TinnitusPhase 2/3RESET2NCT01541969
Evaluation of the CR Neuromodulation Treatment for Tinnitus
A Phase 2/3 study testing CR Neuromodulation and Tinnitus masking in people with Tinnitus, run by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a new device delivering a sound-based intervention (termed acoustic coordinated reset neuromodulation) has significant clinical benefit for people with intrusive tinnitus. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Tinnitus
- What is being tested?
- CR Neuromodulation and Tinnitus masking
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Aug 2012to Feb 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Pure tone average <60 dB HL in the ear where tinnitus is perceived
- Must be able to hear all stimulation tones presented by the device
- Chronic subjective tinnitus for more than 3 months
- Dominant tinnitus frequency measured between 0.2 and 10 kHz
- At least mild tinnitus score on the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory
- Willing to wear the device for 4-6 hours daily during the trial
- Sufficient command of English language to read, understand and complete the questionnaires
- Able and willing to give informed consent
Who cannot join
- Objective tinnitus, Meniere's disease, craniomandibular induced Tinnitus
- Pulsatile tinnitus
- Intermittent tinnitus
- Severe anxiety
- Severe depression
- Catastrophic tinnitus
Show all 11Show fewer
- Hearing-aids wearers for less than 9 months
- Hearing-aid wearers with audiological adjustments within last 3 months
- Absolute thresholds > 70 dB on individual frequencies up to 8 kHz (unable to sufficiently hear the stimulus)
- Taking part in another trial during the last 30 days before study start
- The individually tailored training stimulus is uncomfortable or not acceptable to the participant
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom2 sites
University College London Ear Institute
London, WC1X 8EE
NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, University of Nottingham
Nottingham, NG1 5DU
About this study
Official title: Systematic Evaluation of the Acoustic CR ® Neuromodulation Treatment for Tinnitus
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a new device delivering a sound-based intervention (termed acoustic coordinated reset neuromodulation) has significant clinical benefit for people with intrusive tinnitus. It is hypothesised that the particular pattern of sound stimulation delivered by the device acts to break up patterns of synchronous nerve firing in the brain that may be responsible for the sensation of tinnitus. We will also measure brain activity in a subset of participants to determine if the intervention results in changes in brainwave activity.
Read the detailed description
Tinnitus affects a large number of people in the UK population but is a poorly understood disorder with no form of treatment that benefits everyone. One theory about tinnitus is that it is caused by altered patterns of synchronous nerve firing in the brains hearing centres. It is believed that conditions such as hearing loss lead to changes in how areas of the brain responsible for hearing are 'wired up' causing large areas of the brain to fire at the same time; this is believed to be a mechanism responsible for the sensation of tinnitus. Research suggests that this type of synchronous activity may be interrupted by presenting very specific sequences of sounds to the ears over several months. If sound stimulation can be used to break up patterns of synchronous activity in the hearing brain, then it is argued that it should also be effective in treating tinnitus. The German company ANM have patented a very specific algorithm of sound simulation that is delivered via headphones from a pocket-sized device. This treatment is currently being marketed by the private healthcare sector in Germany and very recently in the UK. The purpose of this study is to independently test the effects of this new therapy on tinnitus severity and related brain activity. We will gather information using questionnaires and listening tests, and make recording of electrical brain activity using electroencephalography (EEG).
- Conditions
- Tinnitus
- Being tested
- CR Neuromodulation, Tinnitus masking
- Keywords
- Ear, Hearing
- Medical subject headings
- Tinnitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CR NeuromodulationDevice
Also called Acoustic Coordinated Reset Neuromodualtion
Ear level device which delivers patterned sound stimulation.
The experimental arm will use the device fitted according to audiologist training given by the manufacturer/funder. An individually specified sound stimulation algorithm is hypothesised to interrupt tinnitus generating activity in the brain. For the first 12 weeks participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 6 hours, and in blocks of time not less than 1 hour. After 12 weeks participants will be unblinded and continue with the same experimental intervention. In weeks 13-36 participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 4 hours, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour.
Tinnitus maskingDevice
Also called Tinnitus masking only (by CR Neuromodulation device)
The active comparator uses the same ear level device and also delivers patterned sound but the stimulus will be determined according to an algorithm predicted not to break up tinnitus generating activity in the brain. It may have a masking effect. For the first 12 weeks participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 6 hours, and in blocks of time not less than 1 hour. After 12 weeks, the participants will be unblinded and the device algorithm will be reprogrammed in the same way as the experimental intervention. In weeks 13-24 participants will be asked to wear the device for 6 hours per day, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour. In weeks 25-36 they will be asked to continue using the device every day for 4 hours, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CR Neuromodulation | Experimental | Adaptive NeuroModulation (ANM) T30 CR® Neurostimulator device. Participants receive the intervention according to the manufacturer/funder training given to the study team. Receives: Device: CR Neuromodulation |
| Tinnitus masking | Active comparator | Participants will receive the same Adaptive NeuroModulation (ANM) T30 CR® Neurostimulator device, but it will NOT be programmed according to the therapeutic algorithm (0-12 weeks). Receives: Device: Tinnitus masking |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ)
Change in the global score on a 27 item, multi-attribute questionnaire measure of the functional impact of tinnitus (0-100 scale). Change was computed as 'visit 2' - 'visit 6' and so a positive change score indicates a reduction of tinnitus symptoms.
Measured: Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)
Secondary outcomes (5)
Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI)
Change in the global score on a 25 item, multi-attribute questionnaire measure of the functional impact of tinnitus (0-100 scale). Change was computed as 'visit 2' - 'visit 6' and so a positive change score indicates a reduction of tinnitus symptoms.
Measured: Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)
Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI)
Change in the global score on a 25 item, multi-attribute questionnaire measure of the functional impact of tinnitus (0-100 scale). Change was computed as 'visit 2' - 'visit 6' and so a positive change score indicates a reduction of tinnitus symptoms.
Measured: Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)
World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF)
The WHOQOL-BREF is a 26-item, multi-attribute questionnaire measure of health related quality of life. Outcome was measured as a change on Question 1: 'How would you rate your quality of life (over the past 4 weeks)?' There are 5 response options (Very poor=1; Poor=2; Neither poor nor good=3; Good=4; Very good=5). Change was computed as 'visit 2' - 'visit 6' and so a positive change score indicates a reduction in self-perceived quality of life.
Measured: Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)
Percent Change From Baseline in Normalized Oscillatory Power in the Delta Brainwave Pattern as Measured by Electroencephalography (EEG)
Non-invasive recording to measure rhythmic patterns of spontaneous brain activity at rest. An a priori hypothesis targeted normalized delta rhythm. Band powers were calculated as percent change in delta brainwave pattern relative to change in total (1-90 Hz) EEG band. Comparison made between 'visit 2' and 'visit 6'.
We used a Neuroscan system (SynAmps2 model 8050, Compumedics Neuroscan, Charlotte, NC, USA) and custom cap with 66 equidistant scalp electrodes (Easycap, GmbH, Germany). A central frontal electrode was used as ground and a nose-tip electrode as reference. Electrode impedances were maintained at 5 kΩ prior to recordings. Recording was done with an offline filter of 0.5 to 200 Hz pass-band and 1 kHz sampling rate. Recording was over a continuous 10-minute period. Participants were seated in a quiet, darkened soundproof booth and were instructed to relax, keep eyes open and fix gaze on a marker point.
Measured: Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)
Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ)
Change in the global score on a 27 item, multi-attribute questionnaire measure of the functional impact of tinnitus (0-100 scale). Change was computed as 'visit 2' - 'visit 10' and so a positive change score indicates a reduction of tinnitus symptoms.
Measured: Baseline (visit 2) and 36 weeks (visit 10)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2012
- Primary completionFeb 2014
- Study completionFeb 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TinnitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Nottingham, University College, London
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Deborah A Hall, PhD, Study director, NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, Unviersity of NottinghamDerek J Hoare, PhD, Principal investigator, NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, University of NottinghamDavid McAlpine, PhD, Principal investigator, University College London, Ear Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01541969
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 11IH006
- Acronym
- RESET2
- Status last verified
- May 2015
- First submitted
- 24 Feb 2012
- Last updated
- 22 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Hoare DJ, Edmondson-Jones M, Gander PE, Hall DA. Agreement and reliability of tinnitus loudness matching and pitch likeness rating. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 5;9(12):e114553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114553. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25478690Hoare DJ, Pierzycki RH, Thomas H, McAlpine D, Hall DA. Evaluation of the acoustic coordinated reset (CR(R)) neuromodulation therapy for tinnitus: study protocol for a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Jul 10;14:207. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-207.
PubMed 23842505Fackrell K, Hall DA, Barry JG, Hoare DJ. Psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): Assessment in a UK research volunteer population. Hear Res. 2016 May;335:220-235. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
PubMed 26415998Pierzycki RH, McNamara AJ, Hoare DJ, Hall DA. Whole scalp resting state EEG of oscillatory brain activity shows no parametric relationship with psychoacoustic and psychosocial assessment of tinnitus: A repeated measures study. Hear Res. 2016 Jan;331:101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
PubMed 26584760Fackrell K, Hall DA, Barry JG, Hoare DJ. Response to Letter: Psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): Assessment in a UK research volunteer population. Hear Res. 2016 May;335:237-238. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Mar 30. No abstract available.
PubMed 27039256Hall DA, Pierzycki RH, Thomas H, Greenberg D, Sereda M, Hoare DJ. Systematic Evaluation of the T30 Neurostimulator Treatment for Tinnitus: A Double-Blind Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial with Open-Label Extension. Brain Sci. 2022 Feb 26;12(3):317. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12030317.
PubMed 35326273
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Systematic Evaluation of the Acoustic CR ® Neuromodulation Treatment for Tinnitus
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01541969
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RESET2 / 11IH006
- Conditions
- Tinnitus
- Keywords
- Ear, Hearing
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Nottingham, University College, London
- Study start
- Aug 2012
- Primary completion
- Feb 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Jun 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a new device delivering a sound-based intervention (termed acoustic coordinated reset neuromodulation) has significant clinical benefit for people with intrusive tinnitus. It is hypothesised that the particular pattern of sound stimulation delivered by the device acts to break up patterns of synchronous nerve firing in the brain that may be responsible for the sensation of tinnitus. We will also measure brain activity in a subset of participants to determine if the intervention results in changes in brainwave activity.
Detailed description
Tinnitus affects a large number of people in the UK population but is a poorly understood disorder with no form of treatment that benefits everyone. One theory about tinnitus is that it is caused by altered patterns of synchronous nerve firing in the brains hearing centres. It is believed that conditions such as hearing loss lead to changes in how areas of the brain responsible for hearing are 'wired up' causing large areas of the brain to fire at the same time; this is believed to be a mechanism responsible for the sensation of tinnitus. Research suggests that this type of synchronous activity may be interrupted by presenting very specific sequences of sounds to the ears over several months. If sound stimulation can be used to break up patterns of synchronous activity in the hearing brain, then it is argued that it should also be effective in treating tinnitus. The German company ANM have patented a very specific algorithm of sound simulation that is delivered via headphones from a pocket-sized device. This treatment is currently being marketed by the private healthcare sector in Germany and very recently in the UK. The purpose of this study is to independently test the effects of this new therapy on tinnitus severity and related brain activity. We will gather information using questionnaires and listening tests, and make recording of electrical brain activity using electroencephalography (EEG).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CR Neuromodulation | Experimental | Device: CR NeuromodulationAdaptive NeuroModulation (ANM) T30 CR® Neurostimulator device. Participants receive the intervention according to the manufacturer/funder training given to the study team. |
| Tinnitus masking | Active comparator | Device: Tinnitus maskingParticipants will receive the same Adaptive NeuroModulation (ANM) T30 CR® Neurostimulator device, but it will NOT be programmed according to the therapeutic algorithm (0-12 weeks). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Pure tone average <60 dB HL in the ear where tinnitus is perceived
- Must be able to hear all stimulation tones presented by the device
- Chronic subjective tinnitus for more than 3 months
- Dominant tinnitus frequency measured between 0.2 and 10 kHz
- At least mild tinnitus score on the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Objective tinnitus, Meniere's disease, craniomandibular induced Tinnitus
- Pulsatile tinnitus
- Intermittent tinnitus
- Severe anxiety
- Severe depression
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CR NeuromodulationAlso: Acoustic Coordinated Reset NeuromodualtionEar level device which delivers patterned sound stimulation. The experimental arm will use the device fitted according to audiologist training given by the manufacturer/funder. An individually specified sound stimulation algorithm is hypothesised to interrupt tinnitus generating activity in the brain. For the first 12 weeks participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 6 hours, and in blocks of time not less than 1 hour. After 12 weeks participants will be unblinded and continue with the same experimental intervention. In weeks 13-36 participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 4 hours, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour. | Device | CR Neuromodulation |
| Tinnitus maskingAlso: Tinnitus masking only (by CR Neuromodulation device)The active comparator uses the same ear level device and also delivers patterned sound but the stimulus will be determined according to an algorithm predicted not to break up tinnitus generating activity in the brain. It may have a masking effect. For the first 12 weeks participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 6 hours, and in blocks of time not less than 1 hour. After 12 weeks, the participants will be unblinded and the device algorithm will be reprogrammed in the same way as the experimental intervention. In weeks 13-24 participants will be asked to wear the device for 6 hours per day, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour. In weeks 25-36 they will be asked to continue using the device every day for 4 hours, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour. | Device | Tinnitus masking |
Primary outcome
Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ)
Time frame: Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)
Change in the global score on a 27 item, multi-attribute questionnaire measure of the functional impact of tinnitus (0-100 scale). Change was computed as 'visit 2' - 'visit 6' and so a positive change score indicates a reduction of tinnitus symptoms.
5 secondary outcomes
Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI)
Time frame: Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)
Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI)
Time frame: Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)
World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time frame: Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)
Percent Change From Baseline in Normalized Oscillatory Power in the Delta Brainwave Pattern as Measured by Electroencephalography (EEG)
Time frame: Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)
Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ)
Time frame: Baseline (visit 2) and 36 weeks (visit 10)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Aug 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 25478690Hoare DJ, Edmondson-Jones M, Gander PE, Hall DA. Agreement and reliability of tinnitus loudness matching and pitch likeness rating. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 5;9(12):e114553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114553. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 23842505Hoare DJ, Pierzycki RH, Thomas H, McAlpine D, Hall DA. Evaluation of the acoustic coordinated reset (CR(R)) neuromodulation therapy for tinnitus: study protocol for a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Jul 10;14:207. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-207.
- Background: PubMed 26415998Fackrell K, Hall DA, Barry JG, Hoare DJ. Psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): Assessment in a UK research volunteer population. Hear Res. 2016 May;335:220-235. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
- Background: PubMed 26584760Pierzycki RH, McNamara AJ, Hoare DJ, Hall DA. Whole scalp resting state EEG of oscillatory brain activity shows no parametric relationship with psychoacoustic and psychosocial assessment of tinnitus: A repeated measures study. Hear Res. 2016 Jan;331:101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
- Background: PubMed 27039256Fackrell K, Hall DA, Barry JG, Hoare DJ. Response to Letter: Psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): Assessment in a UK research volunteer population. Hear Res. 2016 May;335:237-238. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Mar 30. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35326273Hall DA, Pierzycki RH, Thomas H, Greenberg D, Sereda M, Hoare DJ. Systematic Evaluation of the T30 Neurostimulator Treatment for Tinnitus: A Double-Blind Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial with Open-Label Extension. Brain Sci. 2022 Feb 26;12(3):317. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12030317.
- Sponsor supported statement about study reportingLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Tinnitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Acute Nicotine Gum and Auditory Brain Responses in Adults With Chronic Tinnitus
Tinnitus, Chronic Subjective Tinnitus
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of TRTL-913 in Healthy Volunteers (Part A) and in Adults With Tinnitus (Part B)
Tinnitus
RecruitingObservational study
Lemborexant vs Clonidine vs Sedatives to Treat Insomnia in Chronic Pain Patients
Chronic Insomnia, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of a Totally Implantable Cochlear Implant on Tinnitus Severity in Adults With Preoperative Tinnitus
Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Tinnitus
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Comparing an AI-driven Hearing Test With the Standard Hearing Test in Adults With Hearing Loss and Tinnitus
Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Tinnitus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Deborah A Hall, PhD study director
NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, Unviersity of Nottingham
Derek J Hoare, PhD principal investigator
NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, University of Nottingham
David McAlpine, PhD principal investigator
University College London, Ear Institute
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing CR Neuromodulation and Tinnitus masking in people with Tinnitus, run by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Jun 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ) (time frame: Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01541969, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Aug 2016.