Prostate CancerPhase 2NCT01547299
Study of Enzalutamide (Formerly MDV3100) as a Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients Undergoing Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing Enzalutamide, Leuprolide and Dutasteride in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Pfizer at 4 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if enzalutamide is an effective therapy in treating localized prostate cancer prior to prostatectomy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Enzalutamide, Leuprolide and Dutasteride
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 52 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 31 Mar 2012to 30 Nov 2013
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Willing to provide informed consent
- 18 years of age or older
- Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate
- Must be a candidate for radical prostatectomy and considered surgically resectable
Who cannot join
- Stage T4 prostate cancer by clinical or radiologic evaluation
- Treatment with an investigational agent within 4 weeks prior to randomization
- Received therapy for other neoplastic disorders within 5 years
- Hypogonadism or severe androgen deficiency
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 2 countries.
4 sites in 2 countries
United States2 sites
Study site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Study site
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Canada2 sites
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
Study site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Open-label, Phase 2 Study Of Mdv3100 As A Neoadjuvant Therapy For Patients Undergoing Prostatectomy For Localized Prostate Cancer
The purpose of this study is to determine if enzalutamide is an effective therapy in treating localized prostate cancer prior to prostatectomy.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- Enzalutamide, Leuprolide, Dutasteride
- Keywords
- prostate cancer, prostatectomy, neoadjuvant
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EnzalutamideDrug
Also called MDV3100
LeuprolideDrug
DutasterideDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Enzalutamide alone | Experimental | Enzalutamide 160 mg, orally, once daily Receives: Drug: Enzalutamide |
| Enzalutamide & Leuprolide & Dutasteride | Experimental | Enzalutamide 160 mg, orally, once daily and leuprolide 22.5 mg, intramuscular injection, every 3 months, and dutasteride, 0.5 mg, orally, once daily Receives: Drug: Enzalutamide; Drug: Leuprolide; Drug: Dutasteride |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pathologic Complete Response Rate
Pathologic complete response rate was defined as percentage of participants with pathologic complete response. Pathologic complete response rate following triplet therapy (enzalutamide in combination with leuprolide and dutasteride) and enzalutamide alone when administered as neoadjuvant therapy for 180 days prior to prostatectomy in participants with localized prostate cancer. Pathologic complete response was defined as the absence of morphologically identifiable carcinoma in the prostatectomy specimen, as assessed by the local and central pathologist.
Measured: Day 180
Secondary outcomes (30)
Percentage of Participants With Positive Surgical Margins
To determine the percentage of participants with positive surgical margins at prostatectomy as assessed by the local and central pathologist. Surgical margin, also known as tumor free margin referred to the visible normal tissue or skin margin that was removed with the surgical excision of a tumor, growth, or malignancy. The margin was described as positive when the pathologist finds cancer cells at the edge of the tissue, suggesting that all of the cancer has not been removed.
Measured: Day 180
Percentage of Participants With Extracapsular Extension: Local Review
To determine the percentage of participants with extracapsular extension at prostatectomy as assessed by the local pathologist. Extracapsular extension was defined as prostate cancer cells when extended into the prostate capsule or outer lining of the prostate gland.
Measured: Day 180
Percentage of Participants With Extracapsular Extension: Central Review
To determine the percentage of participants with extracapsular extension at prostatectomy as assessed by the central pathologist. Extracapsular extension was defined as prostate cancer cells when extended into the prostate capsule or outer lining of the prostate gland.
Measured: Day 180
Percentage of Participants With Positive Seminal Vesicles
To determine the percentage of participants with positive seminal vesicles at prostatectomy as assessed by the local and central pathologist. Seminal vesicles or seminal glands, were defined as a pair of simple tubular glands located within the pelvis. They secrete fluid that partly composes the semen. Seminal vesicles with cancer cells in them were called positive seminal vesicles.
Measured: Day 180
Percentage of Participants With Positive Lymph Nodes
To determine the percentage of participants with positive lymph nodes at prostatectomy as assessed by the local and central pathologist. Lymph nodes were small clumps of immune cells that act as filters for the lymphatic system. Lymph nodes with cancer cells in them were called positive lymph nodes.
Measured: Day 180
Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Nadir
To determine the effects on PSA as measured by the lowest post baseline PSA value prior to prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was a protein produced by normal, as well as malignant, cells of the prostate gland. The PSA nadir was the participant's lowest observed post baseline PSA value.
Measured: Day 195
Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Nadir
To determine the effects on PSA as measured by the time to the lowest post baseline PSA value prior to prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was a protein produced by normal, as well as malignant, cells of the prostate gland. The PSA nadir was the participant's lowest observed post baseline PSA value.
Measured: Day 195
Percentage of Participants With Reduction in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)
To determine the effects on PSA as measured by the percentage of participants with PSA less than (<) 0.2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL), and a 50 percent (%) and 90% decrease in PSA value prior to prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was a protein produced by normal, as well as malignant, cells of the prostate gland.
Measured: Day 195
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Domain Summary Score
EPIC sexual domain was HRQoL instrument that measured the effects of prostate cancer treatment on a participant's sexual function and sexual satisfaction. Sexual domain summary score was measured on a scale ranged from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) with higher scores representing better sexual function and satisfaction. Best change from baseline category in EPIC sexual domain summary score ranged from worsened to improved where worsened indicated decrease of at least 1 minimally important difference, stable indicated changed by less than 1 minimally important difference and improved indicated increase of at least 1 minimally important difference. Minimally important difference was defined as one-half of the standard deviation of baseline score. Number of participants within each category are reported below.
Measured: Day 180
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Function Subscale Score
EPIC sexual function subscale was HRQoL instrument that measured the effects of prostate cancer treatment on a participant's sexual function and sexual satisfaction. EPIC sexual function subscale was a component of sexual domain that was evaluated on a distinct set of questions. It was measured on a scale ranged from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) with higher scores representing better sexual function. Best change from baseline category in EPIC sexual function subscale score ranged from worsened to improved where worsened indicated decrease of at least 1 minimally important difference, stable indicated changed by less than 1 minimally important difference and improved indicated increase of at least 1 minimally important difference. Minimally important difference was defined as one-half of the standard deviation of baseline score. Number of participants within each category are reported below.
Measured: Day 180
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Bother Subscale Score
EPIC sexual bother subscale was HRQoL instrument that measured the effects of prostate cancer treatment on a participant's sexual function and sexual satisfaction. EPIC sexual bother subscale was a component of sexual domain that was evaluated on a distinct set of questions. It was measured on a scale ranged from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) with higher scores representing less sexual bother and difficulty. Best change from baseline category in EPIC sexual bother subscale score ranged from worsened to improved where worsened indicated decrease of at least 1 minimally important difference, stable indicated changed by less than 1 minimally important difference and improved indicated increase of at least 1 minimally important difference. Minimally important difference was defined as one-half of the standard deviation of baseline score. Number of participants within each category are reported below.
Measured: Day 180
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Domain Summary Score
EPIC Hormonal Domain was HRQoL instrument that measured the effects of prostate cancer treatment on a participant's hormonal function. It was measured on a scale ranged from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) scale with higher scores representing better hormonal function. Best change from baseline category in EPIC hormonal domain summary score ranged from worsened to improved where worsened indicated decrease of at least 1 minimally important difference, stable indicated changed by less than 1 minimally important difference and improved indicated increase of at least 1 minimally important difference. Minimally important difference was defined as one-half of the standard deviation baseline score. Number of participants within each category are reported below.
Measured: Day 180
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Function Subscale Score
EPIC hormonal function subscale score was HRQoL instrument that measured the effects of prostate cancer treatment on a participant's hormonal function. EPIC hormonal function subscale was a component of hormonal domain that was evaluated on a distinct set of questions. It was measured on a scale ranged from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) scale with higher scores representing better hormonal function. Best change from baseline category in EPIC hormonal function subscale score ranged from worsened to improved where worsened indicated decrease of at least 1 minimally important difference, stable indicated changed by less than 1 minimally important difference and improved indicated increase of at least 1 minimally important difference. Minimally important difference was defined as one-half of the standard deviation baseline score. Number of participants within each category are reported below.
Measured: Day 180
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Bother Subscale Score
EPIC hormonal bother subscale score was HRQoL instrument that measured the effects of prostate cancer treatment on a participant's hormonal function. EPIC hormonal bother subscale was a component of hormonal domain that was evaluated on a distinct set of questions. It was measured on a scale ranged from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) scale with higher scores representing less hormonal bothering. Best change from baseline category in EPIC hormonal bother subscale score ranged from worsened to improved where worsened indicated decrease of at least 1 minimally important difference, stable indicated changed by less than 1 minimally important difference and improved indicated increase of at least 1 minimally important difference. Minimally important difference was defined as one-half of the standard deviation baseline score. Number of participants within each category are reported below.
Measured: Day 180
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Twelve-Item Short Form Version 2 General Health Domain Score
The Twelve-Item Short Form Version 2 was HRQoL instrument that measured general health and well-being across physical and mental components. The general health domain score contained 1 item scored on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1=excellent to 5=poor health, where higher score indicated worse health status. Best change from baseline category in general health domain score ranged from worsened (decrease of at least 1 minimally important difference), stable (changed by less than 1 minimally important difference), or improved (increase of at least 1 minimally important difference). Minimally important difference was defined as one-half the standard deviation of the score of interest at baseline.
Measured: Day 180
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Twelve-Item Short Form Version 2 Physical Functioning Domain Score
The Twelve-Item Short Form Version 2 was HRQoL instrument that measured general health and well-being across physical and mental components. The physical functioning domain score contained 2 items each scored on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1=excellent physical functioning to 5=poor physical functioning. Physical functioning domain total score ranged from 1 to 10, where higher scores indicated poor physical functioning. Best change from baseline category in physical functioning domain score ranged from worsened (decrease of at least 1 minimally important difference), stable (changed by less than 1 minimally important difference), or improved (increase of at least 1 minimally important difference). Minimally important difference was defined as one-half the standard deviation of the score of interest at baseline.
Measured: Day 180
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Twelve-Item Short Form Version 2 Role-Emotional Domain Score
The Twelve-Item Short Form Version 2 was HRQoL instrument that measured general health and well-being across physical and mental components. The mental health domain score had 2 items scored on a scale of 1 to 5, where higher scores indicated worse mental status. The total score ranged from 1 to 10, where higher scores indicated worse mental status. Best change from baseline category in mental component summary ranged from worsened (decrease of at least 1 minimally important difference), stable (changed by less than 1 minimally important difference), or improved (increase of at least 1 minimally important difference). Minimally important difference was defined as one-half the standard deviation of the score of interest at baseline.
Measured: Day 180
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Twelve-Item Short Form Version 2 Mental Component Summary
The Twelve-Item Short Form Version 2 was HRQoL instrument that measured general health and well-being across physical and mental components. The mental health domain score had 2 items scored on a scale of 1 to 5 where for 1 item 1=all of the time person felt calm and peaceful to 5=none of the time person felt calm and peaceful. The score ranged from 1 to 5, where higher scores meant worse mental status. For other item 1=all of the time person felt downhearted and blue to 5=none of the time person felt downhearted and blue. The score ranged from 1 to 5, where higher scores meant better mental status. Best change from baseline category in mental component summary ranged from worsened (decrease of at least 1 minimally important difference), stable (changed by less than 1 minimally important difference), or improved (increase of at least 1 minimally important difference). Minimally important difference was defined as one-half the standard deviation of the score of interest at baseline.
Measured: Day 180
Pharmacodynamic Effects: Tissue Dihydrotestosterone (DHT)
To determine pharmacodynamic effects as measured by the amount of tissue DHT in prostatectomy specimens following radical prostatectomy.
Measured: Day 180
Pharmacodynamic Effects: Tissue Testosterone
To determine pharmacodynamic effects as measured by the amount of tissue testosterone in prostatectomy specimens following radical prostatectomy.
Measured: Day 180
Pharmacodynamic Effects: Assessment of Apoptosis
To determine the effects of triplet therapy and enzalutamide alone on apoptosis in prostatectomy specimens. Apoptosis was a process of biochemical events that lead to characteristic cell changes and death.
Measured: Day 180
Pharmacodynamic Effects: Assessment of Mitotic Index
Assessment was performed to determine the effects of triplet therapy and enzalutamide alone on mitotic index. Mitotic index was defined as the ratio between the numbers of cells in a population undergoing mitosis to the number of cells in a population not undergoing mitosis in prostatectomy specimens.
Measured: Day 180
Pharmacodynamic Effects: Assessment of Androgen Receptor Signaling as Measured by Intensity of Androgen Receptor Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining
To determine the effects of triplet therapy and enzalutamide alone on androgen receptor signaling in prostatectomy specimens. Androgen receptor (AR) was a type of nuclear receptor that was activated by binding either of the androgenic hormones, testosterone, or dihydrotestosterone in the cytoplasm and then translocating into the nucleus. Androgen receptor (AR) signaling represented the major therapeutic target for treating metastatic prostate cancer. Assessment of androgen receptor signaling was measured by intensity of androgen receptor IHC staining and were graded as 0 (absent), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate) and 3 (strong). Percentage of participants within each grade are reported below.
Measured: Day 180
Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT): Baseline
Measured: Baseline
Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT): Day 180
Measured: Day 180
Change From Baseline in Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) at Day 180
To determine serum hormone effects as measured by change in DHT values from baseline to the completion of therapy.
Measured: Day 180
Serum Testosterone: Baseline
Measured: Baseline
Serum Testosterone: Day 180
Measured: Day 180
Change From Baseline in Serum Testosterone at Day 180
To determine serum hormone effects as measured by change in testosterone at baseline and at completion of therapy.
Measured: Day 180
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) That Led to Dose Interruption, Dose Reduction, and Study Drug Discontinuation
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
Measured: From baseline up to 210 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Study start31 Mar 2012
- Primary completion30 Nov 2013
- Study completion30 Nov 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Astellas Pharma Inc, Medivation LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01547299
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MDV3100-07
- Other IDs
- C3431019
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 27 Feb 2012
- Last updated
- 23 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Information relating to our policy on data sharing and the process for requesting data can be found at the following link: http://www.pfizer.com/research/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Open-label, Phase 2 Study Of Mdv3100 As A Neoadjuvant Therapy For Patients Undergoing Prostatectomy For Localized Prostate Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01547299
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MDV3100-07
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- prostate cancer, prostatectomy, neoadjuvant
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Astellas Pharma Inc, Medivation LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Inc.
- Study start
- 31 Mar 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Apr 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine if enzalutamide is an effective therapy in treating localized prostate cancer prior to prostatectomy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Enzalutamide alone | Experimental | Drug: EnzalutamideEnzalutamide 160 mg, orally, once daily |
| Enzalutamide & Leuprolide & Dutasteride | Experimental | Drug: Enzalutamide, Drug: Leuprolide, Drug: DutasterideEnzalutamide 160 mg, orally, once daily and leuprolide 22.5 mg, intramuscular injection, every 3 months, and dutasteride, 0.5 mg, orally, once daily |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Willing to provide informed consent
- 18 years of age or older
- Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate
- Must be a candidate for radical prostatectomy and considered surgically resectable
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Stage T4 prostate cancer by clinical or radiologic evaluation
- Treatment with an investigational agent within 4 weeks prior to randomization
- Received therapy for other neoplastic disorders within 5 years
- Hypogonadism or severe androgen deficiency
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EnzalutamideAlso: MDV3100 | Drug | Enzalutamide & Leuprolide & Dutasteride, Enzalutamide alone |
| Leuprolide | Drug | Enzalutamide & Leuprolide & Dutasteride |
| Dutasteride | Drug | Enzalutamide & Leuprolide & Dutasteride |
Primary outcome
Pathologic Complete Response Rate
Time frame: Day 180
Pathologic complete response rate was defined as percentage of participants with pathologic complete response. Pathologic complete response rate following triplet therapy (enzalutamide in combination with leuprolide and dutasteride) and enzalutamide alone when administered as neoadjuvant therapy for 180 days prior to prostatectomy in participants with localized prostate cancer. Pathologic complete response was defined as the absence of morphologically identifiable carcinoma in the prostatectomy specimen, as assessed by the local and central pathologist.
30 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Positive Surgical Margins
Time frame: Day 180
Percentage of Participants With Extracapsular Extension: Local Review
Time frame: Day 180
Percentage of Participants With Extracapsular Extension: Central Review
Time frame: Day 180
Percentage of Participants With Positive Seminal Vesicles
Time frame: Day 180
Percentage of Participants With Positive Lymph Nodes
Time frame: Day 180
Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Nadir
Time frame: Day 195
Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Nadir
Time frame: Day 195
Percentage of Participants With Reduction in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)
Time frame: Day 195
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Domain Summary Score
Time frame: Day 180
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Function Subscale Score
Time frame: Day 180
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Bother Subscale Score
Time frame: Day 180
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Domain Summary Score
Time frame: Day 180
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Function Subscale Score
Time frame: Day 180
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Bother Subscale Score
Time frame: Day 180
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Twelve-Item Short Form Version 2 General Health Domain Score
Time frame: Day 180
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Twelve-Item Short Form Version 2 Physical Functioning Domain Score
Time frame: Day 180
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Twelve-Item Short Form Version 2 Role-Emotional Domain Score
Time frame: Day 180
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Twelve-Item Short Form Version 2 Mental Component Summary
Time frame: Day 180
Pharmacodynamic Effects: Tissue Dihydrotestosterone (DHT)
Time frame: Day 180
Pharmacodynamic Effects: Tissue Testosterone
Time frame: Day 180
Pharmacodynamic Effects: Assessment of Apoptosis
Time frame: Day 180
Pharmacodynamic Effects: Assessment of Mitotic Index
Time frame: Day 180
Pharmacodynamic Effects: Assessment of Androgen Receptor Signaling as Measured by Intensity of Androgen Receptor Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining
Time frame: Day 180
Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT): Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT): Day 180
Time frame: Day 180
Change From Baseline in Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) at Day 180
Time frame: Day 180
Serum Testosterone: Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Serum Testosterone: Day 180
Time frame: Day 180
Change From Baseline in Serum Testosterone at Day 180
Time frame: Day 180
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) That Led to Dose Interruption, Dose Reduction, and Study Drug Discontinuation
Time frame: From baseline up to 210 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Oct 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Information relating to our policy on data sharing and the process for requesting data can be found at the following link: http://www.pfizer.com/research/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
4 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Enzalutamide, Leuprolide and Dutasteride in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Pfizer at 4 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Apr 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pathologic Complete Response Rate (time frame: Day 180). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2018.