MelanomaPhase 3MAVISNCT01546571
Study of a Melanoma Vaccine in Stage IIb, IIc, and III Melanoma Patients
A Phase 3 study testing POL-103A and POL-103A without API in people with Melanoma, run by Polynoma LLC at 65 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine how safe and how well POL-103A works in preventing the relapse of melanoma after patients who have undergone surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Melanoma
- What is being tested?
- POL-103A and POL-103A without API
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 504 participants
- Where
- 65 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 1 May 2012to 30 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically confirmed Stage IIb, IIc, III melanoma
- Surgical resection within 90 days of first dosing
- Persons with positive sentinel nodes must have a complete lymphadenectomy
- ECOG performance status 0 or 1
Who cannot join
- Any prior melanoma treatment other than surgery or regional irradiation
- Use of biologic response modifiers within 60 days of first dosing
- Subjects with history of other malignancy within past 5 years (with exceptions)
Trial locations and contacts
65 sites in 2 countries.
65 sites in 2 countries
United States59 sites
Anschutz Cancer Pavilion
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Harry & Jeanette Weinberg Cancer Institute @ Franklin Square
Baltimore, Maryland, 21237
Bend Memorial Clinic
Bend, Oregon, 97701
Beverly Hills Cancer Center
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
Ironwood Cancer and Research Centers
Chandler, Arizona, 85224
University of Virginia Hospital
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Cancer Solutions
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Baylor Research Institute
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Premier Health Partners Clinical Trials Research Alliance
Dayton, Ohio, 45431
City of Hope National Medical Center
Duarte, California, 91010
Inova Schar Cancer Center
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031
Highlands Oncology Group
Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72703
The West Clinic P.C. d/b/a West Cancer Center
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138
East Carolina University
Greenville, North Carolina, 27834
John Theurer Cancer Center/ Hackensack Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Center for Clinical Studies
Houston, Texas, 77004
Independence Family Health Center (Cleveland Clinic)
Independence, Ohio, 44131
Investigative Clinical Research of Indiana
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
GenesisCare USA of Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, 32204
Cancer Specialists of North Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256
Center for Pharmaceutical Research
Kansas City, Missouri, 64114
University of Tennessee Medical Center
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920
Norris Cotton Cancer Center / Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
Baptist Health Lexington
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503
Central Kentucky Research Associates
Lexington, Kentucky, 40509
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Los Angeles, California, 90025
UCLA Hematology & Oncology Clinic
Los Angeles, California, 90095
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Hillcrest Hospital (Cleveland Clinic)
Mayfield Heights, Ohio, 44124
Mount Sinai Medical Center
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140
University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Institute
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Intermountain Medical Center
Murray, Utah, 84107
Rutgers Cancer Institute of NJ
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, New York, 10032
Advocate Medical Group
Niles, Illinois, 60714
MD Anderson Cancer Center-Orlando
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Ameriderm Research
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
Ventura County Hematology Oncology Specialists
Oxnard, California, 93030
Thomas Jefferson Medical Oncology
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Providence Portland Medical Center
Portland, Oregon, 97213
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Sutter Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, 95816
MediSearch Clinical Trials
Saint Joseph, Missouri, 64506
The Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Care
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112-5550
St. Mary's Hospital & Medical Center Department of Pathology
San Francisco, California, 94117
Virginia Mason Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98101
Ascension Providence Hospital
Southfield, Michigan, 48075
Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
Springfield, Illinois, 62794
St. Louis University Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Multicare Institute for Research & Innovation
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
University of Arizona Cancer Center
Tucson, Arizona, 85719
The Melanoma Center at the Washington Cancer Institute
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
McGlinn Cancer Institute, Reading Hospital
West Reading, Pennsylvania, 19611
Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
Canada6 sites
CISSS de la Montérégie - Centre
Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2H1
Royal Victoria Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H4A3J1
Durham Regional Cancer Centre
Oshawa, Ontario, L1G2B9
CHU de Quebec-L'Hotel-Dieu de Quebec
Québec, G1R2J6
Princess Margaret Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
BCCA Vancouver Island Cancer Centre
Victoria, British Columbia, V8R6V5
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Adaptive Phase 3 Trial of POL-103A Polyvalent Melanoma Vaccine in Post-resection Melanoma Patients With a High Risk of Recurrence
The purpose of this study is to determine how safe and how well POL-103A works in preventing the relapse of melanoma after patients who have undergone surgery.
- Conditions
- Melanoma
- Being tested
- POL-103A, POL-103A without API
- Medical subject headings
- Melanoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
POL-103ABiological
POL-103A is administered intradermally, divided into 4 injections (0.2 mL each injection) into the volar surface of forearms and into the anterior upper thighs
POL-103A without APIBiological
Placebo is administered intradermally, divided into 4 injections (0.2 mL each injection) into the volar surface of forearms and into the anterior upper thighs
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| POL-103A without API | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Biological: POL-103A without API |
| POL-103A | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: POL-103A |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Part B1: Recurrence Free Survival (RFS)
This is an event driven trial. Recurrence-free survival time (RFS) is computed from the earliest of the date of recurrence or death or, if without recurrence or death, the date last assessed for recurrence without diagnosis of recurrence (censored). The date of recurrence is specified as the first date a recurrence is suspected, which is later confirmed by biopsy.
Measured: 432 events or 8 years and 10 months
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight MW) Range 1 [0,20)
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Measured: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for WM range 1.
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 2 [20,28)
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Measured: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 2
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 3 [28,36)
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Measured: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 3
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 4 [36,44)
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Measured: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 4
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 5 [44,53)
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Measured: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 5
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 6 [53,62)
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Measured: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 6
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 7 [62,72)
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Measured: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 7
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 8 [72,83)
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Measured: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 8
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 9 [83,94)
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Measured: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 9
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 10 [94,105)
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Measured: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 10
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 11 [105,118)
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Measured: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 11
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 12 [118,Inf)
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Measured: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 12
Secondary outcomes (1)
Part B1: Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival (OS) analyses were based on the ITT analysis set; OS was defined as the duration from randomization until death. If the patient was alive, OS was censored at the earliest date the participant was known to be alive or the date of data cutoff.
Measured: Overall survival (OS) was measured from randomization until death from any cause, assessed up to 76 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Study start1 May 2012
- Primary completion29 Apr 2021
- Study completion30 Jun 2021
Why it stopped: After interim analysis the study was halted to redesign a pivotal trial.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MelanomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 504 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Polynoma LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Craig Slingluff, M.D., Principal investigator, University of Virginia Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01546571
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 103A-301
- Acronym
- MAVIS
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 26 Feb 2012
- Last updated
- 24 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Slingluff CL, Lewis KD, Andtbacka R, Hyngstrom J, Milhem M, Markovic SN, Bowles T, Hamid O, Hernandez-Aya L, Claveau J, Jang S, Philips P, Holtan SG, Shaheen MF, Curti B, Schmidt W, Butler MO, Paramo J, Lutzky J, Padmanabhan A, Thomas S, Milton D, Pecora A, Sato T, Hsueh E, Badarinath S, Keech J, Kalmadi S, Kumar P, Weber R, Levine E, Berger A, Bar A, Beck JT, Travers JB, Mihalcioiu C, Gastman B, Beitsch P, Rapisuwon S, Glaspy J, McCarron EC, Gupta V, Behl D, Blumenstein B, Peterkin JJ. Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of seviprotimut-L polyvalent melanoma vaccine in patients with post-resection melanoma at high risk of recurrence. J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Oct;9(10):e003272. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003272.
PubMed 34599031
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Adaptive Phase 3 Trial of POL-103A Polyvalent Melanoma Vaccine in Post-resection Melanoma Patients With a High Risk of Recurrence
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01546571
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MAVIS / 103A-301
- Conditions
- Melanoma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: After interim analysis the study was halted to redesign a pivotal trial.
- Enrolment
- 504 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Polynoma LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 May 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Oct 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine how safe and how well POL-103A works in preventing the relapse of melanoma after patients who have undergone surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| POL-103A without API | Placebo comparator | Biological: POL-103A without API |
| POL-103A | Experimental | Biological: POL-103A |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Histologically confirmed Stage IIb, IIc, III melanoma
- Surgical resection within 90 days of first dosing
- Persons with positive sentinel nodes must have a complete lymphadenectomy
- ECOG performance status 0 or 1
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Any prior melanoma treatment other than surgery or regional irradiation
- Use of biologic response modifiers within 60 days of first dosing
- Subjects with history of other malignancy within past 5 years (with exceptions)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| POL-103APOL-103A is administered intradermally, divided into 4 injections (0.2 mL each injection) into the volar surface of forearms and into the anterior upper thighs | Biological | POL-103A |
| POL-103A without APIPlacebo is administered intradermally, divided into 4 injections (0.2 mL each injection) into the volar surface of forearms and into the anterior upper thighs | Biological | POL-103A without API |
Primary outcome
Part B1: Recurrence Free Survival (RFS)
Time frame: 432 events or 8 years and 10 months
This is an event driven trial. Recurrence-free survival time (RFS) is computed from the earliest of the date of recurrence or death or, if without recurrence or death, the date last assessed for recurrence without diagnosis of recurrence (censored). The date of recurrence is specified as the first date a recurrence is suspected, which is later confirmed by biopsy.
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight MW) Range 1 [0,20)
Time frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for WM range 1.
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 2 [20,28)
Time frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 2
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 3 [28,36)
Time frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 3
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 4 [36,44)
Time frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 4
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 5 [44,53)
Time frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 5
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 6 [53,62)
Time frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 6
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 7 [62,72)
Time frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 7
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 8 [72,83)
Time frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 8
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 9 [83,94)
Time frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 9
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 10 [94,105)
Time frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 10
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 11 [105,118)
Time frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 11
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 12 [118,Inf)
Time frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 12
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
1 secondary outcome
Part B1: Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Overall survival (OS) was measured from randomization until death from any cause, assessed up to 76 months.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Oct 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34599031Slingluff CL, Lewis KD, Andtbacka R, Hyngstrom J, Milhem M, Markovic SN, Bowles T, Hamid O, Hernandez-Aya L, Claveau J, Jang S, Philips P, Holtan SG, Shaheen MF, Curti B, Schmidt W, Butler MO, Paramo J, Lutzky J, Padmanabhan A, Thomas S, Milton D, Pecora A, Sato T, Hsueh E, Badarinath S, Keech J, Kalmadi S, Kumar P, Weber R, Levine E, Berger A, Bar A, Beck JT, Travers JB, Mihalcioiu C, Gastman B, Beitsch P, Rapisuwon S, Glaspy J, McCarron EC, Gupta V, Behl D, Blumenstein B, Peterkin JJ. Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of seviprotimut-L polyvalent melanoma vaccine in patients with post-resection melanoma at high risk of recurrence. J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Oct;9(10):e003272. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003272.
Related trials for Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-17 Blockade to Decrease irAEs (REPLAY)
Metastatic Melanoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Feasibility Study Utilizing Immune Recall to Increase Response to Checkpoint Therapy
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Dapansutrile Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With PD-1 Refractory Advanced Melanoma
Melanoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Craig Slingluff, M.D. principal investigator
University of Virginia Hospital
65 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing POL-103A and POL-103A without API in people with Melanoma, run by Polynoma LLC at 65 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 65 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Oct 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Part B1: Recurrence Free Survival (RFS) (time frame: 432 events or 8 years and 10 months). The study lists 13 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01546571, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Oct 2025.