AzTrials
AzTrials

Ventilator-associated PneumoniaPhase 4NCT01546974

Ventilator-associated Pneumonia (VAP) and Humidification System

A Phase 4 study testing HME filter Twin Star 55, Drager Medical, Germany and Heated humidification in people with Ventilator-associated Pneumonia, run by Hospital Sao Domingos at 1 site in Brazil.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine which humidification system is more effective in preventing pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients. The study will compare a heat and moisture exchanger versus heated humidification. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
What is being tested?
HME filter Twin Star 55, Drager Medical, Germany and Heated humidification
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
306 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
Nov 2011to Feb 2014
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients expected to require mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours

Who cannot join

  • Patients < 18 yo and pregnant

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

JOSE R AZEVEDO, MD contact

55 98 32168110

jrazevedo@elo.com.br

Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hospital Sao Domingos

    São Luís, Maranhão, 65060-000

    JOSE R AZEVEDO, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Prospective Analysis of the Incidence of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia Related to the Humidification System: Heat and Moisture Exchanger Versus Heated Humidification

The purpose of this study is to determine which humidification system is more effective in preventing pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients. The study will compare a heat and moisture exchanger versus heated humidification.

Being tested
HME filter Twin Star 55, Drager Medical, Germany, Heated humidification
Keywords
Mechanical Ventilation, Humidification system, Patients submitted to mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours
Medical subject headings
Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HME filter Twin Star 55, Drager Medical, GermanyDevice

  • Heated humidificationDevice

Study groups in NCT01546974
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HME filterExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: HME filter Twin Star 55, Drager Medical, Germany
Heated humidificator MR 730 Fisher & PaykelExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: Heated humidification

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. VAP incidence

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Duration of mechanical ventilation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Mar 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2011
  3. Primary completionNov 2013 (estimated)
  4. Study completionFeb 2014 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
306 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01546974
Sponsor's protocol ID
hsd2012
Other IDs
CEP026/2011
Status last verified
Jan 2012
First submitted
3 Mar 2012
Last updated
7 Mar 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing HME filter Twin Star 55, Drager Medical, Germany and Heated humidification in people with Ventilator-associated Pneumonia, run by Hospital Sao Domingos at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Mar 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact JOSE R AZEVEDO, MD (55 98 32168110, jrazevedo@elo.com.br), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

VAP incidence. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Mar 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in