Deep Venous ThrombosisPot-KastNCT01542723
Pot-Kast: Thrombosis Prophylaxis After Knee Arthroscopy
A study testing LMWH in people with Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism, run by Suzanne C. Cannegieter, MD PhD at 9 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Currently, guidelines and clinical practice differ considerably with respect to use of anticoagulant treatment after arthroscopy of the knee. Trials that have been carried out were aimed at efficacy only, had small sample sizes and therefore mainly used asymptomatic thrombosis as endpoint. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Deep Venous Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism
- What is being tested?
- LMWH
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,500 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- May 2012to Sep 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Meniscectomy
- Diagnostic Arthroscopy
- Removal of corpora libera
Who cannot join
- Contra-indications for LMWH use (recent major bleeding, bleeding disorder, allergy)
- Pregnancy
- Pre-existent indication for anticoagulation therapy, either LMWH or vitamin K antagonists.
- History of venous thromboembolism (indication for anticoagulation therapy for prophylaxis of recurrence)
- Mental of physical disability to fulfill study requirements
- Insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language
- Previous participation in the Pot-(K)Cast study
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country.
9 sites in 1 country
Netherlands9 sites
Orthopedium
Delft, South Holland, 2616 LS
Reinier de Graaf Groep
Delft, South Holland, 2625 AD
Groene Hart Ziekenhuis
Gouda, South Holland, 2803 HH
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA
Alrijne Ziekenhuis
Leiderdorp, South Holland, 2353 GA
PARK MC
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3067 GH
Medisch Centrum Haaglanden
The Hague, South Holland, 2512 VA
HagaZiekenhuis
The Hague, South Holland, 2566 MJ
Isala Klinieken
Zwolle, Overijsel, 8011 JW
About this study
Official title: Pot-Kast: Thrombosis Prophylaxis After Knee Arthroscopy: Determining the Balance Between Benefits and Risks
Currently, guidelines and clinical practice differ considerably with respect to use of anticoagulant treatment after arthroscopy of the knee. Trials that have been carried out were aimed at efficacy only, had small sample sizes and therefore mainly used asymptomatic thrombosis as endpoint. From these trials an overall risk benefit-balance could not be established, hence the current controversy. In the proposed study the investigators will use relevant symptomatic endpoints in a large cohort of patients. Furthermore the investigators will follow subjects with an adverse event for a longer period, during which the investigators will assess the long term sequelae of these events. Lastly, the investigators will determine high risk groups that will benefit most from anticoagulant treatment.
Objective: Comparative effectiveness research to determine cost-effectiveness of two existing policies, i.e. treatment with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) after arthroscopy of the knee. In addition the investigators will investigate personalized prophylaxis based on genetic and acquired risk factors.
Read the detailed description
Background:
Currently, guidelines and clinical practice differ considerably with respect to use of anticoagulant treatment after arthroscopy of the knee. Trials that have been carried out were aimed at efficacy only, had small sample sizes and therefore mainly used asymptomatic thrombosis as endpoint. From these trials an overall risk benefit-balance could not be established, hence the current controversy exists. In the proposed study we will use relevant symptomatic endpoints in a large cohort of patients. Furthermore we will follow subjects with an adverse event for a longer period, during which we will assess the long term sequelae of these events. Lastly, we will determine high risk groups that will benefit most from anticoagulant treatment.
Objective:
Comparative effectiveness research to determine cost-effectiveness of an existing healthcare policy, i.e. treatment with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) after arthroscopy of the knee. In addition we will investigate personalized prophylaxis based on genetic and acquired risk factors.
Study Design:
A randomized controlled trial comparing a policy with the anticoagulant LMWH to a policy with no anticoagulant in patients who underwent knee arthroscopy.
Determination of genetic and acquired risk factors will be performed at the start of the study. Based on the presence or absence of these factors we will assign a risk profile to each patient
Study Population:
The study population will consist of 1500 patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. These patients will be recruited from 6 hospitals in the Leiden/Den Haag region over a two-year inclusion period. All patients over 18 years will be eligible, except patients with a contra-indication or an absolute indication for LMWH use
Intervention:
LMWH (for example nadroparin 2850 IE s.c. once daily, > 100kg 5700IE sc) for 8 days vs no treatment.
Each hospital will use a LMWH according to their own preference.
Blood taken pre- and post-operatively will be analyzed on common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) known to strongly affect thrombotic risk; on levels of coagulation factors in plasma (of which high or low levels are known to increase the risk). Patients will also be screened on acquired risk factors for thrombosis through a questionnaire.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:
We will compare two standard treatment modes that are currently both used depending on the physician's or hospital's preference. The patients in our trial will be subjected to one of these standard treatments. It is therefore not expected that participation will lead to an increased health risk. LMWHs like Nadroparin and Dalteparin are no experimental pharmaceuticals; both have been registered in the Netherlands for these indications since 1989.
Not participating in the trial may, depending on the physician, still lead to treatment with an LMWH.
All patients will need to undergo two venepunctures for blood sampling for the study. These blood samples will be taken pre-operatively and post-operatively. No extra hospital visits are required. Patients will be contacted by an electronic questionnaire 2 weeks and 6 weeks after the arthroscopy of the knee and by telephone after three months.
One questionnaire concerning risk factors for thrombosis, bleeding and patients demographics will be filled in before arthroscopy of the knee.
Only subjects with clinically relevant adverse events (and a similar random sample of subjects without a clinically relevant adverse event) will be monitored for a two year period after the event (in total expected to be about 30 subjects). After six months, one year and two years after the event, patients will be seen for clinical examination and quality of life assessment by means of a questionnaire.
- Conditions
- Deep Venous Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism
- Being tested
- LMWH
- Keywords
- Deep venous thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism, Arthroscopy of the knee
- Medical subject headings
- Venous Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LMWHDrug
Also called Nadroparine, Dalteparine
Each hospital will use a LMWH according to their own preferences.
Prophylactic dosage of LMWH (for example nadroparin 2850 IE s.c.) once daily for 8 days. If the patient's weight is more than 100kg a double dose of LMWH will be given (in case of Nadroparin 5700 IE s.c. once daily).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| LMWH | Experimental | 750 patients with an arthroscopy or the knee will be randomized to receive treatment with a LMWH Receives: Drug: LMWH |
| No intervention | No intervention | 750 patients with an arthroscopy of the knee will be randomized to receive no treatment. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT)
Symptomatic deep venous thrombosis confirmed with compression ultrasonography
Measured: 3 Months
Pulmonary Embolism (PE)
Fatal or non-fatal pulmonary embolism confirmed with:
- an intraluminal filling defect in segmental or more proximal branches on spiral CT scan, or
- a perfusion defect of at least 75% of a segment with a local normal ventilation result (high-probability) on ventilation/perfusion lung scan, or
- detected at autopsy
Measured: 3 months
Major Bleeding
Major bleeding, defined as:
- a fatal bleeding, or
- symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ, or
- extrasurgical site bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin level of 1.24mmol/L (2.0g/dL) or more, leading to transfusion of one or more units of whole blood or red cells, or
- surgical site bleeding that requires a second intervention or a hemarthrosis interfering with rehabilitation, or surgical site bleeding that needs blood suppletion.
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Other clinically relevant bleeding
Other clinically relevant bleeding, defined as overt bleeding not meeting the criteria for major bleeding but associated with medical intervention, unscheduled contact with a physician, (temporary) cessation of study treatment, or associated with discomfort such as pain, or impairment of activities of daily life.
Measured: 3 months
Surgical site infection
Superficial incisional surgical site infection, deep incisional surgical site infection of organ/space surgical site infection according to the definitions of the CDC.
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2012
- Primary completionJul 2016
- Study completionSep 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Deep Venous ThrombosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,500 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Suzanne C. Cannegieter, MD PhD
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Suzanne C. Cannegieter, MD PhD, Leiden University
- Investigators
- Suzanne C Cannegieter, PhD, MD, Study director, Leiden University Medical CenterRob GHH Nelissen, PhD, MD, Principal investigator, Leiden University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01542723
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL35774.058.11(2)
- Acronym
- Pot-Kast
- Status last verified
- Oct 2016
- First submitted
- 27 Feb 2012
- Last updated
- 11 Oct 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
van Adrichem RA, Nemeth B, Algra A, le Cessie S, Rosendaal FR, Schipper IB, Nelissen RGHH, Cannegieter SC; POT-KAST and POT-CAST Group. Thromboprophylaxis after Knee Arthroscopy and Lower-Leg Casting. N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 9;376(6):515-525. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613303. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
PubMed 27959702
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Oct 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pot-Kast: Thrombosis Prophylaxis After Knee Arthroscopy: Determining the Balance Between Benefits and Risks
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01542723
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pot-Kast / NL35774.058.11(2)
- Conditions
- Deep Venous Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism
- Keywords
- Deep venous thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism, Arthroscopy of the knee
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,500 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Suzanne C. Cannegieter, MD PhDUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
- Study start
- May 2012
- Primary completion
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Currently, guidelines and clinical practice differ considerably with respect to use of anticoagulant treatment after arthroscopy of the knee. Trials that have been carried out were aimed at efficacy only, had small sample sizes and therefore mainly used asymptomatic thrombosis as endpoint. From these trials an overall risk benefit-balance could not be established, hence the current controversy. In the proposed study the investigators will use relevant symptomatic endpoints in a large cohort of patients. Furthermore the investigators will follow subjects with an adverse event for a longer period, during which the investigators will assess the long term sequelae of these events. Lastly, the investigators will determine high risk groups that will benefit most from anticoagulant treatment.
Objective: Comparative effectiveness research to determine cost-effectiveness of two existing policies, i.e. treatment with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) after arthroscopy of the knee. In addition the investigators will investigate personalized prophylaxis based on genetic and acquired risk factors.
Detailed description
Background:
Currently, guidelines and clinical practice differ considerably with respect to use of anticoagulant treatment after arthroscopy of the knee. Trials that have been carried out were aimed at efficacy only, had small sample sizes and therefore mainly used asymptomatic thrombosis as endpoint. From these trials an overall risk benefit-balance could not be established, hence the current controversy exists. In the proposed study we will use relevant symptomatic endpoints in a large cohort of patients. Furthermore we will follow subjects with an adverse event for a longer period, during which we will assess the long term sequelae of these events. Lastly, we will determine high risk groups that will benefit most from anticoagulant treatment.
Objective:
Comparative effectiveness research to determine cost-effectiveness of an existing healthcare policy, i.e. treatment with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) after arthroscopy of the knee. In addition we will investigate personalized prophylaxis based on genetic and acquired risk factors.
Study Design:
A randomized controlled trial comparing a policy with the anticoagulant LMWH to a policy with no anticoagulant in patients who underwent knee arthroscopy.
Determination of genetic and acquired risk factors will be performed at the start of the study. Based on the presence or absence of these factors we will assign a risk profile to each patient
Study Population:
The study population will consist of 1500 patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. These patients will be recruited from 6 hospitals in the Leiden/Den Haag region over a two-year inclusion period. All patients over 18 years will be eligible, except patients with a contra-indication or an absolute indication for LMWH use
Intervention:
LMWH (for example nadroparin 2850 IE s.c. once daily, > 100kg 5700IE sc) for 8 days vs no treatment.
Each hospital will use a LMWH according to their own preference.
Blood taken pre- and post-operatively will be analyzed on common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) known to strongly affect thrombotic risk; on levels of coagulation factors in plasma (of which high or low levels are known to increase the risk). Patients will also be screened on acquired risk factors for thrombosis through a questionnaire.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:
We will compare two standard treatment modes that are currently both used depending on the physician's or hospital's preference. The patients in our trial will be subjected to one of these standard treatments. It is therefore not expected that participation will lead to an increased health risk. LMWHs like Nadroparin and Dalteparin are no experimental pharmaceuticals; both have been registered in the Netherlands for these indications since 1989.
Not participating in the trial may, depending on the physician, still lead to treatment with an LMWH.
All patients will need to undergo two venepunctures for blood sampling for the study. These blood samples will be taken pre-operatively and post-operatively. No extra hospital visits are required. Patients will be contacted by an electronic questionnaire 2 weeks and 6 weeks after the arthroscopy of the knee and by telephone after three months.
One questionnaire concerning risk factors for thrombosis, bleeding and patients demographics will be filled in before arthroscopy of the knee.
Only subjects with clinically relevant adverse events (and a similar random sample of subjects without a clinically relevant adverse event) will be monitored for a two year period after the event (in total expected to be about 30 subjects). After six months, one year and two years after the event, patients will be seen for clinical examination and quality of life assessment by means of a questionnaire.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| LMWH | Experimental | Drug: LMWH750 patients with an arthroscopy or the knee will be randomized to receive treatment with a LMWH |
| No intervention | No intervention | –750 patients with an arthroscopy of the knee will be randomized to receive no treatment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Meniscectomy
- Diagnostic Arthroscopy
- Removal of corpora libera
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Contra-indications for LMWH use (recent major bleeding, bleeding disorder, allergy)
- Pregnancy
- Pre-existent indication for anticoagulation therapy, either LMWH or vitamin K antagonists.
- History of venous thromboembolism (indication for anticoagulation therapy for prophylaxis of recurrence)
- Mental of physical disability to fulfill study requirements
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LMWHAlso: Nadroparine, DalteparineEach hospital will use a LMWH according to their own preferences. Prophylactic dosage of LMWH (for example nadroparin 2850 IE s.c.) once daily for 8 days. If the patient's weight is more than 100kg a double dose of LMWH will be given (in case of Nadroparin 5700 IE s.c. once daily). | Drug | LMWH |
Primary outcome
Symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT)
Time frame: 3 Months
Symptomatic deep venous thrombosis confirmed with compression ultrasonography
Pulmonary Embolism (PE)
Time frame: 3 months
Fatal or non-fatal pulmonary embolism confirmed with: * an intraluminal filling defect in segmental or more proximal branches on spiral CT scan, or * a perfusion defect of at least 75% of a segment with a local normal ventilation result (high-probability) on ventilation/perfusion lung scan, or * detected at autopsy
Major Bleeding
Time frame: 3 months
Major bleeding, defined as: * a fatal bleeding, or * symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ, or * extrasurgical site bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin level of 1.24mmol/L (2.0g/dL) or more, leading to transfusion of one or more units of whole blood or red cells, or * surgical site bleeding that requires a second intervention or a hemarthrosis interfering with rehabilitation, or surgical site bleeding that needs blood suppletion.
2 secondary outcomes
Other clinically relevant bleeding
Time frame: 3 months
Surgical site infection
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Oct 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27959702van Adrichem RA, Nemeth B, Algra A, le Cessie S, Rosendaal FR, Schipper IB, Nelissen RGHH, Cannegieter SC; POT-KAST and POT-CAST Group. Thromboprophylaxis after Knee Arthroscopy and Lower-Leg Casting. N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 9;376(6):515-525. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613303. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Deep Venous Thrombosis
Recruiting
The GORE® VIABAHN® FORTEGRA Venous Stent Post-Approval Study
Venous Thromboses, Venous Disease
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
ClotTriever® Thrombectomy System Use-Result Survey in Japan
Deep Vein Thrombosis
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) for Venous Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adult Participants
Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
RecruitingPhase 3
Treatment and Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Adult Participants With Solid and Hematologic Cancers
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Not yet recruiting
SAFELY RULING OUT DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS IN PREGNANCY WITH THE LEFt SCORE AND TRIMESTER-ADJUSTED D-DIMER CUTOFFS (the PREG-DVT Study): A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY.
Pregnancy Related, Deep Vein Thrombosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Suzanne C Cannegieter, PhD, MD study director
Leiden University Medical Center
Rob GHH Nelissen, PhD, MD principal investigator
Leiden University Medical Center
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing LMWH in people with Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism, run by Suzanne C. Cannegieter, MD PhD at 9 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (time frame: 3 Months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01542723, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Oct 2016.