Adolescent Health ServicesAFIXNCT01544764
Examining Adolescent Assessment, Feedback, Incentive, and Exchange (AFIX) in North Carolina
A study testing Assessment , Feedback, Incentives, and eXchange Program in people with Adolescent Health Services and Immunization, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The North Carolina Immunization Branch will evaluate the use of the CDC program to improve adolescent vaccination practices (called Assessment, Feedback, Incentives, and eXchanges, or AFIX). This evaluation is the first of its kind in the nation and may have a profound impact on prevention. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Adolescent Health Services, Immunization
- What is being tested?
- Assessment , Feedback, Incentives, and eXchange Program
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 91 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2011to Dec 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Pediatric and/or family practices participating in the North Carolina Immunization Program
- A minimum of 200 active adolescent patients
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Cervical Cancer-Free North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
North Carolina Immunization Branch
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699
About this study
Official title: Examining Adolescent Assessment, Feedback, Incentive, and Exchange (AFIX)
The North Carolina Immunization Branch will evaluate the use of the CDC program to improve adolescent vaccination practices (called Assessment, Feedback, Incentives, and eXchanges, or AFIX). This evaluation is the first of its kind in the nation and may have a profound impact on prevention.
AFIX has four major components: 1) Assessment of a provider's current immunization practices and vaccination levels, 2) Feedback of the assessment results and strategies to improve coverage levels, 3) Incentives to improve coverage levels, and 4) eXchange of information and resources necessary to facilitate improvement.
This program will evaluate the effectiveness of AFIX visits on affecting provider practices to increase adolescent (age 11-18) immunization. Visits include discussion of that practice's immunization rates and strategies for improving rates. The investigators will compare the changes, from baseline to 5 months, in immunization for practices receiving virtual visits (webinars), in-person visits, and no visits (control group). Thirty practices will be randomly assigned to each intervention type. The main outcomes of this study are practice-wide uptake rates of several adolescent vaccines (Tdap, HPV, and MCV4) as well as pre- and post-AFIX visit surveys focusing on recall tactics utilized by each practice. Data will be collected on practices with at least 200 adolescent patients (note: there is no patient-level data collected in this study).
- Conditions
- Adolescent Health Services, Immunization
- Being tested
- Assessment , Feedback, Incentives, and eXchange Program
- Keywords
- Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine, Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine, Meningococcal Vaccines, Hepatitis B Vaccines, Chickenpox Vaccine, Papillomavirus Vaccines
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis B
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Assessment , Feedback, Incentives, and eXchange ProgramOther
The NC Immunization Branch uses Adolescent AFIX (Assessment, Feedback, Incentives and eXchange) Program, a quality improvement strategy developed by the CDC to improve the immunization practices and vaccination coverage levels of public and private health care providers. It has four main components: 1) Assessment of a provider's current immunization practices and vaccination levels, 2) Feedback of the assessment results and strategies to improve coverage levels, 3) Incentives to improve coverage levels, and 4) eXchange of information and resources necessary to facilitate improvement.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | This arm includes 30 health centers in North Carolina with at least 200 adolescent (age 11-18) patients. Practices in this arm were randomly assigned to receive no AFIX visit. |
| AFIX In-Person Visit | Experimental | This arm includes 30 health centers in North Carolina with at least 200 adolescent (age 11-18) patients. These practices received an in-person AFIX visit from a North Carolina Immunization Branch employee.
Intervention:
Other: Assessment , Feedback, Incentives, and eXchange Program Receives: Other: Assessment , Feedback, Incentives, and eXchange Program |
| AFIX Webinar Visit | Experimental | This arm includes 31 health centers in North Carolina with at least 200 adolescent (age 11-18) patients. These practices received a webinar during which a North Carolina Immunization Branch employee completed the components of an AFIX visit.
Intervention:
Other: Assessment , Feedback, Incentives, and eXchange Program Receives: Other: Assessment , Feedback, Incentives, and eXchange Program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Vaccination Rate: HPV vaccine initiation among 11-12 year olds
We will gather practice-specific rates of coverage for adolescents (age 11-12) for the first dose of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine at baseline and 5 months follow-up.
Measured: Baseline and 5 months follow-up
Secondary outcomes (7)
Change in Vaccination Rate: HPV vaccine initiation among 13-18 year olds
We will gather practice-specific rates of coverage for adolescents (age 13-18) for the first dose of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine at baseline and 5 months follow-up.
Measured: Baseline and 5 months follow-up
Change in Vaccination Rate: Tdap vaccine among 11-12 year olds
We will gather practice-specific rates of coverage for adolescents (age 11-12) for tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis booster (Tdap) at baseline and 5 months follow-up.
Measured: Baseline and 5 months follow-up
Change in Vaccination Rate: Tdap vaccine among 13-18 year olds
We will gather practice-specific rates of coverage for adolescents (age 13-18) for tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis booster (Tdap) at baseline and 5 months follow-up.
Measured: Baseline and 5 months follow-up
Change in Vaccination Rate: Meningitis vaccine among 11-12 year olds
We will gather practice-specific rates of coverage for adolescents (age 11-12) for meningococcal conjugate (i.e., meningitis vaccine) at baseline and 5 months follow-up.
Measured: Baseline and 5 months follow-up
Change in Vaccination Rate: Meningitis vaccine among 13-18 year olds
We will gather practice-specific rates of coverage for adolescents (age 13-18) for meningococcal conjugate (i.e., meningitis vaccine) at baseline and 5 months follow-up.
Measured: Baseline and 5 months follow-up
Change in Vaccination Rate: HPV vaccine completion among 11-12 year olds
We will gather practice-specific rates of coverage for adolescents (age 11-12) for the third and final dose of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine at baseline and 5 months follow-up.
Measured: Baseline and 5 months follow-up
Change in Vaccination Rate: HPV vaccine completion among 13-18 year olds
We will gather practice-specific rates of coverage for adolescents (age 13-18) for the third and final dose of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine at baseline and 5 months follow-up.
Measured: Baseline and 5 months follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2011
- Primary completionDec 2012
- Study completionDec 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Adolescent Health ServicesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of North Carolina, Chapel HillThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 91 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- North Carolina Division of Public Health
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Amanda Dayton, MA, Principal investigator, DPH/WCH/ImmunizationAmy Grimshaw, MS, MSW, Principal investigator, DPH/WCH/ImmunizationNoel T Brewer, PhD, Study director, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01544764
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2011-3
- Acronym
- AFIX
- Status last verified
- Dec 2013
- First submitted
- 24 Feb 2012
- Last updated
- 18 Dec 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Gilkey MB, Dayton AM, Moss JL, Sparks AC, Grimshaw AH, Bowling JM, Brewer NT. Increasing provision of adolescent vaccines in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2014 Aug;134(2):e346-53. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-4257. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
PubMed 25002671Gilkey MB, Moss JL, Roberts AJ, Dayton AM, Grimshaw AH, Brewer NT. Comparing in-person and webinar delivery of an immunization quality improvement program: a process evaluation of the adolescent AFIX trial. Implement Sci. 2014 Feb 18;9:21. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-21.
PubMed 24533515
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Dec 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Examining Adolescent Assessment, Feedback, Incentive, and Exchange (AFIX)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01544764
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AFIX / 2011-3
- Conditions
- Adolescent Health Services, Immunization
- Keywords
- Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine, Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine, Meningococcal Vaccines, Hepatitis B Vaccines, Chickenpox Vaccine, Papillomavirus Vaccines
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 91 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel HillUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- North Carolina Division of Public Health
- Study start
- Apr 2011
- Primary completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The North Carolina Immunization Branch will evaluate the use of the CDC program to improve adolescent vaccination practices (called Assessment, Feedback, Incentives, and eXchanges, or AFIX). This evaluation is the first of its kind in the nation and may have a profound impact on prevention.
AFIX has four major components: 1) Assessment of a provider's current immunization practices and vaccination levels, 2) Feedback of the assessment results and strategies to improve coverage levels, 3) Incentives to improve coverage levels, and 4) eXchange of information and resources necessary to facilitate improvement.
This program will evaluate the effectiveness of AFIX visits on affecting provider practices to increase adolescent (age 11-18) immunization. Visits include discussion of that practice's immunization rates and strategies for improving rates. The investigators will compare the changes, from baseline to 5 months, in immunization for practices receiving virtual visits (webinars), in-person visits, and no visits (control group). Thirty practices will be randomly assigned to each intervention type. The main outcomes of this study are practice-wide uptake rates of several adolescent vaccines (Tdap, HPV, and MCV4) as well as pre- and post-AFIX visit surveys focusing on recall tactics utilized by each practice. Data will be collected on practices with at least 200 adolescent patients (note: there is no patient-level data collected in this study).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –This arm includes 30 health centers in North Carolina with at least 200 adolescent (age 11-18) patients. Practices in this arm were randomly assigned to receive no AFIX visit. |
| AFIX In-Person Visit | Experimental | Other: Assessment , Feedback, Incentives, and eXchange ProgramThis arm includes 30 health centers in North Carolina with at least 200 adolescent (age 11-18) patients. These practices received an in-person AFIX visit from a North Carolina Immunization Branch employee. Intervention: Other: Assessment , Feedback, Incentives, and eXchange Program |
| AFIX Webinar Visit | Experimental | Other: Assessment , Feedback, Incentives, and eXchange ProgramThis arm includes 31 health centers in North Carolina with at least 200 adolescent (age 11-18) patients. These practices received a webinar during which a North Carolina Immunization Branch employee completed the components of an AFIX visit. Intervention: Other: Assessment , Feedback, Incentives, and eXchange Program |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pediatric and/or family practices participating in the North Carolina Immunization Program
- A minimum of 200 active adolescent patients
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment , Feedback, Incentives, and eXchange ProgramThe NC Immunization Branch uses Adolescent AFIX (Assessment, Feedback, Incentives and eXchange) Program, a quality improvement strategy developed by the CDC to improve the immunization practices and vaccination coverage levels of public and private health care providers. It has four main components: 1) Assessment of a provider's current immunization practices and vaccination levels, 2) Feedback of the assessment results and strategies to improve coverage levels, 3) Incentives to improve coverage levels, and 4) eXchange of information and resources necessary to facilitate improvement. | Other | AFIX In-Person Visit, AFIX Webinar Visit |
Primary outcome
Change in Vaccination Rate: HPV vaccine initiation among 11-12 year olds
Time frame: Baseline and 5 months follow-up
We will gather practice-specific rates of coverage for adolescents (age 11-12) for the first dose of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine at baseline and 5 months follow-up.
7 secondary outcomes
Change in Vaccination Rate: HPV vaccine initiation among 13-18 year olds
Time frame: Baseline and 5 months follow-up
Change in Vaccination Rate: Tdap vaccine among 11-12 year olds
Time frame: Baseline and 5 months follow-up
Change in Vaccination Rate: Tdap vaccine among 13-18 year olds
Time frame: Baseline and 5 months follow-up
Change in Vaccination Rate: Meningitis vaccine among 11-12 year olds
Time frame: Baseline and 5 months follow-up
Change in Vaccination Rate: Meningitis vaccine among 13-18 year olds
Time frame: Baseline and 5 months follow-up
Change in Vaccination Rate: HPV vaccine completion among 11-12 year olds
Time frame: Baseline and 5 months follow-up
Change in Vaccination Rate: HPV vaccine completion among 13-18 year olds
Time frame: Baseline and 5 months follow-up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Dec 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25002671Gilkey MB, Dayton AM, Moss JL, Sparks AC, Grimshaw AH, Bowling JM, Brewer NT. Increasing provision of adolescent vaccines in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2014 Aug;134(2):e346-53. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-4257. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24533515Gilkey MB, Moss JL, Roberts AJ, Dayton AM, Grimshaw AH, Brewer NT. Comparing in-person and webinar delivery of an immunization quality improvement program: a process evaluation of the adolescent AFIX trial. Implement Sci. 2014 Feb 18;9:21. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-21.
Related trials for Adolescent Health Services
Recruiting
Estimating the Impact of Sexuality Education and Mobile Health Services on Reproductive Health and Empowerment Among Adolescents in Sierra Leone for the Family Planning Impact Lab
Reproductive Health, Sexual Health
Active, not recruiting
MEST : A School- Based Health Literacy Intervention Trial
Health Literacy, Adolescent Health
Not yet recruiting
QAIAx - SGI/SI Smart Health Cities: Microcity Enclave Program (Quantum SI/AGI Agency a/k/a AI City Hall Project - UPSTO App Nos. 64/074,526, 64/063,557, 64/105,164, 63/903,181, 63/729,428, 64/125,360; USPTO EO 9424 Assignment ID: 2101042 / ARN: REEL/FRAME: 76481/0026 - OUSD-R&E, Department of War)
Asperger's Disorder, Asperger Disorder
Recruiting
Socialization To Enrich Participation & Support Sexuality for Young People With I/DD
Knowledge, Behavior
Recruiting
Linking Youth to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Services
HIV, PrEP
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amanda Dayton, MA principal investigator
DPH/WCH/Immunization
Amy Grimshaw, MS, MSW principal investigator
DPH/WCH/Immunization
Noel T Brewer, PhD study director
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Assessment , Feedback, Incentives, and eXchange Program in people with Adolescent Health Services and Immunization, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Vaccination Rate: HPV vaccine initiation among 11-12 year olds (time frame: Baseline and 5 months follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01544764, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2013.