AzTrials
AzTrials

Ventricular TachycardiaSTRATUM VTNCT01546207

Stepwise Approach To sUbstrate Modification for Ventricular Tachycardia

A study testing catheter-based ablation in people with Ventricular Tachycardia and Catheter Ablation, run by Vivek Reddy at 10 sites in 5 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this trial is to test the impact of a step-wise approach for catheter ablation of recurrent ventricular tachycardia, (irregular heart rhythms that originate in the bottom chambers of the heart), in patients with a previous heart attack for whom catheter ablation is clinically indicated. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
What is being tested?
catheter-based ablation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
4 participants
Where
10 sitesin 5 countries
Study dates
Sep 2011to Aug 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 to 90 years.
  • History of coronary artery disease.
  • Presence of, or planned for, an ICD prior to discharge.
  • Presentation for management of ICD shock/ATP therapy or monomorphic ventricular tachycardia.

Who cannot join

  • Ventricular arrhythmia not thought to be due to CAD.
  • Unstable angina
  • CVA within 30 days.
  • Protruding left ventricular thrombus or critical aortic stenosis on pre-ablation echocardiography
  • Pregnancy
  • Any condition resulting in an absolute contraindication to anticoagulation
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Inability to follow-up at ICD clinic.
  • Inability to give informed consent.
  • Non-inducible for sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia.
  • Prior substrate guided ablation.
  • Definite need for epicardial ablation, as determined by the primary operator.

Trial locations and contacts

10 sites in 5 countries.

10 sites in 5 countries

United States6 sites
  • University of Alabama - Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • Brigham & Women's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • Beth Israel-Deaconess Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • Loyola University

    Maywood, Illinois, 60153

  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

    New York, New York, 10029

  • University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

Other trials in United States

Brazil1 site
  • Hospital Regional Sao Jose

    Santa Catarina

Other trials in Brazil

Canada1 site
  • Southlake Regional Health Center

    Newmarket, Ontario

Other trials in Canada

Czechia1 site
  • Homolka Hospital

    Prague

Other trials in Czechia

Italy1 site
  • San Raffaele Hospital

    Milan

Other trials in Italy

About this study

The goal of this trial is to test the impact of a step-wise approach for catheter ablation of recurrent ventricular tachycardia, (irregular heart rhythms that originate in the bottom chambers of the heart), in patients with a previous heart attack for whom catheter ablation is clinically indicated.

Read the detailed description

Sudden cardiac death due to VT (ventricular tachycardia) or VF (ventricular fibrillation) occurs at an estimated rate of 300,000 events per year in United States, accounting for 5.6% of annual mortality22. A significant proportion of patients treated with ICDs (implantable defibrillators) will receive shocks due to recurrent VT, resulting in increased mortality8. As a result, catheter-based ablation has emerged as an effective treatment for recurrent VT. However, no study has assessed the impact of a step-wise approach on the outcome of catheter ablation of VT. The investigators propose a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm trial to evaluate the impact of a step-wise approach to catheter ablation on ventricular tachycardia recurrence. Given the increasing use of catheter ablation in patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia, this study will answer a critical question regarding the impact of a step-wise approach on the inducibility of VT at the end of the procedure and clinical recurrences of ventricular arrhythmias at 6 months.

Being tested
catheter-based ablation
Keywords
ventricular tachycardia, catheter ablation, VT
Medical subject headings
Tachycardia, Ventricular

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • catheter-based ablationProcedure or surgery

    specific electrophysiological and mapping techniques of activation and entrainment mapping during ongoing VT. Substrate mapping and ablation (substrate modification.) catheter ablation - a medical procedure used to treat some types of arrhythmia

Study groups in NCT01546207
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
catheter-based ablationOthercatheter ablation - a medical procedure used to treat some types of arrhythmia
Receives: Procedure: catheter-based ablation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Catheter Ablation

    The procedural efficacy as defined as acute success of a standardized step-wise approach for substrate-based catheter ablation of recurrent ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease and prior ventricular tachycardia or appropriate therapy. Acute success will be defined as the ability to render VT non-inducible with a standardized complete stimulation protocol. catheter ablation - a medical procedure used to treat some types of arrhythmia

    Measured: at time of catheter ablation procedure (intraoperative)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. ICD Interrogation

    Chronic success will be defined as no recurrence of sustained VT or VT resulting in ICD therapies (ATP and/or ICD shocks) at 6 months follow-up as compared to baseline.

    Measured: baseline and 6 months follow-up

  2. Procedural Safety

    1. Procedural safety as defined by the number of complication within 1week associated with the procedure.

    Measured: 1 week post-op

  3. Signal-Average ECG

    Relationship between change in pre/post saECG and success of the step-wise ablation strategy

    Measured: baseline and post-op day one after procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Mar 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2011
  3. Primary completionAug 2013
  4. Study completionAug 2013

Why it stopped: low enrollment

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
4 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01546207
Sponsor's protocol ID
GCO 12-0045
Acronym
STRATUM VT
Status last verified
Dec 2019
First submitted
13 Feb 2012
Last updated
13 Jan 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing catheter-based ablation in people with Ventricular Tachycardia and Catheter Ablation, run by Vivek Reddy at 10 sites in 5 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 10 sites in United States, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Apr 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Catheter Ablation (time frame: at time of catheter ablation procedure (intraoperative)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jan 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in