Binge DrinkingNCT01546025
Brief Alcohol Intervention for School-to-Work Transitions
A study testing Brief Motivational Counseling and Relaxation training in people with Binge Drinking, run by Brown University.
Trial summary
This is a 2-year research project to test the efficacy of brief motivational intervention for reducing heavy alcohol use in young adults transitioning out of high school. Participation occurs within 3 months prior to graduation or within 1 year following graduation or dropout from high school. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 17 to 20 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Binge Drinking
- What is being tested?
- Brief Motivational Counseling and Relaxation training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 168 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jun 2010to Oct 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 17 to 20 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- high school students anticipating graduation within 3 months, drop outs or graduates
- males must report at least one day drinking 5 or more standard drinks in past month
- females must report at least one day drinking 4 or more standard drinks in past month
Who cannot join
- plans to enroll at traditional 4-year college within 12 months
- plans to enter military within next 12 months
- plans to move more than 1 hour from current location in within 12 months
About this study
This is a 2-year research project to test the efficacy of brief motivational intervention for reducing heavy alcohol use in young adults transitioning out of high school. Participation occurs within 3 months prior to graduation or within 1 year following graduation or dropout from high school. Heavy drinkers ages 17-20 will be randomly assigned to receive one session of BMI or one session of relaxation training. All participants complete identical assessments at baseline and immediately post-intervention (during session 1). Participants also complete in-person 6-week and 3-month follow up assessments to evaluate intervention effects. Study aims involve: a) testing the comparative efficacy of BMI; b) identifying moderators (person-level predictors) of intervention response; and c) identifying mediators (mechanisms) of intervention effects, that is, how BMI exerts its effect on outcomes.
Read the detailed description
This study tested the efficacy of a single session of BMI for reducing heavy drinking and related adverse consequences among underage young adult drinkers not attending a 4-year college or university. We designed the intervention to be delivered proximal to the transition out of high school (with or without graduation), because such periods of transition and discontinuity in the life course present opportunities to positively alter developmental paths (Masten et al., 2009). Thus, interventions timed to co-occur with naturalistic transition points may have great potential for decreasing drinking trajectories or preventing harmful escalations in trajectories going forward. To increase the applicability of our findings to the heterogeneous population of community-dwelling young adults, our recruitment targeted a purposefully inclusive "non-4-year-college" population. We hypothesized that, compared to a time and attention-matched control condition (i.e., relaxation training [REL]), BMI would result in significantly reduced heavy drinking and reduced adverse consequences of alcohol use at 6-week and 3-month follow-up.
- Conditions
- Binge Drinking
- Being tested
- Brief Motivational Counseling, Relaxation training
- Medical subject headings
- Binge Drinking
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Brief Motivational CounselingBehavioural
Also called Brief Motivational Intervention, BMI
One hour session of brief motivational counseling focused on reduction of heavy drinking.
Relaxation trainingBehavioural
Also called REL
One hour training in relaxation techniques
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Relaxation training (REL) | Placebo comparator | This was a 1-hr behavioral counseling session designed to control for nonspecific therapeutic effects by providing equivalent levels of attention from and rapport with a counselor. It began with an introduction and rapport building. The counselor asked about the participant's daily stress level and strategies used to cope. Experience with meditation and relaxation were explored. The counselor presented a rationale for the use of REL for alcohol reduction, namely: the transition to adulthood can be stressful, and stress can lead to increased alcohol use; meditation and relaxation can reduce stress and thereby prevent excessive alcohol use. Didactic information about mental and physical stress and coping was provided. Two strategies were practiced: a simple, guided breathing meditation and a full-body progressive muscle relaxation. The session concluded with a review of the participant's experiences during the 2 exercises and a recommendation to practice the techniques regularly. Receives: Behavioral: Relaxation training |
| Brief Motivational Intervention (BMI) | Active comparator | This is a 1-hr motivational intervention session. The counselor built rapport while eliciting information about the participant's drinking, discussing current experiences, goals and plans in different domains (education, work, financial independence, social transitions, relationships). The counselor explored how drinking fit into the participant's life and explored risk and protective factors. The session involved: Assessing motivation; Enhancing motivation; Personalized feedback; Envisioning the future with/without change; Counselor summary; and Optional personalized change plan. Participant strengths, protective factors, and autonomy/ability to make changes were elicited and supported. Counselors used MI principles and techniques, including using open-ended questions, reflective listening, eliciting change talk, and supporting self-efficacy statements. Receives: Behavioral: Brief Motivational Counseling |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Timeline Follow Back Assessing Number of Standard Drinks
This is a calculation of the number of standard alcohol drinks consumed per week, based on data collected via the timeline follow back interview
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire
Measure of problem severity in young adult drinkers. Respondents indicated on the Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (BYAACQ; Kahler et al., 2005) whether they had experienced each of 24 adverse alcohol-related consequences in the prior 6 weeks; items are summed for a total score (Cronbach's α = 0.81 at BL), with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 24. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Measured: 6 week and 3 month follow ups
Help Seeking
Count of participants reporting receiving any type of counseling for alcohol in the prior 6 weeks
Measured: 6 week and 3 month follow ups
Drinking Reduction Strategies
Total score on the Strategies to Limit Drinking 31-item scale. Likert response for each item ranges from 1 = never to 5 = always; range = 31 to 155; higher scores indicate better outcomes: higher scores reflect greater frequency of using various strategies to deliberately limit one's drinking over the past 6 weeks
Measured: 6 week and 3 month follow ups
Employment Outcomes
Mean score on the "Your Workplace" questionnaire: Negative Effects on Work Performance subscale.
Range = 0 to 5. Response options for each item on the subscale are 0 = never; 1 = once or twice, 2 = about once every 2 weeks, 3 = about once a week, 4 = 2-4 times a week, 5 = about daily.
Higher scores indicate worse outcomes: Higher scores reflect more frequent negative effects of alcohol use on work performance in the past 6 weeks.
Measured: 6 week and 3 month follow ups
Satisfaction With Life
This is a mean score on the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), a 5-item instrument designed to measure global cognitive judgments of life satisfaction, using a 7-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree), with higher scores indicating better outcomes, i.e., higher scores indicate greater life satisfaction at the time of assessment. Range = 1 to 7.
Measured: 6 week and 3 month follow ups
Adolescent Reinforcement Survey Schedule (ARSS)
The ARSS contains a list of 45 rewarding activities. Participants rate the frequency with which they participate in each activity WITH and then WITHOUT alcohol/drug use, and then rate their enjoyment of each activity WITH and WITHOUT alcohol/drug use. The outcome measure represents the percentage of reinforcement participants get (i.e., the cross product of frequency X enjoyment) from activities involving alcohol/drug use divided by the total reinforcement they get from all activities with or without alcohol/drug use. Range = 0 to 100; higher scores indicate worse outcomes, i.e., higher scores reflect a greater percentage of enjoyable activities involving alcohol and/or use.
Measured: 6 week and 3 month follow ups
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2010
- Primary completionOct 2011
- Study completionOct 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Binge DrinkingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 168 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Brown University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Suzanne M. Colby, Brown University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01546025
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R01AA016000
- Other IDs
- R01AA016000
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 20 Feb 2012
- Last updated
- 12 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Colby SM, Orchowski L, Magill M, Murphy JG, Brazil LA, Apodaca TR, Kahler CW, Barnett NP. Brief Motivational Intervention for Underage Young Adult Drinkers: Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Jul;42(7):1342-1351. doi: 10.1111/acer.13770. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
PubMed 29750362
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Brief Alcohol Intervention for School-to-Work Transitions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01546025
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R01AA016000
- Conditions
- Binge Drinking
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 168 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Brown UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
- Study start
- Jun 2010
- Primary completion
- Oct 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Mar 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a 2-year research project to test the efficacy of brief motivational intervention for reducing heavy alcohol use in young adults transitioning out of high school. Participation occurs within 3 months prior to graduation or within 1 year following graduation or dropout from high school. Heavy drinkers ages 17-20 will be randomly assigned to receive one session of BMI or one session of relaxation training. All participants complete identical assessments at baseline and immediately post-intervention (during session 1). Participants also complete in-person 6-week and 3-month follow up assessments to evaluate intervention effects. Study aims involve: a) testing the comparative efficacy of BMI; b) identifying moderators (person-level predictors) of intervention response; and c) identifying mediators (mechanisms) of intervention effects, that is, how BMI exerts its effect on outcomes.
Detailed description
This study tested the efficacy of a single session of BMI for reducing heavy drinking and related adverse consequences among underage young adult drinkers not attending a 4-year college or university. We designed the intervention to be delivered proximal to the transition out of high school (with or without graduation), because such periods of transition and discontinuity in the life course present opportunities to positively alter developmental paths (Masten et al., 2009). Thus, interventions timed to co-occur with naturalistic transition points may have great potential for decreasing drinking trajectories or preventing harmful escalations in trajectories going forward. To increase the applicability of our findings to the heterogeneous population of community-dwelling young adults, our recruitment targeted a purposefully inclusive "non-4-year-college" population. We hypothesized that, compared to a time and attention-matched control condition (i.e., relaxation training [REL]), BMI would result in significantly reduced heavy drinking and reduced adverse consequences of alcohol use at 6-week and 3-month follow-up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Relaxation training (REL) | Placebo comparator | Behavioral: Relaxation trainingThis was a 1-hr behavioral counseling session designed to control for nonspecific therapeutic effects by providing equivalent levels of attention from and rapport with a counselor. It began with an introduction and rapport building. The counselor asked about the participant's daily stress level and strategies used to cope. Experience with meditation and relaxation were explored. The counselor presented a rationale for the use of REL for alcohol reduction, namely: the transition to adulthood can be stressful, and stress can lead to increased alcohol use; meditation and relaxation can reduce stress and thereby prevent excessive alcohol use. Didactic information about mental and physical stress and coping was provided. Two strategies were practiced: a simple, guided breathing meditation and a full-body progressive muscle relaxation. The session concluded with a review of the participant's experiences during the 2 exercises and a recommendation to practice the techniques regularly. |
| Brief Motivational Intervention (BMI) | Active comparator | Behavioral: Brief Motivational CounselingThis is a 1-hr motivational intervention session. The counselor built rapport while eliciting information about the participant's drinking, discussing current experiences, goals and plans in different domains (education, work, financial independence, social transitions, relationships). The counselor explored how drinking fit into the participant's life and explored risk and protective factors. The session involved: Assessing motivation; Enhancing motivation; Personalized feedback; Envisioning the future with/without change; Counselor summary; and Optional personalized change plan. Participant strengths, protective factors, and autonomy/ability to make changes were elicited and supported. Counselors used MI principles and techniques, including using open-ended questions, reflective listening, eliciting change talk, and supporting self-efficacy statements. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 17 to 20 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- high school students anticipating graduation within 3 months, drop outs or graduates
- males must report at least one day drinking 5 or more standard drinks in past month
- females must report at least one day drinking 4 or more standard drinks in past month
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- plans to enroll at traditional 4-year college within 12 months
- plans to enter military within next 12 months
- plans to move more than 1 hour from current location in within 12 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Brief Motivational CounselingAlso: Brief Motivational Intervention, BMIOne hour session of brief motivational counseling focused on reduction of heavy drinking. | Behavioural | Brief Motivational Intervention (BMI) |
| Relaxation trainingAlso: RELOne hour training in relaxation techniques | Behavioural | Relaxation training (REL) |
Primary outcome
Timeline Follow Back Assessing Number of Standard Drinks
Time frame: 3 months
This is a calculation of the number of standard alcohol drinks consumed per week, based on data collected via the timeline follow back interview
6 secondary outcomes
Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire
Time frame: 6 week and 3 month follow ups
Help Seeking
Time frame: 6 week and 3 month follow ups
Drinking Reduction Strategies
Time frame: 6 week and 3 month follow ups
Employment Outcomes
Time frame: 6 week and 3 month follow ups
Satisfaction With Life
Time frame: 6 week and 3 month follow ups
Adolescent Reinforcement Survey Schedule (ARSS)
Time frame: 6 week and 3 month follow ups
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jun 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 29750362Colby SM, Orchowski L, Magill M, Murphy JG, Brazil LA, Apodaca TR, Kahler CW, Barnett NP. Brief Motivational Intervention for Underage Young Adult Drinkers: Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Jul;42(7):1342-1351. doi: 10.1111/acer.13770. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
Related trials for Binge Drinking
Recruiting
Multisensory Processing of Alcohol Cues in Young Adult Binge Drinkers
Drinking, Binge
Recruiting
Understanding the Associations Between Romantic Relationship Conflict, Psychophysiological Responding and Alcohol Misuse Among Emerging Adults
Heavy Episodic Drinking
Recruiting
Preliminary Trial of an Avatar Guided Digital Intervention for Emerging Adults
Binge Alcohol Consumption, Suicidal Ideation
Recruiting
Reset Challenge: Reducing High-risk Drinking for Cancer Prevention
Alcohol Drinking, Heavy Drinking
Recruiting
Text-Based Messaging Strategies for Preventing Subsequent Problematic Alcohol Use
Alcohol Drinking, Binge Drinking
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Brief Motivational Counseling and Relaxation training in people with Binge Drinking, run by Brown University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Timeline Follow Back Assessing Number of Standard Drinks (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01546025, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2025.