Glaucoma, Open-AngleNCT01540370
Study Comparing Quantitative Assessments in Open-angle Glaucoma (OAG) and/or Ocular Hypertension (OHT)
An observational study of Glaucoma, Open-Angle and Ocular Hypertension, run by Allergan at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate assessments from the Goniometric Lens compared with those from anterior segment imaging in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and/or ocular hypertension (OHT). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Glaucoma, Open-Angle, Ocular Hypertension
- What is being tested?
- No Treatment
- How many people
- 102 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2012to Jul 2012
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with open-angle glaucoma and/or ocular hypertension
Who may be able to join
- Open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
Who cannot join
- Allergy or sensitivity to diagnostic agents used in study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This study will evaluate assessments from the Goniometric Lens compared with those from anterior segment imaging in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and/or ocular hypertension (OHT).
- Conditions
- Glaucoma, Open-Angle, Ocular Hypertension
- Being tested
- No Treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Glaucoma, Open-Angle, Ocular Hypertension
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
No TreatmentOther
No treatment
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with OAG and/or OHT | Patients with OAG and/or OHT Receives: Other: No Treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Intra- Examiner Agreement in Angle Width by Goniometric Lens
Intra-rater agreement (for each of the 6 raters) of Large Step angle width (range: 0.5 to 5.5 with 0.5 unit intervals) was evaluated using weighted kappa (Fleiss-Cohen) statistics. The angle is the area between the iris and cornea of the eye. Each examiner performed a pair of angle-width measurements by goniometric lens predilation (ie, 2 measurements per examiner). The degree of agreement within raters was interpreted according to Landis and Koch, where: <0:poor, 0.00-0.20:slight, 0.21-0.40:fair, 0.41-0.60:moderate, 0.61-0.80:substantial, and 0.81-1.00:almost perfect.
Measured: Day 1
Inter- Examiner Agreement in Angle Width by Goniometric Lens
Inter-rater agreement (among 6 raters) of Large Step angle width (range: 0.5 to 5.5 with 0.5 unit intervals) was evaluated using weighted kappa (Fleiss-Cohen) statistics. The angle is the area between the iris and cornea of the eye. Each examiner performed a pair of angle-width measurements by goniometric lens predilation (ie, 2 measurements per examiner). The degree of agreement within raters was interpreted according to Landis and Koch, where: <0:poor, 0.00-0.20:slight, 0.21-0.40:fair, 0.41-0.60:moderate, 0.61-0.80:substantial, and 0.81-1.00:almost perfect.
Measured: Day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Feb 2012 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2012
- Primary completionJul 2012
- Study completionJul 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Glaucoma, Open-AngleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Allergan
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study director, Allergan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01540370
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 192024-076
- Status last verified
- Jul 2013
- First submitted
- 23 Feb 2012
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study Comparing Quantitative Assessments in Open-angle Glaucoma (OAG) and/or Ocular Hypertension (OHT)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01540370
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 192024-076
- Conditions
- Glaucoma, Open-Angle, Ocular Hypertension
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AllerganIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2012
- Primary completion
- Jul 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Feb 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Sep 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate assessments from the Goniometric Lens compared with those from anterior segment imaging in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and/or ocular hypertension (OHT).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with OAG and/or OHT | – | Other: No TreatmentPatients with OAG and/or OHT |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with open-angle glaucoma and/or ocular hypertension
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Allergy or sensitivity to diagnostic agents used in study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| No TreatmentNo treatment | Other | Patients with OAG and/or OHT |
Primary outcome
Intra- Examiner Agreement in Angle Width by Goniometric Lens
Time frame: Day 1
Intra-rater agreement (for each of the 6 raters) of Large Step angle width (range: 0.5 to 5.5 with 0.5 unit intervals) was evaluated using weighted kappa (Fleiss-Cohen) statistics. The angle is the area between the iris and cornea of the eye. Each examiner performed a pair of angle-width measurements by goniometric lens predilation (ie, 2 measurements per examiner). The degree of agreement within raters was interpreted according to Landis and Koch, where: <0:poor, 0.00-0.20:slight, 0.21-0.40:fair, 0.41-0.60:moderate, 0.61-0.80:substantial, and 0.81-1.00:almost perfect.
Inter- Examiner Agreement in Angle Width by Goniometric Lens
Time frame: Day 1
Inter-rater agreement (among 6 raters) of Large Step angle width (range: 0.5 to 5.5 with 0.5 unit intervals) was evaluated using weighted kappa (Fleiss-Cohen) statistics. The angle is the area between the iris and cornea of the eye. Each examiner performed a pair of angle-width measurements by goniometric lens predilation (ie, 2 measurements per examiner). The degree of agreement within raters was interpreted according to Landis and Koch, where: <0:poor, 0.00-0.20:slight, 0.21-0.40:fair, 0.41-0.60:moderate, 0.61-0.80:substantial, and 0.81-1.00:almost perfect.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Glaucoma, Open-Angle
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Impact of Glaucoma and Visual Field Loss on Life Space
Primary Open-angle Glaucoma
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Glaucoma, Visual Field Loss, and Their Association With Life Space in Older Adults
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
Recruiting
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of MINIject S+ in Subjects With Open Angle Glaucoma
Glaucoma
Active, not recruiting
OMNI 3.1 Surgical System in Subjects With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation the Safety and Effectiveness of the GORE GDI in Adult Subjects With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma in Whom Previous Medical and Surgical Treatment Have Failed.
Glaucoma, Primary Open Angle
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director study director
Allergan
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Glaucoma, Open-Angle and Ocular Hypertension, run by Allergan at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Sep 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Intra- Examiner Agreement in Angle Width by Goniometric Lens (time frame: Day 1). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2013.