(8):2038-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.08.149.
PubMed 11956263Ma J, Mai HQ, Hong MH, Min HQ, Mao ZD, Cui NJ, Lu TX, Mo HY. Results of a prospective randomized trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy with radiotherapy alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Mar 1;19(5):1350-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.5.1350.
PubMed 11230478Tang QN, Liu LT, Qi B, Guo SS, Luo DH, Sun R, Sun XS, Chen DP, Guo L, Mo HY, Wang P, Liu SL, Liang YJ, Li XY, Yang ZC, Chen QY, Mai HQ, Tang LQ. Effect of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Nedaplatin vs Cisplatin on the Long-term Outcomes of Survival and Toxic Effects Among Patients With Stage II to IVB Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A 5-Year Follow-up Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2138470. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38470.
PubMed 34928359Tang LQ, Chen DP, Guo L, Mo HY, Huang Y, Guo SS, Qi B, Tang QN, Wang P, Li XY, Li JB, Liu Q, Gao YH, Xie FY, Liu LT, Li Y, Liu SL, Xie HJ, Liang YJ, Sun XS, Yan JJ, Wu YS, Luo DH, Huang PY, Xiang YQ, Sun R, Chen MY, Lv X, Wang L, Xia WX, Zhao C, Cao KJ, Qian CN, Guo X, Hong MH, Nie ZQ, Chen QY, Mai HQ. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with nedaplatin versus cisplatin in stage II-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Apr;19(4):461-473. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30104-9. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
PubMed 29501366
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Oct 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Phase III Non-inferiority Study of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Nedaplatin Versus Cisplatin in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01540136
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Sun Yat-sen University
- Conditions
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 402 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Guangzhou Medical University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Meizhou City Hospital Of Guangdong Provience
- Study start
- Feb 2012
- Primary completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Feb 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a Phase III trial to study the effectiveness of nedaplatin versus cisplatin with IMRT chemoradiotherapy in treating patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Detailed description
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is endemic in Southern China and Southeast Asia. Several prospective randomized trials have demonstrated that concurrent chemoradiotherapy was superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locoregionally advanced NPC. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been shown to have higher response rates in NPC than noncisplatin regimens. However, the patients' compliance was unsatisfactory because the obvious gastrointestinal toxicity of cisplatin. Nedaplatin is the new second generation platinum and it has slight gastrointestinal reaction. Our trial is in order to study the effectiveness of nedaplatin or cisplatin with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) chemoradiotherapy in treating patients with locoregionally advanced NPC.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Nedaplatin | Experimental | Drug: NedaplatinNedplatin combine with IMRT |
| Cisplatin | Active comparator | Drug: CisplatinCisplatin combine with IMRT |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patients with newly histologically confirmed non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma, including WHO II or III
- Original clinical staged as T1-4N1-3 or T3-4N0(according to the 7th AJCC edition)
- No evidence of distant metastasis (M0)
- Male and no pregnant female
- Age between 18-65
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients have evidence of relapse or distant metastasis
- The presence of uncontrolled life-threatening illness
- Receiving other ways of anti-cancer therapy
- Receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy
- Pregnancy or lactation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NedaplatinAlso: NDPNedaplatin 100mg/m2(3 weekly),D1,D22,D43 of RT | Drug | Nedaplatin |
| CisplatinAlso: DDPCisplatin 100mg/m2(3 weekly),D1,D22,D43 of RT | Drug | Cisplatin |
Primary outcome
Progress-free survival
Time frame: 2 years
Progress-free survival is calculated from the date of randomization to the date of the first progress at any site.
8 secondary outcomes
Determine the toxic effects, both quantitatively and qualitatively, and quality of life (QoL) of these regimens in these patients.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Complete Response (CR)
Time frame: after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy treatment (up to 9 weeks)
Overall Survival(OS)
Time frame: 2 years
Locoregional Relapse-Free Survival(LRRFS)
Time frame: 2 years
Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS)
Time frame: 2 years
Anti-neoplasms sensitization effects of chemotherapy to radiotherapy
Time frame: radiotherapy in 20Gy、40Gy、70Gy
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Time frame: completion of chemoradiotherapy
Correlate effects of CCRT with biomarkers of response and predictors of long-term outcome
Time frame: before chemoradiotherapy and after chemoradiotherapy
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Oct 2016.
- Background: PubMed 20085903Zheng J, Wang G, Yang GY, Wang D, Luo X, Chen C, Zhang Z, Li Q, Xu W, Li Z, Wang D. Induction chemotherapy with nedaplatin with 5-FU followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy concurrent with chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010 May;40(5):425-31. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyp183. Epub 2010 Jan 19.
- Background: PubMed 17332057Fuwa N, Kodaira T, Tachibana H, Nakamura T, Daimon T. Dose escalation study of nedaplatin with 5-fluorouracil in combination with alternating radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007 Mar;37(3):161-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyl138. Epub 2007 Mar 1.
- Background: PubMed 17966212Tanaka T, Yukawa K, Umesaki N. Radiation reduces carboplatin sensitivity and enhances nedaplatin sensitivity in cervical squamous cell carcinoma in vitro. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2007;28(5):352-5.
- Background: PubMed 22056739Chen QY, Wen YF, Guo L, Liu H, Huang PY, Mo HY, Li NW, Xiang YQ, Luo DH, Qiu F, Sun R, Deng MQ, Chen MY, Hua YJ, Guo X, Cao KJ, Hong MH, Qian CN, Mai HQ. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: phase III randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Dec 7;103(23):1761-70. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr432. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
- Background: PubMed 11956263Chan AT, Teo PM, Ngan RK, Leung TW, Lau WH, Zee B, Leung SF, Cheung FY, Yeo W, Yiu HH, Yu KH, Chiu KW, Chan DT, Mok T, Yuen KT, Mo F, Lai M, Kwan WH, Choi P, Johnson PJ. Concurrent chemotherapy-radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: progression-free survival analysis of a phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Apr 15;20(8):2038-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.08.149.
- Background: PubMed 11230478Ma J, Mai HQ, Hong MH, Min HQ, Mao ZD, Cui NJ, Lu TX, Mo HY. Results of a prospective randomized trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy with radiotherapy alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Mar 1;19(5):1350-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.5.1350.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34928359Tang QN, Liu LT, Qi B, Guo SS, Luo DH, Sun R, Sun XS, Chen DP, Guo L, Mo HY, Wang P, Liu SL, Liang YJ, Li XY, Yang ZC, Chen QY, Mai HQ, Tang LQ. Effect of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Nedaplatin vs Cisplatin on the Long-term Outcomes of Survival and Toxic Effects Among Patients With Stage II to IVB Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A 5-Year Follow-up Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2138470. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38470.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29501366Tang LQ, Chen DP, Guo L, Mo HY, Huang Y, Guo SS, Qi B, Tang QN, Wang P, Li XY, Li JB, Liu Q, Gao YH, Xie FY, Liu LT, Li Y, Liu SL, Xie HJ, Liang YJ, Sun XS, Yan JJ, Wu YS, Luo DH, Huang PY, Xiang YQ, Sun R, Chen MY, Lv X, Wang L, Xia WX, Zhao C, Cao KJ, Qian CN, Guo X, Hong MH, Nie ZQ, Chen QY, Mai HQ. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with nedaplatin versus cisplatin in stage II-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Apr;19(4):461-473. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30104-9. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
- cancerLink provided by the sponsor.
- cisplatinLink provided by the sponsor.
- nedaplatinLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Docetaxel and SX-682 in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Salivary Gland Carcinoma, and Advanced Prostate Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Addition of BMS-986016 (Relatlimab) to the Usual Immunotherapy After Initial Treatment for Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Cancer
Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
P-MUC1C-ALLO1 Allogeneic CAR-T Cells in the Treatment of Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Breast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Validation of a Biopsy Decision Model for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Serological Markers and Endoscopic Features
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
VMD-928 Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab to Treat TrkA Overexpression Driven Solid Tumors or Lymphoma
Head and Neck Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
HaiQiang Mai, MD,Ph.D principal investigator
Cancer center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Nedaplatin and Cisplatin in people with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progress-free survival (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01540136, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Oct 2016.