AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Myeloid LeukemiaPhase 2NCT01546038

A Study To Evaluate PF-04449913 With Chemotherapy In Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome

A Phase 2 study testing PF-04449913, Low dose ARA-C (LDAC) and Decitabine in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by Pfizer at 81 sites in 6 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a study to evaluate PF-04449913 (an inhibitor of the Hedgehog pathway) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and high-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome in combination with standard agents used to treat these diseases. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
What is being tested?
PF-04449913, Low dose ARA-C (LDAC) and Decitabine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
255 participants
Where
81 sitesin 6 countries
Study dates
27 Jun 2012to 4 Mar 2019
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with AML or RAEB 2 High Risk MDS who are newly diagnosed according to the WHO 2008 Classification and previously untreated.
  • Patients with AML (arising from an antecedent hematologic disease [AHD]) or MDS who may have had one prior regimen with commercially available agents for the treatment of their prior hematologic disease. The patients may not have had a prior therapy for their AML.
  • AML patients include de novo AML, AML evolving from MDS or other AHD and AML after previous cytotoxic therapy or radiation (secondary AML)
  • For a diagnosis of AML, a bone marrow blast count of 20% or more is required.
  • For a diagnosis of high-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome RAEB 2 the patient must have 10-19% bone marrow blasts
  • Adequate Organ Function
  • ECOG Performance Status 0, 1, or 2

Who cannot join

  • AML M3 Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL) or patients with a t(9:22) cytogenetic translocation.
  • Patients with known active uncontrolled central nervous system (CNS) leukemia.

Trial locations and contacts

81 sites in 6 countries.

81 sites in 6 countries

United States52 sites
  • University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center Clinical Trials Office

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-2800

  • University of Michigan Health System

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • Emory University Hospital

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Investigational Drug Service, Emory University Clinic

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • The Emory Clinic

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • University of Colorado Denver

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • University of Colorado Hospital

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35249-6909

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35249

  • Tufts Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02111

  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Brigham and Women's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI)

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute

    Buffalo, New York, 14263

  • Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Northwestern Medicine Developmental Therapeutics Institute

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • The University of Chicago Medical Center

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • The University of Chicago's Medical Center

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • Cleveland Clinic Cancer Institute

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Siteman Cancer Center - West County

    Creve Coeur, Missouri, 63141

  • University of Kansas Clinical Research Center

    Fairway, Kansas, 66205

  • Hackensack University Medical Center

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

  • John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack University Medical Center

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

  • The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • University of Kansas Hospital

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66160

  • UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center - Investigational Drug Services

    La Jolla, California, 92037-0845

  • UC San Diego Medical Center - La Jolla

    La Jolla, California, 92037

  • UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center

    La Jolla, California, 92093-0698

  • Keck Hospital of USC

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • LAC & USC Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center / Investigational Drug Services

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center Drug Information Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • UCLA Drug lnformation/lnvestigational Drugs

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • UCLA Hematology/Oncology Clinic

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • Centennial Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203

  • Sarah Cannon Research Institute

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203

  • Tennessee Oncology, PLLC

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203

  • UC San Diego Medical Center - Hillcrest

    San Diego, California, 92103

  • University of Washington-Seattle Cancer Care Alliance

    Seattle, Washington, 98109

  • University of Washington Medical Center

    Seattle, Washington, 98195

  • Barnes Jewish Hospital North Campus

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Barnes-Jewish Hospital

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Washington University School of Medicine - Division of Bone Marrow Transplant & Leukemia

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Washington University School of Medicine, Siteman Cancer Center

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • H.Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

  • University of Kansas Cancer Center and Medical Pavilion

    Westwood, Kansas, 66205

Other trials in United States

Germany11 sites
  • Charite -Universitatsmedizin Berlin - Campus Benjamin Franklin

    Berlin, 12203

  • Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin

    Berlin, 13353

  • Johann Wolfgang Goethe University

    Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60590

  • Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

    Hamburg, 20246

  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

    Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30625

  • Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein

    Kiel, 24105

  • Universitaetsklinikum Magdeburg A.oe.R.

    Magdeburg, 39120

  • Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz

    Mainz, 55131

  • Universitaetsklinikum Muenster

    Münster, 48149

  • Universitaetsklinikum Ulm

    Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, 89081

  • Universitaetsklinikum Ulm

    Ulm, 89081

Other trials in Germany

Spain8 sites
  • Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol

    Badalona, Barcelona, 08916

  • Hospital del Mar

    Barcelona, 08003

  • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

    Barcelona, 08025

  • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron

    Barcelona, 08035

  • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona

    Barcelona, 08036

  • Hospital Ramon y Cajal

    Madrid, 28034

  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio

    Seville, Andalusia, 41013

  • Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe

    Valencia, 46026

Other trials in Spain

Italy5 sites
  • Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi

    Bologna, Province OF Bologna, 40138

  • ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda

    Milan, 20162

  • Policlinico Universitario "Umberto I" Universita degli Studi "La Sapienza" Sezione di Ematologia

    Rome, 00161

  • A.O. Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - S.C. Ematologia

    Torino, 10126

  • Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine

    Udine, 33100

Other trials in Italy

Poland3 sites
  • Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne Gdanskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego

    Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, 80-952

  • Oddzial Hematologii Z pododzialem chemioterapii-Klinika Hematologii Wojewodzkie Wielospecjalistyczne

    Lodz, 93-513

  • Dolnoslaskie Centrum Transplantacji Komorkowych z Krajowym Bankiem Dawcow Szpiku

    Wroclaw, 53-439

Other trials in Poland

Canada2 sites
  • Centre de Sante et de Services Sociaux (CSSS) Champlain - Charles-Le Moyne

    Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2H1

  • Juravinski Cancer Centre @ Hamilton Health Sciences

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A PHASE 1B/2 STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PF-04449913, AN ORAL HEDGEHOG INHIBITOR, IN COMBINATION WITH INTENSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY, LOW DOSE ARA-C OR DECITABINE IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA OR HIGH-RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME

This is a study to evaluate PF-04449913 (an inhibitor of the Hedgehog pathway) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and high-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome in combination with standard agents used to treat these diseases.

Being tested
PF-04449913, Low dose ARA-C (LDAC), Decitabine, Daunorubicin, Cytarabine
Keywords
Hedgehog Inhibitor, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic syndrome, Intensive chemotherapy, LDAC, glasdegib
Medical subject headings
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Myelodysplastic Syndromes

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PF-04449913Drug

    PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28-days.

  • Low dose ARA-C (LDAC)Drug

    Low dose ARA-C (LDAC) administered at 20 mg SQ, BID on Days 1 through 10.

  • PF-04449913Drug

    PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28 days.

  • DecitabineDrug

    Decitabine given at 20 mg/m2 over 1 hour infusion for 5-days

  • PF-04449913Drug

    PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28 days

  • DaunorubicinDrug

    Daunorubicin given using 60 mg/m2 for 3-days

  • CytarabineDrug

    Cytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 7

  • PF-04449913Drug

    PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28 days

  • DaunorubicinDrug

    Daunorubicin given using 60 mg/m2 for 3-days

  • CytarabineDrug

    Cytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 7

  • PF-04449913Drug

    PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28 days (if randomized to receive PF-04449913)

  • Low dose ARA-C (LDAC)Drug

    Low dose ARA-C (LDAC) administered at 20 mg SQ, BID on Days 1 through 10.

Study groups in NCT01546038
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm A (Phase 1B)ExperimentalPF-04449913 in combination with low dose ARA-C (LDAC)
Receives: Drug: PF-04449913; Drug: Low dose ARA-C (LDAC)
Arm B (Phase 1B)ExperimentalPF-04449913 in combination with Decitabine
Receives: Drug: PF-04449913; Drug: Decitabine
Arm C (Phase 1B)ExperimentalPF-04449913 in combination with intensive chemotherapy: PF-04449913 administered continuously for 28 days. Daunorubicin given using 60 mg/m2 for 3-days together with cytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 7 followed by cytarabine 1g/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5 during 2-4 cycles of consolidation therapy.
Receives: Drug: PF-04449913; Drug: Daunorubicin; Drug: Cytarabine
P2 Fit (Phase 2 Single Arm)ExperimentalPF-04449913 in combination with intensive chemotherapy: PF-04449913 administered continuously for 28 days. Daunorubicin given using 60 mg/m2 for 3-days together with cytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 7 followed by cytarabine 1g/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5 during 2-4 cycles of consolidation therapy.
Receives: Drug: PF-04449913; Drug: Daunorubicin; Drug: Cytarabine
P2 Unfit (Phase 2 Randomized)OtherPatients will be randomized 2:1 (low dose ARA-C in combination with PF-04449913: low dose ARA-C alone).
Receives: Drug: PF-04449913; Drug: Low dose ARA-C (LDAC)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs) at Phase 1B

    A DLT was any of the following adverse events (AEs) in Cycle 1 and considered by the investigator possibly related to glasdegib in combination with chemotherapy: (1) Grade >= 3 non-hematologic toxicity, excluding Grade >= 3 infection, fever (including febrile neutropenia), infusion related AEs, electrolyte abnormalities and ALT/AST elevation that returned to Grade <= 1 or baseline within 7 days; (2) prolonged myelosuppression that lasted longer than 42 days from the point of detection, defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 500/microliter(mcL) or platelet count < 10 *10^9/L with a normal bone marrow (<5% blasts and no evidence of disease or dysplasia); (3) inability to deliver at least 80% of the planned study doses for all agents in a combination due to non-hematologic toxicities; (4) Delay of >28 days in receiving the next scheduled cycle due to persisting non-hematologic toxicities. Arm A: Glasdegib+LDAC; Arm B: Glasdegib+Decitabine; Arm C: Glasdegib+Cytarabine/Daunorubicin.

    Measured: Arms A and B: Cycle 1, Day 1 to Day 28; Arm C: Cycle 1, Day -3 to Day 21 or to Day 28 depending on when the next chemotherapy cycle was started

  2. Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at Phase 2 Fit

    For AML participants:CR were those with repeat bone marrow showing <5% myeloblasts,spicules present and no Auer rods, peripheral blood showing neutrophils>=1000/mcL and platelets>=100,000/mcL, transfusion independent and no extramedullary disease. For MDS participants:CR were those with repeat bone marrow showing <=5% myeloblasts, peripheral blood showing neutrophils>=1000/mcL, platelets>=100,000/mcL, 0% blast and hemoglobin (Hgb)>= 11 g/dL, normal maturation of all cell lines.

    Measured: 4 years

  3. Overall Survival (OS) at Phase 2 Unfit

    OS was defined as duration from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate median OS. In this method, every participant had a follow-up time which was associated with an indicator, 1=event (death in our case), and 0 =censored. If the participants were not known to have died, time to date of last known to be alive was used as to calculate the follow-up time and indicator was 0 for these participants. KM method estimates the median OS based on the K-M curve. The K-M curve only drops when we had an event and censor data are the ticks in the graph. To estimate median OS, the K-M curve usually will be smoothed first and a line will be drawn at 50%. The median OS is the point when K-M curve and the horizontal hit. Survival status was collected every month for the first 2 months after discontinuation of study treatment and thereafter every 2 months until death or 4 years from time of randomization for each participant.

    Measured: Randomization to Follow-up (4 years)

Secondary outcomes (67)
  1. Overall Survival (OS) at Phase 1B

    OS was defined as duration from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate median OS. In this method, every participant had a follow-up time which was associated with an indicator, 1=event (death in our case), and 0 =censored. If the participants were not known to have died, time to date of last known to be alive was used as to calculate the follow-up time and indicator was 0 for these participants. KM method estimates the median OS based on the K-M curve. The K-M curve only drops when we had an event and censor data are the ticks in the graph. To estimate median OS, the K-M curve usually will be smoothed first and a line will be drawn at 50%. The median OS is the point when K-M curve and the horizontal hit. Survival status was collected every month for the first 2 months after discontinuation of study treatment and thereafter every 2 months until death or 4 years from each participant's first dose.

    Measured: First dose to Follow-up (4 years)

  2. Overall Survival (OS) at Phase 2 Fit

    OS was defined as duration from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate median OS. In this method, every participant had a follow-up time which was associated with an indicator, 1=event (death in our case), and 0 =censored. If the participants were not known to have died, time to date of last known to be alive was used as to calculate the follow-up time and indicator was 0 for these participants. KM method estimates the median OS based on the K-M curve. The K-M curve only drops when we had an event and censor data are the ticks in the graph. To estimate median OS, the K-M curve usually will be smoothed first and a line will be drawn at 50%. The median OS is the point when K-M curve and the horizontal hit. Survival status was collected every month for the first 2 months after discontinuation of study treatment and thereafter every 2 months until death or 4 years from each participant's first dose.

    Measured: First dose to Follow-up (4 years)

  3. Percentage of Participants With CR / Complete Response With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi) at Phase 1B

    For AML participants:CR were those with repeat bone marrow showing <5% myeloblasts,spicules present and no Auer rods, peripheral blood showing neutrophils>=1000/mcL and platelets>=100,000/mcL, transfusion independent and no extramedullary disease. For MDS participants:CR were those with repeat bone marrow showing <=5% myeloblasts, peripheral blood showing neutrophils>=1000/mcL, platelets>=100,000/mcL, 0% blast and hemoglobin (Hgb)>= 11 g/dL, normal maturation of all cell lines.For AML and MDS participants, complete response with incomplete blood count recovery(CRi)were those with repeat bone marrow showing <5% myeloblasts with either platelets or neutrophils not recovered (platelets <100,000/mcL or neutrophils <1000/mcL).

    Measured: 4 years

  4. Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at Phase 2 Unfit

    For AML participants:CR were those with repeat bone marrow showing <5% myeloblasts,spicules present and no Auer rods, peripheral blood showing neutrophils>=1000/mcL and platelets>=100,000/mcL, transfusion independent and no extramedullary disease. For MDS participants:CR were those with repeat bone marrow showing <=5% myeloblasts, peripheral blood showing neutrophils>=1000/mcL, platelets>=100,000/mcL, 0% blast and hemoglobin (Hgb)>= 11 g/dL, normal maturation of all cell lines.

    Measured: 4 years

  5. Percentage of Participants With Disease-specific Efficacy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit

    AML participants,disease specific efficacy measures included:CRi;Morphologic Leukemia Free State(MLFS)(bone marrow<5%myeloblasts with spicules and no blasts with auer rods,neutrophils<1000/mcL and platelets<100,000/mcL);partial remission(PR)(bone marrow myeloblasts decrease to 5-25\&>=50%decrease from start, neutrophils>=1000/mcL, platelets>=100,000/mcL);PR with incomplete blood count recovery(PRi)(bone marrow myeloblasts decrease to 5-25\&>=50%decrease from start,neutrophils<1000/mcL or platelets<100,000/mcL);minor response(MR)(bone marrow myeloblasts decrease to>=25% from start);stable disease(SD)(bone marrow myeloblasts stable+/-25% from screening value);cytogenetic complete response(CRc)(bone marrow<5%myeloblasts, neutrophils>1000/mcL, platelets>100,000/mcL and normal cytogenetics),molecular complete response(CRm)(bone marrow<5%myeloblasts, neutrophils>1000/mcL, platelets>100,000/mcL and molecular-negative).

    Measured: 4 years

  6. Percentage of Participants With Disease-specific Efficacy for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit

    For all MDS participants, disease specific efficacy measures included: CRi (bone marrow showing <5% myeloblasts with platelets <100,000/mcL or neutrophils <1000/mcL, including confirmed and unconfirmed responses); PR (repeat bone marrow myeloblasts showing decreased by >= 50% decrease but still >5%, peripheral blood showing neutrophils >= 1,000/mcL, platelets >= 100,000/mcL and Hgb>=11g/dL; including confirmed and unconfirmed responses); SD (including confirmed and unconfirmed responses, failure to achieve PR and no evidence of progression for >8 weeks); marrow complete response (mCR) (bone marrow showing <=5% myeloblasts and decreased by >= 50%), partial cytogenetic response (>=50% reduction of chromosomal abnormality) and complete cytogenetic response (CRc) (disappearance of chromosomal abnormality with no appearance of now ones).

    Measured: 4 years

  7. Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21

  8. Time to Cmax (Tmax) of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21

  9. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21

  10. Cmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 2/Day 1

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2/Day 1

  11. Tmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 2/Day 1

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2/Day 1

  12. AUCtau of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 2/Day 1

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2/Day 1

  13. Cmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3 and Day 10

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10

  14. Tmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3 and Day 10

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10

  15. AUCtau of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3 and Day 10

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10

  16. Cmax of LDAC and Ara-U in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10

    Ara-U is the major metabolite of cytarabine. LDAC (low dose cytarabine) is rapidly degraded to the stable metabolite Ara-U, Cmax levels of both LDAC and Ara-U were reported.

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10

  17. Tmax of LDAC and Ara-U in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10

    Ara-U is the major metabolite of cytarabine. LDAC (low dose cytarabine) is rapidly degraded to the stable metabolite Ara-U, Tmax levels of both LDAC and Ara-U were reported.

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10

  18. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to Infinity (AUCinf) of LDAC in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10

  19. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of LDAC and Ara-U in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10

    Ara-U is the major metabolite of cytarabine. LDAC (low dose cytarabine) is rapidly degraded to the stable metabolite Ara-U. Area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) levels of both LDAC and Ara-U were reported.

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10

  20. Cmax of Decitabine in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour from start of infusion, 1 hour (at end of infusion) and 2, 3 and 4 hours from start of infusion on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2

  21. Tmax of Decitabine in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour from start of infusion, 1 hour (at end of infusion) and 2, 3 and 4 hours from start of infusion on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2

  22. AUCinf of Decitabine in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour from start of infusion, 1 hour (at end of infusion) and 2, 3 and 4 hours from start of infusion on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2

  23. AUCtau of Cytarabine and Ara-U in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

    Ara-U is the major metabolite of cytarabine. LDAC (low dose cytarabine) is rapidly degraded to the stable metabolite Ara-U, levels of both cytarabine and Ara-U were reported.

    Measured: Pre-dose, 6 and 24 hours post start of cytarabine infusion on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

  24. Cmax of Daunorubicin and Daunorubicinol in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

    Daunorubicinol is the major metabolite of daunorubicin, which has anti-neoplastic activity. Cmax values of daunorubicin and daunorubicinol are reported.

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post administration of daunorubicin on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

  25. Tmax of Daunorubicin and Daunorubicinol in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

    Daunorubicinol is the major metabolite of daunorubicin, which has anti-neoplastic activity. Tmax values of daunorubicin and daunorubicinol are reported.

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post administration of daunorubicin on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

  26. AUCtau of Daunorubicin and Daunorubicinol in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

    Daunorubicinol is the major metabolite of daunorubicin, which has anti-neoplastic activity. AUCtau values of daunorubicin and daunorubicinol are reported.

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post administration of daunorubicin on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

  27. Pre-dose Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Glasdegib in Phase 2 Fit on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10

    Measured: Pre-dose, 1 and 4 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10

  28. Cmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 2 Unfit on Cycle 1/Day 10

    Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hour post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10

  29. Tmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 2 Unfit on Cycle 1/Day 10

    Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hour post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10

  30. AUCtau of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 2 Unfit on Cycle 1/Day 10

    Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hour post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10

  31. Number of Participants With Disease-related Gene Mutations at Phase 1B

    Peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate were collected for baseline mutational analyses. Genetic abnormalities frequently associated with AML were analyzed. These genetic abnormalities included known mutations in the genes NPM1, CEBPA, FLT3, RUNX1, IDH1, IDH2, KIT, K Ras, N Ras and WT1. Additional genes with mutations known to be associated with AML and MDS such as TET2 and DNMT3A were also evaluated.

    Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose for Glasdegib + LDAC and Glasdegib + Decitabine Arms; Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose for Glasdegib +Cytarabine/Daunorubicin Arm)

  32. Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 1B - Baseline

    Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Values showing statistically significant, ≥2-fold difference compared with baseline are reported here.

    Measured: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose)

  33. Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 1B - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

    Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Values showing statistically significant, ≥2-fold difference compared with baseline are reported here. Statistically significant, >=2-fold baseline difference was only seen for MMP-3 (Matrix metalloproteinase-3) at Induction Cycle 1/Day 3.

    Measured: Induction Cycle 1/Day 3, 1 Hour Post dose

  34. Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 1B - Induction Cycle 1/Day 10

    Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Values showing statistically significant, ≥2-fold difference compared with baseline are reported here.

    Measured: Induction Cycle 1/Day 10, 1 Hour Post dose

  35. Baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 1B

    Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. The data of analytes for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response in Arm C are reported. Baseline levels statistically associated with best overall response was only seen in SDF-1 (stromal cell-derived factor 1) in glasdegib+cytarabine/daunorubicin arm.

    Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose for Glasdegib + LDAC and Glasdegib + Decitabine Arms; Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose for Glasdegib +Cytarabine/Daunorubicin Arm)

  36. Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 1B - Induction Cycle 1/Lead-In

    Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. The data of analytes for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. Post-baseline levels statistically significant associated with best overall response was only seen for MMP-3 (Matrix metalloproteinase-3) at Induction Cycle 1/Lead-in.

    Measured: Induction Cycle 1/Lead-in, 1 Hour Post dose

  37. Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 1B - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

    Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. The data of analytes for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. Post-baseline levels statistically significant associated with best overall response was only seen for SDF-1 (Stromal cell-derived factor 1) at Induction Cycle 1/Day 3.

    Measured: Induction Cycle 1/Day 3, 1 Hour Post dose

  38. Number of Participants With Disease-related Gene Mutations at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit

    Peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate were collected for baseline mutational analyses. Genetic abnormalities frequently associated with AML were analyzed. These genetic abnormalities included known mutations in the genes NPM1, CEBPA, FLT3, RUNX1, IDH1, IDH2, KIT, K Ras, N Ras and WT1. Additional genes with mutations known to be associated with AML and MDS such as TET2 and DNMT3A were also evaluated.

    Measured: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose for Phase 2 Fit; Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose for Phase 2 Unfit)

  39. Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

    Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected values showing statistically significant difference compared with baseline are reported here.

    Measured: Induction Cycle 1/Day 3, 1 Hour Post dose

  40. Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 10

    Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected values showing statistically significant difference compared with baseline are reported here.

    Measured: Induction Cycle 1/Day 10, 1 Hour Post dose

  41. Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - Consolidation Cycle 1/Day 1

    Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected values showing statistically significant difference compared with baseline are reported here.

    Measured: Consolidation Cycle 1/Day 1, 1 Hour Post dose

  42. Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - Consolidation Cycle 1/Day 10

    Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected values showing statistically significant difference compared with baseline are reported here.

    Measured: Consolidation Cycle 1/Day 10, Pre-dose

  43. Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - End of Treatment

    Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected values showing statistically significant difference compared with baseline are reported here.

    Measured: End of Treatment (maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first, an average of 1 year)

  44. Baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit

    Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. Selected data of analyte for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported.

    Measured: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose)

  45. Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

    Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. Selected data of analyte for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported.

    Measured: Induction Cycle 1/Day 3, 1 Hour Post dose

  46. Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 10

    Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. Selected data of analyte for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported.

    Measured: Induction Cycle 1/Day 10, 1 Hour Post dose

  47. Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit - End of Treatment

    Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. Selected data of analytes for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported.

    Measured: End of Treatment (maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first, an average of 1 year)

  48. Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Unfit - Cycle 1/Day 1

    Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected value showing statistically significant difference compared with baseline is reported here.

    Measured: Cycle 1/Day 1, 1 Hour Post dose

  49. Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Unfit - Cycle 1/Day 10

    Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected values showing statistically significant differences compared with baseline are reported here. ITAC (Interferon-inducible T-cell α chemoattractant) level in LDAC alone arm at Cycle 1/Day 10 exhibited non-significant change from baseline but similar trends as in Glasdegib 100 mg+LDAC arm.

    Measured: Cycle 1/Day 10, Pre-dose

  50. Baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Unfit

    Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. The data of analytes for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported.

    Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose)

  51. Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Unfit - Cycle 1/Day 1

    Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. Selected data of analytes for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported.

    Measured: Cycle 1/Day 1, 1 Hour Post-dose

  52. Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Unfit - End of Treatment

    Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. Selected data of analyte for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported.

    Measured: End of Treatment (maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first, an average of 1 year)

  53. Ratios of mRNA Levels to Baseline at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

    Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Values showing statistically significant, ≥2-fold differences compared with baseline are reported here. CDKN1A: cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A; SMO: mRNA encoding the glasdegib target Smoothened; PTCH2: Patched 2; MYCN: Neuroblastoma Myc oncogene.

    Measured: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose); Induction Cycle 1/Day 3, 1 Hour Post dose

  54. Ratios of mRNA Levels to Baseline at Phase 2 Fit - End of Treatment

    Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Selected values showing statistically significant differences compared with baseline are reported here. CCND2:G1/S-Specific Cyclin D2; MSI2: Musashi RNA Binding Protein 2; PTCH2: Patched 2.

    Measured: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose); End of Treatment (maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first, an average of 1 year)

  55. Ratios of mRNA Levels to Baseline at Phase 2 Unfit - End of Treatment

    Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Only the analytes showing statistically significant change from baseline are reported here.

    Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose); End of Treatment (maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first, an average of 1 year)

  56. Baseline mRNA Levels Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit

    Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Baseline mRNA level showing statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. Baseline mRNA levels statistically significant associated with best overall response was only seen for CCND2 (G1/S-Specific Cyclin D2).

    Measured: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose)

  57. Baseline mRNA Levels Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Unfit

    Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Baseline mRNA level showing statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. FOXM1: Forkhead box M1; PTCH1: Patched 1.

    Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose)

  58. Ratios of mRNA Levels to Baseline Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit

    Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Ratios of mRNA level to baseline showing statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported.

    Measured: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose); End of Treatment (maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first, an average of 1 year)

  59. Ratios of mRNA Levels Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Unfit

    Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Ratios of mRNA level to baseline showing statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. Ratios of mRNA levels to baseline statistically significant associated with best overall response was only seen for MYCN (Neuroblastoma Myc oncogene) at Cycle 1/Day 1.

    Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose); Cycle 1/Day 1, 1 Hour Post dose

  60. Number of Participants With Corrected QT Interval Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Values Meeting Predefined Criteria at Phase 1B

    Maximum absolute values and increases from baseline were summarized for QTcF interval (time from the beginning of Q wave to the end of T wave corresponding to electrical systole corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula). Number of participants with QTcF meeting the following criteria is presented: QTcF interval:<450 msec; QTcF interval: 450 to <480 msec; QTcF interval: 480 to <500 msec; QTcF interval >=500 msec; QTcF interval increase from baseline: <30 msec; QTcF interval increase from baseline: 30 to <60 msec; QTcF interval increase from baseline >=60 msec. Arms in the time frame description are defined as: Arm A, Glasdegib +LDAC; Arm B, Glasdegib + Decitabine; Arm C, Glasdegib + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin. End of treatment in the time frame were defined as: maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first.

    Measured: 1 year

  61. Number of Participants With Corrected QT Interval Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Values Meeting Predefined Criteria at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit

    Maximum absolute values and increases from baseline were summarized for QTcF interval (time from the beginning of Q wave to the end of T wave corresponding to electrical systole corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula). Number of participants with QTcF meeting the following criteria is presented:QTcF interval:<450 msec; QTcF interval: 450 to <480 msec; QTcF interval: 480 to <500 msec; QTcF interval >=500 msec; QTcF interval increase from baseline: <30 msec; QTcF interval increase from baseline: 30 to <60 msec; QTcF interval increase from baseline >=60 msec. End of treatment in the time frame were defined as: maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first.

    Measured: 1 year

  62. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) at Phase 1B (All Causality)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Treatment Emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study medication and occurred within 28 days post last dose. AEs were graded by the investigator according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 : Grade 1: mild AE; Grade 2: moderate AE; Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.

    Measured: 4 years

  63. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs at Phase 1B (Treatment-related)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Treatment Emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study medication and occurred within 28 days post last dose. Treatment-related AEs were AEs related to glasdegib and/or backbone chemotherapy. AEs were graded by the investigator according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 : Grade 1: mild AE; Grade 2: moderate AE; Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.

    Measured: 4 years

  64. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs Categorized by Seriousness at Phase 1B

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Treatment Emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study medication and occurred within 28 days post last dose. An serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death; was life threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect.

    Measured: 4 years

  65. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit (All Causality)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Treatment Emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study medication and occurred within 28 days post last dose. AEs were graded by the investigator according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 : Grade 1: mild AE; Grade 2: moderate AE; Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.

    Measured: 4 years

  66. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit (Treatment-related)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Treatment Emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study medication and occurred within 28 days post last dose. Treatment-related AEs were AEs related to glasdegib and/or backbone chemotherapy. AEs were graded by the investigator according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 : Grade 1: mild AE; Grade 2: moderate AE; Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.

    Measured: 4 years

  67. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs Categorized by Seriousness at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Treatment Emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study medication and occurred within 28 days post last dose. An serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death; was life threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect.

    Measured: 4 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Mar 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study start27 Jun 2012
  3. Primary completion3 Jan 2017
  4. Study completion4 Mar 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
255 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01546038
Sponsor's protocol ID
B1371003
Other IDs
2012-000684-24
Status last verified
Feb 2020
First submitted
1 Mar 2012
Last updated
3 Mar 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Publications

  • Heuser M, Smith BD, Fiedler W, Sekeres MA, Montesinos P, Leber B, Merchant A, Papayannidis C, Perez-Simon JA, Hoang CJ, O'Brien T, Ma WW, Zeremski M, O'Connell A, Chan G, Cortes JE. Clinical benefit of glasdegib plus low-dose cytarabine in patients with de novo and secondary acute myeloid leukemia: long-term analysis of a phase II randomized trial. Ann Hematol. 2021 May;100(5):1181-1194. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04465-4. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

    PubMed 33740113
  • Lin S, Shaik N, Chan G, Cortes JE, Ruiz-Garcia A. An evaluation of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia and the relationship with glasdegib treatment and exposure. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020 Oct;86(4):451-459. doi: 10.1007/s00280-020-04132-x. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

    PubMed 32885274
  • Cortes JE, Heidel FH, Fiedler W, Smith BD, Robak T, Montesinos P, Candoni A, Leber B, Sekeres MA, Pollyea DA, Ferdinand R, Ma WW, O'Brien T, O'Connell A, Chan G, Heuser M. Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2020 Jul 14;13(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00929-8.

    PubMed 32664995
  • Cortes JE, Heidel FH, Hellmann A, Fiedler W, Smith BD, Robak T, Montesinos P, Pollyea DA, DesJardins P, Ottmann O, Ma WW, Shaik MN, Laird AD, Zeremski M, O'Connell A, Chan G, Heuser M. Randomized comparison of low dose cytarabine with or without glasdegib in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia. 2019 Feb;33(2):379-389. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0312-9. Epub 2018 Dec 16.

    PubMed 30555165
  • Cortes JE, Douglas Smith B, Wang ES, Merchant A, Oehler VG, Arellano M, DeAngelo DJ, Pollyea DA, Sekeres MA, Robak T, Ma WW, Zeremski M, Naveed Shaik M, Douglas Laird A, O'Connell A, Chan G, Schroeder MA. Glasdegib in combination with cytarabine and daunorubicin in patients with AML or high-risk MDS: Phase 2 study results. Am J Hematol. 2018 Nov;93(11):1301-1310. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25238. Epub 2018 Sep 9.

    PubMed 30074259
  • Savona MR, Pollyea DA, Stock W, Oehler VG, Schroeder MA, Lancet J, McCloskey J, Kantarjian HM, Ma WW, Shaik MN, Laird AD, Zeremski M, O'Connell A, Chan G, Cortes JE. Phase Ib Study of Glasdegib, a Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitor, in Combination with Standard Chemotherapy in Patients with AML or High-Risk MDS. Clin Cancer Res. 2018 May 15;24(10):2294-2303. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2824. Epub 2018 Feb 20.

    PubMed 29463550

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing PF-04449913, Low dose ARA-C (LDAC) and Decitabine in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by Pfizer at 81 sites in 6 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 81 sites in United States, Germany, Spain, Italy, Poland and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 May 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs) at Phase 1B (time frame: Arms A and B: Cycle 1, Day 1 to Day 28; Arm C: Cycle 1, Day -3 to Day 21 or to Day 28 depending on when the next chemotherapy cycle was started). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01546038, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in